How a CIA hit on al Qaeda ensnared a U.S. citizen in Afghanistan
Blindfolded in the back seat, Habibi and his driver were driven off by gunmen sporting shoulder patches of the Taliban's feared secret police, the General Directorate of Intelligence (GDI), according to several witness statements in U.S. government possession.
Afghanistan's Taliban government denies it detained Habibi, 37, who was a former head of Afghanistan's civil aviation. While dividing his time between the United States and Kabul working for a private company, he became a U.S. citizen after the Taliban took power in 2021. The Taliban also says they have no knowledge of his whereabouts, three years after he disappeared.
That is contradicted by the witness accounts and other evidence, including data monitored from Habibi's cellphone, described by a U.S. official and a former U.S. official familiar with the matter.
The Taliban denials present a conundrum for the FBI, which is leading the U.S. government effort to gain his release; and for the State Department, which describes Habibi's detention a major impediment to exploring increased engagement with Afghanistan, three years after his August 10, 2022 arrest.
U.S. President Donald Trump has made freeing Americans held abroad a top priority and already has secured the release of dozens, including from Afghanistan, Russia and Venezuela.
The case of Habibi — the only publicly identified American held in the country — has been harder to resolve.
Interviews with the U.S. official and a former U.S. official with knowledge of the case reveal that the Taliban likely detained Habibi because the CIA had penetrated the company where he worked. The sources say the U.S. spy agency had accessed one of the company's security cameras, helping it pinpoint the al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a Kabul guesthouse.
Habibi's detention came 10 days after Zawahiri — the last of the top plotters of the September 11, 2001, attack on the United States — was dramatically assassinated by a U.S. drone strike on the guesthouse, ordered by Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden.
At the time, U.S. officials briefed journalists that it was a CIA operation. The U.S. sources said that Habibi was unaware of the CIA plot and was wrongly detained after returning to Kabul from a work trip to Dubai after the assassination, oblivious of the danger he was in.
A Taliban official hands out bags of cucumbers to Afghan refugees returning from Iran, at a reception center in the border town of Islam Qala, Afghanistan, on July 10. |
Jim Huylebroek / The New York Times
The CIA, the Taliban, the White House and Habibi's employer, Virginia-based ARX Communications, did not respond to detailed requests for comment for this story. ARX has previously said neither it, nor its subsidiaries, were involved with the strike on Zawahiri. It could not be independently verified whether Habibi was or wasn't aware of the plot.
In a statement, a State Department spokesperson called for Habibi's immediate release.
"We know the Taliban abducted Mahmood Habibi nearly three years ago," the spokesperson said.
A co-worker detained with Habibi, then later released, saw him in GDI headquarters and heard him in an adjacent room being asked if he worked for the CIA or was involved in the strike on Zawahiri, according to one of the statements in U.S government possession.
Then, in June and August of 2023, the U.S. government detected that his mobile phone had been switched on in GDI headquarters, the U.S. official and former official said.
The U.S. official familiar with the matter said excerpts of the statements have been presented to the Taliban in response to their repeated denials of Habibi's detention.
As Habibi and his family on Sunday mark the third anniversary of his arrest, the Trump administration has stepped up efforts to win his release, including offering a $5 million reward for information. But so far, he appears no closer to freedom, the U.S. sources said.
"Our family has new hope that the Trump team will be successful," said Habibi's older brother, Ahmad.
Ahmad said his brother would never have gone to Kabul four days after the Zawahiri assassination if the CIA had told ARX to warn him it was too dangerous to return.
"Nobody told him anything. Neither the company, neither the CIA nor anybody. So, he just went back,' Ahmad said.
The U.S. government officially considers Habibi a hostage, said the U.S. official, because his arrest and location remain unconfirmed by the Taliban. The official and the former official spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the case.
In response to a request for comment, the FBI said that along with partners in other U.S. departments involved in hostage recovery, it remains "committed to bringing Habibi home to his family." The Taliban rejected an offer made last year to trade Habibi for alleged Osama bin Laden aide Mohammad Rahim al-Afghani, the last Afghan held in the Guantanamo Bay military prison.
"We've tried in terms of both carrots and sticks,' said the official, who requested anonymity to discuss the case.
The Taliban "literally throw up a wall," said the official.
Camera on cell tower
As part of the operation against Zawahiri, the CIA penetrated the Asia Consultancy Group (ACG), a subsidiary of ARX, according to the current and former U.S. officials, who provided details of how the spy agency was able to target the al Qaeda chief.
ACG, whose parent is headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, had a contract to erect cellphone towers around Kabul, the sources said. CCTV cameras were fitted to the towers to protect the structures, they said.
Mahmood Habibi and his older brother Ahmad Habibi during a visit to Toronto in 2014 |
Ahmad Shah Habibi / via REUTERS
One of the cameras, the sources said, was pointed at a house U.S. officials have linked to Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban's acting interior minister both at the time and now, in the heart of Kabul's diplomatic quarter, a short distance from the shuttered British and American embassies.
The sources said the camera sent back video to the CIA confirming Zawahiri's presence in the residence.
That confirmation helped the agency kill the Egyptian Islamist with two drone-fired Hellfire R9X missiles on July 31, 2022, as he emerged onto a balcony, they said. His wife and family survived the strike.
Arrest
On the day of his arrest, Mahmood Habibi was in his apartment in Kabul's Sherpur neighborhood packing to return to New Jersey, where he had a home, with the help of a sister, who was there with her two children, according to Ahmad.
It was about noon when a phone call came from the ACG office saying it had just been raided by the Taliban, Ahmad said. Habibi told his sister that he had to leave without explaining why. He was arrested immediately after getting into his vehicle, Ahmad said.
A few minutes later, somebody announcing that they were with GDI knocked on his apartment door, according to Ahmad and a witness statement. His sister declined to open it, telling those outside that she had to conform to the Taliban rule that an adult male relative had to be present.
The Taliban broke open the door, entered the apartment and rifled through closets and drawers, demanding Habibi's laptop, according to Ahmad and the witness statement.
A crowd had gathered outside after the Taliban arrived in five vehicles, blocked the street and surrounded Habibi's car, before driving him off, according to Ahmad and a separate witness statement.
The GDI arrested 30 other ACG employees, according to a letter that ACG sent to Afghanistan's Ministry of Communications. Except for Habibi and one other, all were eventually released.
In the letter, dated September 15, 2022, ACG asked that family members be allowed to visit him and three other staff who the GDI still held.
Afghan refugee women tailor a carpet at the Khurasan camp on the outskirts of Peshawar on Sunday. |
AFP-JIJI
The ministry appeared to confirm Habibi was a GDI prisoner in a reply two days later, saying that the intelligence directorate would decide on the petition when its investigation was completed.
However, in a July 3, 2025 statement reported by Afghanistan's state news agency, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that in response to requests from Habibi's family, the Taliban had investigated but no evidence has been found to suggest that he was detained by Afghanistan's security forces.
Mujahid said the Taliban are a legitimate governing body that does not detain individuals without due process or hide them from public view. Mujahid did not respond to a request for comment.
U.S. citizen
Born to parents from the southern city of Kandahar, Habibi is one of eight siblings — three brothers and five sisters — who grew up in the Kabul neighborhood of Karte Parwan.
His excellent English helped him secure a job with the U.N. civil aviation agency in Kabul in 2008. He worked for the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's U.S. embassy office from 2011 to 2013.
Tapped as deputy civil aviation minister, Habibi helped transition Afghanistan's air traffic system from U.S. control to the U.S.-backed Kabul government. Habibi became civil aviation minister in 2017. He held that post until 2019 while earning a civil aviation master's degree from Embry Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, the university confirmed.
In 2019, he resigned and then joined ARX to help oversee its Afghan subsidiary's contract to run air traffic control at Kabul's international airport. Habibi lived between the city and the United States, accumulating the last of the 30 months of U.S. residency he needed over a five-year period for U.S. citizenship in 2021, Ahmad said.
He was in Kabul with his family during the chaotic departure of the last U.S. troops in August 2021, Ahmad said, as the Taliban consolidated its grip on the capital after 20 years of war.
Habibi flew from Dubai to Kabul on August 4, 2022, after stopping in Qatar to check on his family and parents who were housed on a U.S. military base there waiting for final processing of U.S. immigration visas, said Ahmad. A week later Habibi was arrested.
His wife, daughter and parents, who waited in Qatar until October for their visas before flying to the United States and settling in California, have not seen or heard from him since.
Resolving Habibi's case would be the easiest way for the Taliban, who crave international recognition as Afghanistan's legitimate rulers, to explore improving ties with the U.S., the current U.S. official said.
Since Habibi's detention, four other Americans have been arrested and released by the Taliban.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Last Actress of Kabul's Theater Stage
Nafeesa Nafees is perhaps the only female theater actor living in Kabul today. She dwells in a modest brick-and-mud home in the Afghan capital, where she and her daughter share a quiet sanctuary amid the surrounding turmoil. Affectionately known as Khala Nafeesa (Aunt Nafeesa), a title of honor reflecting her age and seniority, she is a veteran of cinema and television who witnessed firsthand the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in the 1980s. She lost much of her family during the civil war in Kabul that followed the collapse of the pro-Soviet government and eventually fled to Pakistan, living as a refugee. She often spoke bitterly about working as a shoe shiner and later in a brick factory to survive as a refugee of war. U.S. troops, alongside British forces, launched airstrikes against Taliban and al-Qaida targets in Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, as part of Operation Enduring Freedom; the next month the White House assigned the weekly Saturday radio address, typically delivered by the president, to First Lady Laura Bush. In her address, she described the war on terror as 'a fight for the rights and dignity of women.' Millions of Afghans trusted that very promise made by the United States. While precise figures vary, a Brown University study estimated that more than 2 million Afghan refugees returned home between 2001 and 2003. Khala Nafeesa was one of them. As an actor, she became a household name in the cities, mainly for her work in public service announcements and infomercials. In villages where television was not available, she gained fame performing with traveling theater troupes, tackling some of the most fundamental topics, from elections and voting rights to contraception and birth control. To convey her message more smoothly and profoundly in a country plagued by some of the world's highest rates of maternal mortality, illiteracy, and poverty, she often blended comedy, sarcasm, and tears. But four years ago, the small flame of hope she carried for creating a different future was abruptly and brutally extinguished. The fall of the U.S.-backed government in Kabul on August 15, 2021, was not just a political collapse; for women like Khala Nafeesa, it marked the end of an entire world. In those days, the weight of betrayal felt heavier than defeat, betrayal by those who claimed to represent and serve but fled, and by those who called themselves friends and allies, yet turned away in the hour of need. They stood in silent watch, gripped by uncertainty and the oppressive weight of an unknown fate, as their American supporters made a hurried exit, while most of the Afghan governing elites had largely disappeared even before the Americans. Months prior to the government's collapse, numerous high-ranking Afghan politicians and members of the elite had already departed Kabul or at least relocated their immediate families abroad. The public, aware of this reality, cynically derided their ostensible loyalty, quipping that many were 'poised with a suitcase, one foot on the airplane's step and the other still anchored in their office.' Many of those who remained for a while later revealed, in interviews and public engagements such as Clubhouse talks and X discussions, that the final days of the government were a chaotic process unfolding in stages and, their presence was less about a commitment to safeguarding the public they claimed to protect and more about practical reasons: some were still securing passports and identification documents, others were selling properties and withdrawing funds from banks, while many queued for foreign visas. While most elites escaped to resume comfortable lives elsewhere, ordinary Kabul residents like Khala Nafeesa confronted a starkly different reality. With each loss of territory to the Taliban offensive, fresh waves of fear swept through the city. Rumors of brutal retribution and the looming threat of anarchy and looting, reminiscent of the civil war that followed the Soviet withdrawal, spread rapidly, fueling a desperate scramble to flee. The harrowing images of people clinging to aircraft and falling from military planes captured only a fraction of the human tragedy that unfolded during the Kabul airlift, and the bloodshed served as a grim reminder that when political control shifts from one side to another, it is always the civilian population that bears the cost. For millions of Afghan women, including Khala Nafeesa, defeat on the battlefield meant the immediate loss of some of their most basic rights: the right to education, the right to work, and the right to speak freely. Yet despite these harsh restrictions, her presence in Kabul today stands as a testament to endurance, mirroring the spirit of the ancient capital itself, a city that has weathered the brutality of the Cold War and countless other storms before it. Her strength is not simply symbolic; it is forged in a life shaped by hardship from the start. In Afghanistan, a land deeply entrenched in patriarchal traditions, widespread illiteracy, and chronic poverty, many communities have long imposed austere and often unforgiving customs upon women. For example, women were commonly expected to eat only after men and were denied access to medical care, including treatment from male doctors, even at the expense of their lives. In households where poverty demanded a choice, it was almost invariably the male child who was granted the privilege of education. Khala Nafeesa was never afforded privilege. Born and raised in the narrow alleys of old Kabul, her parents could not support her education, leaving her unable to finish high school even in the comparatively open Kabul of the 1980s, long before the Taliban existed. When access to education was denied, work became her only avenue for agency and survival. She launched her career in the Kabul theater as an amateur, carving out a space for herself in a society that systematically marginalized women. Today, after nearly four decades on stage, that space has been forcibly erased. This is not merely a denial of employment; it is an assault on her dignity, her right to self-sufficiency, and her fundamental entitlement to live without dependence on the mercy of others. While the majority of Afghanistan's cinema and film actors chose to flee when the Taliban established full control, Khala Nafeesa chose to stay and survive in a country heavily sanctioned and largely isolated from the rest of the world. Consequently, she turned to YouTube, where she and a small team performed short theatrical sketches and simple comedy shows. However, as restrictions tightened over time, her productions dwindled to the bare essentials. In her videos, she places a few vegetables and a portable cooking stove in front of her, cooking and speaking directly to her audience. She laughs, jokes, and cries. Sometimes she criticizes her audience for not watching or liking her videos enough; other times, she grows frustrated with her colleagues for not cooking well, organizing properly, or being sharp enough. She rarely speaks of politics and keeps the hardships of her daily life in Kabul tightly guarded from public view. Yet watching her journey over the past four years on YouTube, it is impossible to ignore the rapid toll it has taken on her: her hair has grown whiter, her face more lined, and her laughter now carries an unmistakable undercurrent of sadness. When she appeals for support to her viewers, she embodies the plight of nearly 40 million Afghans rendered dependent by the consequences of policy decisions and geopolitical actions beyond their control or understanding. After the Taliban's return to power in 2021, most of the international community and aid organizations withdrew, and Afghanistan faced sanctions due to the Taliban's policies. Its central bank assets remain frozen. In theory, these sanctions are intended to punish the Taliban leadership, particularly for their extreme oppression of women. In practice, women like Khala Nafeesa bear the heaviest burden of the country's isolation and sanctions. Thousands of women like her live scattered across the alleys of Kabul, and millions more reside in rural villages. They have been left at the mercy of both the Taliban's oppressive policies and global neglect. These are the women truly suffering, the ones the world claims to want to save, yet they remain trapped between a rock and a hard place. Khala Nafeesa's last appearance on her YouTube channel was two weeks ago. She is not answering her phone. Her WhatsApp connection seems inactive. Today, she serves as a symbol for the millions of women confined within a heavily sanctioned country, their only lifeline to the outside world a tenuous thread of internet and a flickering hope for change. And that hope grows ever fainter as the Taliban remain unyielding and the international community, once trusted, turns its gaze elsewhere, weary of its long entanglement in Afghanistan and absorbed by other conflicts. It has been four years of daily struggle, and if nothing changes, Khala Nafeesa may turn out to be the very last female theater actor in Kabul. And now it seems like even her voice has been quieted.
NHK
11 hours ago
- NHK
Japan plans to step up defenses against outside election interference
The Japanese government is considering stepping up measures to stop other countries interfering in elections through false online information or other means. The government says that in the Upper House election in July, some false information about political parties and candidates appears to have been spread by automated bots, possibly from overseas. Japan's National Security Secretariat and the Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office work together to handle such threats. But some critics say Japan's system is weaker than those of Western nations. They also say the development of AI technologies is making the risk of other countries interfering in elections even greater. The government is now considering setting up a new unit in the Cabinet Secretariat to play a central role in addressing the risk and making legal arrangements. Officials are also studying advanced measures used in other countries to establish what needs to be done in Japan. Digital Transformation Minister Taira Masaaki told NHK that Japan is now a target. He said elections are the foundation of democracy, and that it is important to bolster the country's defenses to prevent foreign interference through false online information.
Japan Times
13 hours ago
- Japan Times
Why Ishiba shouldn't issue a WWII 80th anniversary statement
In Japan, Aug. 15 is widely known as "Shusen no Hi," meaning "The Day of the End of the War." But technically speaking, it might more appropriately be referred to as "The Day of Defeat for Japan." Under international law, the formal end of the Pacific War was on Sept. 2, 1945, when Japan's foreign minister and the army chief of staff signed the surrender document on the deck of the USS Missouri battleship in Tokyo Bay, alongside representatives of the Allied powers. Aug. 15 is referred to as the day the war ended because it is when Emperor Hirohito announced Japan's surrender over the radio. However, a week prior, on Aug. 9, the Soviet Union unilaterally abrogated the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact and suddenly declared war on Japan. Even after Japan accepted the terms of the Potsdam Declaration on Aug. 10, Soviet forces continued combat operations, advancing southward through the Kuril Islands and, between Aug. 28 and Sept. 5, invading and occupying the Northern Territories.
