logo
Putin baselessly offers Ukraine's rare earth minerals as Russian commodity

Putin baselessly offers Ukraine's rare earth minerals as Russian commodity

In a Feb. 24 interview with Russian state TV-1, President Vladimir Putin questioned Ukraine's reserves of valuable minerals. Russia, said Putin, can offer access to significantly larger deposits of rare earth minerals, including in the four regions of Ukraine — Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson, which Russia annexed in 2022.
Putin claimed the four Ukrainian territories 'historically' belonged to the Russian Federation and Moscow simply reclaimed them as its own.
That is false.
Putin's reference to 'historic' ownership of Ukrainian territories currently under Russian occupation dates to the Soviet Union or U.S.S.R., a socialist nation composed of 'federative republics,' which among others included the Russian Federative Republic and the Ukrainian Federative Republic.
The U.S.S.R. drew the borders of those republics following the Russian 1917 socialist revolution.
All four regions described by Putin were part of the Ukrainian Federative Republic, then the independent state of Ukraine from 1918 until the 2014 Russian invasion. The Russian Federation was established in 1991 after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and these regions were never part of it.
By clandestinely invading Ukraine in 2014, then waging a full-scale war in 2022, Russia violated numerous international agreements and treaties Moscow ratified recognizing Ukraine's borders and guaranteeing its territorial integrity.
These agreements include:
The 1991 Alma-Ata Declaration: Affirmed the independence and borders of former Soviet republics.
The 1994 Budapest Memorandum: Russia, along with the U.S. and U.K., pledged to respect Ukraine's borders. In exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear arsenal, Moscow reaffirmed commitment to respecting sovereignty, independence, and existing borders and pledged not to use force or threaten Ukraine.
The 1997 Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation: Ensured the inviolability of borders.
The 2003 Ukraine-Russia Border Treaty: Delineated the land border.
The 2010 Kharkiv Pact: Extended Russia's lease of a Navy base in Sevastopol and confirmed the status of Crimea as Ukrainian territory.
By annexing these regions, Russia broke the agreements, violated Ukraine's territorial integrity, and defied international law.
Russia's actions led to global condemnation and sanctions, with the international community refusing to recognize the annexation. Ukraine continues to seek security guarantees in the face of Russia's ongoing aggression.
Conclusion: Ukrainian regions that Russia declared as its own in 2022 were never part of the Russian Federation, which was formed in 1991. Russia's actions violate international law and treaties, and these territories remain part of Ukraine in the eyes of international law.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer: ‘Sooner or later' Russia must yield to peace
Starmer: ‘Sooner or later' Russia must yield to peace

Voice of America

time15-03-2025

  • Voice of America

Starmer: ‘Sooner or later' Russia must yield to peace

Britain's leader encouraged his global counterparts to continue pushing for a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine at the start of a virtual meeting Saturday intended to end the fighting between the two countries. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told a virtual meeting of mostly European leaders that 'sooner or later' Russia would have to engage in talks on reaching a ceasefire in the three-year conflict. He addressed the group, described as a 'coalition of the willing,' of mostly European leaders as well as those from Australia, New Zealand and Canada but not the United States. 'Sooner or later, he's going to have to come to the table,' Starmer said of Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose country invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump urged Moscow to accept a ceasefire deal agreed to by U.S. and Ukrainian delegations in Saudi Arabia, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said 'the ball is in Russia's court.' Putin has said he agrees with a ceasefire in theory, but Russia still has certain conditions and questions that must be addressed before accepting any agreement. In his nightly video address, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggested that Putin is stalling and has demanded so many preconditions 'that nothing will work out at all.' Meanwhile, the U.S. has expanded sanctions on Russian oil and gas as well as its financial sectors. Saturday's discussion among world leaders could address future military and financial support for Ukraine and Zelenskyy's security concerns if a peace deal is reached. Zelenskyy attended Saturday's online video session.

Russian foreign minister exaggerates Russia-China relations, ignores nuances
Russian foreign minister exaggerates Russia-China relations, ignores nuances

Voice of America

time15-03-2025

  • Voice of America

Russian foreign minister exaggerates Russia-China relations, ignores nuances

On March 12, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke with American bloggers Mario Nawfal, Larry C. Johnson and Andrew Napolitano in Moscow. When asked whether the U.S. administration's efforts to normalize relations with Moscow are just to use Russia "cynically against the Chinese," Lavrov rejected such possibility. He described Russia-China relations as long-term, stronger and more confidential, based in deep trust and mutual understanding, and he emphasized widespread public support in both countries. That is misleading. The claim overlooks the underlying complexities and skepticism in the Russia-China relationship. Underlying tensions: Despite the appearance of a strong partnership, ongoing tensions underlie the relationship. This includes skepticism on both sides, especially about economic stability, military strength and the extent of mutual trust. Economic imbalance: China has become a dominant economic partner for Russia, but many Russians are concerned about China's increasing influence and the lack of substantial Chinese investment in Russia. Military relations: Unlike the strong military alignment seen in the Sino-Soviet alliance of 1950, today's cooperation is not as deeply integrated, particularly in military terms. China has not provided direct military aid to Russia in the Ukraine conflict, which would have been expected in a deeply allied relationship. Public sentiment: There is skepticism about the partnership in both Russia and China. Russian citizens are not entirely supportive of Chinese products or investments, and many Chinese question the long-term economic and military viability of Russia. Historical context Sino-Soviet Alliance (1950s): This period marked a high point of cooperation, with the Soviet Union providing substantial economic, technological and military support to China. Yet, the alliance ended with the Sino-Soviet split by the late 1950s. This contradicts Lavrov's characterization that current relations are unprecedented in their depth. Strategic Partnership (1996-2014): The strategic partnership strengthened after the Cold War, especially under Vladimir Putin and Jiang Zemin. However, China still balanced its relations with the West, highlighting that the partnership was pragmatic, not based purely on mutual trust. Anti-Western Alignment (2014-2025): The relations have become closer since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Ukraine invasion. China has been providing crucial economic support. Beijing, however, avoids direct military aid to evade Western sanctions and maintains neutrality. This signals that the cooperation is based on shared opposition to the West, not genuine trust or an alliance akin to that of the 1950s. Current economic dependence Moscow is now heavily dependent on Beijing: China has become Russia's largest trading partner, and Russia plays a key role in supplying China with oil and gas. The economic relationship has its imbalances, however. China's total investments in Russia remain relatively low compared with its global investments. China still prioritizes its global economic ties, while Russia has become increasingly dependent on Beijing. Vedomosti, Russia's leading business daily, reported that China rarely invests directly in Russia, noting that while Russia seeks high-tech investments, China prioritizes mining, real estate, and banking. Since 2023, China has been Russia's largest trading partner, whereas Russia ranks only sixth among China's top trade partners. Skepticism in both countries Russians question Chinese investment and the long-term benefits, while many Chinese doubt Russia's economic resilience and military strength. In February 2025, FilterLabs released the results of research that used its Talisman data tool to analyze Chinese and Russian news and social media. Talisman's analysis reveals deep skepticism about Russia among Chinese social media users, many of whom question whether Russia's economy is truly as resilient as Moscow claims, whether its military strength matches its rhetoric, and what its long-term intentions are. These doubts suggest that despite official narratives of strong ties, public confidence in Russia within China is far from unanimous. The research also shows that online sentiments in Russia toward economic cooperation with China are more negative than official narratives suggest. International sanctions have pushed many Western products out of Russia, allowing Chinese goods to fill the gap in sectors such as automobiles and technology. While their market share grows due to affordability and geopolitical shifts, many Russians remain skeptical and dissatisfied with Chinese products, FilterLabs reported. In both countries, social media discussions are consistently less positive than mainstream press coverage, which itself was not uniformly supportive, revealing underlying skepticism about the partnership. "Their partnership is vulnerable," FilterLabs founder Jonathan Teubner told VOA. Conclusion While Lavrov's statement reflects an official narrative of a strong and enduring partnership, the truth is more nuanced. Relations are indeed closer than at any point since the 1950s, but they are shaped more by pragmatism, economic necessity and shared opposition to Western influence than by deep trust or historical affinity. In both countries, public opinion reveals skepticism, and the economic and military cooperation, while growing, is not without concerns.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store