logo
In scathing letter, NASA workers rebuke ‘rapid and wasteful changes' at agency

In scathing letter, NASA workers rebuke ‘rapid and wasteful changes' at agency

CNN21-07-2025
A group of 287 scientists and current and former NASA employees has issued a declaration lambasting budget cuts, grant cancellations and a 'culture of organizational silence' that they say could pose a risk to astronauts' safety.
The document — titled 'The Voyager Declaration' and dedicated to astronauts who lost their lives in tragic spaceflight incidents of the past — is addressed to acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, a staunch Trump loyalist who abruptly replaced Janet Petro, a longtime NASA employee, in the agency's top role on July 9. The letter has 156 anonymous signatories and 131 public signatures — including at least 55 current employees.
Hours after the letter published, Goddard Space Flight Center Director Makenzie Lystrup, who has led the NASA campus since 2023, abruptly resigned. Lystrup did not give a reason for her departure.
'Major programmatic shifts at NASA must be implemented strategically so that risks are managed carefully,' states the letter to Duffy, a former member of Congress, prosecutor and reality TV personality who also currently serves as Transportation secretary. 'Instead, the last six months have seen rapid and wasteful changes which have undermined our mission and caused catastrophic impacts on NASA's workforce.'
The letter raises concerns about suggested changes to NASA's Technical Authority, a system of safety checks and balances at the agency.
Established in the wake of the 2003 Columbia shuttle disaster that killed seven astronauts, the Technical Authority aims to ensure mission safety by allowing NASA employees at all levels of the agency to voice safety concerns to leaders outside their direct chain of command.
'If you have a significant disagreement with a technical decision that's being made, (the system) gives someone an alternate avenue that's not their project manager or program manager' to express that concern, a source at Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution, told CNN.
Changes to that system 'should be made only in the interests of improving safety, not in anticipation of future budget cuts,' the declaration reads.
The source said that they considered looming changes 'a really scary prospect, especially for my colleagues who work directly on the human spaceflight side of things.'
The letter comes as the agency is grappling with the impending loss of thousands of employees and broader restructuring.
In a statement, current NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens responded to the Voyager Declaration. 'NASA will never compromise on safety. Any reduction — including our current voluntary reduction — will be designed to protect safety-critical roles,' she said.
'Despite the claims posted on a website that advances radical, discriminatory DEI principles, the reality is that President Trump has proposed billions of dollars for NASA science, demonstrating an ongoing commitment to communicating our scientific achievements,' Stevens added in the statement. 'To ensure NASA delivers for the American people, we are continually evaluating mission lifecycles, not on sustaining outdated or lower-priority missions.'
In her resignation email to staff, Lystrup said she was leaving her post at Goddard with confidence in Cynthia Simmons, the current deputy center director who will take over on an interim basis, and 'the center leadership team, and all of you who will help shape the next chapter of this center.' Lystrup did not mention agency leadership. Her last day will be August 1.
Spokespeople at NASA headquarters and Goddard Space Flight Center did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Lystrup's resignation.
The signed letter is the most recent in a string of declarations rebuking proposed cuts and changes at other federal agencies.
Some National Institutes of Health employees led the way in June, publishing a declaration opposing what they called the politicization of research.
Another letter, signed by federal workers at the Environmental Protection Agency earlier this month, resulted in about 140 people being placed on administrative leave. At least some of those workers will remain on leave until at least August 1, 'pending the Agency's inquiry,' according to internal email correspondence obtained by CNN.
One signatory of the NASA letter who spoke to CNN said they felt that expressing dissent against the Trump administration may pose a risk to their livelihoods, but they believed the stakes were too high to remain silent.
Ella Kaplan, a contractor employed by Global Science and Technology Inc. and the website administrator for the NASA Scientific Visualization Studio, said she decided to publicly attach her name to the Voyager Declaration because 'the overall culture at NASA has very much shifted — and it feels a lot less safe for me.'
'That's been felt kind of universally by most minority employees at NASA,' Kaplan said.
While Kaplan said her job has not yet been directly threatened, in her view, 'I'm a member of the LGBT community … and I'm probably going to be fired for this at some point, so I might as well do as much community organizing as possible before that point.'
The letter and its signatories implore Duffy to evaluate recent policies they say 'have or threaten to waste public resources, compromise human safety, weaken national security, and undermine the core NASA mission.'
The declaration's criticism of changes to NASA's Technical Authority stem from statements made at an agency town hall in June. During that meeting, NASA executives said they planned to attempt to make the Technical Authority more 'efficient.'
'We're looking at: 'How do we do programs and projects more efficiently? And how much should we be spending on oversight?'' said Vanessa Wyche, NASA's acting associate administrator.
Garrett Reisman — a former NASA astronaut and engineer who later served as a SpaceX advisor — told CNN that he believes implementing some changes to the Technical Authority may be welcome. He noted that NASA may have become too risk averse in the wake of the Columbia tragedy, and the current structure may be hampering innovation.
But, Reisman said, any changes to the space agency's safety backstops need to be made with extreme care. And currently, he said, he does not trust that will happen.
'I have very little confidence that it will be done the right way,' Reisman, who signed the declaration, said. 'So far, this administration has used a very heavy hand with their attempts to remove bureaucracy — and what they've ended up doing is not making things more efficient, but just eliminating things.'
The signatories who spoke to CNN each expressed opposition to President Donald Trump's directives to shutter Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility — or DEIA — initiatives.
At NASA, leadership complied with Trump's executive order by shuttering a DEIA-focused branch, scrubbing pronouns from email signatures, and removing references to a pledge made during the president's previous term to land a woman and person of color on the moon for the first time. The space agency also shuttered employee groups that lent support to minority workers.
The source who spoke with CNN anonymously said that DEIA policies not only ensure a welcoming work environment — they're also essential to practicing sound science.
'The concept of inclusivity being a pathway to better science is something that has become really entrenched in the overall academic and scientific community in the last decade or so,' the source said, adding that the changes 'set an immediate tone for the destruction that was going to come.'
Among the other policies that the letter decries is the Trump administration's call for NASA to shutter some projects that have Congressional backing — a move the signatories say is wasteful and 'represents a permanent loss of capability to the United States both in space and on Earth.'
The NASA employee told CNN that leadership has already begun shutting down some facilities that the Trump administration put on the chopping block in its budget proposal, despite the fact that Congress appears poised to continue funding some of them.
'We've also been hearing repeatedly passed down from every level of management: No one is coming to save you; Congress is not coming to save you,' the source said. 'But it seems like Congress is moving towards an appropriations that's going to continue to fund our projects at approximately the same level.'
The source noted that they have first-hand knowledge of leadership beginning to decommission a clean room — a facility free of dust and debris where sensitive hardware and science instruments must be prepared for spaceflight — despite the fact that there are ongoing tests happening at the facility.
The Voyager Declaration also criticizes what it refers to as 'indiscriminate cuts' planned for the agency.
The White House's proposal to slash NASA's science budget by as much as half has been met with widespread condemnation from stakeholders who say such cuts threaten to cripple US leadership in the field.
Recent agency communication to staff has also noted that at least 3,000 staff members are taking deferred resignation offers, according to an internal memo, the authenticity of which was confirmed to CNN by two sources who had seen the communication.
Broader workforce cuts could also be on the horizon. NASA leadership under Petro also worked on an agency restructuring plan, though the details of that initiative have not yet been made public.
Other Trump-era changes denounced in the Voyager Declaration include directives to cancel contracts and grants that affect private-sector workers across the country and plans to pull the space agency out of some projects with international partners. The White House budget proposal calls for defunding dozens of projects, including the Lunar Gateway space station that the US would have worked on with space agencies in Canada, Europe, Japan and the United Arab Emirates.
The letter and its signatories argue these policies are wasteful, squandering investments that have been years or decades in the making.
'American taxpayers have invested a lot of money in my education and training directly,' the Goddard source said. 'I'm in it for the public service — and I want to return that investment to them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is redistricting? What to know in Tennessee amid Trump-led effort in Texas
What is redistricting? What to know in Tennessee amid Trump-led effort in Texas

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What is redistricting? What to know in Tennessee amid Trump-led effort in Texas

Texas's redistricting battle has spilled across state lines, drawing national attention and involving lawmakers from beyond its borders. In an effort to block a vote on a proposed congressional map that could give Republicans five additional seats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, dozens of Democratic lawmakers fled the state. In response, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ordered their arrest, though it's unclear how Texas law enforcement might coordinate with authorities in other states to carry out the order. As of Aug. 5, more than 50 of Texas' 67 Democratic legislators had fled the state, USA TODAY reported. The following day, on Aug. 6, former President Barack Obama weighed in, calling the Republican-led redistricting effort 'a power grab that undermines our democracy.' Here's what to know about the redistricting fight in Texas and how the process works in Tennessee. More: Texas Democrats fled the state to oppose GOP redistricting. Why this one stayed behind. What is redistricting? Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral districts, such as those for Congress and state legislatures, in each state. The process normally happens every 10 years after the U.S. Census to ensure each district has roughly the same number of people, so every vote carries equal weight. It affects congressional, state legislative districts and sometimes local districts. However, in a break from tradition, President Donald Trump encouraged Texas Republicans to begin redistricting mid-decade. During an Aug. 5 appearance on CNBC, he argued that Republicans 'are entitled to five more seats' in Texas due to his 2024 election win in the state. Each state is responsible for redrawing its district boundaries to reflect population changes and maintain equal representation across its allotted number of congressional seats. According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, redistricting has been "highly contentious" throughout American history. In the U.S., redistricting is mostly handled by state legislatures, making it a highly political process. Unlike many other countries that use independent, non-partisan commissions, the U.S. approach often leads to public distrust and partisan conflict. Because redistricting can shape which party holds power and how communities — especially minority groups — are represented, it's a major source of tension and debate. How Trump-led redistricting push in Texas is extending beyond state lines In July, Trump proposed a Texas redistricting plan that would yield five new Republican seats. The move was met with sharp criticism from Texas Democrats in Congress who labeled the move a "threat to democracy." If Trump's proposal moves forward, Republicans could gain additional U.S. House seats in Texas, potentially helping them preserve their narrow majority in the 2026 midterm elections. The plan would give the GOP a chance to flip key districts and strengthen their hold on Congress. On Aug. 4, several Democratic lawmakers fled Texas to prevent Republicans from reaching the quorum needed to vote on redrawing the state's 38 congressional districts. The Republican State Leadership Committee criticized the move, accusing the absent legislators of 'neglecting their responsibility,' reported USA TODAY. Many of the lawmakers traveled to the Chicago area, while others went to Boston, Massachusetts, and Albany, New York. Although Abbott ordered state law enforcement to arrest the Democrats who left, it remains unclear how Texas authorities could coordinate with out-of-state law enforcement to carry out the arrests. Abbott said the order is meant to enforce civil arrest warrants issued earlier that day by Republican lawmakers in an 85–6 vote. These warrants, however, only apply within Texas state lines. Democratic governors including Gavin Newsom of California, Kathy Hochul of New York and J.B. Pritzker of Illinois have signaled pursuing their own redistricting efforts, moves that could strengthen Democratic representation and escalate partisan tensions. How does redistricting work in Tennessee? In Tennessee, congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn by the state legislature. Following the 2020 census, Tennessee retained its nine seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, the same number it held after the 2010 census, according to Ballotpedia. On Feb,. 6, 2022, Gov. Bill Lee signed new congressional maps into law, approving a proposal passed by both chambers of the Tennessee legislature. The new map split Davidson County into three separate congressional districts, a move that diluted the county's Democratic and minority voting power, as previously reported by The Tennessean. Former U.S. Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Nashville, called the redistricting a 'crisis' for the city. 'Gerrymandering is an extinction event for the political life of Nashville,' he said. A group of Tennessee voters, including former state Sen. Brenda Gilmore, D-Nashville, later sued over the maps, alleging the redistricting effort intentionally discriminated against Black voters by diluting the voting power of communities of color. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2024 by a three judge panel, the Nashville Banner reported. Contributing: USA TODAY Diana Leyva covers trending news and service journalism for the Tennessean. Contact her at Dleyva@ or follow her on X at @_leyvadiana This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Texas redistricting battle: What to know about practice in Tennessee Solve the daily Crossword

"America, You Are In Grave Danger": The Internet Is VERY Worried About Donald Trump's Disturbing Latest Move
"America, You Are In Grave Danger": The Internet Is VERY Worried About Donald Trump's Disturbing Latest Move

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"America, You Are In Grave Danger": The Internet Is VERY Worried About Donald Trump's Disturbing Latest Move

The American public has grown increasingly concerned about President Donald Trump's moves toward authoritarianism and autocracy as he positions himself as being above the law and frequently mentions not leaving office at the end of his Constitutionally-granted second and final term. During a press conference on Monday morning, Trump announced a sweeping plan by his administration to increase its control over law enforcement in the United States capital city of Washington, DC. Washington, DC, is the capital city and the federal district of the US, but is not an incorporated state or part of one. Jurisdiction over DC belongs to Congress. He started the press conference with a comment on how crowded the room is, saying they need a ballroom instead. Attorney General Pam Bondi grinned along. Trump launches into the topic of the press conference. "And we're here for a very serious purpose. Very serious purpose. Something is out of control, but we're gonna put it in control very quickly, like we did on the southern border," he said. "I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor. And worse." Related: "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're gonna take our capital back," Trump said. "We're taking it back." He announced his plan: "Under the authorities vested in me as the president of the United States, I'm officially invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act — you know what that is — and placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control." "In addition, I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order, and public safety in Washington, DC and they're gonna be allowed to do their job properly," Trump continued. He then directly addressed the journalists in the room about the supposed crime hotbed of DC, saying, "You people are victims of it, too." President Trump then said that "The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Colombia, Mexico City, some of the places that you hear about as being the worst places on Earth," as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth nodded along. "The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled," Trump said. "Murders in 2023 reached the highest rate probably ever." "Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs, and homeless people. And we're not gonna let it happen anymore. We're not gonna take it," Trump told the crowd. He then repeated that the problem would be treated like the southern border, which he said "nobody comes to" anymore. For clarity, the Justice Department reported early this year that violent crime in Washington, DC, is down 35% from 2023. According to the DC Metropolitan Police Department, the very agency that Trump is seeking to federalize, violent crime is currently down 26% year-over-year. "We are not experiencing a spike in crime," DC mayor Muriel Bowser told MSNBC on Sunday. "In fact, we're watching our crime numbers go down." Related: Richard Stengel, author and former government official under President Barack Obama, said that, "Throughout history, autocrats use a false pretext to impose government control over local law enforcement as a prelude to a more national takeover." People quickly hopped on Reddit's r/politics to discuss the CNBC article about Trump's announcement (you can watch the full press conference here). This is what some of the over 3,000 commenters had to say: 1."Federalizing the DC Police under fake numbers... Literally watching fascism unfold before our eyes, people. It's past time to get pissed." —thedrizztman 2."I thought he said he couldn't deploy the National Guard on January 6? So now we know he could have, but didn't because it was his people." —swiftfoot_hiker 3."This is the big red flashing sign of fascism for anyone still wondering." —ImperatorUniversum1 Related: 4."Every word out of this MF'er's mouth is a LIE. EVERY WORD. Taking over DC is to keep protestors out because this administration's next actions will be brutal." —mhouse2001 5."Martial law in motion. MF didn't even bother to stage a Reichstag fire." —alloutofchewingum 6."Here we fucking go. And sweet Jesus, it's only August of year one..." —KingMario05 7."This is the death of the republic we're watching. Temporary takeovers have a very long history of becoming permanent. We're so fucked." —Violent_Mud_Butt 8."So, he could have done this to put down the insurrection at the Capitol?" —aeppelcyning 9."This is a pretext for something. His excuse is the homeless — what I really think he's preparing for are protests or maybe even riots. Maybe connected to the upcoming 'peace talks' with Russia, or the Epstein scandal." —rainghost 10."So that's it. No more freedom or rule of law in the US. And all the flag-waving Trump supporters don't care. Not a peep from them." —Large-Phase9732 11."So I assume DC residents won't be able to vote ever again." —V_T_H Related: 12."Full fucking stop. Yes, this is a distraction attempt from Epstein, among other things, but this is a pilot program for doing this in other major cities around America. This is the next step in a full fascist takeover of this country. But hey, eggs are... I mean, gas is... I mean, Kamala's laugh." —spqr2001 13."We are going to find out if the military is going to uphold their oath to defend us from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Trump is the biggest domestic terrorist I've seen in this country in my lifetime." —Ol_Turd_Fergy 14."That's it folks. Democracy in the US is now over. What a shameful country." —boringfantasy 15."Authoritarianism it is then, I guess." —Jonny_Segment 16."Correct me if I'm wrong, but I could have sworn that Trump had no authority to do this. I mean, that's what he said for January 6. He said that the Speaker of the House needs to make this call. Could he have been lying?" —dydski 17."Is this about homeless people? What is this about? Those National Guard are gonna be real sad when they realize a ton of the homeless individuals they are arresting are vets." —Resident_Standard437 finally, "America, you are in grave danger. An authoritarian is seizing power over the police, based on a made-up emergency. This is a precursor to stealing the elections. It's the only thing left between them and ruling forever. They are stealing our democracy and do not plan to give it back. And all of you are silent. The republic is dying, rapidly and right before our eyes, and nothing is being done to stop it." —kevendo So, what do you think? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Trump rebukes Goldman's Solomon and bank's economics research on tariff impact
Trump rebukes Goldman's Solomon and bank's economics research on tariff impact

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump rebukes Goldman's Solomon and bank's economics research on tariff impact

(Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday consumers are not paying the costs of tariffs, countering a recent Goldman Sachs' research division estimate that they had absorbed 22% of the costs through June. "It has been shown that for the most part, consumers aren't even paying these tariffs, it is mostly companies and governments, many of them foreign picking up the tabs," Trump wrote in a post on social media platform Truth Social. "But David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due." Trump did not specifically mention which Goldman report he was referring to. The Wall Street investment bank declined to comment on the matter. U.S. consumers had absorbed 22% of tariff costs through June and their share will rise to 67% if the recent tariffs follow the same pattern as the earliest ones, Goldman Sachs Economics Research said in a note published on August 10. "This implies that U.S. businesses have absorbed more than half of the tariff costs so far but that their share will fall to less than 10%," analysts led by Jan Hatzius said. Hatzius did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Since February 1, when Trump kicked off trade wars by slapping levies on imports from Mexico, Canada and China, at least 333 companies worldwide have reacted to the tariffs in some manner, as of August 12, according to a Reuters tracker. Tariffs are taxes levied on imported goods to typically protect domestic industries or influence trade policies. Its financial impact can be distributed among manufacturers, retailers and consumers, depending on market conditions and supply-chain dynamics. Economists continue to study how much of the tariff cost is ultimately passed on to consumers through higher prices. Meanwhile, Trump has also been vocal about his complaints concerning corporate policies and operations since he took office in January. He met Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan on Monday, days after seeking his resignation. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store