Pornhub suspends access in France in protest over age verification law
The owner of Pornhub, RedTube and YouTube has blocked access to the adult platforms in France, in protest against a law requiring porn sites to verify the age of their users.
Parent company Aylo said it would stop operating in France as of Wednesday, having criticised the French government's measures to shield children from inappropriate content by making porn platforms take extra steps to ensure that users are 18 or older.
"I can confirm that Aylo has made the difficult decision to suspend access to its user-uploaded platforms (Pornhub, YouPorn, RedTube) in France. We will be using our platforms to directly address the French public,' a Pornhub spokesperson said on Tuesday.
Under France's so-called SREN law, which was passed in 2023, adult content platforms have until Saturday to implement age verification measures. French media regulator Arcom can request that porn sites are blocked and issue fines if it finds their checks are lacking.
Solomon Friedman, a partner at Ethical Capital Partners, which owns Aylo, told reporters in a briefing call on Tuesday that the law was "ineffective", "dangerous", and "potentially privacy-infringing".
"It's a matter of putting our values first, and that means communicating directly with the French people to tell them what their government is refusing to tell them," he said, in reference to a message that Aylo's platforms will display to French users on Wednesday.
Aurore Bergé, French minister for gender equality, wrote "au revoir" in a post on X in response to Aylo's statement.
"There will be less violent, degrading and humiliating content accessible to minors in France," she wrote.
Clara Chappaz, France's junior minister for artificial intelligence and digital technology, said on X: "If Aylo would rather leave France than apply our laws, they are free to do so."
European Union regulators announced last week that they were investigating four major porn websites over suspected breaches of the bloc's online content rules, which include provisions for protecting children from pornographic material. These include risks that age verification measures deployed by the sites are ineffective.
The European Commission said it has opened formal proceedings against Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX and XVideos under the 27-nation bloc's Digital Safety Act.
Aylo said last week that it was aware of the investigation and was "fully committed" to ensuring online safety of children. XNXX, Stripchat and XVideos did not comment.
A court in El Salvador has sentenced three former senior military officers to 15 years in prison for the killing of four Dutch journalists in 1982.
Jan Kuiper, Koos Koster, Hans ter Laag and Joop Willemson were killed in an ambush by the Salvadoran army in the northern province of Chalatenango while filming a documentary about the Central American country's civil war, which lasted from 1980 until 1992.
Late on Tuesday, a five-person jury in a Chalatenango court found three former top military officials guilty over their deaths after a trial that was closed to the public.
The convicted men were former Defence Minister José Guillermo García, 91, former Treasury Police Director Francisco Morán, 93, and Mario Adalberto Reyes Mena, 85, the former army commander of the Fourth Infantry Brigade in Chalatenango.
García and Morán remain under a police guard at a private hospital in the capital San Salvador, while Reyes Mena lives in the US. The Salvadoran Supreme Court started extradition proceedings in March to bring him back to face justice.
García was deported from the US in 2016, with a US judge declaring him responsible for serious human rights violations during the Salvadoran civil war.
Óscar Pérez, lawyer for the Foundation Comunicandonos that represented the victims' families, said prosecutors had requested a minimum 15-year prison sentence for all three men.
Shortly before they were killed, the four Dutch reporters, who were making a documentary for Ikon TV, had joined up with guerrillas to film behind enemy lines.
Salvadoran soldiers armed with assault rifles and machine guns then ambushed them and the guerrillas.
Pérez told reporters that there was 'sufficient proof' that 'deliberate and well-planned military action' led to the Dutch journalists' killings. The same assessment was also made by the United Nations Truth Commission for El Salvador after the end of the civil war.
The lawyer added that the judge in the case also condemned the Salvadoran government, ordering President Nayib Bukele to apologise publicly to the victims in his role as head of the country's armed forces.
Juan Carlos Sánchez, from the NGO Mesa Contra la Impunidad, said the trial was a 'transcendental step that the victims have waited 40 years for'.
The prosecution of the military officials was relaunched in 2018, after the country's highest court ruled that the general post-civil war amnesty was unconstitutional.
In March 2022, relatives of the victims as well as representatives of the Dutch government and the EU demanded that the suspects be tried.
Some of the men accused of being involved in the killings had already died, including Mario Canizales Espinoza, who was believed to have led the patrol that carried out the massacre.
Some 75,000 Salvadoran civilians were killed during the civil war, most of whom died at the hands of the US-backed government security forces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
The Woolmark Company's Damien Pommeret: 'It's up to industries to share their environmental impact data'
A few weeks before being announced as Jean Paul Gaultier 's new creative director, Duran Lantink was awarded the Woolmark Prize 2025. The whimsical and talented Dutch designer had applied his expertise and vision of disproportionately swollen volumes to a wool creation. Each year, this event organized by The Woolmark Company - the representative body of the Australian wool industry - rewards contemporary design, with an endowment of 300,000 Australian dollars (around 172,000 euros). It's also an opportunity to promote the properties of this natural fiber, at the heart of a broader commitment. In addition to its promotional activities in the premium and luxury fashion sectors, The Woolmark Company is also working to protect an entire industry, which provides a livelihood for many family farms across the continent. This involves applied research projects, such as the recent development of its "denim lab", as well as a major effort to organize the industry and raise its profile. In this respect, assessing the CSR impact of the material is a major challenge. Damien Pommeret, the organization's representative in Western Europe, reviews the initiatives undertaken by The Woolmark Company and its innovation center. In particular, he details its involvement in the 'Make the Label Count' initiative, launched in 2021 with other players in the textile sector. As Europe moves forward with the validation of new environmental assessment tools - in particular the PEF (Product Environmental Footprint) and the French method - this approach is taking on strategic weight today. After years of consultation, Europe has just validated advances in methodologies for assessing the environmental cost of textiles. However, with certain approaches, the calculation could favor materials derived from the petrochemical industry to the detriment of natural materials. Was this an issue for you? Damien Pommeret: We started sounding the alarm over three years ago. We took part in the creation of 'Make the Label Count' to defend the advantages of using renewable and biodegradable fibers and to highlight the harmful effects of microplastic pollution. At first, we were pretty much alone, but the cotton and other natural materials sectors realized that there were aligned messages. Above all, there was a realization that we were small in comparison with other lobbies. FNW: And now? DP: Natural materials are starting to connect. Initially, brands and supply chains saw this as a pure risk, thinking that the issues were different. The collaborative aspect was complex. Especially as working on the technical details requires a lot of time and dedicated people. But now it's more concrete. The fact that we created "Make the LabelCount", which wasn't linked to a specific material, allows us to get involved. The cotton industry contributes funds. The 64-member coalition is gaining in weight with the authorities, particularly in Europe. FNW: In concrete terms, what does this mean for an industry like wool, represented by Woolmark? DP: It already carries weight with the Australian government and the wool industry. To change approaches, we have to share data with the French government. This data had not been consolidated for sharing and gives very detailed information on the Australian wool industry. We had to overcome legal and political fears about sharing it with Ecobalyse. But it's up to the industries to share their data. Because in reality, the French government will never be able to know the progress made on coffee, avocados or natural textiles when it comes to establishing its results. FNW: But how important is this sharing of data? DP: It's very important. In fact, petroleum-based materials have more data than natural materials, which adds value to the results in assessment systems. Strategic impact assessment tools were created to evaluate products produced by industries using calibrated resources. So it's not adapted to agriculture and livestock farming, even if we're trying to adapt it... The difficulty is that there are lots of different types of operation. We have to create the measurement tools and collect the data, which is much more complex. With Woolmark, we invest in these tools and follow technologies developed by start-ups to improve the situation. Because the biggest impact is on the farms. But that's also where all the potential lies in protecting water resources and biodiversity. FNW: In concrete terms, has this sharing of information improved the ratings of wool products via Ecobalyse? DP: Yes, clearly. As they didn't have any data, they worked with the information they did have: an impact study on sheep in the United States which served as the basis for calculating all wool products. But for textiles, 85% of Merino wool comes from Australia. In Australia, sheep farming is extensive, with 6 to 8 animals per hectare in semi-freedom. So the impact is not at all the same. With our data, this reduced the impact in the final results. The challenge now is to finance regular data collection and to go into more detail. Because this commits the sector to improvement and can be promoted to customers. FNW: Can this be applied to other natural materials? DP: Each sector can have its own elements. For example, American cotton has all these data. The key point is that it's not just a matter of collecting data. It has to commit the industry, breeders, farmers and polyester producers to doing better, and consumers to consuming better. Otherwise, it's pointless transparency. It's necessarily a political issue. The aim is not to point the finger at industries and see people lose their jobs. The aim is to have a tool that enables us to optimize, to be more intelligent in manufacturing and consumption. FNW: Except that, despite the improvement, wool is still not rated as highly as polyester... DP: Admittedly, even if the result is better, we're far from having won. For our part, we have to be transparent about the real impact of wool. But then, the criteria will have to include a projection onto a new way of consuming. The life and impact of a product after its manufacture are not the same for a natural product as for those made from petrochemicals. And this is not yet taken into account at European level. It's a battle that needs to be fought. The other aspect is that we're going to have to consume less to meet our environmental commitments. FNW: What do you mean by this? DP: Let's be clear: natural materials are not the ones that have the least impact, and are often intended for premium products. We're not going to sell a 50-euro cotton t-shirt to every Indian. Each fiber has its own purpose. The aim is to be able to use fibers and products for their performance at the right level of consumption. While we obviously need to keep fashion affordable, the problem is volume. There's a difference between accessible fashion and an industry that's unbridled on environmental and social issues. We're going to have to find a way of ensuring that Europe's affluent classes don't over-consume low-priced products. Which is the case today."
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Boat for Gaza: La France Insoumise rallies support for Rima Hassan
Breaking the Israeli blockade was the goal of the MADLEEN sailboat crew, whose journey was cut short off the coast of the Gaza Strip. The 12 pro-Palestinian activists on board, including Swedish activist Greta Thunberg and MEP Rima Hassan of the left-wing France Insoumise party, were delivering humanitarian aid to Gaza. During the night of June 8 to 9, Israeli naval commandos intercepted the vessel about 31 nautical miles from the Palestinian enclave, redirecting it to the port of Ashdod in southern Israel. During the day, while the 12 activists – six of whom are French – were handed over to Israeli police, the French embassy requested consular access to visit them to ensure their well-being and prepare for their prompt return to France. This marked the second time Hassan had been expelled from Israel: On February 25, she was denied entry upon arrival at Ben-Gurion Airport. While the humanitarian mission failed, the activists' communications campaign proved successful. This was especially true for Hassan, who had been at the forefront of the media battle since the boat departed Italy eight days earlier. At regular intervals, she provided updates on the expedition's progress while warning of alleged threats facing the vessel and its crew. This dramatic narrative received wide attention on social media and was supported by the entire La France Insoumise movement from the first days of the MADLEEN's journey toward Gaza.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
China carefully assembling a deep-sea mining strategy
The world's oceans, both international waters and those under national jurisdiction, are rich in minerals and metals, like cobalt, nickel and copper. These are important for building electric car batteries, for instance, and other technologies as countries try to transition away from fossil fuels. China "is an energy-thirsty country. It will look for resources everywhere," including the deep sea, said Julia Xue of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. But she said China is not particularly anxious over the issue, although recent developments -- one company is itching to be the first to start mining the sea bed -- may put more pressure on Beijing. A Canadian firm, The Metals Company, has filed an application with the United States to begin undersea mining in international waters. Using its American subsidiary, it acted after President Donald Trump, bypassing international negotiations, signed an executive order in April to speed up the permit-issuing process for such mining in US and international waters. Trump cited an obscure 1980 US law that says American citizens can explore for and recover deep sea minerals in areas beyond the country's jurisdiction. Environmental groups are outraged by Trump's order, arguing that a wild hunt for the potato-sized, metal-containing nodules could harm fragile undersea ecosystems. The Canadian company initially said it would submit its request to the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a body which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor in international waters. The Metals Company says it ignored this authority because of its slow pace in talks on adopting a mining code that establishes rules for exploiting seabed resources. The United States is not an ISA member. A long-time observer of those talks who spoke on condition of anonymity said China is not particularly worried about who starts mining first. "For them it's more about dominance, staying competitive in the game, and giving the impression that you can't mess with us," the observer said. With that goal in mind "they're definitely developing the technology and putting the strategic agreements in place," Alex Gilbert, a researcher at the Payne Institute for Public Policy at Colorado School of Mines, told AFP. For instance, China has reached an agreement with the Cook Islands to explore for minerals in that Pacific country's waters. Another tiny Pacific nation, Kiribati, also says it is exploring a deep-sea mining partnership with China. This approach is "more geopolitical than economic," said Emmanuel Hache of the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs, noting Beijing is using undersea mining as a lure to cement greater diplomatic support as it exerts power. China holds five contracts handed out by the ISA to look for resources in the Pacific and Indian Ocean sea beds and these contracts cover all types of undersea mineral resources. China's is the largest number of the 22 contracts the organization has granted. Years behind "From a research perspective, we have been continuously getting closer. And from a technical perspective, we have been continuously improving," said Chen Xuguang, a researcher at Ocean University of China. In 2024 a Chinese prototype deep-sea mining vehicle called Pioneer II, developed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University, set a national record by operating at a depth of more than 4,000 meters (13,100 feet). State-owned Beijing Pioneer Hi-Tech Development Corporation told AFP that later this year it plans a seabed nodule collection test. Still, China is not as advanced technologically as The Metals Company, experts say. "I would characterize China as being two to four years behind them in terms of their technology," said Gilbert in Colorado. Hache, the French expert, put the gap at five years. But China has an advantage over firms like the Canadian one in recovering and processing nodules: its companies are supported by the state and China has infrastructure for processing metals. The observer of the international seabed talks said China does not need seabed mining for metal supply, "but maybe geopolitically, in the context of maintaining their control over the commodities market." China wants to keep its options open, this person said. © 2025 AFP
