Ban on ticketless parking fines takes effect in July, months after NSW law passed
More than six months after the Minns government claimed to be ending the "unfair" practice, rangers are still issuing fines without attaching physical notices to vehicles.
Jye Smith learnt this the hard way after being repeatedly stung near his office in Surry Hills.
His rage against the parking machine began mid-last year, when he discovered his vehicle registration had been cancelled due to unpaid infringements.
"After looking into it, it seems I'd acquired seven parking fines having no idea, parking around the corner from work," he said.
He said the penalty notices never arrived in the mail, even though he had updated his address.
"We had no idea that we'd been ticketed, because there were no tickets left on the window.
"I wouldn't have parked for another seven weeks there and accumulated well over $2,000 worth of fines."
The lack of immediate deterrent was one of the main reasons Labor moved to end the ticketless system, which was brought in by the Coalition government during the pandemic.
In March last year, Finance Minister Courtney Houssos requested councils revert to issuing on-the-spot notifications to drivers.
But her polite letter was not enough to sway councils, which were collecting tens of millions of dollars in extra revenue thanks to ticketless fines.
Despite the protests of local authorities, which raised concerns about the safety of rangers, the government passed legislation in November to force compliance.
But the new laws are yet to take effect, with the government having spent months developing regulations specifying the form of the mandated notifications, and other details like the font colour required on certain signs.
The ABC can now reveal the end of the road for ticketless fines is in sight, with the practice finally set to be outlawed on July 1.
"From the 1st of July, if it's not done in accordance with the legislation, those parking fines will be invalid," Ms Houssos said on Thursday.
Asked why the government had taken so long to enliven the ban, the minister said it had introduced "what we thought was a reasonable period" for councils to make the necessary changes.
"But there's nothing stopping councils introducing those notifications immediately today," Ms Houssos added.
The City of Sydney, which raised more than $40 million from ticketless parking fines in 2023-24, said it would not implement the changes until the new financial year.
"Motorists should be aware the current system of paperless fines remains in place until the legislation comes into force on 1 July," a spokesperson for the council said.
Mr Smith said it was a "long time" between the legislation passing and the ban coming into force.
He said it was "obvious" why the City of Sydney had not brought back traditional tickets of its own volition.
"I'm sure they're going to lose a huge source of revenue as this comes in, because this will be a deterrent," he said.
"And I think that's why they're avoiding it, because they know it'll actually stop people from parking there."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a few seconds ago
- ABC News
Convicted murderer Susan Neill-Fraser challenging new 'restrictive' media ban
Convicted murderer Susan Neill-Fraser is challenging a "new restrictive parole condition" preventing her from speaking to media "directly or indirectly" about her case. Neill-Fraser was found guilty of murdering her partner of 18 years, Bob Chappell, aboard their yacht in Hobart on January 26, 2009. No body or weapon was ever found. Neill-Fraser has always maintained her innocence. She served 13 years in prison, before being released on parole under numerous conditions in October 2022. In December 2024, the Tasmanian Parole Board added a condition that she not speak "directly or indirectly with any media outlet to claim [her] alleged innocence and/or wrongful conviction". Earlier this year, her lawyers at the Human Rights Law Centre revealed it had filed legal proceedings on behalf of Neill-Fraser challenging the condition. The Human Rights Law Centre said the media ban was replaced by a "new restrictive parole condition", in May. It's challenging the new condition, which it claims prevents Neill-Fraser from communicating "directly or indirectly, including through third parties ... to assert claims regarding [her] alleged innocence, wrongful conviction, or despite the legitimacy of [her] conviction or sentencing". The Human Rights Law Centre will argue it's "unreasonable, improper and in breach of the constitutionally implied freedom of political communication". Legal director Sarah Schwartz said freedom of speech and political communication "are core democratic rights that belong to everyone — including and especially people who have been in prison". "Instead of stopping people from speaking out after being in prison, parole should be focused on ensuring people are supported as they re-enter the community," she said. The matter returned to the Supreme Court in Hobart on Wednesday and was adjourned. It will return to court in September for a case management hearing. The Parole Board of Tasmania said it "does not comment on individual matters". Neill-Fraser's parole period will end in 2032.
ABC News
a few seconds ago
- ABC News
NSW inquiry into child care told Little Zak's Academy received state funding despite regulation breaches
The owner of a Sydney childcare centre where a child was fed a known and potentially life-threatening allergen has received millions of dollars in state government funding, despite a history of breaching regulations. Little Zak's Academy at Auburn, in the city's west, was found to have broken the law last year when a child "anaphylactic to dairy" was fed milk products, according to education department documents. The documents also show children fell out of their cots and hit their heads after the company's staff failed to properly fit safety rails at a centre in Wollongong in 2022. Last year, a staff member at the same facility held a "struggling, kicking" child on their lap until a colleague shouted at them to "let go", according to the documents. In another breach by Little Zak's Academy last year, in Newcastle, a child was found in a washing machine cupboard after being "inadequately supervised". Greens MP Abigail Boyd raised the cases in a NSW parliamentary inquiry into the childcare sector on Wednesday, pressing Department of Education Secretary Murat Dizdar on why the operator was awarded funding. "What due diligence does the department do before encouraging providers who have such poor track records?" Ms Boyd asked. Describing the breaches by Little Zak's Academy as "shocking" and "unacceptable", Mr Dizdar said due diligence was done through "regulatory visits". The company, which trades under LT Pty Ltd and LZ Ryde Trust, collected more than $2.9 million in "early childhood education and care grants" in 2023-24, the education department's annual report shows. Little Zak's Academy said in a statement that steps had been taken to prevent future incidents. "As a family company that has been caring for children for 30 years, these incidents should never have happened to any child in our care." Mr Dizdar said services taking too long to lift standards had been "put on notice" by the federal government within the past week and threatened with the loss of funding if they failed to improve. Mark Barraket, the deputy secretary of the education department, told the inquiry the state government was planning to follow suit. "We will be working closely with the Australian government around where they might choose to revoke the childcare subsidy from service," Mr Barraket said. "Should they do that, we will also seek to revoke any 'Start Strong' funding that the NSW government provides to that service as well." Following a review by former deputy NSW Ombudsman Chris Wheeler, triggered by a rise in safety breaches in the sector last year, the government committed to setting up an independent, more powerful regulator. The government has also proposed tougher penalties under national regulations, changes to which it will pitch to education ministers from other states at a meeting next week. If other states do not agree to the changes, the government has indicated it will "go it alone" and legislate stronger laws for centres in NSW.
ABC News
a few seconds ago
- ABC News
Paedophile banned, Working with Children Checks mandated for Perth Royal Show exhibitors
Perth Royal Show organisers say a convicted paedophile has been "banned for life" after the ABC revealed he ran demonstrations for children last year. And the revelation has led to a revision of the show's Working with Children Checks, which have now become mandatory for exhibitors. The paedophile, a prominent WA farmer and businessman, was spotted by the mother of his victim in a pavilion last year surrounded by young children as he performed a cow-milking demonstration. The man is considered a Class One offender under the Working With Children Act, and due to the seriousness of his offending, would not have been granted a clearance if he had been required to obtain one by organisers. The incident prompted child safety advocates to call for mandatory Working with Children Checks, saying they would "remove any doubt". Royal Agricultural Society chief executive Robyn Sermon said this year, all exhibitors and volunteers would be required to have Working with Children Checks — but stopped short of requiring them for all vendors. Ms Sermon said since the incident, show organisers had increased the number of background checks to more than 1,000, more than double the number from last year, as she sought to assure parents the show was safe. "We have 80 monitored cameras, we have an emergency operations centre, we have 55 police on site, 130 security guards and hundreds of trained people," she said. She said it was not "feasible" to implement mandatory Working with Children Checks for all vendors, but the show would take a "risk-based" approach. "It depends on what people are doing, if people are sitting under a camera selling … hats to people in full public view, they're not necessarily required," Ms Sermon said. "We have over probably 5,000 people involved in pulling the show together, many from small businesses, many from smaller community organisations, many volunteers, as you're aware, and so we think we've got the balance [right]." Background checks were only a "part of the puzzle", she said. "I think we've taken a very pragmatic approach," Ms Sermon said. 'I think parents, when they come to the show, are very good at supervising their own children, that's a very big part of it too, we always encourage parental supervision of kids." Agriculture Minister Jackie Jarvis said she was confident the show had taken the right steps and had gone "above and beyond" the regulatory requirements. "You've got to remember parts of the Royal Show are equivalent to a large shopping mall where you have commercial providers," Ms Jarvis said. The State Government has injected $2.8 million into the Royal Show this year, some $2.2 million of which is earmarked to provide subsidised tickets. Tickets for children under 16 years old and concession card holders will be half price, and children under four will be let in for free.
