Pahalgam terror attack due to 'intelligence failure': Former Army Chief Shankar Roychowdhury
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Former Army chief General Shankar Roychowdhury (Retd) on Friday said the Pahalgam terror attack was due to "intelligence failure" and demanded accountability at the highest levels. Speaking to PTI, Roychowdhury, the country's 18th Army chief, said, "I suspect intelligence failure. Somebody must answer for the lapses. There is definitely someone responsible for negligence and they must be held accountable for the consequences."He also said Pakistan and its intelligence agency ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) have a role behind the Pahalgam attack, where 26 civilians, mostly tourists were shot dead by terrorists in front of their family members."There must be complacency somewhere. How did so many infiltrators manage to get through? This needs to be investigated," he added.The Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) proxy group, The Resistance Front (TRF), has claimed responsibility for the attack.Asked whether the Indian government's diplomatic sanctions on Pakistan were an adequate response, Roychowdhury said, "The diplomatic steps taken are not enough. Resistance measures will have to be taken. What shape they take depends on us. Conventional measures would not be enough.""We will have to react in kind, that is the only way I see it. We must retaliate by maintaining international diplomacy. Enough is enough," Roychowdhury said.On the possibility of an insider assisting the attackers, he said, "I am not suggesting that directly, but we must keep our eyes and ears open. Pakistan and the ISI have always played an active role. We have our own intelligence agency, RAW, and we must utilise it effectively."On whether Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir's statement on Kashmir acted as a catalyst for the terrorists, Roychowdhury said, "I think that is the only thing that works in Pakistan. Definitely, that worked as an impetus for terror outfits. I must say attacking civilians must not be done."General Munir in a recent address had described Kashmir as Pakistan's "jugular vein".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Your turn will come': What PM Modi told Naval chief soon after India-Pak ceasefire
Anyone who knows Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh, General Upendra Dwivedi, or Admiral Dinesh Tripathi will realize that they are all apolitical yet unafraid to speak their minds to the political leadership when it comes to national security. ACM Singh is a classic test fighter pilot who lives for the day and could not care less if the political leadership gets upset with his bindass attitude. General Dwivedi is a typical OG, dyed-in-wool green, most comfortable when with his troops. He is shy to a point but asserts himself when required and can be ruthless. Admiral Tripathi is a total badass who believes in the lethal power of the Navy and was ready to wipe out Karachi port on the morning of May 10—until the Pakistani DGMO pleaded for peace. PM Narendra Modi with his war cabinet on May 10. The report was presented to a national security team headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, and Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan. One common denominator with all four is that they know how to walk a razor's edge and have the daring to take any decision when it comes to national security—ready to face the consequences. Together, they make a formidable hunting pack. On the morning of May 10, while appreciating the Indian armed forces' response, PM Modi congratulated Gen Dwivedi and ACM Singh. He then looked at Admiral Tripathi and said: 'Humne aapke mooh se niwala cheen liya, aapko mauka phir milega' ('I have snatched the morsel out of your mouth, but your turn will come'). This statement came soon after the Indian Navy was told to stand down from launching a BrahMos missile attack on Karachi port. Unafraid that Pakistan could retaliate with a missile strike on his home state, Gujarat, in response to the Karachi move, the PM gave the three chiefs a total free hand and was prepared for the worst. The three chiefs may have had second thoughts—but not the PM. While many armchair strategists in state-funded think tanks may feel that ACM Singh's remarks in Bengaluru on Saturday were overstated, the fact is that the Air Chief spoke only about confirmed Pakistani aircraft, radar, and AEW&C platform kills during the May 7–10 conflict. He did not account for other hard evidence. National security planners and intelligence agencies know that a hangar housing C-130 Hercules VVIP transport aircraft was hit hard at Chaklala airbase in Rawalpindi on May 10, and two F-16s were destroyed on the ground in Jacobabad. The northern PAF command-and-control network went blind after Nur Khan (Chaklala) was hit at 2.30 am on May 10. ACM Singh also did not include 'half kills' in his remarks. Such was the fear of the Indian Army's M777 Excalibur shells and Warmate loitering ammunition that Pakistani troops abandoned posts near the LoC and fled. The IAF's response forced all prized PAF assets to be moved towards the western border with Iran and Afghanistan. For that very reason, an S-400 missile was used to take out a wide-bodied aircraft 315 kilometers from the Indo-Pak border in Punjab, Pakistan. The hit aircraft was a Saab AEW&C platform, though many in the IAF believe it could also have been a Dassault Falcon 20 ELINT aircraft. If that were not enough, hardly any ship or submarine of the Pakistan Navy was out at sea to counter the Indian Navy's armada, with all enemy vessels moving towards Gwadar in fear of the Indian response. Although PM Modi's critics and sundry professors may taunt him for stopping the armed response due to alleged US intervention, the last Indian BrahMos strike hit Bholari airbase at noon on May 10—after which all mission objectives were complete. Since Field Marshal Asim Munir was DG (ISI) when the Pulwama suicide bombing took place on February 14, 2019, and Army Chief when the Pahalgam Hindu tourist massacre was enacted at the instructions of Rawalpindi on April 22, 2025, it is clear that Pakistan will attempt another terror attack in the Kashmir Valley or the Indian hinterland in the near future. While Munir may get promoted to Pakistan's President or Field Marshal Administrator, it seems that the Indian Navy will get its turn after all.
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Assam eviction drives aimed at 'creating narrative' before assembly polls: Experts
On these recent evictions, eminent advocate Santanu Borthakur said: "If it is a forest land, then whosoever stays there for whatever longer period, it does not give them legal rights to settle there permanently. " However, targeting only one community, as seen in the recent cases in Golaghat is "absolutely discriminatory", he added. "The CM's recent comment that no eviction will take place against people from other communities is anti-Constitution and not permitted by law," Borthakur said. In Rengma, 1,500 Muslim families were evicted. The remaining families are from Bodo, Nepali, Manipuri and other communities, who have certificates from the Forest Rights Committee (FRC). According to Kaustubh Deka, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Dibrugarh University, the eviction drive is a significant and sensitive moment for the state, and the whole episode highlights the critical bearing of the state's complex socio-political history. "The government must maintain a fair balance between three aspects. One, the allegation that genuine Indian citizens are being selectively targeted, needs to be addressed in all earnestness. Two, the rights given to people under progressive environmental legislations such as 'Forest Rights Act' need to be respected," he added. Also, care should be taken that the ongoing process doesn't trigger complications in Assam's already volatile border dispute scenario with many of its neighbouring states, Deka said. Talking about alleged encroachments in inter-state border areas in Rengma, advocate Borthakur said that normally in border areas, the government settles people in the buffer zones so that no encroachment takes place from the opposite side. "We can see such habitation in all border areas. Usually minorities, Gorkha and Bihari people, are settled in such locations," he added. Barua too supported his claim and said that in all the border areas with neighbouring states, usually people or communities originally from outside are settled. "The indigenous people usually do not live there. People from communities like Adivasis, Gorkhas and minorities live in such areas," he added. The reserve forests witnessing recent evictions are along Assam-Nagaland border, where people from the neighbouring state had allegedly attempted to occupy land. The evicted people claimed that their previous generation was settled in the forest by the Golap Borbora government in 1978-79 and the AGP government, which came to power in 1985. Borthakur said, "Without considering the historical background, carrying out an eviction is not appropriate. Legally, the government has the power, but the manner in which that power was exercised is not acceptable. It is inhuman and arbitrary." He also stressed that evicting people without rehabilitation is wrong. Echoing similar sentiments, Deka said, "This is against all democratic norms and practices. Utterly inhumane." Even the Supreme Court judgement says that even pavement dwellers can not be evicted without rehabilitation.
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
Army Chief Calls Out Pakistan's Victory Claims Over Operation Sindoor Chess Game
Chief of Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi has criticized Pakistan's attempts to portray itself as victorious following Operation Sindoor, describing the strategic military campaign as an unpredictable chess match where India ultimately delivered a decisive checkmate. Speaking at an event at IIT Madras, the Army chief mocked Islamabad's narrative management tactics while explaining the complex nature of the grey zone operation. General Dwivedi compared the anti-terror mission to a strategic chess game, emphasizing the uncertainty both sides faced during the operation. He explained that neither India nor Pakistan could predict the opponent's next move, making it a classic grey zone conflict—one that falls just short of conventional warfare. Despite the risks involved, including potential losses to Indian forces, the Army chief stated that India successfully executed its strategy and achieved victory. The Army chief specifically targeted Pakistan's propaganda efforts, particularly their decision to promote Army Chief Asim Munir to the rank of five-star general and field marshal as a way to project success. He sarcastically noted how Pakistanis would interpret this promotion as evidence of victory, highlighting the power of narrative management in shaping public perception of military outcomes. Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7 as retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack, where Pakistan-based militants killed 26 civilians in Jammu and Kashmir. General Dwivedi praised the political leadership's resolve and strategic clarity, particularly commending the decision-making process that granted the military complete operational freedom. He revealed that during high-level meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on April 23, the leadership declared "enough is enough" and gave the armed forces a free hand to determine appropriate action. The Army chief emphasized the significance of political clarity and confidence shown by the government, describing it as unprecedented. He noted how all three service chiefs were aligned on the need for decisive action, and the political leadership's trust in military judgment enabled effective execution of the mission. Regarding the operation's naming, General Dwivedi highlighted how "Operation Sindoor" resonated with the entire nation and galvanized public support. He mentioned that the widespread national backing led to questions about why the operation was concluded, indicating strong public appetite for such decisive military action. The targeted military campaign involved precision strikes against terrorist infrastructure and camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Indian armed forces utilized a combination of air and missile strikes to hit nine specific targets. While India maintained that the strikes were focused, measured, and non-escalatory, Pakistan attempted retaliatory drone and missile attacks, which were successfully neutralized by India's air defence systems. Military analysts widely consider Operation Sindoor a comprehensive victory for India, both in military and psychological terms. The mission demonstrated India's capability for high-precision, coordinated military action while successfully dismantling terrorist infrastructure and restoring deterrence against state-sponsored cross-border terrorism. The Army chief's remarks underscore the importance of narrative warfare in modern conflicts, where perception often matters as much as actual military outcomes. His criticism of Pakistan's propaganda efforts highlights how different nations attempt to frame the same events to suit their domestic and international audiences, making truth a casualty in information warfare.
