SA Greens push for mandatory work-from-home day amid fierce opposition

The Australian

a day ago

A second Australian state is set to push for workers to be able to work from home one day a week; however, the move has not come without its detractors.
MLC Robert Simms announced on Thursday the South Australian Greens were drafting a Bill to guarantee public sector staff could work from home (WFH) one day a week if it was 'reasonable', saying it would 'set a benchmark for the private sector'.
Robert Simms is calling for South Australia to guarantee public sector staff can WFH one day a week. Picture Dean Martin
His call comes after Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced plans to legislate WFH protections for workers who could 'reasonably' carry out their duties from home.
Ms Allan said the reform, which would make Victoria the first state to enshrine WFH legislation, was about recognising modern work patterns and protecting employees from having flexible arrangements arbitrarily revoked.
'It's working now, but we know that we need to protect it,' Ms Allan said on Today.
'We need to protect it for workers but also make it really clear for employers as well who are already doing this that working from home should be a right, not a request.'
In SA, however, the move has been greeted largely with disapproval.
Earlier this week, SA Premier Peter Malinauskas told ABC Radio that he would not support the proposed legislation.
'To mandate things, I think, runs the risk of having unintended consequences,' he said.
'And occasionally I think employers should have the ability to say, 'Look, we're paying you to do a particular task and this is where I need you to perform those tasks'.'
Peter Malinauskas will not support WFH legislation. Picture Ben Clark
Mr Simms claimed more staff working from home would negate travel time, cut traffic congestion and boost productivity, along with saving workers and families vital dollars.
However, the SA Business Chamber has rejected the plan, saying legislation could drive a wedge between workers and hamper investment.
Chamber chief executive Andrew Kay claimed current arrangements were working 'perfectly well where employers and employees negotiated WFH arrangements'.
'Enshrining WFH rights has the potential to drive a wedge in the workplace between the haves and the have nots,' he said.
Legal experts revealed the Labor-Allan government's push to legislate WFH rights in the private sector were logistically almost impossible.
Working from home has its benefits. Picture: iStock
Stacks Law Firm special counsel Geoff Baldwin said a large number of workers in Victoria were already eligible to request flexible working arrangements, and any new legislation would be at risk of being 'struck down', as it would presumably be inconsistent with existing Commonwealth laws.
'It's hard to see what (the) Victorian (government) might do which would have any appreciable impact on the Victorian workforce as a whole,' he said.
A SA government spokesperson added that 'the state government opposes any Peter Dutton-style attempts to ban working from home'.
'Working from home arrangements where practical are important in a modern workplace,' they said.
'These arrangements tend to work best where it is mutually agreed between employees and employers, which is why mandating such a practice through legislation is not being contemplated by the state government.'
Read related topics: Greens