logo
Euthanasia activist arrested over 'suicide pod' dies

Euthanasia activist arrested over 'suicide pod' dies

BBC News03-06-2025
A pro-euthanasia activist who was arrested following the death of a woman using the world's first so-called suicide pod has died.Dr Florian Willet, 47, was reportedly the only other person present when a 64-year-old American woman took her own life using the device in a forest in Switzerland last September.The pod's inventor Philip Nitschke told BBC News that Dr Willet died by assisted suicide in Germany.In a separate statement, Mr Nitschke said Dr Willet had suffered psychological trauma following his arrest and detention in connection with the Switzerland death.
If you are experiencing any of the issues mentioned in this story you can visit BBC Action Line for a list of websites and helplines that can offer direct help at any time.
"In the final months of his life, Dr Florian Willet shouldered more than any man should," he said.The Last Resort - an assisted dying organisation founded by Dr Willet to facilitate the use of the pod - said the arrest had left him "broken".The activist was held in pre-trial detention for 70 days while police investigated whether he had intentionally killed the woman - an allegation he was not charged with.Prior to his death on 5 May, Dr Willet fell from a third-floor window, the group said, leaving him requiring surgery and needing to be "cared for by a full psychiatric team".While assisted dying is legally protected in some circumstances in Switzerland, it is strictly regulated, and the pod has encountered opposition.Advocates say the device - manufactured by Sarco - provides an assisted dying option which is not reliant on drugs or doctors and expands potential access. Critics fear the device's modern design glamorises suicide, and that the fact that it can be operated without medical oversight is concerning.Assisted dying is illegal in the UK and in most other European countries, but thousands have travelled to Switzerland over the years to end their own lives.BBC News has contacted the Swiss prosecutor's office for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Review of child hip surgery cases won't begin until January, HSE confirms
Review of child hip surgery cases won't begin until January, HSE confirms

BreakingNews.ie

time20 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Review of child hip surgery cases won't begin until January, HSE confirms

A review of the individual cases of children who may have undergone unnecessary hip surgeries will not take place until January, the HSE has confirmed. It comes after a clinical audit of surgeries for dysplasia of the hips in children found that a lower threshold for operations was used at CHI Temple Street hospital and the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh (NOHC) than the threshold used at CHI Crumlin. Advertisement The review discovered that in the period 2021 to 2023, almost 80 per cent of children operated on at the NOHC, and 60 per cent of those at Temple Street, did not meet the threshold for surgery. In a statement, the HSE said an expert review is being commissioned and the independent panel will be convened to review patient files 'to determine, in so far as possible, the appropriateness of the original decision to operate in individual cases'. It said this would be based on the 'appropriate radiological indices and clinical history' of the cases. An international call for experts to apply for the panel closed on Friday and saw submissions from Ireland, the UK, the US, Canada, Asia, and other parts of Europe. Advertisement The HSE said these submissions will be subject to a shortlisting and recruitment process prior to the formal announcement of the panel, which is expected to convene in September. It is also negotiating terms and conditions for an independent international expert to chair the panel who has already been identified, adding that their name will be published 'in due course'. The HSE added: 'It is expected that the review of individual cases will commence in January. This timeline reflects the complexity of the work involved and the need to ensure a rigorous and comprehensive approach. 'This is a highly complex piece of work that requires sufficient time for planning and preparation. As such the following steps are in progress.' Advertisement The HSE said it had 'engaged meaningfully with patient advocates' and a workshop is being scheduled to progress terms of reference for the review. The Hip Dysplasia Advocacy Group, acting for children who may have undergone unnecessary surgeries, met CHI and HSE officials last Thursday. It said it was told the HSE is aiming for a six-month timeframe for the process. In a statement, it said: 'There has yet to be any correspondence surrounding the retrospective review from the HSE to the families of the children who are potentially affected. Advertisement 'We, the advocacy group, relayed this information to the families immediately post our meeting. Representatives from the Hip Dysplasia Advocacy Group said that this is unacceptable. 'There needs to be full transparency between the HSE and the families regarding these reviews, everyone is left completely in the dark.' Ireland Tánaiste agrees to meet parents of boy who died af... Read More It added that the HSE is yet to confirm the criteria it will use to assess the children's need for surgery. 'A member from the HSE has suggested it will be determined by the expert panel when they are appointed. Advertisement 'We have asked for the HSE to issue an update to all families involved as the lack of correspondence to parents is unacceptable. They have been left in limbo.'

‘I was on a cocktail of antidepressants and prescription drugs. It nearly cost me my sanity'
‘I was on a cocktail of antidepressants and prescription drugs. It nearly cost me my sanity'

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘I was on a cocktail of antidepressants and prescription drugs. It nearly cost me my sanity'

As a junior doctor in her mid-thirties, working an average of 80 hours a week while raising young children, Cathy Wield found herself both burnt out and attempting to deal with suppressed childhood trauma. 'As a child, my parents lived overseas, and I was sent away to boarding school from the age of nine,' recalls Wield, now 65. 'I hated it, and managed to bury the memories of what was a very difficult and traumatic time for me. But when my eldest child won a place at the Royal Ballet School, it meant she would be boarding. I was already exhausted and memories from my childhood started to surface.' Feeling she was in the midst of an emotional crisis, Wield booked a GP appointment. Little did she know that this would precipitate a cascade of dozens of prescription medicines for more than two decades, and as detailed in a memoir, Unshackled Mind, it would ultimately leave her with permanent thyroid and nerve damage. It began initially with a simple antidepressant. But this pill led to suicidal ideations – a known risk in some people who take SSRI medications – and following a spell in hospital, Wield found herself being prescribed dozens of drug cocktails at a time, from antidepressants to antipsychotics and sleeping pills. Her prescription records reveal that over a seven year period, she was prescribed 33 different psychiatric medications. In the throes of side effects which left her barely able to function, Wield was in no position to question the treatment she was getting. 'I was a zombie,' says Wield. 'The side effects were unbelievable. I lost my sexual function because of the drugs and just felt totally numb most of the time, but when I reported these symptoms, I was just told, 'Oh no, that's your depression.' I experienced weight gain, constipation, a condition called postural hypertension which means dizziness when getting out of a chair. I had several head injuries as a result of that. But no doctor at any stage during these years looked and said, 'The problem is the drugs.' It just never entered their heads.' Wield's case is a particularly acute example of the problems of polypharmacy, when people are prescribed more than five different medications at the same time. The issue has been highlighted through studies which have linked polypharmacy to a greater risk of hospitalisation, adverse drug reactions, falls, and reduced quality of life. In one paper, focusing on Liverpool University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, adverse reactions to prescription medications were a cause of 16.5 per cent of all admissions, with researchers suggesting that the problem could be costing the NHS as much as £2 billion per year. 'We have seen a significant increase in the number of treatments prescribed over the previous two decades,' says Dula Alicehajic-Becic, a consultant NHS pharmacist. 'In England alone, more than one million people take 10 or more medications per day.' So why does this happen? The risks of taking too many pills Wield says that all the years of medication have left her with a permanently damaged thyroid due to treatment with lithium, a drug commonly prescribed for mood disorders, as well as small fibre neuropathy, chronic damage to the small nerve fibres which branch out from the brain and spinal cord to the rest of the body. She says that it manifests as a painful, burning sensation in her feet. 'My feet burn if they're warmed,' she says. 'So through the hot summer I have to put them in bowls of cold water, and I have to use ice slippers during the night which I keep in a freezer near the bed.' According to NHS psychiatrist Dr Louise Bundock, who works at the UK's only drug deprescribing clinic, helping stop medications they no longer need, adverse effects relating to mental health medications that mimic psychiatric symptoms are often perceived as the patient's condition worsening, prompting the prescribing of yet more drugs. 'In the worst cases they end up on multiple medications with multiple new psychiatric diagnoses, sometimes being admitted to a psychiatric hospital, and significant effects on their ability to function in all areas of their life, losing jobs, losing relationships and unable to take part in life in the way they did previously,' says Bundock. 'Often the individual themselves believe that they have become very mentally unwell, sometimes for decades.' Polypharmacy has also been identified as a specific risk in older adults over the age of 65. While more than half of people in this age group have at least two medical conditions meaning medicines are necessary, too many pills can increase risk of dizziness, sudden drops in blood pressure when a person stands up, and confusion, which can all lead to falls and fractures. According to Deborah Gompertz, a GP and deputy honorary secretary of the British Geriatrics Society, the balance can be delicate as older people metabolise medications less well, as their kidneys and liver may be less adept at excreting them, meaning they can be more affected by certain drugs. 'We want to optimise the treatment of their long-term conditions, keeping them safe, and helping them to live independently in the community, while still minimising risk of falls, hospitalisation, and potentially death,' she says. How many prescription pills is too many? Researchers and clinicians are keen to emphasise that in many cases, a drug cocktail is both appropriate and necessary. For example, the recommended treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder is a 'triple therapy' of three inhaled medications. However, there are some classes of prescription pills which carry greater risks, such as sedatives and anticholinergic drugs, particularly when people are taking more than five medicines. Anticholinergics can be prescribed for everything from overactive bladder to managing symptoms of Parkinson's disease. 'The higher the anticholinergic burden, the more at risk you are from a fall or confusion,' says Gompertz. For people taking psychiatric medications, Bundock says it is also key to be aware that symptoms such as increased anxiety, worsening low mood, obsessive and compulsive behaviours, suicidal thoughts and even hallucinations can actually be side effects of mental health medications such as antidepressants or sleeping tablets. Why is overprescribing happening? The good news is that overprescribing has been recognised nationally as a problem, but the reasons for it are multi-faceted and complex. Alicehajic-Becic suggests that some clinicians may overestimate the benefits and underestimate the risks of certain medications, while the increasing prevalence of over 65s with multiple health conditions can make it difficult for doctors to strike the balance of trying to manage chronic illnesses while keeping medication load manageable. Gompertz points out that some patients question why a doctor is removing one of their medications or reluctant to prescribe them an additional pill, often assuming that it is due to cost saving rather than concerns of side effects. Alicehajic-Becic says that the issue can also occur because older people with more than one health condition can be seeing multiple consultants. 'Health records are also not uniformly shared, hence information pertinent to a new prescription may not be available in real time,' she says. 'Payments are also given to providers to achieve a certain target, such as cholesterol lowering, which incentivises prescribing.' However when it comes to mental health, Wield feels that doctors need to stop being so quick to medicalise what she describes as 'normal distress'. 'When I look back to that first time when I sought help from the GP, I just needed time to recuperate,' she says. 'I was overwhelmed, overtired and I just needed support, and I wanted to talk to somebody. If I'd had simple talking therapy, I think I would have been fine. Instead, it's cost the NHS a huge amount of money and resources, and personally impacted myself, my family, and my career.' What can you do? Gompertz says that anyone taking multiple medications should be having a structured medicine review at least every six to 12 months, but in some cases, for example medicines like blood thinners, a review should be carried out on a three monthly basis. 'It's something that adult children with an elderly parent can be aware of,' she says. 'If you notice that your mum and dad have got a build-up of their medication at home, it could be an idea to talk to whoever's prescribing those medications for your parents. And if the person themselves feels they're getting side effects or not tolerating them, it's important to have that conversation.' When it comes to psychiatric medications, Bundock advises people to be aware of the possible side effects listed in the accompanying leaflets in the medication box, provided by the drug company. For people who have been on a number of these drugs for a period of time, it is also important not to stop them too abruptly. 'The longer someone has been on a mental health medication, the more important it becomes for it to be stopped slowly,' she says. 'Because there is the possibility of injury to the nervous system from these medications being stopped too fast.' Wield has now been mostly medication-free since 2018. These days she only takes three pills – a hypertension drug, a hayfever tablet and thyroid hormone replacement drug called levothyroxine. But decades of inappropriate polypharmacy have had a lasting impact on her life. 'I'm very fortunate that my husband stuck with me, because it was very, very difficult for our children growing up to have their mother in that state. And with my career, I did manage to return to work and become a specialist in emergency medicine, but I was not able to complete my training and progress to become a consultant. So it's had a huge impact on us financially as well.' Despite her experience, Wield says she's not interested in blaming any individuals for what happened to her, but she is determined to keep raising awareness to try and drive greater systemic change. 'It's driven me to become an activist to try and stop this happening to anybody else,' she says. 'I really do think the prescribing system and doctor's training needs to be addressed so that this doesn't happen to other people.'

Man (26) accused of €17,000 bank thefts and having personal data of victims
Man (26) accused of €17,000 bank thefts and having personal data of victims

BreakingNews.ie

time20 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Man (26) accused of €17,000 bank thefts and having personal data of victims

A man is to stand trial for theft valued at more than €17,000 from two bank accounts and possessing a memory storage device with personal information on money laundering victims in Dublin. Joelle Mopiti (26), of Brookview Avenue, Tallaght, appeared at Dublin District Court on Tuesday following an investigation by the Garda National Economic Crime Bureau (GNECB). Advertisement He faces more than 30 charges, mainly for thefts from a man's and a woman's separate AIB accounts, stealing their bank cards, money laundering, and using a false instrument in 2020 and 2021. It is also alleged that he used the man's cards to withdraw cash in varying sums, make purchases of goods in shops and a fast food restaurant, and spend €5,000 on iPhones in stores in Dublin. It is alleged he took out a €3,500 loan in that injured party's name. He is also accused of having €7,000 in proceeds of crime in a Bank of Ireland and an An Post account. Advertisement According to the charges, he stole €4,200 from the woman's account. One charge alleges he aided, abetted, counselled or procured the commission of an offence by possessing a USB storage device which had the personal banking information of individuals who were victims of money laundering. It is also alleged that at an address in Clonsilla, Dublin, he used a false instrument, a fake AIB document. The charges are under the Theft and Fraud Act and the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering & Terrorist Financing) Act 2010. Advertisement Ireland Man (41) accused of threatening to burn down woman... Read More He appeared before Judge Cephas Power at Dublin District Court yesterday/today when Detective Garda Michael Harney said Mr Mopiti made no reply to the charges. The GNECB officer said the Director of Public Prosecutions has directed trial on indictment in the Circuit Court. No plea was entered by Mr Mopiti, who did not address the court. There was no objection to bail with conditions; Judge Power ordered unemployed Mr Mopiti to sign on at his local Garda station three days a week, surrender his passport and not apply for other travel documents and to remain contactable on a phone number he has already supplied to gardaí. Judge Power adjourned the case for prosecutors to prepare a book of evidence and ordered the accused to appear again on September 22nd. Legal aid was granted after the judge noted the man was on social welfare.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store