Police's disposal of miners' strike documents ‘deeply worrying'
Lucy Powell said anyone involved in the strikes 'must retain the records' and come forward with information when asked to, after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns in the Commons.
In its manifesto, the Labour Party pledged to ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, 'that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'.
The violent confrontation in June 1984 outside a coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, led to many miners being injured and arrested, although their trials later collapsed.
Speaking during business questions, Mr Lavery said it was 'extremely disturbing news that Northumbria Police has destroyed all documents relating to the miners' strike, including Orgreave'.
The MP for Blyth and Ashington said: 'It is absolutely alarming.
'The Labour Government have pledged an inquiry through investigation into these events, yet the wanton destruction of this vital and critical evidence has been allowed to happen.
'Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question.
'Who gave the permission to destroy these documents and what's behind it?
'Can we have an urgent debate into how the Government can instruct all police forces, all authorities, everyone that holds any detail on the miners' strike and on Orgreave (to) make sure that they retain and maintain that evidence, for when the Labour Government maintains its pledge for an inquiry into the events that happened in 1984.
'Because justice cannot be served if the evidence is systematically and deliberately destroyed.'
Ms Powell replied: 'This sounds like a deeply, deeply worrying development in this case, and I am sure the whole House will be shocked to hear it.
'He has campaigned for justice and for answers in relation to what happened at Orgreave, 41 years ago, raised it with me last week. I will continue to raise that with ministers on his behalf.
'And I would join him in saying to people, anyone involved, that they must retain the records and they must come forward, as they would be expected to do when those questions are asked, with every bit of information they've got on what happened.'
News of the destroyed boxes came to light following a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the Guardian reports.
A Northumbria Police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a few seconds ago
- BBC News
More than 11,000 no-fault bailiff evictions in past year, figures show
More than 11,000 households in England have had their homes repossessed by bailiffs following a no-fault eviction process since last year when the Labour government came into its manifesto, Labour promised to "immediately abolish" Section 21, also known as no-fault, evictions which allow landlords to remove tenants without a reason. A bill ending the practice was announced last year and is expected to become law when Parliament returns from its summer charity Shelter said it was "unconscionable" that "renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the government said would be scrapped immediately". A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: "No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill."We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the bill becomes law."The Renters' Rights Bill will introduce a new system giving new tenants a 12-month "protected period" where they cannot be evicted if the landlord wants to move in or sell the can still get rid of tenants for other reasons including non-payment of rent or criminal behaviour by the tenants. After the first year, landlords would have to give tenants four months' notice to leave, doubling the current time period, and provide a specific reason for ending a tenancy. In September, Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook had said he hoped the bill would be passed "within the first half or around summer next year". However, when Parliament paused for the summer, the bill had just been passed by the House of Lords, albeit with some changes September, the House of Commons will debate and vote on the changes. Both houses of Parliament will need to approve the bill before it can become law. In the latest figures, released by the Ministry of Justice, the number of repossessions by a county court bailiff following a no fault eviction rose from 10,576 between July 2023 and June 2024 to 11,402 the following represents an increase of 8%, a more modest rise compared to the previous two years which saw jumps of 29% and 60% if a tenant doesn't leave a property by a specified date, a landlord can make a possession claim to the courts, with an accelerated procedure, which could lead to a the year to June, there were 30,729 claims, a 4% decrease on the previous 12-month period. Mairi MacRae, Shelter's director of campaigns and policy, said: "To curb record homelessness and ensure renters can live free from the threat of no-fault eviction, the government must deliver on this commitment, pass the bill, and name an implementation date when Section 21 will finally be scrapped."The charity said around 950 households could be evicted for every month a ban is delayed. The National Residential Landlords Association echoed Shelter's demands for the government to set a date when the changes would come into said a "lack of certainty" had "led to a great deal of confusion and concern amongst landlords".The association also noted a rise of more than two weeks in the length of the court process for recovering properties over the past year.A spokesperson added it was "essential that we have clarity about what support will be given to the courts service to ensure it is able to cope with the added pressures which will be created by these reforms". Earlier this month, the homelessness minister Rushanara Ali was forced to resign after revelations about how she handled a property she was renting out. The i newspaper reported that a former tenant of Ali's had been sent an email in November giving four months' notice the lease would not be said shortly after she and the three other tenants had moved out, the house in east London had been re-listed at a rent £700 a month higher, in a practice that would be banned under the Renters' Rights bill would prevent landlords from re-listing a property for rent, if they have ended a tenancy in order to sell, for six months.
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Council is forced to ditch plans to slap 20 per cent 'fat tax' on wider burial plots after facing a furious backlash
A Labour-run council has been forced to ditch plans to impose a 20 per cent 'fat tax' on wider burial plots after facing a furious backlash. The embarrassing U-turn comes after the City of Wolverhampton Council was accused of 'discrimination' against larger people and a 'lack of empathy' towards grieving families. The premium which was given the go ahead in May would mean a 6ft-wide plot at Danescourt Cemetery in Tettenhall, Wolverhampton would cost families £2,700 - a hefty 20 per cent premium on the cost of a standard 5ft grave. However, after facing criticism over the move, a spokesperson for the council said 'we have decided not to proceed with the plans'. Ross Hickton, of Hickton Family Funeral Directors in the West Midlands, said the 'fat tax' would 'push more people into funeral poverty'. 'If you live in Wolverhampton, you have the right to be buried here without extra costs. 'You shouldn't be paying a premium for a basic right. It shows a lack of empathy for what a family goes through.' Danescourt Cemetery in Tettenhall was due to charge families £2,700 to buy a 6ft wide plot, a 20 per cent increase on the cost of a standard 5ft grave The council said it had considered the extra charge after an increase in demand for larger graves Mr Hickton claimed that the local authority, which has also increased its council tax by the maximum 4.99 per cent, failed to consult the public on the move. 'Wolverhampton passed this under the radar. If you've paid into the system your whole life, through council tax and income tax, you shouldn't be forced to pay an additional 20pc tax,' he added. The council had told the BBC that the extra charge was needed after an increase in demand for larger graves. Rosemarie McLaren who is from Wolverhampton said it was a form of 'discrimination' and that it was 'not acceptable' 'Someone like me who's a bit bigger, is going to be charged [more] because I'm fat,' she added. The city has higher than normal obesity rates of 33.3 per cent, compared with the national average of 25.9 per cent, according to a 2021 survey. A spokesperson said the local authority contacted 25 funeral directors serving the city and 10 responded with only one objection. The council said the extra costs reflected 'the increased costs incurred in providing them, including disposing of the additional soil'. 'Many other local councils, including Birmingham and Walsall, charge higher fees for larger graves', the spokesperson added. However, a City of Wolverhampton Council spokesperson told the Mail this afternoon: 'No formal decision was ever taken on plans to charge more for larger burial plots. 'This is a common practice taken by councils around the country where higher charges cover the costs of providing a larger plot. 'However, while under consideration, we have decided not to proceed with the plans.' The BBC found that a third of 27 local authorities in the West Midlands charged more for wider graves including Telford, Birmingham, Walsall, Coventry and Staffordshire. Houghton Regis Town Council in Bedfordshire was one of the first council's to introduce higher prices for larger coffins by doubling fees back in 2009 taking the cost from £364 to £728. It's website states: 'Where the coffin width is such that the burial encroaches into the next available burial plot, such that it cannot be used, the above fees will be increased by 50per cent.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
More than 100 migrants in one vessel thought to have bumped crossings to 27,799
Authorities intercepted a 10 metre-long craft with 106 people on board, trying to cross the English Channel. A Government spokesperson said it was 'pure chance' that the 'grossly overcrowded' soft-bottomed taxi boat survived for more than 15 hours at sea. Home Office figures show 325 migrants crossed between mainland Europe and Britain by small boat on Wednesday, in the same week that the number of arrivals since Labour won the election hit 50,000. 'We intercepted a 10m soft-bottomed vessel transporting 106 people across the Channel illegally,' the spokesperson said. 'It is a matter of pure chance that this grossly overcrowded taxi boat survived more than 15 hours at sea, and it again shows the complete disregard people smugglers have for whether people live or die. 'We will stop at nothing to dismantle the business models of those smuggling gangs and bring them to justice.' According to the Government, migrants have attempted the journey on similar sized vessels, including during three crossings since last October where between 96 and 98 people were detected on board. But a small boat carrying 112 migrants capsized in the sea in April 2024, resulting in the deaths of five people, including a seven-year-old girl. 'This latest incident also shows the importance of the agreement we have reached with the French authorities to review their maritime enforcement tactics, so that they are able for the first time to intercept boats in shallow waters and prevent taxi boats from parking offshore to collect large numbers of migrants unhindered,' the spokesperson added. (PA Graphics) Authorities have begun detaining migrants under the UK's 'one in, one out' deal with France this month. As part of the agreement, migrants who risk a small boat crossing face being taken to France, and the UK will take in an approved asylum seeker from the continent via a safe route. The Home Office spokesperson said: 'Through international intelligence sharing under our Border Security Command, enhanced enforcement operations in northern France, and tougher legislation in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, we are strengthening our ability to identify, disrupt and dismantle the gangs.' A total of 51,041 migrants have been detected crossing the Channel since Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer entered No 10 on July 5 last year.
