Kremlin says Trump-Putin meeting agreed for 'coming days'
The Russian president named the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a potential location for the summit with Trump, but essentially ruled out a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The Trump-Putin summit would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. It comes as the Republican seeks an end to Russia's military assault on Ukraine.
Three rounds of direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv have failed to yield any progress towards a ceasefire. The two sides appear as far apart as ever in the conditions they have set for an end to the more than three-year-long conflict.
Trump said on Wednesday that he was likely to meet Putin face-to-face "very soon."
They last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term as US president, but have spoken by telephone several times since the former reality TV star returned to the White House earlier this year.
"Both sides showed interest" in the Russia-US leaders meeting, Putin told reporters on Thursday. "We have many friends who are willing to help us organise such events. One of our friends is the president of the United Arab Emirates," he said, standing next to UAE President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
Earlier on Thursday, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said that the plan to hold a bilateral summit was "at the suggestion of the American side." "Next week has been set as a target date," said Ushakov, adding that both sides have already agreed the venue "in principle", without mentioning it.
Putin-Zelensky meeting?
Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its military offensive on Ukraine in February 2022.
Russian bombardments have forced millions of people to flee their homes and have destroyed swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine. Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire.
At talks in Istanbul, Russian negotiators outlined hardline territorial demands if Ukraine wants Russia to halt its advance — calling for Kyiv to withdraw from some territory it still controls and to renounce Western military support.
Reports of the upcoming summit came after US envoy Steve Witkoff met Putin in Moscow.
Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting with Zelensky, but Putin appeared to rule out direct talks with the Ukrainian leader.
"I have nothing against it in general, it is possible, but certain conditions must be created for this," he told reporters, adding: "Unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions."
Putin said in June that he was ready to meet Zelensky, but only during a "final phase" of negotiations on ending the conflict.
Zelensky earlier on Thursday had refreshed his call for a meeting with Putin — which he says is the only way to make progress towards peace. "It is necessary to determine the timing for such a format and the range of issues to be addressed," he wrote on social media.
The Ukrainian leader later spoke with his European allies, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as he called for the continent to be included in any potential peace talks.
"The war is happening in Europe, and Ukraine is an integral part of Europe — we are already in negotiations on EU accession. Therefore, Europe must be a participant in the relevant processes," Zelensky said on social media after the call with Merz.
He also said that he would hold several other conversations throughout the course of the day, including with Italian officials.
"Today, security advisors will hold an online meeting to align our joint views — Ukraine and the whole of Europe, the United States," Zelensky said.
"Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side. It is time we ended the war," he added.
Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dubai Eye
2 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Zelenskyy says Ukraine 'fully supports' joint statement by European leaders
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Sunday that Kyiv "values and fully supports" a joint statement by European leaders on achieving peace in Ukraine while protecting Ukrainian and European interests. French, Italian, German, Polish, British, Finnish and European Commission leaders on Saturday welcomed US President Donald Trump's efforts to try to end the war, but emphasised the need to pressure Russia and provide security guarantees for Kyiv. "The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations," Zelenskyy wrote on X. "Ukraine values and fully supports the statement by President Macron, Prime Minister Meloni, Chancellor Merz, Prime Minister Tusk, Prime Minister Starmer, President Ursula von der Leyen, and President Stubb on peace for Ukraine." Trump plans to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. He has talked up the prospect of a deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict. Zelenskyy and his European allies have warned that any deal requiring Ukraine to surrender significant parts of its territory would only encourage Russian aggression.
Dubai Eye
2 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Europe stresses need to protect Ukrainian interests ahead of Trump-Putin talks
European leaders on Saturday welcomed US President Donald Trump's plans to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on ending the war in Ukraine, while stressing the need to keep pressure on Moscow and protect Ukrainian and European security interests. Trump plans to meet Putin in Alaska on Friday, saying the parties, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, were close to a deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict. The US president is open to a trilateral summit with Putin and Zelenskyy, but for now the White House is planning a bilateral meeting as requested by Putin, a White House official said. Russian and Ukrainian officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the prospects of a trilateral meeting. Details of a potential deal have not been announced, but Trump said it would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". It could require Ukraine to surrender significant parts of its territory, an outcome Zelenskyy and his European allies say would only encourage Russian aggression. US Vice President JD Vance met British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and representatives of Ukraine and European allies on Saturday at Chevening House, a country mansion southeast of London, to discuss Trump's push for peace. A joint statement from the French, Italian, German, Polish, British and Finnish leaders and the president of the European Commission welcomed Trump's efforts, while stressing the need to maintain support for Ukraine and pressure on Russia. "We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests," they said. "We agree that these vital interests include the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," the statement said, adding: "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine." The leaders said "they remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force", and added: "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations." They said negotiations could only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. The White House did not immediately respond when asked about the European counterproposals. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron spoke and pledged to find a "just and lasting peace" in Ukraine and "unwavering support" for Zelenskyy while welcoming Trump's efforts to end the fighting, a Downing Street spokesperson said.
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
How is the US economy doing after Trump tariffs?
The June 2025 trade figures for imports and exports indicate that the imports have fallen substantially, and the exports inched up, and the resultant narrowing of trade deficit is to be seen as good news for the American economy. But the figures that are being highlighted are for a narrow period of time, and it has to be seen whether the trend will continue for a longer period. The overall trade gap came down to 16 per cent in June to $60.2 billion. The trade deficit in goods went down to 10.8 per cent, the lowest since September 2023. American exports of goods and services stood at $277.3 billion, down from $278 billion in May. The imports fell to $337.5 billion in the month of June, consumer goods fell by $8.4 billion, industrial supplies and materials by $2.7 billion, auto and parts by $1.3 billion. The reduced trade deficit is seen as a contributory factor to the rise in GDP. The economy has expanded by 3 per cent in the second quarter after contracting 0.5 per cent in the first. This looks like clutching at straws. The trade deficit with China came down to $9.5 billion, the lowest since 2004. Imports from China dropped to $18.9 billion, the lowest since 2009. China has been the main target of President Trump's tariff fury. The question remains as to whether by unleashing punitive tariffs against all the trade partners, has Trump strengthened the American economy? The jury is out on that issue. Inflation is slightly above the mandatory 2 per cent. People are feeling the pinch of inflation. Jobs have not grown. Trump realizes that there will be pain in the transition. He is promising that in the long term, his trade policy will make the American economy strong. Trade deficit has certainly declined because imports into the country have gone down. Is it because the countries that export to America have held back because of the high tariffs, or the demand in the American markets has gone down because the Americans were not willing to buy the higher prices caused by the higher tariffs? It looks like that both the United States and its major trading partners will have to adjust to the new conditions. Reducing trade deficit may be a good thing for a short period and range. If there is local demand, especially for the industries in terms of material inputs, then the American industries will suffer. Similarly, if the import of consumer goods has fallen steeply, either the domestic producers should benefit in the long term, or the American consumers will have to cut back on their needs. It is not possible for American producers to meet the domestic consumer demand, and the tariffs make the imports costlier for the American consumer. The consequences of high tariffs will play out gradually, and they cannot be seen immediately. The long-term effects of high tariffs are likely to be harmful than beneficial for international trade as well as domestic economies. There is no denying the fact that the tariff regime in the US has been liberal. The fact that the US is the most indebted country and this is being traced to the low tariffs and the flood of imports. The connection looks plausible but it is not accurate. The reason for American indebtedness is due to internal social and economic weaknesses. The limited educational levels of most Americans and the difficulty in employing them in frontier technology enterprises. The remedy for American problems does not exactly lie in high tariffs. It lies in the social sphere. And impromptu Trump solutions do not work.
