How Abortion Bans Are Affecting Where Women Live and Work
'It seemed like people were always trying to change the legislation around abortion every single year but I never thought it would really happen legitimately,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
18 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Cancel Culture Isn't Going Anywhere — Here's How Smart Leaders Respond
Cancel culture can derail B2C and B2B thought leadership efforts, as public scrutiny gets amplified by social media. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Today's leaders are expected to speak up — not just for business, but for society. According to the 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer, 73% of people believe CEOs should step in when governments fail, and 68% feel empowered to pressure organizations into change. This isn't just about leadership — it's about leverage. Public expectations are high, and the cost of silence or missteps can be steep. Thought leadership now exists in a landscape of hypervisibility. Social media amplifies every comment, every slip. There are no warning shots — just consequences. So where does that leave leaders? Caught between the demand to lead and the fear of being "cancelled." This article explores how cancel culture is reshaping the rules of engagement—and how modern leaders can navigate it with clarity, credibility and confidence. Related: Cancel Culture Is Lazy. We Need Revision Culture Instead. Understanding cancel culture At its core, cancel culture is amplified public accountability. It's the collective decision to disengage from individuals or organizations seen as offensive or unethical. Social media often fuels the outrage, which can quickly damage reputations and opportunities. Some see it as justice. Others, as mob rule. A 2022 Pew Research Center study revealed a divide: 58% believe calling out others promotes accountability, while 38% see it as unfair punishment. It's a tense environment for leaders. Share an opinion and risk backlash. Stay silent and risk irrelevance. That hesitation is reshaping thought leadership—and not for the better. Leadership voices on thin ice Public sentiment shifts fast. What's acceptable today might spark outrage tomorrow. That unpredictability keeps leaders in the crosshairs. As a result, many opt for silence —but that's risky too. Diluted ideas turn thought leadership into thought followership: safe, bland and forgettable. The real risk isn't saying the wrong thing. It's saying nothing at all. Modern leadership requires clarity, conviction and the courage to speak from a foundation of values and insight—even as the ground shifts beneath you. Cancel culture and B2B: the hidden impact Cancel culture headlines usually spotlight consumer brands, but the effect in B2B is quieter and more insidious. Imagine this: Business A approaches Business B for a promising deal. Then, Business A backs out over a years-old tweet from Business B's founder. No press, no hashtags — just a lost opportunity behind closed doors. This is micro cancel culture. And for smaller companies without the PR or legal teams to manage reputation risks, it creates serious vulnerability. The result? Companies start choosing "safe" over smart. Innovation suffers. Integrity is replaced with risk aversion. Related: Here's the No. 1 Thing Brands Can Do to Avoid Public Outrage and Cancel Culture Cancel-proof thought leadership strategies In today's climate, it's not just what you say — it's how, when and why. Here's how to lead with courage and credibility: Embrace a micro-program strategy: Skip rigid campaigns that age fast. Break bold ideas into short, agile pieces that can evolve with current events. Test messaging early and often. Stay true to your values: Speak up only on issues that align with your mission. A 2023 Weber Shandwick study found one-third of consumers believe companies should only take stands when it's relevant to their business. Balance instinct with inclusion: Speed matters, but so does perspective. Build diverse voices into your decision-making process and vet your partnerships carefully. Use research as a shield and spotlight: Data makes bold ideas harder to dismiss. Root your opinions in real-world research and trend analysis to shift the conversation from emotion to evidence. Own your mistakes—fast: Perfection isn't required. Accountability is. PwC reports 38% of consumers will forgive a brand that apologizes and takes action. Act quickly, correct transparently and move forward. Final thoughts Cancel culture isn't going anywhere. Public expectations around business responsibility are only rising. The real challenge for leaders isn't avoiding controversy — it's staying relevant and trustworthy in a shifting world. Let values guide your message. Let data back it up. Let courage drive it forward. Cancel culture can feel like a threat — but it can also serve as a filter that pushes leadership toward greater clarity, integrity and long-term credibility. The goal isn't to dodge scrutiny. It's to build a brand that can withstand it. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.
New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Senate, Once Insulated From Trump, Has Remade Itself in His Image
When the former Republican senator Jeff Flake of Arizona looks at the soon-to-be former Republican senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, he sees a reflection of himself from 2017, when he decided to retire from the Senate rather than conform to the new party politics embodied by President Trump. 'Thom Tillis could have won re-election,' said Mr. Flake, who became ambassador to Turkey during the Biden administration after leaving the Senate because of repeated clashes with Mr. Trump over the president's character and truthfulness. 'He would have had to change into somebody he isn't — and I felt the same.' Mr. Tillis's decision not to run for re-election after crossing the president is just the latest example of how profoundly Mr. Trump has reshaped the Senate. Republicans who showed the temerity to challenge Mr. Trump are out, and devotees are in, with Mr. Trump's endorsement looming as a decisive factor in Senate primaries. Gone are multiple independent-minded Republican senators who were willing to question the president's actions or assert legislative prerogatives. Mr. Tillis was the latest to succumb, after finding himself on the receiving end of a Trump tirade and primary threat over his opposition to the party's signature tax cut and domestic policy bill. He has plenty of company. Along with Mr. Flake, the Republican casualty list from the first Trump tenure includes former senators Bob Corker and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Richard M. Burr of North Carolina, Rob Portman of Ohio, Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Mitt Romney of Utah and Ben Sasse of Nebraska. Relations with Mr. Trump weren't the sole reason those men bowed out. The difficulty of navigating a MAGA electorate in their home states, the endless demands of fund-raising and frustration with the inability to get much accomplished in Congress all played a role. But Mr. Trump was a major factor, considering that four of them — Senators Burr, Romney, Sasse and Toomey — were among the seven Republicans who voted to convict Mr. Trump on impeachment charges arising out of the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol. Now, the seats of the departed have been assumed by avowed Trump devotees such as Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri, who has become a point man for the White House, and Senators Marsha Blackburn and Bill Hagerty, both archconservatives from Tennessee. In addition, Senators Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Jon Tester of Montana and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania — all Democrats — were defeated and replaced by Trump acolytes Bernie Moreno, Tim Sheehy and David McCormick respectively, deepening the MAGA hold on the chamber. Mr. Tillis acknowledged that the Senate is no longer a place that celebrates political independence and if he had it do over again, he might not. 'The Thom Tillis who made the decision to run in 2013 probably would not have made the same decision,' he said in an interview. The evolution of the Senate was vividly illustrated when the chamber took the sweeping domestic policy and tax-cut measure produced by the House and made it more conservative. That is the opposite of how things traditionally go in Congress, where the courtly Senate has more often been the moderating 'cooling saucer' for the House's hotly partisan tea. Republicans in the Senate, where members are usually jealous protectors of their power over federal spending, also acceded to Mr. Trump's demand to cancel $9 billion already approved by Congress, even though they conceded that the White House was not providing the level of detail they were seeking about the cuts. Just two Republicans, Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, rejected the spending clawbacks. These days, they are often the only two senators in play as potential Republican defectors, though Mr. Tillis often presents himself as a wild card. Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the former party leader, who has shown disdain for Mr. Trump, has also cast a few votes in opposition to the president's policies and nominees. After Mr. Tillis decided to support Emil Bove, a Trump appeals court nominee accused by a Justice Department colleague of encouraging resistance to court rulings, only Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski opposed him. Mr. Trump has erased all but a few doubters from the Senate in his second incarnation as president. 'During the first administration, there was a contingent of Republicans who stood up to him in various ways,' said Ira Shapiro, a former senior Senate aide and an author of three books on the Senate. 'Once he succeeded in this remarkable political comeback, he has basically unified the party in slavish loyalty to him.' Mr. Shapiro noted that as recently as 2022, when the Senate was under Democratic control, the Senate was able to notch a series of bipartisan legislative accomplishments on gun safety, public works and marriage equality — a type of bipartisanship that would seem almost impossible now. Even Senator John Thune, the South Dakota Republican who took over as majority leader this year after getting crosswise with Mr. Trump in the past, has developed a close working relationship with the president as he delivers on the Trump agenda. In a recent social media post, the president flattered the majority leader as 'the very talented John Thune, fresh off our many victories over the past two weeks and, indeed, 6 months.' Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who has fought with Trump in the past, said it shouldn't be surprising how tightly aligned Senate Republicans are with Mr. Trump. 'The president is very strong in the conference,' Mr. Graham said about his fellow Republicans. 'He's very popular with the base. Republican senators usually help Republican presidents. That's the way the system works. If you look at the history of how party majorities serve their presidents, you will find a lot of consistency there.' Referring to President Lyndon Baines Johnson, Graham added, 'It's what L.B.J. was known for.' But the Senate was also known for strong personalities and formidable politicians who were eager to assert their power and saw themselves as equal partners to the president, with the ability to shape legislation and the right to reject nominees they deemed unfit or unqualified. Over the past few decades, the Senate has become a much more partisan institution, and both parties have seen power shift to the White House. Mr. Tillis noted that Democrats with an independent streak, such as Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, have also left the Senate — though they were not so much run out by the leaders of their party as they were bowing to the reality that they would have a hard time winning re-election. He said he worried that the state of the Senate would discourage capable candidates in the future and further reduce the chamber's historic influence. 'I think it has a more of a dampening effect on those who come behind us,' Mr. Tillis said. 'You do get to a point to wonder if the Senate can be the backstop that it has been in the past.' Mr. Flake said he shared that view. 'I love the Senate,' he said. 'It typically forces the parties to work together. It pains me to see it the way it is. We are taking out what should be a huge, huge balance of power.' But he also said it was not tenable for him to find a way to remain, even as supporters encouraged him to try to fight it out. 'I could have said I didn't mean those things I said about President Trump or that his behavior was growing on me,' Mr. Flake said. 'No job is worth that. You have to face your kids and your grandkids.'
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
AOC Will Pay $3,000 For Ethics Violations Over Met Gala Appearance
The House Ethics Committee on Friday found Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., violated ethics rules after she 'impermissibly' accepted gifts during her appearance at the 2021 Met Gala—including her white dress with the phrase, 'Tax the Rich'—and said the lawmaker must pay roughly $3,000 to settle the claims. A yearslong probe found Ocasio-Cortez 'impermissibly' accepted gifts for the event, including a ... More white dress with the phrase, 'Tax the Rich.' GC Images The bipartisan Ethics Committee found Ocasio-Cortez 'impermissibly' accepted a gift of free admission to the Met Gala for her now-fiancé Riley Roberts, valued at about $35,000, and failed to pay the full market price for some of the items she wore to the event, though a probe found she did not intentionally violate ethics rules. An investigation found Ocasio-Cortez coordinated with Met Gala staff to ensure she would not violate House rules, which the staff confirmed, and that Ocasio-Cortez was offered a guest ticket to attend, the committee said. Ocasio-Cortez paid just over $990 for the dress, shoes, handbag and jewelry she wore to the event, and must pay the remaining $2,733 to cover the fair market price of the items and settle the claims, according to the committee, in addition to $250—the price of a meal at the Met—to cover Roberts' attendance. Mike Casca, Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff, said in a statement she 'accepts the ruling and will remedy the remaining amounts, as she's done at each step in this process.' An early inquiry found designer Brother Vellies originally billed Ocasio-Cortez $1,300 for her 'Tax the Rich dress,' and a later invoice requested $300. It's not immediately clear why the price tag was reduced, though a former campaign staffer for Ocasio-Cortez told the Ethics Committee they discussed her complete attire totaling about $1,000. Key Background The House Ethics Committee opened an investigation into Ocasio-Cortez's Met Gala appearance in December 2022, months after the American Accountability Foundation filed an ethics complaint. Experts told Forbes at the time that Ocasio-Cortez's acknowledging she wore 'borrowed items' to the event indicated she violated House gift rules, which prevent lawmakers from accepting gifts like free attendance to events and travel. In an Instagram post, Ocasio-Cortez defended attending the Met Gala for free, arguing elected officials in New York City are 'regularly invited to and attend the Met due to our responsibilities' overseeing the city's cultural institutions. Forbes Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Likely Violated Ethics Laws With Met Gala Appearance, Says House Ethics Office By Zach Everson
