Sirois, Snyder propose constitutional amendment to create DOGE-like Florida Cabinet position
The legislation filed by Sirois, R-Merritt Island, calls for a constitutional amendment that Florida residents would vote on in November 2026 to create a Commissioner of Government Efficiency as an elected Cabinet officer responsible for enhancing government efficiency by preventing waste, fraud and abuse.
Sirois' proposal is co-sponsored by Rep. John Snyder, R-Stuart.
'As elected officials, we have a fiduciary responsibility to be good stewards of public funds, recognizing that Florida families work hard and must carefully manage their own household budgets," Snyder said. "Just as they balance their checkbooks, it is critical that government also lives within its means. It requires us to be lean, efficient and transparent, while also planning for the future by setting aside reserves for emergencies. Having an elected voice that is charged with looking at how billions of taxpayer dollars are being spent will help us root out any waste or fraud.'
Sirois defends the need for such a position — even though Republicans have been in the governor's mansion and controlled both houses of the Florida Legislature since 1998.
Sirois said he believes having a watchdog role in government finances is a continual process — no matter which political party is in power in Tallahassee — and that the mechanism for doing so should be part of the Florida Constitution, thus making it more permanent.
He also envisions the new government efficiency Cabinet department using artificial intelligence and other technology to do its work.
Sirois' proposal — House Joint Resolution 1325 — follows on the announcement earlier this week by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis that he is creating a Florida State Department of Governmental Efficiency task force. DeSantis said the task force would "work to further eliminate waste within state government, save taxpayers money and ensure accountability in Florida."
In response, Florida Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, a leading critic of the governor, said: "Let's be clear: The Republican Party has dominated our state government for nearly 30 years, and any inefficiencies are a direct result of their long-standing mismanagement. It's laughable that, after decades in power, they now pretend to know how to fix what they themselves have broken. This is the same governor who has squandered millions defending unconstitutional laws, inflated his budget with unnecessary election police forces, and funneled taxpayer dollars into partisan electioneering. He has no credibility when it comes to improving government efficiency."
Eskamani said that "emulating the disorder seen in federal mismanagement under figures like Elon Musk is not only misguided, but dangerous for our state's future."
DeSantis has defended his and the Republican-dominated Florida Legislature's efforts to cut waste. He cited, for example, Florida's relatively small state budget compared with New York's budget; reductions in Florida's total debt; and the previous elimination of unneeded boards and commissions.
Because Sirois' proposal would change the Florida Constitution, it would have to be approved by three-fifths of the membership of each chamber of the Florida Legislature. The proposed amendment then would have to be approved by 60% of voters in a statewide referendum in 2026.
Because of the timeline for implementing constitutional amendments, the first proposed Commissioner of Government Efficiency would not take office until after the 2026 election, and the first commissioner would be appointed by the Florida Legislature, rather than elected by Florida voters.
Sirois' proposed constitutional amendment also would eliminate the elected position of lieutenant governor, which is vacant following the appointment earlier this month of then-Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nuñez as interim president of Florida International University.
On the federal level, President Donald Trump previously had created a federal Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, led by senior adviser Elon Musk, a businessman who heads SpaceX, Tesla and the social media site X.
Although, Florida's Commissioner of Government Efficiency would not have jurisdiction over county or municipal budgets, the person would have "the power to audit, investigate and report on fraud, waste and abuse" within the executive branch of state government, as well as within counties, municipalities and special districts.
The commissioner also would serve as a member of the Florida Cabinet, participating in asset management and administrative oversight functions.
The Cabinet currently includes the attorney general, chief financial officer and commissioner of agriculture.
If voters approve the constitutional amendment in 2026, under the timeline in the legislation, the first Commissioner of Government Efficiency would be appointed by the Florida Legislature no later than March 2, 2027 — the first day of its 2027 regular session. The first appointee would serve until the 2028 general election, at which point the office would be filled by election for the two remaining years of the term.
Starting in 2030, the commissioner would be elected on the same four-year cycle as all other Cabinet members, with a term limit of eight consecutive years.
Sirois — whose House district is in Central Brevard County — said the legislation is a product of himself and other leaders of the Florida Legislature, and that DeSantis was not involved in its crafting.
Sirois said the office of lieutenant governor — along with the staff for that position — would be eliminated. That, Sirois said, would help free up state budget money for the creation of the Commissioner of Government Efficiency and that person's staff. He said the cost for establishing the new Cabinet position has not been determined.
With the current vacancy in the lieutenant governor's position, DeSantis has the power to make an appointment to that office. But he had said he wasn't planning to do so until after the end of the 2025 regular session of the Florida Legislature that begins Tuesday and runs for two months.
The Florida Constitution is vague on the role of the lieutenant governor, saying that person performs duties that "shall be assigned by the governor," as well as other duties that "may be prescribed by law." The lieutenant governor also becomes governor is there is a vacancy, impeachment, or physical or mental incapacity involving the governor.
Sirois' legislation would modify that, to enable the Florida Legislature to establish a new succession procedure for the governor's position.
The legislation also would eliminate the existing Government Efficiency Task Force. Approved by voters in 2006 by an amendment to the Florida Constitution and first established in 2007, the Government Efficiency Task Force is required to meet every four years to develop recommendations to improve governmental operations and reduce costs.
If approved by the Florida Legislature and voters, this would be the first change in the composition of the Florida Cabinet since voters approved a constitutional amendment in 1998, reducing the elected Cabinet from six to three members. The amendment merged the Cabinet offices of treasurer and comptroller into one chief financial officer; and made the elected Cabinet positions of secretary of state and education commissioner appointed positions.
Sirois' legislation would have a provision to eliminate the Cabinet office of the Commissioner of Government Efficiency if residents don't like it. A proposed constitutional amendment would appear on the ballot in 2044, asking voters if the office should be repealed. If the voters approve the repeal, that would take effect at the end of 2046.
DeSantis said the Florida State DOGE Task Force he established Monday by executive order will serve a one-year term. It will have multiple tasks in its efforts to eliminate waste, and will use artificial intelligence and other technologies to do so. He said its tasks will include:
Abolishing an additional 70 boards and commissions this year.
Conducting a deep dive into all facets of college and university operations and spending, and making recommendations to the Board of Governors and Florida Board of Education to eliminate any wasteful spending.
Using artificial intelligence to supplement ongoing efforts to review operations at state agencies and identify more ways to cut unnecessary spending and eliminate bureaucracy.
Looking into local government spending by using publicly available county and municipal spending records to expose bloat within local governance.
Returning unused or surplus federal dollars allocated to the state.
Dave Berman is business editor at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Berman at dberman@floridatoday.com, on X at @bydaveberman and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/dave.berman.54
This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: Sirois, Snyder propose creating DOGE-like Florida Cabinet position
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
13 minutes ago
- CBS News
Judge blocks Trump administration from expanding Florida's "Alligator Alcatraz" over environmental concerns
A federal judge on Thursday ordered an indefinite halt to new construction at an immigration detention facility that Florida officials have dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," and barred any new detainees from being brought to the site, siding with environmental groups who said the facility is endangering the Everglades and its wildlife. The decision is a setback for Florida's Republican-led state government and its aggressive efforts to aid the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda, including by deputizing thousands of state police as federal immigration officers. The order by U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams did not require Florida officials to completely cease operations at Alligator Alcatraz, allowing the state to continue using existing structures there to detain immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally. But Williams barred any more detainees from being transferred to the site — dashing plans to expand the detention center. The makeshift detention facility — located in what was largely an abandoned airfield — is one of several locations and prisons that Republican-led states have offered the Trump administration so they can be converted into immigration detention centers. Officials in Indiana and Nebraska have also allowed facilities in their states to hold immigrants facing deportation. Thursday's ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the Miccosukee tribe and environmental activists who challenged operations at Alligator Alcatraz on environmental grounds. They've argued environmental reviews mandated in federal law should have been completed before the site was set up. Florida officials have argued Alligator Alcatraz is not subject to those federal environmental requirements because the facility is run by the state. The Trump administration has said it will reimburse Florida for the effort using federal funds. Williams had paused further construction at Alligator Alcatraz earlier this month, but only for two weeks. A separate lawsuit over the legal rights of those held at the Everglades facility is also playing out. That case was partially dismissed by the U.S. District Court Judge Rodolfo Ruiz earlier this week, since the Trump administration had designated an immigration court to hear the claims of those detained at Alligator Alcatraz, one of the main concerns raised by the lawsuit. But Ruiz allowed another part of the case centered on detainees' right to in-person and confidential legal consultations to proceed, transferring the lawsuit to another federal judge.
Politico
16 minutes ago
- Politico
Californians' love-hate relationship with high-speed rail
Presented by With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL: California voters aren't confident the state's high-speed rail project will ever be finished, but they're not ready to give up on it either. Nearly two-thirds — 62 percent — of voters say that California should continue bankrolling the planned rail line from the Bay Area to Los Angeles after the Trump administration clawed back $4 billion in federal grants last month, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. The poll revealed a clear partisan divide among the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed, as just 21 percent of Democrats said it's time to pull the plug, compared to 45 percent of independents and 62 percent of Republicans. But that doesn't mean liberal Californians believe it's any more likely that they'll be able to ride from Southern California to San Francisco in their lifetime. Just 27 percent of Democrats said there's a high likelihood the project will be completed, roughly matching the 23 percent of their conservative counterparts who believe California officials can finish the first high-speed rail line in North America. That seemingly counterintuitive outcome offers a lesson for Gov. Gavin Newsom and the candidates vying to replace him who've doubled down on their support: It's time to put up or shut up. 'There definitely is this sense that the state can't do big things,' said Andrew Acosta, a veteran California Democratic campaign consultant. 'Californians would like to see it happen, but show me the last project that came in on time or under budget.' That sentiment is reflected in the poll, as 38 percent of Democrats said their support is contingent on the project keeping to its current budget. But, in the short term, President Donald Trump's incessant hammering of a project beset with construction delays and cost overruns could be doing California officials a favor. His Federal Railroad Administration yanked $4 billion in Obama- and Biden-era grants last month, following a barrage of attacks from Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, congressional and state Republicans. 'This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED,' Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social, the day the federal funding was revoked. 'Not a SINGLE penny in Federal Dollars will go towards this Newscum SCAM ever again.' Jack Citrin, a political science professor at University of California, Berkeley, and partner on the poll, said the partisan divide over whether California should continue the project reflects a broader trend on issues that have federal connections, like electric vehicle policies. 'Any of these questions that smell of Trump, the Democrats are going to be pushed in the opposite direction,' Citrin said. Newsom and high-speed rail backers, including powerful labor unions, have countered the Republican crackdown with a proposal to guarantee $1 billion in funding annually through the state's cap-and-trade program. Democratic voters' continued support for state funding could bolster their argument as negotiations over how to divvy up revenue generated by cap-and-trade auctions heat up with less than a month before the end of the legislative session. Those are signs that even without federal help, high-speed rail isn't going anywhere in the short term. Democratic lawmakers will likely face another reckoning sooner rather than later over a project that was originally slated for completion by 2020 and is now expected to open its initial line connecting Bakersfield to Merced in 2033, with no projected date for final completion. The rail line's price tag is now estimated to cost up to $128 billion, nearly four times its original $33 billion projection. But Citrin said the results show that Democrats remain hopeful about high-speed rail, even if they have doubts. 'I think a lot of this support shows that hope springs eternal,' he said. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! PASS 'EM IF YOU'VE GOT 'EM: Kids are back in school, Labor Day plans are locked in, and it's hot enough to cook an egg on the sidewalk in Sacramento. All signs of one undeniable fact: It's almost the end of the session. Since recess ended, redistricting and a slew of major energy packages have dominated the conversation. But there's still some perfectly good legislation to pass outside the center of those dueling storms. At least so says a coalition of renewable energy business groups and advocates. The group — including former state Sen. Fran Pavley, Advanced Energy United and The Climate Center — sent a letter Thursday to Newsom and the leadership of both legislative houses and their appropriations committee making the case for giving some lower-profile energy bills some love. 'These common-sense bills will have a big impact on lowering energy costs, expanding access to clean energy, and strengthening grid reliability,' said Edson Perez, California lead with Advanced Energy United. 'But because they've faced no big controversy and advanced quietly, they risk slipping under the radar in this crowded legislative session.' So what's on the list? THE CLIMATE MONEY: Remember Proposition 4, the $10 billion climate bond voters approved last November as one of the year's big climate wins? The groups that championed it sure do — and now they're angling for their payday. Water, wildfire, conservation and renewable energy groups urged budget leaders in a Thursday letter to detail and pass a spending plan for at least $2.7 billion of the money this year. 'Given the cuts to and uncertainty around federal funding for natural resources, state investments are more important than ever,' wrote the groups, including The Nature Conservancy, American Clean Power-California and the Association of California Water Agencies. In its own letter, ACWA detailed 'shovel-ready' dam safety and recycled water projects that were originally slated to get money from the general fund but were cut in an agreement between Newsom and lawmakers to instead fund them with the bond money. Sen. Ben Allen and Assemblymember Steve Bennett, who chair the budget subcommittees overseeing environmental spending, have said in interviews they're interested in passing a spending plan for the bond money. But negotiations around the pot of money are tangled with negotiations over how to distribute cap-and-trade revenues as part of the program's reauthorization. — CvK SOAK IT UP: One reservoir's loss is another's gain. The California Water Commission voted unanimously this week to redirect $218.9 million in Prop 1 bond money it had allocated to the Los Vaqueros Reservoir expansion, which stalled last year over disagreement over who should pay for what, to the Sites Reservoir project, bringing the total state contribution to $1 billion for the proposal to store enough American River water to supply 3 million households per year. The money comes at a good time for Sites, the state's biggest new reservoir in decades, because a brand new cost estimate hiked its ten-year-old price tag of $4.5 billion up to $6.8 billion — but it's not enough. Filling in the gap will be the water agencies who've signed up to get some of the water but have yet to finalize their contribution — most notably the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which has preliminarily signed up for a 22 percent share. The federal government, coming in at 9 percent right now, has also expressed interest in getting more of the water. If the State Water Resources Control Board signs off on its water permit as expected this year and, crucially, the cost-share is figured out, construction could start as soon as next year — making Sites a major test of California's ability to build large-scale water infrastructure in a changing climate. — CvK NUCLEAR BY THE BAY: Bay Area startups and tech veterans appear to be the earliest winners in the Trump administration's push to loosen nuclear regulations and speed up the development of small reactors. Eight of 10 companies chosen by the Department of Energy last week to compete for safety design approvals were founded in the San Francisco Bay Area or have former tech industry leaders in executive positions, as Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho reports for POLITICO's E&E News. That program aims to quickly advance nuclear technology and have at least three new pilot plants operating by July 4, 2026. The development comes after Trump signed a May executive order that allows safety designs for new reactors already tested and certified either by DOE or the Defense Department to avoid scrutiny from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Industry watchers say that change benefits startups, which are less eager to work with the NRC than are established nuclear developers like Westinghouse Nuclear and GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy. — AN RAISE A GLASS: How do you wrap up a day of lobbying legislators, many of whom are on the brink of rolling back major environmental regulations? You drink on it. The EnviroVoters Ed Fund (the group's 501(c)3 arm) hosted the Green CA Reception on Wednesday evening at Cafeteria 15L. POLITICO spotted Assemblymember Alex Lee in the crowd, plus a slew of environmental advocates including: Resource Renewal Institute Director of Advocacy and Engagement Scott Webb, Environmental Defense Center Chief Counsel Linda Krop, BlueGreen Alliance Senior California Policy Organizer Franki Gracey, Fearless Advocacy Inc. President Jennifer Fearing and, of course, California Environmental Voters Executive Director Mike Young. — NB SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. We're thrilled to announce our panel: 'California's Energy Policy at a Crossroads,' featuring state Senate energy and environment policy adviser Kip Lipper, Western States Petroleum Association CEO Catherine Reheis-Boyd, Newsom senior climate adviser Lauren Sanchez and environmental justice consultant Katie Valenzuela — and moderated by our editor Debra Kahn. The live event is currently at capacity, but will be streamed. Advance registration is required — request an online invite here. — Sammy Roth at the Los Angeles Times pins California's climate backsliding on Newsom. — Southern California is facing a triple threat of extreme heat, wildfire risk and thunderstorms. — A leading expert on energy affordability has a new book on the implications of solar getting cheaper.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett says he will not seek reelection if new congressional map is approved
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Democratic U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett announced he would end his reelection campaign if a new controversial congressional map is approved by the courts. Doggett currently serves a blue district in Austin. 'If the courts give Trump a victory in his scheme to maintain control of a compliant House, I will not seek reelection in the reconfigured CD37, even though it contains over 2/3rd of my current constituents,' Doggett said in a news release Thursday evening. This announcement comes just weeks after the longest-serving representative in the state's delegation said he would run for another term in Congressional District 37. A new congressional map approved by the Texas House of Representatives on Wednesday would give Republicans an advantage to pick up an additional five seats in Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. The rare mid-decade redistricting push is in response to President Donald Trump wanting to shore up Republican control in the U.S. House ahead of the midterm elections in his second term. State Rep. Todd Hunter, R – Corpus Christi, submitted the proposed map and told his colleagues in open meetings that the map was drawn with political performance in mind. They targeted five blue districts in Texas to give Republicans an advantage. One of the districts targeted was CD 35, which is currently held by U.S. Rep. Greg Casar. The current configuration of CD 35 captures parts of east Austin and San Antonio. Under Hunter's proposal, CD 35 was shifted to cover only east San Antonio. The new voting lines were drawn to favor Republican candidates. In the 2024 election, voters in the proposed CD 35 voted for Donald Trump by a 10-point margin. If the map is ultimately approved, it gives Casar a tough decision. He can either run in his current district that now leans more Republican, or challenge his Democratic colleague in Austin. Doggett and Casar stood united against the gerrymandering effort on Aug. 1, but later in the month a 'save the date' email acquired by Punchbowl News reporter Ally Mutnick showed Doggett saw it best that Casar continue to run for reelection in CD 35 because it was more Hispanic. 'Of course I plan to run for reelection in Austin,' Casar said in a statement at the time. 'But the most important thing right now isn't any one person's political career. The most important thing is fighting Trump's gerrymandering, which is what I'm focused on.' But Doggett's latest announcement shows he would concede the seat to Casar if the map prevails in the courts, which state Democrats have already said they would challenge once it is fully approved. 'I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump,' Doggett's statement reads. 'While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats. If Trump extreme gerrymandering prevails, I wish Congressman Casar the best.' Casar posted kind words for Doggett on social media, describing him as 'an Austin institution.' 'I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues,' Casar wrote. Doggett did leave the door open for another congressional run if the federal courts strike down the proposed map. 'If this racially gerrymandered Trump map is rejected, as it should be, I will continue seeking reelection in Congressional District 37 to represent my neighbors in the only town I have ever called home,' the statement read. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
