Royal Navy shadows Russian ships through English Channel
The Royal Navy has shadowed Russian ships as they travelled through the English Channel.
Portsmouth-based destroyer HMS Duncan and patrol ship HMS Mersey were dispatched to track the movements of RFN Boikiy which was on its way back from deployment in the Gulf of Guinea.
Duncan met the corvette near the island of Ushant at the south-western end of the Channel on the French coast on June 20 before HMS Mersey took over duties off the Isle of Wight.
It is the latest deployment of a UK warship to follow Russian vessels.
It came soon after patrol ship HMS Trent and Wildcat helicopters from 815 Naval Air Squadron shadowed RFN Admiral Grigorovich as part of joint Nato efforts as the Russian frigate sailed past Gibraltar, through the English Channel and into the North Sea, the Royal Navy said.
Luke Pollard, Minister for the Armed Forces, said: 'Russian warships are increasingly sailing through the English Channel, and every time they do, a Royal Navy vessel will be keeping an eye on them.
'I have every confidence, as should the British public, that our Royal Navy will continue to defend our waters and keep our undersea cables safe.'
Commander Daniel Lee, Commanding Officer of HMS Duncan, said: 'Escorting foreign warships through waters near the UK is a vital part of our mission to protect our nation and uphold international maritime law.
'It's a clear demonstration of our commitment to ensuring the safety and security of our seas, which are so important to the lives and livelihoods of the British people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
If Labour cuts my PIP, I lose everything I have worked for
It's been a horrific few weeks – few months – for disabled people, with the never-ending uncertainty around the Labour government's disability benefit cuts making our community scared for our lives. The government claims their welfare reforms are to help support disabled people into work, but they're ignoring the fact that many disabled people can only work because of the benefits they receive – and I'm one of them. I live with a wide range of conditions including lupus, endometriosis, arthritis, migraines and dyspraxia, the toll these have on my body means that my disability mostly manifests through lack of energy and cognitive function. I would never be able to work a full time job or one with a strict schedule, as I can only work for a few hours at a time before I can't look at a screen anymore. I mostly work from bed as that's where I'm most comfortable. However, I've still managed to build a pretty successful career as a writer. With my limited energy and time, I've also helped shape the Taking the PIP campaign, which has brought together more than 130 well-known disabled people to urge the prime minister to stop the cruel cuts to benefits. But the harsh reality is that if these cuts are approved next week, with a second reading vote on the welfare reform bill, I will lose everything I have. I receive £558 a month in PIP. I also receive Universal Credit, the amount of which changes every month because I have to input my earnings, but is roughly around £400 a month. At a time when I only have the energy to work one or two hours a week, it means that I'm not working myself to the bone in order to be able to afford to live and can still afford my bills. Currently, you have to score 8 points to qualify for the daily living component of PIP. But if the eligibility changes come in, you will also have to score at least 4 points in one activity – these involving your ability to cook and clean, socialise and maintain good hygiene. On my last assessment, the highest I scored on all activities was 2. Due to my depression and neurodivergent conditions, I've made myself ill in the past with bad hygiene. I have to be reminded or pushed to keep myself clean. When I'm in deep depressive episodes, I will go days, or sometimes even weeks, without changing my clothes or washing myself. It's unsafe for me to do certain things in the kitchen as I sometimes lack control of my hands. I enjoy cooking, but often cut or burn myself and struggle to use many kitchen utensils. My cognitive and mental health conditions also mean I put housework at the bottom of the list, and prioritise just keeping myself alive. Only this week, I had to deep-clean my house – with the support of friends – after I discovered a fly infestation. But I make allowances so that I can live a good, independent life. I have apps that remind me to clean and eat, I buy pre-sliced food or mostly rely on ready meals. I live in social housing, in an accessible bungalow, so I can move around it safely without fear that I will put myself in danger. I live five minutes from my parents, who are on hand to help with housework. But if Labour's cuts to PIP go through, I won't be able to afford to continue living my lovely little life. I will be forced to find a job that will push me mentally and physically to breaking point. If I lose my PIP, I genuinely can't guarantee I'll still be here in five years time. And I'm far from the only one. Under Labour plans, more than 3.2 million people will see their benefits cut, pushing around 8,000 people into poverty or even absolute poverty, which is defined by the UN as 'a condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services.' More than 280,000 PIP claimants who are already in work would lose their support – and, as a result, could lose their jobs. In return, just 1-3 per cent of those affected will be able to move into work. While many working people will be affected, those who can't work will also be hard hit. Where I agree with the government is that the welfare system does need reform, but only to make it more compassionate and less inhumane. Starmer says the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone', and that it's 'counterproductive' and 'works against them getting into work'. It is all well and good the government saying they want to support people into work – but when they're also quietly cutting Access to Work entitlement, their actions don't show it. I hear every single day from scared disabled people who have no idea how they'll survive if these cuts go through. The government can claim this is a cost-cutting measure all they want, but the reality is that the very real cost will be that of disabled people's lives. Is that really a debt politicians want on their hands? * Rachel Charlton-Dailey is a journalist and disability rights campaigner who is part of the 'Taking the PIP' campaign
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Here comes Sir U-turn… Starmer braces to make concessions as MORE Labour MPs join massive benefits revolt ahead of crunch vote with demands for 'regime change'
Keir Starmer is poised to make humiliating concessions on benefits reforms today after failing to quell a massive Labour revolt. Ministers have been hinting at a climbdown as they face a disastrous defeat in a crunch Commons vote on the flagship legislation. Despite frantic direct pleas from the PM and Chancellor Rachel Reeves, more MPs have added their names to a fatal amendment overnight. Around 130 have now publicly declared they will oppose the Second Reading of the Bill, easily enough to overturn even Labour's massive majority. There is speculation that Sir Keir could offer to widen eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (Pip) or weaken curbs on Universal Credit - blowing a hole in hopes the proposals will save the government £5billion. He has dismissed what has been described as the nuclear option of delaying or abandoning the package altogether. Ms Reeves has been among the strongest backers of the reforms, as she desperately struggles to balance the books without resorting to more tax hikes. Even with the changes the benefits bill was still due to keep spiralling, just at a slightly slower rate. In a grim sign for the premier, bitter infighting has been surfacing with MPs and aides swiping at No10 chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. Some have been demanding 'regime change' complaining that Downing Street is dominated by 'over-excitable boys'. A No10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Lord Blunkett last night suggested the PM had failed to focus on the peril the Government is in because he has spent so much time abroad. And he warned that Sir Keir will be forced to hold a formal confidence vote if he loses. No government Bill has failed to pass second reading - typically a verdict on the broad principles of plans rather than details - since 1986. The Labour grandee told LBC: 'If they lost it, they'd have to go for a vote of confidence, I think. 'But the embarrassment of that one year in leaves you with two problems. One is you've been humiliated, and the second is you've still got the problem. The welfare issue has not gone away. So, solving the problem, not taking the hit, is the sensible solution.' Urging a delay in the vote, he added: 'Keir Starmer, for very understandable reasons, has been diverted on to the international agenda. I think he now needs to come back from Holland and be absolutely focused on this.' Facing questions at the Nato summit yesterday, Sir Keir bridled at suggestions he had failed to read the mood of Labour MPs. He risked inflaming the mood by shrugging off the insurrection as 'noises off', insisting benefits reform must happen and the vote will go ahead on Tuesday. Angela Rayner delivered the same message as she stood in at PMQs. But by the evening the tone had changed, with ministers stressing they are listening to complaints from MPs. Sir Keir is finally due to take his feet in the Commons today, giving a statement expected to cover the G7 in Canada, Nato summit and Middle East crisis. It has been over two weeks since he spoke in the chamber. Touring broadcast studios this morning, trade minister Douglas Alexander admitted that the government was thinking about how to 'implement' the intention of curbing benefits. He told Sky News: 'Everyone agrees welfare needs reform and that the system was broken. Everyone recognises you're trying to take people off benefit and into work, because that's better for them and also better for our fiscal position. 'And everyone recognises that we need to protect the most vulnerable. 'Where there is honestly some disagreement at the moment, is on the issue of 'how do you give implementation to those principles?'' Toby Perkins is among the new MPs to add their names to the fatal amendment He suggested that normally the second reading of a bill, its first Commons test, was a vote on the principle behind a piece of legislation rather than the way it will be implemented. 'The effect of what's happened with this reasoned amendment being tabled is that that's brought forward the discussion of how to give implementation to those principles,' he said. 'So given the high level of agreement on the principles, the discussions over the coming days will really be about the implementation of those principles.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Miliband shuns £25bn UK-Morocco renewable energy project Xlinks
The government is snubbing a £25bn renewable energy project which promised to import enough solar and wind power from Morocco to meet nearly a tenth of the UK's electricity demand. Sky News has learnt that Ed Miliband, the energy security and net zero secretary, has decided not to proceed to formal negotiations with Xlinks, a privately owned company, about a 25-year price guarantee agreement. A ministerial statement is expected to be made confirming the decision later on Thursday. The government's move to snub Xlinks after protracted talks with the company will come as a surprise to energy industry executives given the company's pledge to deliver large quantities of power at a price roughly half of that to be generated by new nuclear power stations. Xlinks, which is chaired by the former Tesco chief executive Sir Dave Lewis, had been seeking to agree a 25-year contract for difference with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, which would have guaranteed a price for the power generated by the project. One Whitehall insider said its decision was partly motivated by a desire to focus on "homegrown" energy supplies - an assertion queried by industry sources. Sir Dave told The Sunday Telegraph earlier this year that Xlinks would switch its focus to another country if the UK government did not agree to support the project. The company is now expected to explore other commercial opportunities. Xlinks had not been seeking taxpayer funding for it, and claimed it could help solve the 'intermittency problem' of variable supply to UK households and businesses. Reducing manufacturers' energy costs was the centrepiece of the government's industrial strategy launched earlier this week. Sources said that market-testing of the financing for Xlinks construction of a 4000-kilometre cable between Morocco and the Devon coast had been significantly oversubscribed. Xlinks' investors include Total, the French energy giant, with the company having raised about £100m in development funding so far. The company has said it would be able to deliver energy at £48-per-megawatt hour, significantly lower than that of new nuclear power stations such as the one at Sizewell C in Suffolk to which the government allocated more than £14bn of taxpayers' money earlier this month. It was unclear whether the growing risk of undersea cable sabotage was one of the factors behind the government's decision not to engage further with Xlinks. In an interview with Sky News in 2022, Sir Dave said Xlinks enjoyed low geopolitical risk because of Britain's centuries-old trading relationship with Morocco and the north African country's ambitions of growing the energy sector as a share of its exports. "The Moroccan government has recognised that exporting green [energy] is a very important part of their economic plan going forward, so they have an export strategy," he t said at the time. "The Sahara desert is probably one of the best places in the world to generate renewable energy from... so you have a very long period of generation. "And if you're capturing that energy and adding some battery storage, you can generate energy to cover a little bit more than 20 hours a day, which makes it a fantastic partner for the UK." The former Tesco chief added that the quality of modern high-voltage cables meant that energy could now be transported "over very long distances with very, very few losses". Sir Dave said the technology risks associated with the project were relatively small, citing examples of much longer cable links being planned elsewhere in the world. "The benefit here is that it's proven technology with a very committed reliable partner with a cost we will never [be able to] match in the UK," he said.
