Dozens of new laws just took effect in Maryland, impacting DUI penalties, payouts to sex abuse survivors and more
Dozens of laws took effect in Maryland on June 1, impacting DUI penalties, payouts to the victims in cases of sexual abuse cases, and more. Here's a look at some of the changes.
Sexual abuse survivors
Sexual abuse survivors in Maryland now face caps on court compensation after revisions to the Child Victims Act took effect Sunday.
HB1378 limits payouts to $400,000 for abuse claims involving public institutions and $700,000 for claims against private institutions. Attorney fees are also capped at 20% for cases settled out of court and 25% for cases that go to trial.
Governor Wes Moore signed the revisions into law in April. The changes come as juvenile detention facilities across Maryland face multiple lawsuits from abuse survivors.
The original Child Victims Act allowed payouts up to $890,000 from public institutions and $1.5 million from private institutions. The new caps represent significant reductions from those amounts.
The revisions also establish specific limits on attorney fees for the first time.
Punishments increase for DUI convictions
Maryland drivers convicted of driving under the influence now face stiffer penalties under HB388. The Motor Vehicle Administration will assess 12 points against anyone's license for DUI convictions involving alcohol or other drugs.
Baltimore City will now increase its speed cameras along Interstate 83 from two to four under HB913.
Healthcare and housing changes
Several laws expand healthcare protections and access. HB1045 classifies gender-affirming healthcare as "legally protected health care" in Maryland and makes it not subject to disclosure laws.
Health insurers must now permanently cover telehealth visits under HB869, known as the Preserve Telehealth Act of 2025.
HB390/SB327 allows county governments to exempt rental housing properties from property taxes if owners maintain at least 25% of units as affordable housing and enter payment agreements with counties.
Other notable changes
HB102 delays the Maryland Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program launch 18 months to January 1, 2027.
HB910/SB911 increases property tax exemptions for blind individuals from $15,000 to $40,000.
HB402/SB307 raises Anne Arundel County's student board member scholarship from $8,000 to $15,000.
HB412/SB337 requires local election boards to provide meeting agendas at least 48 hours in advance and offer live video streaming of open meetings.
Maryland also gained two new official state symbols under SB764. Chromite becomes the state mineral, and the orange crush becomes the state cocktail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why six hours of sleep is not enough
For those of us who worry about our sleep, every morning is a scramble of mental maths as we turn to our bedside clock and calculate whether or not we've had 'enough'. The current National Sleep Foundation guidelines recommend that most adults sleep for between seven and nine hours per night. This followed a 2022 paper from the University of Cambridge, itself an amalgam of hundreds of studies that followed people's long-term experience of heart disease, diabetes and mental-health difficulties. 'Having a consistent seven hours' sleep each night, without too much fluctuation in duration, was also important to cognitive performance and good mental health and wellbeing,' say the authors of the paper. Those who slept between seven and nine hours reported a lower incidence of these chronic conditions. But what if, for any reason, you consistently don't sleep that much? If you have trouble sleeping, or if you just want to jump onto the latest 5am trend, get up with the lark and to find a couple more precious hours in your day? Does it have real implications – and does it even matter at all? What is the problem with having six hours sleep? The long-term impacts of sleep deprivation So are people who only sleep six hours a night doomed? Strategies to improve sleep quality If you consistently have less than six hours' sleep, the chances are that you are risking health problems. 'On the surface, you will be moody, frustrated and irritated,' says Maryanne Taylor, a sleep consultant from sleep consultancy The Sleep Works. 'On a deeper level, you'll be raising your risks of stress and anxiety – these have a bidirectional relationship to your sleep.' Three key problems are: Sophie Bostock is a sleep scientist and behavioural psychologist. 'We know that poor sleep and mental health are inextricably linked,' she says. 'Poor sleepers are twice as likely to develop anxiety and depression than good sleepers. 'While this is no surprise to those who lie awake at night worrying, there is some good news, too – improving one's sleep will benefit one's mental health.' 'Our brains evolved to see sleep loss as a warning sign,' says Bostock. 'Our ancestors were more likely to be kept awake by predators than by scrolling through their phones, so we respond to short sleep by going into high alert.' Hence, we get more sensitive to potential foes. 'We are more likely to interpret neutral faces as threatening and to withdraw from social situations, diverting resources from the more rational part of our brain and decision-making capacity,' she says. 'Without enough sleep, in the longer term, we struggle to focus, to learn and remember, to empathise and make logical, sensible decisions,' says Bostock. Insomnia is linked to a wide variety of conditions, from obesity to Type 2 diabetes and even Alzheimer's. The reasons were discussed in the May 2019 edition of the journal Experimental Psychology, with theories ranging from blood vessels littered with fatty deposits, to 'cellular garbage' in the brain. According to the research, people who sleep fewer than seven hours a night have a significantly raised level of molecules called microRNAs, which suppress the protein content of cells and have previously been linked to inflammation and poor blood vessel health. Not getting enough sleep makes you more likely to gain weight, according to the analysis of 36 studies, discussed in the journal Obesity. Various studies have shown that poor sleep disrupts the productions of the hormones ghrelin and leptin – the hormones that control hunger. Thus, insomniacs crave fatty, starchy and sugary foods, potentially eating hundreds of extra calories a day in refined carbohydrates The daytime exhaustion means you can't be bothered to exercise and so your weight gain spirals, as does a cascade into other conditions such as diabetes and heart disease. People with a chronic lack of sleep significant risk an increase in Type 2 diabetes, according to a report in the journal Diabetes Care. Patients who suffered poor sleep (defined as fewer than five hours a night) for a year or longer had three times the risk of those who slept six hours or more. As with obesity (also linked to Type 2 diabetes), the underlying cause is thought to involve disruption of the body's normal hormonal regulation, but in this case it results from insufficient sleep. It's well known that sleep is necessary for a healthy immune system, the part of our make-up which tackles antigens, or foreign invaders, as well as 'T cells': white blood cells which destroy virus carrying cells. One study showed that subjects who slept fewer than seven hours a night were three times as likely to catch colds than those who got the full eight, or more. Much modern research indicates that insomnia raises the risk of Alzheimer's. The Harvard Medical School report revealed that people with sleep impairments were nearly 1.7 times as likely to develop cognitive impairments than those without. Researchers from the University of Tennessee noted that chronic insomnia was tied to a 1.5 times higher risk of kidney decline, and an even steeper increase in risk of kidney failure: 2.4 times. A comprehensive report linking insomnia with high cholesterol and blood pressure was published in 2019 by a top American university. People who don't get enough sleep also have raised levels of stress hormones and substances that indicate inflammation, a key cause of cardiovascular disease. Fewer than four hours' a night sleep could double a woman's risk of dying of heart disease. But before you take to your bed in despair, Taylor draws a distinction between short periods of six hours' sleep or fewer, and longer-term sleep deprivation. 'If a small burst of stress (a job interview, for example) impacts the amount of hours you get, it's unlikely to mean you have an ongoing sleep problem. We all have these blips.' Bostock also says there is no reason to panic. 'All these chronic conditions are multifactorial, so we need loads of subjects to work out the rule of the impact of confounding factors. In the short term studies, typically healthy people recover after several days of proper sleep.' The first step is to make sure you have the bases covered: that your bedroom is dark, quiet and at optimum temperature – between 16C to 18C. Your bedding should be comfortable and, ideally, made of natural fibres. Cut out coffee after midday, and have a proper wind-down routine. If you are suffering with chronic sleep problems, attending to sleep hygiene may not be enough, however. 'We can become a slave to hygiene and in some ways it can be counterproductive,' says Taylor. 'There is so much paraphernalia out there: Spray this! Drink this! The fact is that people who sleep well don't actually do anything. Sleep is an innate process, and we all can do it: it's just about creating the conditions in our brain.' Instead, Taylor suggests adopting a more flexible mindset. 'Bedtime procrastination can cause sleep anxiety,' she says. 'Firstly, it really is OK to stop looking at your work emails after 7pm.' Waking up in the night is part of the natural process, says Bostock. 'Your sleep goes in 90-minute cycles, and people tend to wake up more as they get older.' But problems arise if you wake up and have difficulty falling back to sleep again. 'Many people who wake up at night tell themselves: I have to stay in bed,' says Taylor. 'But this can be the crux of maintaining sleep problems.' Taylor suggests making what she calls a 'nest' outside your bed. 'A comfortable chair or beanbag, lit with dim light, with a book or your headphones, and not your phone,' she says. 'When you feel sleepy, go back to bed. If you have to get up a few times a night to do this, that's fine.' Anyone who's had a run of broken nights will agree with Taylor's philosophy that sleep doesn't do well under pressure. 'Have a look at your sleep narrative,' she says. 'If you are telling yourself: 'I'm a terrible sleeper', 'I won't be able to manage tomorrow,' this can be very powerful and only serve to make you more stressed and less able to drop off. You need to step out of your own way.' Instead, tell yourself: 'It's OK, I will survive', and 'I'm a good sleeper, I'm just having a bad night.' Sleeping well is not just about what happens in the hours of darkness: you set yourself up for the next night the minute you open your eyes that day. 'What do you do the minute you wake up?' asks Taylor. 'If you feel rubbish, do you keep pressing snooze until you jump up in a panic? Do you pick up your phone, and are catapulted brutally into the next day? Of course your sleep will be impacted.' Instead, she recommends easing into the day with a cup of tea, in the light. 'As soon as you wake up, aim to get lots of light into your eyes,' she says. 'Go outside if you can, if not, or at least sit near a window. This banishes the sleep hormone, melatonin, and activates the cortisol awakening response in your brain telling you that the day has begun.' Miranda Levy is the author of The Insomnia Diaries: How I Learned to Sleep Again Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Catch up on the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial so far
The federal trial of the United States of America v. Sean 'Diddy' Combs has captured much of the world's attention in its first four weeks in session. The prosecution is continuing to present its case, where it is seeking to prove Combs and some in his inner circle constituted a criminal enterprise that used threats, violence, kidnapping and other means to coerce women into 'Freak Offs' with male escorts and to protect his image. Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. His defense has acknowledged Combs was violent but has questioned the motives of those testifying and has said the accusations fall short of the charges. If convicted on all counts, Combs could face up to life in prison. Here is what we've learned in testimony at this point in the trial, which is expected to continue on for several more weeks.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans and Economists at Odds Over Whether Megabill Will Spur Growth Boom
WASHINGTON—Republicans see a golden age of prosperity ahead, driven by the tax-and-spending megabill they are trying to push through Congress by July 4. Nonpartisan experts project far more modest effects, forecasting a slight near-term economic expansion and larger federal budget deficits. The growth debate is at the core of this summer's fiscal fight. Republicans are trying to focus public attention on growth—from tax cuts, deregulation and fossil-fuel production—and play down the Congressional Budget Office estimate that the bill would increase budget deficits by $2.4 trillion through 2034. The White House highlights growth to bolster congressional support, countering claims from Elon Musk and others that the package irresponsibly darkens America's fiscal picture. 'Sextortion' Scams Involving Apple Messages Ended in Tragedy for These Boys The U.S. Economy Is Headed Toward an Uncomfortable Summer I Got Burned by the 401(k) 'Hierarchy Trap' Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2 Republicans and outside economists agree on the basic direction: tax cuts increase consumer spending and business investment, accelerating short-term growth. But they differ vastly on how large and meaningful that jump would be. The bill, according to public- and private-sector economists, would fall far short of Republicans' hoped-for boom. 'We would expect some dynamic revenue, some revenue feedback in that larger economy,' said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, which favors lower tax rates and a simpler system. 'But it wouldn't come close to paying for itself.' President Trump said in a social-media post last month that the U.S. annual growth rate would triple or even quintuple the 1.8% in CBO's January forecast, which doesn't incorporate the effects of any GOP policies. Since 2005, real U.S. gross domestic product growth hit or exceeded 3% twice: in 2018 after the 2017 tax cuts, and in 2021 during the recovery from the pandemic. House Republicans assume a 2.6% growth rate, yielding enough revenue to cover the megabill's deficits. 'The economy is going to explode in capital formation. Jobs will increase. Wages will increase,' Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R., Idaho) said after meeting with Trump last week. 'We're going to see the kind of growth and strength that this country wants.' Broadly, economists across the political spectrum discount elected officials' predictions. Tax Foundation: The conservative-leaning group estimates that the bill would boost long-term GDP by 0.8%, generating enough revenue to cover about one-third of its costs. That is compared with doing nothing and letting tax cuts expire Dec. 31. The gain is like adding an average of 0.1 percentage point to the annual growth rate; reaching 3% would require much larger changes, Watson said. Penn Wharton: Its budget model projects a 0.4% increase in GDP over the first decade. That is equivalent to raising the annual growth rate to 1.85% from 1.8%. 'Basically, I would call this flat,' said Kent Smetters, who runs the Penn model. 'We all know this is all going to get swamped by all the randomness.' Joint Committee on Taxation: The nonpartisan congressional scorekeeper projected that the bill's tax components would produce short-run growth through increased labor supply and capital stock. That would be counteracted by rising budget deficits, with a net effect of taking 1.83% annual growth to 1.86%. JCT estimates that the bill's tax provisions would cover less than 3% of their costs with revenue from economic growth. Yale Budget Lab: The think tank says the bill would bump the growth rate roughly to 2% from 1.8% through 2027, before the drag of federal debt weakens and reverses that effect. Those all contrast with the view of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, which has a far rosier scenario. It projects a 4.2% to 5.2% increase in short-term GDP and a long-term gain of 2.9% to 3.5%. That gain would be three to four times the Tax Foundation estimate, which itself is larger than Penn Wharton, Yale or JCT. Economists caution that tax policy can't move the needle much in the U.S. economy, particularly given higher costs and uncertainty caused by tariffs. Still, putting money in taxpayers' pockets could increase demand for goods and services. Lower business taxes—especially faster write-offs for equipment and factories—encourage investment and have the biggest bang for the buck. Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran said growth after 2017 demonstrates that the Republican formula can work. The economy and incomes grew solidly in 2018 and 2019 before the Covid-19 pandemic scrambled everything. 'When Americans elected President Trump, they did so knowing that he was a pro-growth president,' Miran said. 'The bill is going to create a vibrant, dynamic economy.' Miran added that federal taxes as a share of GDP was barely unchanged from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2024. According to CBO, revenue was 17.3% of GDP in 2017 and 17.1% in 2024. 'There was no long-term hole in revenues,' Miran said. But before the tax cuts passed, CBO forecast revenue increasing to 18.3% in 2024, and the law changed that trajectory. One of the most thorough academic studies found that the 2017 law increased domestic business investment but didn't come close to paying for itself. The Tax Foundation's Watson said policymakers should expect a more muted response from extending the 2017 tax cuts than from creating them. The bill includes new and revived business incentives but schedules them to expire. 'It's pro-growth,' Watson said. 'The more you add in some of these gimmicks and temporary changes, the more watered-down it gets.' Senators including James Lankford (R., Okla.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are seeking changes to encourage growth. They are particularly focused on making permanent some business-tax provisions such as immediate deductions for equipment purchases. 'If you have an expiration, you just don't get predictability,' Lankford said. Capital-investment incentives would be muted because tariff uncertainty complicates business planning, said Seth Carpenter, global chief economist at Morgan Stanley, which estimates that the bill would boost growth in 2026 before turning neutral and then negative. Some projects might make sense with high tariffs but not lower ones. Even with the bill's new deduction for factory expenses, without tariff certainty, Carpenter said, 'I don't think you're going to be in any sort of hurry to start breaking ground.' Kimberly Clausing, a former Biden administration economist now at the University of California, Los Angeles, said she worries about the drag from budget deficits. 'If they failed,' she said, 'I actually think that would be the best possible macroeconomic outcome.' Write to Richard Rubin at How Hydrogen, the Fuel of the Future, Got Bogged Down in the Bayou Chinese-Owned Company Halts Work on Factory to Make Batteries in U.S. It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending Trump's New Steel Tariffs Look Vulnerable to a Courtroom Challenge Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
