
Swedish inquiry finds abuse and fraud in international adoptions dating back decades
Anna Singer, a Swedish expert leading the country's investigation into its international adoption practices, speaks during an interview in Seoul, South Korea, March 21, 2023. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon, file)
STOCKHOLM — STOCKHOLM (AP) — A Swedish commission recommended Monday that international adoptions be stopped after an investigation found a series of abuses and fraud dating back decades.
Sweden is the latest country to examine its international adoption policies after allegations of unethical practices, particularly in South Korea.
The commission was formed in 2021 following a report by Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter detailing Sweden's problematic international adoption system. Monday's recommendations were sent to Minister of Social Services Camilla Waltersson Grönvall, who said her department would review the report.
'The assignment was to investigate whether there had been irregularities that the Swedish actors knew about, could have done and actually did,' Anna Singer, a legal expert and the head of the commission, told a news conference. 'And actors include everyone who has had anything to do with international adoption activities.
'It includes the government, the supervisory authority, organization, municipalities and courts. The conclusion is that there have been irregularities in the international adoptions to Sweden.'
The commission called on the government to formally apologize to adoptees and their families. Investigators found confirmed cases of child trafficking in every decade from the 1970s to the 2000s, including from Sri Lanka, Colombia, Poland and China.
Singer said that a public apology, beside being important for those who are personally affected, can help raise awareness about the violations because there is a tendency to downplay the existence and significance of the abuses.
An Associated Press investigation, in collaboration with Frontline (PBS), last year reported dubious child-gathering practices and fraudulent paperwork involving South Korea's foreign adoption program, which peaked in the 1970s and '80s amid huge Western demands for babies.
The AP and Frontline spoke with more than 80 adoptees in the U.S., Australia and Europe and examined thousands of pages of documents to reveal evidence of kidnapped or missing children ending up abroad, fabricated child origins, babies switched with one another and parents told their newborns were gravely sick or dead, only to discover decades later they had been sent to new parents overseas.
The findings are challenging the international adoption industry, which was built on the model created in South Korea.
In March, South Korea's truth commission concluded that the government bears responsibility for facilitating a foreign adoption program rife with fraud and abuse, driven by efforts to reduce welfare costs and enabled by private agencies that often manipulated children's backgrounds and origins.
The Netherlands last year announced it would no longer allow its citizens to adopt from abroad. Denmark's only international adoption agency said it was shutting down, and Switzerland apologized for failing to prevent illegal adoptions. France released a scathing assessment of its own culpability.
South Korea has sent around 200,000 children to the West for adoptions in the past six decades, with more than half of them placed in the U.S. Along with France and Denmark, Sweden has been a major European destination of South Korean children, adopting nearly 10,000 of them since the 1960s.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Auto industry hit by China's rare earth export curbs as worldwide concerns grow
Some European auto parts plants have suspended output and Mercedes-Benz is considering ways to protect against shortages of rare earths, as concerns about the damage from China's restrictions on critical mineral exports deepen across the globe. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. China's dominance of the critical mineral industry, key to the green energy transition, is increasingly viewed as a key point of leverage for Beijing in its trade war with U.S. President Donald Trump. China produces around 90% of the world's rare earths, and auto industry representatives have warned of increasing threats to production due to their dependency on it for those parts. 'It just puts stress on a system that's highly organized with parts being ordered many weeks in advance,' said Sherry House, Ford's finance chief, at an investor conference on Wednesday. She said China's export controls add administrative layers that are sometimes smooth, and sometimes not. 'We're managing it. It continues to be an issue, and we continue to work the issues.' EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said on Wednesday that he and his Chinese counterpart had agreed to clarify the rare earth situation as quickly as possible. 'We must reduce our dependencies on all countries, particularly on a number of countries like China, on which we are more than 100% dependent,' said EU Commissioner for Industrial Strategy Stephane Sejourne. 'The export (curbs) increase our will to diversify,' he said as Brussels identified 13 new projects outside the bloc aimed at increasing supplies of metals and minerals essential. Europe's auto supplier association CLEPA said several production lines have shut down after running out of supplies, the latest to warn about the growing threat to manufacturing due to the controls. Of the hundreds of requests for export licenses made by auto suppliers since early April, only a quarter have been granted so far, CLEPA added, with some requests rejected on what the association described as 'highly procedural grounds.' It did not identify the companies but warned of further outages. While China's announcement in April coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally and are causing worry among business executives around the world. Earlier on Wednesday, Mercedes-Benz production chief Joerg Burzer said he was talking to top suppliers about building 'buffers' such as stockpiles to protect against potential threats to supply. Mercedes was currently not affected by the shortage. BMW said that part of its supplier network was disrupted but its own plants were running as normal. German and U.S. automakers have complained that the restrictions imposed by China threaten production, following a similar grievance from an Indian EV maker last week. Mathias Miedreich, board member for electrified propulsion at German automotive supplier ZF Friedrichshafen, said the company has largely been able to get needed permits from China. In a media briefing on Tuesday, he said he worries though that the situation eventually could resemble the computer-chip shortage during the COVID-19 pandemic, which wiped out millions of vehicles from automakers' production plans. Many are lobbying their governments to find a quick solution but some companies only have enough supplies to last a few weeks or months, Wolfgang Weber, CEO of Germany's electrical and digital industry association ZVEI, said in an e-mailed statement. Swedish Autoliv, the world's biggest maker of airbags and seatbelts, said its operations are not affected, but CEO Mikael Bratt said he has set up a task force to manage the situation. There are few alternatives to China. Automakers from General Motors to BMW and major suppliers like ZF and BorgWarner are researching or have developed motors with low- to zero rare earth content in a bid to cut their reliance on China, but few have managed to scale production to bring down costs. BMW has deployed a magnet-free electric motor for its latest generation of electric cars, but still requires rare earths for smaller motors powering components like windshield wipers or car window rollers. 'There is no solution for the next three years except to come to an agreement with China,' said Andreas Kroll, managing director of Noble Elements, rare earths importer for medium-sized companies and startups without their own inventories. 'China controls practically 99.8 per cent of global production of heavy rare earths. Other countries can only produce these in minimal quantities, virtually on a laboratory scale.' China's slow pace of easing its critical mineral export controls has become a focus of Trump's criticism of Beijing, which he says has violated the truce reached last month to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. Trump has sought to redefine the United States' trading relationship with its biggest economic rival by imposing steep tariffs on billions of dollars of imported goods in hopes of narrowing a trade deficit and bringing back lost manufacturing. He imposed tariffs as high as 145% against China only to scale them back after a selloff in stock, bond and currency markets over the sweeping nature of the levies. China has responded with its own tariffs and is leveraging its dominance in key supply chains to persuade Trump to back down. Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to talk this week to try to iron out their differences and the export curbs are expected to be high on the agenda. In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump said that Xi is 'VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH,' highlighting the fragility of the deal.


Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Top 3 ETFs Defense Hawks Are Buying
Global military spending is accelerating, with total worldwide military expenditures for 2024 estimated at $2.72 trillion. This marks a 9.4% increase in real terms over 2023 levels and the sharpest year-over-year (YOY) rise in decades. While spending in the major military powers of the United States, Russia, China, Germany, and India still accounts for the majority of total defense spending, budgets in other parts of the world are also increasing, particularly given instability in the Middle East and concern in Europe about the escalation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Defense hawk investors who believe this trend is likely to continue may be inclined to invest in aerospace and defense firms that are most likely to benefit from increased military spending. Individual investments in this area are accessible for U.S. investors but less so for international defense companies. Hawkish investors seeking broader international exposure to the defense space might consider a dedicated and expansive exchange-traded fund (ETF) targeting this industry. Targeted Global Defense Exposure in a Popular Fund [content-module:CompanyOverview|NYSEARCA:SHLD] The Global X Defense Tech ETF (NYSEARCA: SHLD) has more than $2 billion in assets under management (AUM), making it one of the largest and most popular defense-focused ETFs. SHLD includes about 40 holdings with companies in the industrials, cybersecurity, AI, and drone systems spaces. The fund is fairly concentrated, with positions in German automotive and arms manufacturer Rheinmetall AG (ETR: RHM) and U.S.-based Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: PLTR) together accounting for more than 21% of the portfolio. Just over half of the portfolio is given over to U.S. companies, with Germany, France, Britain, and South Korea among the other markets best represented. SHLD offers an expense ratio of 0.50%, which is somewhat high for a passively managed fund but understandable given its global exposure and specialized theme. What's more, the fund's performance in recent months has likely more than made up for its fee—SHLD has returned nearly 52% year-to-date (YTD) and 69% in the past 12 months. North American and European Focus With a New Fund [content-module:CompanyOverview|NASDAQ:NATO] The Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NASDAQ: NATO) is a fund specifically focused on aerospace and defense stocks headquartered in the 32 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries across Europe and North America. NATO's portfolio includes more than 70 companies, and the largest position is under 9% of total assets. This makes the fund somewhat more diversified than SHLD above, even as it has a more narrowly focused geographical purview. NATO is also almost exclusively focused on industrials names, while SHLD gives over a portion of its portfolio to software and AI companies with defense interests as well. More than two-thirds of NATO's portfolio is made up of U.S. companies, with France and the U.K. making up the bulk of the remainder. NATO comes in ahead of SHLD when it comes to fees, as it has an expense ratio of just 0.35%. Having launched last October, it has a limited performance history, but it has generated returns of about 32% YTD. However, with an AUM of around $24 million and a one-month average trading volume hovering around 17,000, investors may find liquidity to be an issue here more so than for SHLD. High-Risk, High-Reward 3X Defense Leverage [content-module:CompanyOverview|NYSEARCA:DFEN] Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares Fund (NYSEARCA: DFEN) is a fund reserved for defense investors comfortable taking on a high degree of risk. This ETF provides an opportunity for investors anticipating a short-term rally in U.S. defense stocks, offering daily 3X leveraged exposure to a bucket of about 38 companies. Like SHLD above, DFEN is fairly concentrated, with the top two positions representing more than a quarter of assets invested. As with other leveraged funds, DFEN is not designed to be held longer than a single day of trading. This means it may be a viable option for investors holding one of the defense funds above long-term but seeking additional targeted exposure in anticipation of an intraday rally in this industry. Due to its leverage and unique focus, this fund has a higher expense ratio of 0.95%. It also has the highest degree of leverage available in defense ETFs, but there are alternatives providing 2X exposure for investors interested in taking on a more moderate degree of risk. Where Should You Invest $1,000 Right Now? Before you make your next trade, you'll want to hear this. MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. Our team has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and none of the big name stocks were on the list. They believe these five stocks are the five best companies for investors to buy now...


CTV News
6 hours ago
- CTV News
U.S. and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris
FILE -The "Cosco Shipping France" container ship is moored at the Long Beach Container Terminal, LBCT, at Middle Harbor in the Port of Long Beach, Calif., , April 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File) PARIS — Europe and the United States are meeting in Paris to negotiate a settlement of a tense tariff spat with global economic ramifications between two global economic powerhouses. The European Union's top trade negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, met Wednesday with his American counterpart, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, on the sidelines of a meeting of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 'We're advancing in the right direction at pace — and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum,' Šefčovič posted on social media platform X alongside a photo of him shaking hands with Greer. Brussels and Washington are unlikely to reach a substantive trade agreement in Paris. The issues dividing them are too difficult to resolve quickly. President Donald Trump regularly fumes about America's persistent trade deficit with the European Union, which was a record $161 billion last year, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. Trump blames the gap between what the U.S. sells and what it buys from Europe on unfair trade practices and often singles out for criticism the EU's 10% tax on imported cars. America's was 2.5% until Trump raised it to 25% in April. The EU has argued its purchases of U.S. services, especially in the technology sector, all but overcome the deficit. After the Trump administration's surprise tariffs last week on steel rattled global markets and complicated the ongoing, wider tariff negotiations between Brussels and Washington, the EU on Monday said it is preparing 'countermeasures' against the U.S. The EU has offered the U.S. a 'zero for zero' deal in which both sides end tariffs on industrial goods, including autos. Trump has rejected that idea, but EU officials say it's still on the table. The EU could buy more liquefied natural gas and defense items from the U.S., and lower duties on cars, but it isn't likely to budge on calls to scrap the value added tax, which is akin to a sales tax, or open up the EU to American beef. 'We still have a few weeks to have this discussion and negotiation,' French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said in Paris on Wednesday ahead of the OECD meeting. 'If the discussion and negotiation do not succeed, Europe is capable of having countermeasures on American products and services as well.' Greta Peisch, who was general counsel for the U.S. trade representative in the Biden administration, said the zero-for-zero proposal could provide a way to make progress if the Trump administration 'is looking for a reason not to impose tariffs on the EU.'' But Peisch, now a partner at the Wiley Rein law firm, wondered: 'How motivated is the U.S. to come to a deal with the EU?'' Trump, after all, has longstanding grievances complaints about EU trade practices. One target of his ire is the value-added tax, similar to U.S. state sales taxes. Trump and his advisers consider VATs unfair protectionism because they are levied on U.S. products. But VATs are set at a national level, not by the EU, and apply to domestic and imported products alike, so they have not traditionally been considered a trade barrier. There is little chance governments will overhaul their tax systems to appease Trump. Likewise, the Europeans are likely to balk at U.S. demands to scrap food and safety regulations that Washington views as trade barriers. These include bans on hormone-raised beef, chlorinated chicken and genetically modified foods. 'When you start talking about chickens or GMOs or automobile safety standards, you're talking about the ways countries choose to regulate their economies,' Reinsch said. 'We think that's protectionist. They think it's keeping their citizens healthy ... It's been a sore point for 60 years.'' ___ By Catherine Gaschka, Sam Mcneil And Paul Wiseman, The Associated Press McNeil reported from Barcelona and Wiseman reported from Washington, D.C.