Deadline looms as nations remain divided on global plastic pollution treaty
While plastic has transformed modern life, plastic pollution poses an increasing threat to the environment and the human body - and every day the garbage accumulates on land and in the oceans.
The 184 countries meeting at the United Nations to sculpt a first international accord setting out the way forward return to the negotiating table after a day off Sunday to reflect on their differences.
The first week of talks in Geneva fell behind schedule and failed to produce a clear text, with states still deeply divided at square one: the purpose and scope of the treaty they started negotiating two and a half years ago.
Delegates at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Photo: EPA
Last week, working groups met on technical topics ranging from the design of plastic to waste management, production, financing for recycling, plastic reuse, and funding waste collection in developing countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China accuses US of using ‘lies as pretext for seeking control' of Panama Canal
China has clashed with the United States in a UN session over the Panama Canal , a flash point in bilateral ties under the Trump administration, while accusing Washington of being 'the biggest disrupter of peace and stability' in the South China Sea. 'China has always respected the permanent neutrality of the canal and firmly supports Panama in safeguarding its sovereignty over the canal to ensure its openness and smooth operation,' Fu Cong, China's ambassador to the United Nations, told the meeting, chaired by Panama's President José Raúl Mulino, on Monday. Acting US ambassador Dorothy Shea spoke afterwards about concerns regarding China's 'outsized influence' over the Panama Canal, especially over critical infrastructure and port operations. She also called China's influence a 'risk to Panama and the US' and a 'potential threat to global trade and security'. 10:37 Why the US is worried about China's growing influence in South America Why the US is worried about China's growing influence in South America 'China's expansive and unlawful maritime claims and aggressive actions demonstrate its threat to maritime security and commerce,' Shea said, alluding to the South China Sea. In response to Shea's remarks, Fu condemned what he called 'unwarranted accusations' against China. 'The US fabrication of lies and groundless attacks against China are nothing but a pretext for seeking control of the canal,' he said. 'It has openly threatened the normal operation of the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal, and has wantonly challenged the sovereignty of other states … We urge the United States to do some serious soul searching and to assume in good faith responsibilities as a major country.' US President Donald Trump has claimed without proof that China secretly controls the canal, and he has threatened to 'take back' the waterway, which was built by the US in the 1900s but returned to Panama in 1999.
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump deploying National Guard in Washington
We use cookies to tailor your experience and present relevant ads. By clicking '', you agree that cookies can be placed per our Privacy Policy
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
India must learn the lessons of US trade deal failure
The failure of trade negotiations between India and the United States after five intense rounds of talks marks a critical moment in the bilateral relationship between the two nations. The US tariff on Indian goods now stands at an eye-watering 50 per cent – 25 per cent effective from August 7, and a further 25 per cent levied to penalise India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The additional tariff, announced last week, is expected to take effect on August 27. With bilateral trade valued at over US$190 billion and India's ambition to increase it to US$500 billion by 2030, both sides will have much to lose as the stand-off escalates. India, one of the world's fastest-growing economies, offers an enticing market of 1.4 billion people, while the US, the world's largest economy, wields significant influence in setting global trade standards. The breakdown of negotiations reveals vulnerabilities in both sides' negotiation strategies, political miscalculations and the impact of broader geopolitical factors. Lessons must be learned if the relationship is to be mended. The negotiation process had begun with optimism. Indian officials, encouraged by US President Donald Trump's statements about a potential 'big' deal, were confident they could secure a rate of 10 to 15 per cent while eliminating tariffs on steel, aluminium and automotive products, according to a Reuters report. These moves reflected India's confidence as an emerging economic power with strong bargaining leverage. However, this confidence proved to be a double-edged sword. Trump's statements, interpreted as positive signals, prompted India to harden its stance, Reuters said.
