logo
In Georgia, a police officer's cheek ranks above all

In Georgia, a police officer's cheek ranks above all

OC Media08-08-2025
The Caucasus is changing — and not for the better.
With authoritarianism on the rise across the region, the threat to independent journalism is higher than ever.
Join our community and help push back against the hardliners.
Become a member
It was hard to find anyone around me who had positive expectations about journalist Mzia Amaghlobeli's trial.
Her colleagues and friends, whom I had spoken to since her detention, especially in the final week leading up to the verdict, were emotionally preparing themselves for the worst-case scenario:
The court would agree with the prosecution's claim that the slap Amaghlobeli gave to Batumi Police Chief Irakli Dgebuadze after a heated exchange should be considered an 'assault on a police officer' — a charge punishable by up to seven years in prison.
Such expectations were quite logical: even before the verdict, the Georgian state had gone to great lengths to portray Amaghlobeli as a criminal unworthy of spending even a single day of almost a seven months-long pre-trial period outside prison walls. Even Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze joined the campaign, pushing a theory that Amaghlobeli slapped Dgebuadze on prior instructions as part of a greater plan to discredit Georgian law enforcement agencies.
Would the Georgian courts, widely regarded by critics as being directly subordinate to the political authorities, take a different stance? Past experiences hardly gave Amaghlobeli's supporters any reason for such optimism. They believed the state wanted to make an example out of a media founder, and that it would definitely do so.
I've known Amaghlobeli since 2017, when I joined Netgazeti — the sister outlet of the Batumelebi newspaper which she and her friend Eter Turadze founded in the coastal city of Batumi back in 2001. Over the years, both outlets have earned a reputation as trusted sources, thanks to their uncompromising coverage of state corruption, human rights violations, and the government's intolerance of dissent.
Critics inside and outside Georgia believe that Amaghlobeli ended up behind bars as a victim of one of the very problems — a corrupt judiciary and police — that Batumelebi consistently exposed under all three governments it has witnessed throughout its history.
Amaghlobeli's case hasn't been important to me just because I know her personally, nor because it's the first time state repression has directly touched someone close to me. What troubles me just as much is the disproportionate, almost dystopian nature of the case itself:
Up to seven years in prison for a slap; months of legal debate over whether the Batumi police chief's cheek was actually injured; and repeated court approvals of the prosecution's claim that a 50-year-old woman with no criminal record — who went on hunger strike for the first 38 days of her detention and nearly lost her vision during her time in prison — posed a risk of reoffending and should remain in pre-trial detention.
I'm not even mentioning the inconsistencies the defence claimed in both the administrative and criminal cases against Amaghlobeli, nor the police testimonies that were, in several instances, nearly identical. Nor am I talking about the fact that in the past, Georgia's courts have applied far lighter charges in cases involving serious violence against police officers.
All this, while Dgebuadze — who, according to Amaghlobeli, swore at her, spat on her, and even denied her access to a toilet during detention — continues his job without consequences. The same goes for the police officers who beat, humiliated, and robbed protesters and journalists during the November–December rallies with shocking brutality, yet were never held accountable.
During the final hearings, it wasn't just Amaghlobeli's friends and colleagues who gathered outside the Batumi courthouse — who I saw there also included activists, people from across generations and professional fields both from Batumi and other parts across Georgia.
Most moving of all were those who had been previously helped by Batumelebi in their own fights against injustice.
'If someone shoots at you [journalists], I'll throw myself in front so you don't get hit', a middle-aged woman told me while I was interviewing people at Amaghlobeli's rally. As it turned out later, she was a homeless citizen, whose plea to the local government for housing had been covered by Batumelebi.
Another woman stood at the protest holding a 14-year-old issue of Batumelebi, which featured an article on the main page about the woman's efforts to find her niece, who had been placed in a psychiatric institution involuntarily, with her family unaware for months of her exact whereabouts.
'If journalists like this were sitting in parliament [as MPs], we'd be thriving today!' she shouted outside the courthouse.
On the day the verdict was finally announced — after two previous hearings had ended without one, despite expectations — the courtroom was packed with Amaghlobeli's friends and supporters. Unlike the last time, I managed to get inside as well. As always, the entire room welcomed Amaghlobeli with chants of support the moment she entered.
I'll never forget that one second when the courtroom erupted in joy — right after Judge Nino Sakhelashvili said, 'The charge against Mzia Amaghlobeli shall be reclassified…' It was a fleeting moment of hope, when people believed the state had finally backed down in her favour. But the joy was short-lived: although the charge was indeed reclassified under a lighter article, Amaghlobeli was still sentenced to two years in prison.
As we left the courtroom, the atmosphere was filled with mixed emotions. Two years certainly sounded lighter than four, six, or seven — but was justice really served?
'In terms of justice, nothing has changed — this is still an unfair decision, just repackaged as a two-year sentence', Eter Turadze, Batumelebi's editor-in-chief, told me after the hearing.
We had a short conversation outside the publication's office, where Amaghlobeli's supporters had gathered after leaving the courthouse.
'This isn't just about Mzia: it concerns every citizen of this country. They created a precedent where a 50 year-old woman with a serious health condition […] can be imprisoned for two years over Dgebuadze's cheek. It's a dehumanising environment', she added.
Even some Georgian Dream supporters can't fully justify what Turadze is talking about: according to a June survey by the Georgian research organisation ISSA, the majority of Georgians (59%) found the charges against Amaghlobeli unfair — including 70% in Tbilisi, 54% in the regions, and 22% of Georgian Dream supporters. Among the ruling party's voters, 23% also either had no answer or refused to respond.
While in Batumi, I kept thinking about how Amaghlobeli used to shy away from fame — she was barely active even on social media.
And yet now, thanks to the Georgian state, she has become a symbol of resistance for many — one encouraging others with smiles, gestures of defiance, and a phrase from one of her letters that became a motto of the campaign in her support:
'Fight, before it's too late'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Georgian authorities launch first FARA probe, targeting prominent NGOs
Georgian authorities launch first FARA probe, targeting prominent NGOs

OC Media

time2 days ago

  • OC Media

Georgian authorities launch first FARA probe, targeting prominent NGOs

Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article The Caucasus is changing — so are we. The future of journalism in the region is grim. Independent voices are under threat — and we're responding by building a newsroom powered by our readers. Join our community and help push back against the hardliners. Become a member Georgia's Anti-Corruption Bureau has launched inspections against six prominent civil society organisations under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), warning that failure to register under the law is a criminal offence. At a joint press briefing on Friday, the groups said they had received official letters from the bureau on 11 August, describing it as a threat of criminal prosecution. Those targeted were the Civil Society Foundation, the women's rights group Sapari, Transparency International Georgia, the Social Justice Centre, the Media Development Foundation, and the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED). The move is the first of its kind since FARA was adopted earlier this year, indicating that unlike the previous foreign agent law, the government intends to enforce the law to target critics. In their letter to the NGOs, seen by OC Media, the Anti-Corruption Bureau claimed the groups may have been engaging in 'political activity' aimed at 'shaping, adopting, or influencing Georgia's domestic or foreign policy', as well as activity driven by the interests of a foreign government or foreign political party. According to the bureau, the inspection mentioned in the letters was based on a possible FARA violation. They added that their inspection aimed to identify individuals required to register as agents and to examine their activities. The bureau asked the organisations to explain why they did not submit a registration application on time. Advertisement 'Due to the failure to submit the registration application to the bureau within the period established by law, the individual is subject to criminal liability', the letter warned. Prominent civil society groups in Georgia, including election watchdogs, human rights groups, and others, have widely rejected the law, publicly vowing not to comply. As part of the inspection, the groups in question are required to explain 'what evidence has been destroyed' in the context of FARA, citing their public statements as the basis for the request. This likely refers to a June remark by Sapari's director, Baia Pataraia, who said that the vast majority of the organisation's archives had already been destroyed to ensure that sensitive information about its beneficiaries — women and children — would not fall into the wrong hands. 'We are independent Georgian NGOs' In response to the letters, the groups reiterated their long-stated position that they do not intend to register as agents of foreign interests. 'We are independent Georgian NGOs operating under our own statutes […] we serve solely the interests of our people and of Georgia', they said. The Georgian Dream government adopted FARA on 1 April, presenting it as a word-for-word translation of the US Foreign Agents Registration Act, also more commonly known as FARA. This followed widespread backlash against the 2024 foreign agent law, which critics labelled a 'Russian law', comparing it to the Kremlin's draconian regulations. Violations of Georgia's FARA law can be punished by up to five years in prison, a fine of up to ₾10,000 ($3,600), or both. Critics have repeatedly pointed out that the US law has not been used to target civil society and media organisations, and that Georgian Dream was disregarding US judicial practices over their own legislation in doing so. 'In the style of [Russian President Vladimir] Putin's Russia, the persecution of independent NGOs and free media aims to end democracy. But we will continue our work and will not leave the Georgian people without support', the organisations said on Friday. The letters follow the Anti-Corruption Bureau's June court-backed request for extensive information from civil society organisations. The bureau cited four laws at the time, including FARA, but the court approved the request without mentioning FARA, for unclear reasons. At the time, the organisations said the requested information included sensitive data about their beneficiaries, which they were unwilling to provide to the state. They appealed the first-instance court's approval, but unsuccessfully. Ultimately, several organisations pointed the bureau to publicly available information on their websites. The SJC allowed the bureau access only to information related to its own activities, such as grant agreements, without disclosing sensitive data about third parties. Responding to criticism from civil society, the head of the bureau, Razhden Kuprashvili, stated that the legal and financial documentation requested by his office 'does not go beyond the boundaries of the law'. In its June motion, the bureau sought to support its suspicion that the organisations were engaged in 'covert political activity' by citing public statements and social media posts from them and their representatives. A legislative crackdown against civil society In recent months, the ruling Georgian Dream party has adopted a series of restrictive laws and amendments, several of which have specifically targeted civil society organisations and independent media. One of the amendments made to the law on grants in April required civil society organisations to obtain the government's permission before receiving any grant from outside of Georgia. In addition, donor organisations must also submit a copy of the grant to the Georgian government beforehand. During the same period, the ruling party introduced the FARA law. Under the law, a foreign agent is defined as any person who is under the control of, or acts at the direction of, a foreign power and acts in the interests of that foreign power. The enforcement of both laws — including decisions about who is 'acting at the direction of a foreign power' and who is receiving unauthorised grants — has been entrusted to the Anti-Corruption Bureau, which is under the Prime Minister's Office. Georgian Dream has repeatedly claimed that new legislation was necessary to fight the 'influence of external powers'. Nonetheless, critics of the ruling party have insisted that these changes aim to undermine the media and civil society in an already fragile democracy. The restrictive laws were passed in a parliament where opposition is virtually nonexistent. Following the disputed 2024 elections, opposition parties refused to participate in parliamentary sessions. Since then, the ruling party has passed several new restrictive pieces of legislation without any obstacles, targeting the media, civil society, and other critics.

Georgian Dream Revives Controversial War vs. Peace Campaign Theme
Georgian Dream Revives Controversial War vs. Peace Campaign Theme

Civil.ge

time4 days ago

  • Civil.ge

Georgian Dream Revives Controversial War vs. Peace Campaign Theme

Georgian Dream has revived a controversial and what is seen as a tone-deaf war vs. peace campaign theme ahead of the upcoming local elections, seeking to scaremonger voters by contrasting wartime destruction in Ukraine with development projects in what it portrays as a peaceful Georgia. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Georgia's ruling party has cast itself as a guarantor of peace, while implying that Ukraine bears responsibility for failing to prevent Russian aggression. The war vs peace theme featured prominently in last year's disputed parliamentary campaign, with banners in the Georgian streets and metro stations juxtaposing images of war-torn Ukraine against colorful depictions of Georgia's supposed prosperity. The messaging sparked outcry at the time from Georgian Dream's domestic critics and drew condemnation from Kyiv. Now the trope has returned, with the party posting a campaign clip on social media late on August 13. The video again pairs black-and-white footage of bombings and ruins in Ukraine on the left, subtitled 'No to war!' – with colored shots of Georgian infrastructure projects, including parks, roads, and buildings, on the right, overlaid with the slogan 'Choose peace!'. In the most controversial segment, the war footage is contrasted with a color image of the newly renovated Vake Park in central Tbilisi. The shot shows the park's fountain where, shortly after its ceremonial reopening in 2022, damaged electric wiring electrocuted three people, claiming the life of a teenager and injuring others, an incident that drew public outrage as a stark example of official disregard for safety. The war-versus-peace theme has been central to Georgian Dream's campaign for the partially boycotted October 4 municipal vote from the outset. In late July, the party picked incumbent Kakha Kaladze to seek third term as Tbilisi mayor, with his main slogan – 'Peace to Georgia, More Good to Tbilisi' – unveiled at the launch event. The message soon appeared on large banners flooding the capital's streets and has been echoed in local campaigns nationwide. Seventeen parties have registered for the partially boycotted municipal vote, less than half of the number in the previous 2021 local elections. Key names on the ballot include the ruling Georgian Dream, the Lelo-led Strong Georgia, For Georgia led by former Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia, the right-libertarian Girchi, and ultraconservative and far-right forces such as the Alliance of Patriots and Conservatives for Georgia (Alt-Info). Nine opposition parties are boycotting the elections, with the vote taking place amid ongoing repression, legislative crackdowns on opposition, jailings of political leaders, and a lack of international observation . The boycott includes key forces that ran in major opposition alliances last October, such as the United National Movement, parties in the Coalition for Change, and smaller groups that broke away from the Lelo-led alliance after the disputed election. Also Read:

Kobakhidze: UNM ‘Treason' in August War Doesn't Justify Russian Occupation
Kobakhidze: UNM ‘Treason' in August War Doesn't Justify Russian Occupation

Civil.ge

time6 days ago

  • Civil.ge

Kobakhidze: UNM ‘Treason' in August War Doesn't Justify Russian Occupation

Reiterating his accusations that the former United National Movement government is responsible for triggering the 2008 Russo-Georgian war, Georgian Dream Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze said the 'treason' by UNM still doesn't justify the Russian occupation of 20% of Georgia's territory. 'Russia has occupied 20 percent of our territories, this is one of our most important national challenges, and, accordingly, the peaceful restoration of Georgia's territorial integrity is our important national task,' Kobakhidze told journalists on August 11 at the memorial to the soldiers who died in the battle at Shindisi village of Gori municipality during the August War. 'Of course, no treason by Saakashvili and the [United] National Movement can justify or will ever justify the occupation that was carried out by the Russian Federation.' Kobakhidze also repeated his claims that in 2008, UNM didn't 'represent' the Georgian state, since it had stayed in power through 'fraud.' 'The 2008 war was clearly started by Saakashvili's regime. He was a president who had remained in office through fraudulent means, and this traitor, this traitor who stayed in power through fraud, this foreign agent, in 2008 fulfilled his assignment and started the war,' GD leader said, arguing that UNM was 'externally installed in power in 2003' and that they from the beginning were 'foreign agents.' Kobakhidze also commented on the similarly controversial remarks from the tense presidential campaign of 2018 by Salome Zurabishvili, then a GD-endorsed independent candidate who also pointed at Saakashvili's responsibility in starting the war in 2008. Georgian Dream leaders at the time distanced themselves from Zurabishvili's remarks. GD Prime Minister recalled what he said was a closed-door meeting with Zurabishvili and her PR advisers in 2018, when Kobakhidze was the parliament speaker. 'One of the questions we asked Salome Zurabishvili,' he recounted, 'was what her response would be if asked about the start of the [August] war. She told us that she would say the truth – that the war was started by the Saakashvili regime.' According to Kobakhidze, they advised her to take a 'softer approach,' since a political climate at the time would make it 'difficult for us to protect Salome Zurabishvili,' adding that the team warned her that an open statement blaming Saakashvili would dominate the entire election campaign, something they considered unwise. 'She promised us that she would make a different kind of statement,' he said. 'However, in the end she told the truth […] that Saakashvili's regime started the war.' Also Read: This post is also available in: ქართული

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store