Trump to send weapons to Ukraine, threatens secondary sanctions on Russia in 50 days
KYIV/WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine on Monday, and threatened to hit buyers of Russian exports with sanctions unless Russia agrees a peace deal in 50 days, a major shift in policy brought on by disappointment with Moscow.
Sitting side-by-side with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters that he was disappointed in Russian President Vladimir Putin. Billions of dollars in weapons would be distributed to Ukraine, he said.
"We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO," Trump said, adding that Washington's NATO allies would pay for the weapons.
The weapons would include Patriot air defence missiles which Ukraine has urgently sought to defend its cities from Russian air strikes.
"It's a full complement with the batteries," Trump said when asked whether he would send Patriot missiles specifically.
"We're going to have some come very soon, within days... a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have."
"We're going to be doing secondary tariffs. If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100%," Trump said.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun
Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3
Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA
Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder
Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean
Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges
Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack
Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat
A White House official said Trump was referring to 100% tariffs on Russian exports as well as so-called secondary sanctions, which target third countries that buy a country's exports.
Such secondary sanctions are widely seen as likely to have a far more severe impact on Russia's economy than measures that have been imposed previously, which have allowed Russia to continue selling oil to buyers such as China and India, earning hundreds of billions of dollars. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
12 minutes ago
- Business Times
South Korea exports rise at fastest in 7 months before higher US tariffs kick in
[SEOUL] South Korea's exports rose for the second straight month in July, beating market expectations on strong chip demand and shipments being moved forward ahead of higher US tariffs, which are expected to weigh in the second half of the year. Exports from Asia's fourth-largest economy, an early bellwether for global trade, rose 5.9 per cent from the same month last year to US$60.82 billion, trade data showed on Friday, higher than the 4.3 per cent increase in June and the strongest since December 2024. The figure beat a median 4.6 per cent rise forecast for July in a Reuters poll of economists, who also noted signs of front-loading shipments ahead of an Aug 1 deadline for higher US tariffs. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10 per cent to 41 per cent on US imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations. With South Korea, Trump announced a trade deal on Wednesday setting tariffs at 15 per cent, lower than a threatened 25 per cent but higher than the current 10 per cent, which officials, companies and economists cheered for reducing uncertainty over the trade environment. 'Despite the trade deal, demand is still expected to weaken from August as overall tariff rates will increase,' said Lee Jeong Hoon, an economist at Eugene Investment Securities. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Demand for artificial intelligence, however, will continue to be strong, while that for automobiles is growing in non-US markets.' A separate business survey showed on Friday South Korea's factory activity contracted for the sixth straight month in July, as uncertainty over US tariffs weighed on output and orders. The trade-reliant economy grew at the fastest pace in more than a year in the second quarter, buoyed by rebounding consumer spending and a surge in exports driven by demand for technology. Exports of semiconductors jumped 39.3 per cent in July, the biggest annual increase since October 2024, while cars rose by a five-month high of 8.8 per cent on robust demand in non-US markets such as Europe. Ship exports surged 107.6 per cent. By destination, shipments to the US rose 1.4 per cent, after three straight months of declines, as growing technology demand offset the impact of Trump's tariffs on steel and auto parts. Exports to China fell 3.0 per cent, while those to the European Union rose 8.7 per cent. Imports rose 0.7 per cent in July to US$54.21 billion, compared with a gain of 4.3 per cent in June and 2.0 per cent expected by economists. The monthly trade balance stood at a surplus of US$6.61 billion, narrower than the previous month's US$9.08 billion, which was the biggest since September 2018. REUTERS
Asia News Network
15 minutes ago
- Asia News Network
US President Trump's trade deal may present geopolitical challenges for Indonesia: analysts
August 1, 2025 JAKARTA – A celebratory and hopeful tone has been raised over the United States' decision to lower Indonesia's trade tariff to 19 percent, but analysts have warned that the country may still face tricky situations ahead as nonaligned Jakarta works to rebalance ties with other key economic partners. Indonesia's ambition to be less reliant on volatile superpowers could be challenged by its new obligation to purchase more American goods, observers have added, who also warned that the decision to significantly lower trade barriers for Washington may ruffle feathers among other key partners if not managed properly. Countries around the world are wrapping up their trade negotiations with Trump ahead of his Aug. 1 deadline for enforcing his so-called 'reciprocal tariff' policy. Some have finalized the trade agreement in the past weeks, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan and Vietnam. On July 15, US President Donald Trump announced a 19-percent tariff for Indonesia, significantly below the 32 percent level he threatened earlier. As part of the deal, Trump added that Indonesia agreed to purchase US$15 billion in oil and gas, $4.5 billion in agricultural products and 50 Boeing jets. Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) economist Dandy Rafitrandi suggested that the geopolitical repercussions have already appeared. 'I think, […] we can already tell that the [deal] carries quite a heavy weight because of its non-optional nature and other consequences,' he told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday. Indonesia was granted a lower levy at 19 percent following what Indonesian negotiators described as an 'extraordinary struggle' to reach a fairer deal with Trump. The 19-percent rate, which is the lowest Washington has extended to any country in Southeast Asia so far, may come at a cost, as Indonesia is required to commit to major US purchases and be willing to remove all nontariff barriers for US imports to grant further ease of access for American companies. Included in the list of nontariff barriers to be removed are import restrictions, licensing requirements on US remanufactured goods or parts and local content requirements. The government has so far welcomed the deal with a positive tone, with president Prabowo Subianto affirming his commitment to usher in a 'new era of mutual benefit between two great nations'. The Office of the Coordinating Economic Minister also hailed the deal as a 'huge win for Indonesia's labor-intensive industries', calling it a 'strategic achievement', as quoted in a statement issued earlier this month. Keeping everybody happy? But questions started to emerge over how Indonesia plans to fulfill its pledge to purchase more US goods given its limited fiscal space and longstanding partnerships with several countries over certain commodities. Concerns were also raised over Jakarta's nonaligned stance and growing ambition to deepen ties with alternative partners. Indonesia's obligation to, for example, purchase 50 Boeing planes from the US may consolidate the latter's position as its key aircraft supplier and reduce future orders from alternative companies such as French aircraft manufacturer Airbus. Provisions in the deal may make Indonesia more dependent on the US, making the agreement an obvious victory for Washington, according to international relations expert Ahmad Rizky M. Umar of Aberystwyth University. 'Indonesia has no choice but to buy these goods, which may cost more,' Ahmad said. 'This is also counterproductive to Jakarta's recent efforts to diversify its trading partners, including by finalizing the comprehensive economic partnership agreement with the EU [IEU-CEPA] earlier this month,' he went on to say, referring to the long-awaited deal with the EU to open wider market access. During its months-long negotiations with Washington, Indonesia, which has chosen to cooperate with the US, has at the same time intensified its efforts to strengthen its ties with alternative trading partners, seeking to buffer itself from the uncertainty of the US' increasingly unilateral trade moves. President Prabowo has traveled to at least 14 countries across the Middle East, Southeast Asia and Europe since Trump's tariff announcement in April, which observers say were efforts to intensify Jakarta's economic partnerships amid tariff uncertainties. Yet, as Indonesia becomes increasingly reliant on the US for trade, its alternative partnerships could face challenges because of shifting constellations in economic ties. CSIS economist Dandy compared the deal with Trump with the IEU-CEPA: 'It took the EU a decade to score a zero-tariff deal with Indonesia, while Trump took weeks.' 'We have also now relaxed local content requirements for US imports. Our other trade partners will also want the same perk, and it will be a challenge for Indonesia to keep everyone happy.'
Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘Clinton Plan' e-mails were likely made by Russian spies, new documents show
Evidence that undermines the theory that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame US President Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election has been declassified. WASHINGTON – The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame Mr Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on J uly 31 shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported e-mail from July 27, 2016, that said Mrs Clinton had approved a campaign proposal to tie Mr Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private e-mail server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported e-mails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, Mr John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the e-mails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The declassification is the latest disclosure in recent weeks concerning the Russia investigation. The wave has come as the administration is seeking to change the subject from its broken promise to release files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Even as the releases shed more light on a seismic political period nearly a decade ago, Mr Trump and his allies have wildly overstated what the documents show, accusing former President Barack Obama of 'treason'. The release of the annex was no exception. Mr John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from 'a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency'. And Mr Kash Patel, the FBI director, who has a long history of pushing false claims about the Russia investigation, declared on social media that the annex revealed 'evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax'. In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Clinton approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr Durham concluded that the e-mail from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Mr Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 e-mail, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did 'not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,' he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the 'Clinton Plan intelligence,' as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US government's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited. 'Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,' Mr Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins. Mr Durham's report also mentioned that Mrs Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation. But Mr Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the e-mail he called the 'Clinton Plan intelligence' was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation. The annex shows that the person who supposedly sent the July 27 e-mail, Mr Leonard Benardo of the Open Society Foundations network, told Mr Durham in 2021 that he had never seen the message and did not write it. The network is the philanthropic arm of liberal financier George Soros, who has been made out to be a villain by Russian state media and by some American conservatives. The annex also cited a purported e-mail from July 25, 2016, also attributed to Mr Benardo. Referring to President Vladimir Putin of Russia, the message claimed that a Clinton adviser was proposing a plan 'to demonize Putin and Trump,' adding, 'Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.' That message identified the adviser as 'Julie,' while the July 27 one said 'Julia'. An accompanying Russian intelligence memo identified the aide as Ms Julianne Smith, a foreign policy adviser for the Clinton campaign who worked at the Centre for a New American Security. But the trove of Russian files contained two different versions of the July 25 message – one that somehow had an additional sentence. And Mr Benardo denied sending it, telling Mr Durham's team that he did not know who 'Julie' was and would not use a phrase like 'pour more oil into the fire'. Ms Smith informed Mr Durham in 2021 that she had no memory of proposing anything to campaign leadership about attacking Mr Trump over Russia, although she 'recalled conversations with others in the campaign expressing their genuine concerns that the DNC hack was a threat to the electoral system, and that Trump and his advisers appeared to have troubling ties to Russia'. The annex also shows that Mr Durham obtained e-mails from several liberal-leaning think tanks mentioned in the Russian memos and did not find copies of the messages supposedly written by Mr Benardo. The think tanks included the Open Society Foundations, the Atlantic Council, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Centre for a New American Security. But Mr Durham found other 'e-mails, attachments and documents that contain language and references with the exact same or similar verbiage' to those messages. Those included a July 25 email by a Carnegie Endowment cyber expert that contained an extensive passage about Russian hacking that was echoed, verbatim, in the purported July 25 message attributed to Mr Benardo. Mr Durham also obtained text messages from Ms Smith on July 25 showing that she had unsuccessfully tried to determine whether the FBI had opened an investigation into the Democratic National Committee breach, although they did not mention Mr Trump. And he obtained a July 27 e-mail from Ms Smith asking her colleagues at the think tank to sign a bipartisan statement criticising Mr Trump's denunciations of the Nato alliance as reckless and too friendly to Russia. Mr Durham wrote that it would have been logical for someone to conclude that she played a role in efforts by the Clinton campaign to tie Mr Trump to Russia. Her July 25 texts and July 27 email could be seen as support for the idea that such a plan existed, he added. But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key e-mails, the annex shows. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,' it says. The Russian intelligence memos first came to public attention in 2017 after The New York Times and The Washington Post explored the decision by Mr James Comey, then the FBI director, to violate Justice Department procedure. In publicly addressing the investigation into Mrs Clinton, he sharply criticised her use of a private e-mail server but said no charges could be brought over it. Mr Comey later told Congress and an inspector general that he decided to be the face of the decision, rather than allowing Justice Department officials to do so, as is typical, in part because of something in the Russian memos. A Dutch spy agency had hacked the memos from a Russian spy agency's server in 2016 and gave copies to the US government. Two of the memos described purported communications in January 2016 and March 2016 involving a top Democratic Party leader, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, one with Mr Benardo and the other with a different official at the Open Society Foundations. The memos indicated that the attorney general at the time, Ms Loretta E. Lynch, was pressuring the FBI about the e-mail inquiry and sharing confidential information about it with the Clinton campaign. But Mr Comey and other officials also said they believed that the memos described fake e-mails, in part because the January one also said that Mr Comey himself was trying to help Republicans win the election. In 2017, Mr Benardo and Mr Wasserman Schultz said that they had never even met, let alone communicated about Mrs Clinton's e-mails. The Trump administration has also declassified and released a report by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that summarised unflattering claims about Mrs Clinton from the Russian memos without flagging suspicions that the trove contained misinformation. After the special counsel investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, Mr Robert Mueller, issued his final report, the attorney general at the time, Mr Bill Barr, assigned Mr Durham to hunt for evidence proving Mr Trump's conspiracy theory that the investigation had stemmed from a deep-state plot against him. In 2020, as The New York Times has reported, after Mr Durham failed to find evidence of intelligence abuses, he shifted to instead trying to find a basis to blame the Clinton campaign for the fact that Mr Trump's campaign had come under suspicion of colluding with Russia. Mr Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Mr Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false about his ties to Russia, but he nevertheless used court filings and his final report to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in outside efforts to scrutinise possible ties between Mr Trump and Russia, both of which ended in quick acquittals. NYTIMES
