logo
'Deeply dangerous' assisted dying bill should be scrapped, says leading care consultant

'Deeply dangerous' assisted dying bill should be scrapped, says leading care consultant

Sky News31-05-2025

Why you can trust Sky News
A leading British palliative care consultant has described the assisted dying bill as "not fit for purpose" and is urging MPs to stop the bill from progressing any further.
Rejecting assurances from supporters of assisted dying who claim the proposed British version would be based on the scheme used in the American state of Oregon - widely regarded as the model with the most safeguards - Dr Amy Proffitt said "it's far from a safe system".
"The majority, 80% of the people that have assisted death have government insurance with Medicaid or Medicare suggesting that the vulnerable in society are not worth it," she said.
"Put that into our NHS and what does it say about us as a society... those with disability, those with learning disabilities, those with social deprivation?"
Dr Proffitt added: "I think it's deeply dangerous for the bill that has been proposed and it needs to be scrapped and we go back and look again."
She and other leading palliative care doctors have expressed concern about the erosion of end of life care if the bill passes. It is a fear expressed by Britain's hospice sector.
Dr Ted Gruber, a retired Oregon doctor who has assisted numerous assisted deaths, says those fears have not been realised and the state's hospice sector has strengthened since the introduction of assisted dying in Oregon in 1994.
He says he has never had any doubts about his role as a physician who assists a patient's death.
"I've never been conflicted," he explains. "I've attended a number of them.
"Each of the ones I've attended has been almost sacred if you will, it's hard to explain but with the family there, the family dog in the bed, with the music playing that they want.
"Everyone's sad, everyone's crying, it's not a joyful moment but in a way it's kind of a sacred moment."
Oregon's assisted dying laws have not seen the same number of changes to widen the cohort groups who would qualify for an assisted death in the way, for example, Canada has.
So it has managed to steer clear of the "slippery slope" criticism levelled at other programmes.
Dr Gruber also said the assisted death scheme in Oregon had enhanced the patient-physician relationship.
"The role of the doctor who is attending the dying patient is one of listening and paying attention to what the needs of the dying patient are and it's eroded when the patient can't trust the doctor," he said.
"When I've seen a patient who has tried to talk to a doctor about aid in dying and they're like 'oh, I won't do that, I'm opposed to it'... well that doesn't enhance a doctor-patient relationship, it will be enhanced when a doctor says let's talk about why you want to ask that."
Oregon's assisted death model is the closest to what is being proposed in the UK.
Both require it to apply only to adults who are terminally ill, mentally competent, and have six months to live or less, and to take the drugs themselves.
But while Oregon cases are reviewed by two doctors, in the UK they would be reviewed by a panel including a psychiatrist, a social worker and a legal professional.
In Oregon, the drugs are posted to the individual for them to take when ready, whereas in the UK, a healthcare professional would bring them on the day of the planned death.
Marcy Lehman's father Ted was "her hero, the person I looked up to'. An Oregon doctor, he chose to have an assisted death at home in Portland surrounded by his family.
Marcy was there by his side. And it was for her, her mother and ultimately her father, the right decision.
"This was my hero, the person I looked up to, and now the roles were switched and I was taking care of him, and I had to be his hero," Marcy said.
She explained that his stomach cancer "was starting to work up his system so he couldn't eat."
"My dad was a strong person and stronger even up until his death," Marcy added.
"He didn't want someone to have to go to the bathroom with him to help with that or to feed him that wasn't what he wanted - yeah, he was in pain, he could endure the pain, but it was really more the dignified way he wanted to leave this Earth."
Ted's family are grateful that they live in a state where assisted death is allowed. It's a choice they would make again if they had to.
Now the UK must soon decide if that same choice is made available over here.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill was introduced to the House of Commons last October. Later next month, MPs will be asked to vote again in a ballot that will decide the fate of the proposed legislation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction
Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction

Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, says his fight to reform the legal system's handling of miscarriages of justice is far from over. The 59-year-old had his conviction overturned in 2023 after years protesting his innocence. Mr Malkinson, who told The Sunday Times his 'life was desolated' by the wrongful conviction, says he is determined to change the justice system, starting with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). 'I haven't finished. I want to change a lot more,' he said. 'It's a good feeling that something so dreadful and tragic is leading to real change.' It comes amid news Dame Vera Baird KC will become the interim chairwoman of the CCRC. The barrister will take up the post from June 9 until December 8 next year, and is tasked with carrying out an urgent review into the running of the independent body and making sure lessons have been learnt from previous cases. Mr Malkinson said he remained 'incandescent' at the CCRC, as well as the Government's compensation scheme, which makes it difficult for wrongly-convicted people to receive payouts. 'This is an assault on innocent people,' he said. 'It's an assault on the public, because any member of the public could end up where I was. Anybody could be the next victim, because there will be more.' Despite having his conviction quashed in 2023, he had to wait until February to get his first compensation payment. Mr Malkinson had been living on benefits and food banks from his release until then. Under the 2014 Antisocial Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Ministry of Justice data showed that only 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation. Figures showed that 35 have since received money, with average amounts totalling £68,000. In a statement in February, lawyer Toby Wilton welcomed the payment, but said the £1 million cap on compensation payouts should be lifted. This is currently the maximum amount that can be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice who are wrongly jailed for at least 10 years. 'The Government should lift the current cap on compensation, and end the twisted quirk that whilst awards under other compensation schemes are excluded from assessment for benefits,' he said.

Trump deploys National Guard after clashes in LA
Trump deploys National Guard after clashes in LA

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trump deploys National Guard after clashes in LA

Manage consent settings on AMP pages These settings apply to AMP pages only. You may be asked to set these preferences again when you visit non-AMP BBC pages. The lightweight mobile page you have visited has been built using Google AMP technology. Strictly necessary data collection To make our web pages work, we store some limited information on your device without your consent. Read more about the essential information we store on your device to make our web pages work. We use local storage to store your consent preferences on your device. Optional data collection When you consent to data collection on AMP pages you are consenting to allow us to display personalised ads that are relevant to you when you are outside of the UK. Read more about how we personalise ads in the BBC and our advertising partners. You can choose not to receive personalised ads by clicking 'Reject data collection and continue' below. Please note that you will still see advertising, but it will not be personalised to you. You can change these settings by clicking 'Ad Choices / Do not sell my info' in the footer at any time.

‘People smuggler' re-enters UK despite being stripped of citizenship
‘People smuggler' re-enters UK despite being stripped of citizenship

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

‘People smuggler' re-enters UK despite being stripped of citizenship

An asylum seeker who was granted UK nationality but was later stripped of his citizenship over his alleged links to a prolific people-smuggling ring has managed to return to the country using his British passport. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is thought to have been on holiday in Iraq when he was served with a citizenship deprivation order by the Home Office because of his suspected involvement in 'serious organised crime'. Yet he was somehow allowed to re-enter Britain and is now contesting his removal on human rights grounds because he has a wife and children here. The alleged people smuggler has been granted anonymity by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac), the secretive court where he is appealing against the decision to strip him of British citizenship. He is referred to only as 'G5'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store