Russian negotiator names terms for Putin-Zelensky meeting
Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, who led Kiev's delegation, previously suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky should meet next month to try to break the deadlock.
Medinsky, however, argued that a face-to-face sit-down would be pointless unless the deal is already finalized. 'The meeting must be properly prepared, and only then will it make sense. We have conveyed this position to the Ukrainian delegation,' he said.
'For such a meeting to take place, we must first agree on the terms of the deal and have a clear understanding of the agenda. In essence, the meeting should serve not to negotiate the agreement, but to sign it,' he added.
'There's no point in meeting only to begin negotiations from square one,' Medinsky said.
He argued that a meeting between the two leaders would not automatically end the conflict, pointing to the Chinese Civil War in the 1940s. 'Chiang Kai-shek constantly insisted on meeting in person to discuss everything. I believe they met five times, smiled, and posed for photographs, but it did not bring an end to the civil war. The core issues remained unresolved, and the war went on,' he said.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov added that finalizing agreements would be a necessary precursor for a Putin-Zelensky meeting.
Although Putin has questioned Zelensky's legitimacy, he said last month that he was open to meeting him at the final stage of talks.
Zelensky, whose five-year presidential term expired in May 2024, has refused to call new elections, citing martial law. Moscow has listed the lifting of martial law as one of the conditions for a lasting ceasefire and has demanded that Ukraine hold elections within 100 days after martial law is lifted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Aeroflot cancels flights after alleged major hacking breach
Pro-Ukrainian hackers have claimed responsibility for a large-scale cyberattack on Aeroflot on Monday, alleging they have destroyed the Russian airline's internal IT infrastructure and brought operations to a halt. Aeroflot has confirmed major technical issues but has not disclosed the full extent of the damage. The airline has canceled or delayed over 100 flights, with routes across Russia and several international destinations affected. The hacker groups Silent Crow and Cyberpartisans BY have claimed they were inside Aeroflot's corporate network for over a year. They say they downloaded more than 20 terabytes of data, compromised all critical systems, and accessed employee computers, including those of top managers. They also claim to have destroyed around 7,000 physical and virtual servers. In a statement, the hackers estimated that restoration could cost tens of millions of dollars and called the damage 'strategic.' Following their announcement, Aeroflot warned passengers of internal technical issues and said flight schedule changes were likely. Later in the day, the company announced it had canceled 49 pairs of flights from Moscow, including to Minsk, Yerevan, and Astana. Flights operated by Rossiya and the low-cost airline Pobeda have also been affected. The attack has caused significant disruption at Russian airports. At Sheremetyevo, where Aeroflot is based, large crowds formed as hundreds of passengers sought updates. The company urged people not to come to the airport unless necessary and said rebooking is currently available only to limited categories of passengers. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has confirmed that Aeroflot suffered a hack attack and announced a criminal case. The Kremlin has called the situation alarming. 'The hacker threat remains for all large companies providing services to the public,' spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. The attack comes as Moscow airports have already faced months of disruption due to Ukrainian drone activity, which has repeatedly forced temporary flight suspensions.
Russia Today
33 minutes ago
- Russia Today
US could slash troop presence in Europe
The US could cut its troop presence in Europe by up to 30%, Politico reported on Monday, citing sources. The reduction could be announced as early as September as part of a Pentagon-led reassessment of military deployments called the Global Force Posture Review. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has accused European NATO members of not paying their fair share of defense costs, while his administration has hinted that the US may reduce its military footprint on the continent. In February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth urged allies to boost defense spending, warning they cannot assume 'America's presence' in Europe 'will last forever.' Reports indicate European leaders have been unsettled by potential drawdown plans, though neither their scope nor timeline has been defined. Aylin Matle of the German Council on Foreign Relations has predicted a roughly 20% troop reduction possibly this fall, most likely involving the removal of about 20,000 troops deployed under Joe Biden in 2022 after the Ukraine conflict escalated. She said even such a cut 'would still leave a substantial American footprint,' noting current US troop levels fluctuate between 90,000 and 100,000. Matle further suggested that the cuts could be lower, as US forces in Europe are used for regional defense and 'projecting power into the Middle East and, to some extent, Africa.' The report notes that Germany, which hosts the largest US contingent in Europe of around 35,000 troops at 35 sites, is particularly alarmed by the potential cuts. Berlin's concerns come amid the EU's broader militarization drive, including the €800 billion ($930 billion) ReArm Europe initiative and a recent NATO pledge to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP, both citing Russia as a threat. After meeting Hegseth earlier this month, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said he pressed Washington for a roadmap, warning of 'dangerous capability gaps' if US forces withdraw faster than Europe can replace them. Moscow has rejected claims it poses a threat, calling them 'nonsense' and accusing the West of using such rhetoric to justify expanding military budgets.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump says he will shorten Ukraine peace deadline
US President Donald Trump has warned he will reduce the time frame he had set for Moscow and Kiev to settle the Ukraine conflict. He had previously demanded the sides reach an agreement in 50 days, threatening to impose additional sanctions against Russia otherwise. The set of punitive measures announced by Washington would involve secondary sanctions, including tariffs on countries and entities doing business with Russia. Trump's initial deadline was due to expire in early September. 'I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him (Putin) to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen,' Trump told journalists in Scotland ahead of a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The American leader claimed he had been close to reaching a ceasefire deal on Ukraine conflict with Russian President Vladimir Putin five times. 'I've spoken to President Putin a lot, I've gotten along with him very well,' he said, while accusing Moscow of launching strikes against Ukrainian cities and stating that he was 'very disappointed' with the Russian leadership. Moscow has stated throughout the conflict that it is open for dialogue and could start negotiations without preconditions, as long as the situation on the ground is taken into account and the root causes of the conflict are addressed during the talks. It also said Trump's new sanctions threats serve primarily 'as signals to continue war' for Ukraine and called on Washington to put pressure on Kiev instead. Any new sanctions, including the secondary ones, would not affect Russia's policy as Moscow would 'continue to move along our independent, sovereign, and sustained path,' Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said in response to Trump's previous threats. The US president said earlier this week that he could potentially impose the announced sanctions before the previously declared deadline. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
