[Editorial] Avoid overoptimism
North Korea on Saturday began dismantling some of its loudspeakers installed along the border for noise campaigns against South Korea, according to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The move is encouraging in that the North seemingly took a corresponding measure after the South finished removing its anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers. But it is premature to conclude based on this response alone that inter-Korean tensions have begun to thaw.
The South Korean military suspended the propaganda broadcasts it had been sending to North Korea through its loudspeakers on June 11.
About eight hours later, the North turned off its loudspeakers that since last year had jarred the nerves of South Korean residents in border towns by blaring eerie noises.
However, Kim Yo-jong, a high-ranking official of the North Korean Workers' Party and sister of its leader Kim Jong-un, said on July 28 that the South's suspension of loudspeaker broadcasts was not worthy of evaluation. She also said that there is no way for the North to sit across from the South for talks.
Yet, Seoul took another step to appease Pyongyang. On Aug. 7, it postponed about half of some 40 field training drills in the annual South Korea-US combined Ulchi Freedom Shield military exercise set to take place later this month.
Then two days later, the North was spotted dismantling some of its loudspeakers.
North Korea's removal of loudspeakers could be seen as a sign of positive change in South-North relations. Pyongyang has ignored Seoul since it ended communication with the South unilaterally in April 2023. But overoptimism is dangerous.
Even though the government in Seoul seeks to ease inter-Korean tensions, it should not make one-sided concessions. It should not try to meet the North's unreasonable demands, either. However, the Lee administration's measures toward North Korea are worrisome. It may be going too far to appease the North.
The decision to push back some training of the Ulchi Freedom Shield came after Kim Yo-jong condemned the South Korea-US joint drills.
After her condemnation, South Korea's Unification Minister Chung Dong-young reportedly said he would suggest to the president that the military exercise be rescheduled, and part of it actually was rescheduled. It is hard to exclude the possibility that South Korea might have first asked to postpone parts of the exercise in an effort to curry favor with the North. But soldiers who train less or do not train at all would not be able to defend their country in a time of emergency.
South Korea's military strength reportedly decreased from 560,000 in 2019 to 450,000 in July this year. Two years ago, it fell below the 500,000 mark regarded as the minimum level needed in the state of armistice between South and North Korea. Now, it is 50,000 short of that very level. Due to the decrease in military strength, the number of division-level units is said to have gone down from 59 in 2006 to 42. Diminishing force and unit dissolutions could produce ill effects for national security in many ways.
South Korea must not forget that Kim Jong-un has defined South Korea as its unchangeable No. 1 enemy state. The North, while persistently upgrading its nuclear weapons and missiles, has even accumulated combat experience by sending its soldiers to Russia to fight against Ukraine. It is also expanding weapons and technology deals with Russia.
China and Russia conduct joint marine training, posing a great threat to East Asia. There are growing calls in Washington for South Korea to take on more leading roles in responding to the North's threats. It is part of a strategy for US forces, including in Korea, to be operated flexibly to focus on checking China.
It is hasty at this stage to view North Korea's dismantling of some of its loudspeakers favorably. Above all, a strong military must be the basis of steps to relax tensions with North Korea.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
10 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Outgoing Indian envoy, Herald CEO discuss India-Korea ties
Outgoing Indian Ambassador to Korea Amit Kumar and Herald Media Group CEO Choi Jin-young underscored deepening India-Korea ties in a courtesy meeting on Wednesday. They discussed bilateral dimensions and mutual perceptions amid global economic uncertainties, with Kumar praising the Herald Media Group's commercial forums and events for connecting Korean and Indian businesses. 'I'll leave a note for my successor,' Kumar said, referring to Herald Media Group events and content such as the Hello India series, which helped bridge the information gap between Korea, India and the wider world. He cited HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering's memorandum of understanding with India's largest state-owned shipbuilder, Cochin Shipyard Limited, for long-term cooperation in the shipbuilding value chain. "In green hydrogen, we have known four companies, four Indian companies, which are accredited by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy," Kumar added. Choi urged deeper strategic cooperation and stronger economic diplomacy between India and Korea to ensure future economic security, while thanking Kumar for his efforts in boosting ties and hosting the India-Korea Business Partnership Forum in November 2024. 'India and Korea together can respond to global challenges more effectively,' said Choi, suggesting ways to 'strengthen networks' for strategic goals through stronger economic diplomacy. Kumar will return to the Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi after completing his tenure in South Korea this month. sanjaykumar@


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
New chiefs named for antitrust, financial oversight
President Lee Jae Myung unveiled a sweeping reshuffle of top economic and regulatory posts, nominating a mix of veteran policymakers and academics to lead agencies that set the country's market and financial agenda. Ju Biung-ghi, an economics professor at Seoul National University, was tapped to head the Fair Trade Commission, the country's antitrust watchdog. A University of Rochester-trained economist, Ju has advised the presidential National Economic Advisory Council and led the Korean Association of Applied Economics. Presidential Chief of Staff Kang Hoon-sik said the nominee is expected to 'meticulously implement the administration's economic philosophy of eradicating chronic unfair practices, such as subcontracting abuses, collusion and insider transactions, and establishing a fair market order' as the new chief of the nation's 'economic prosecutor.' Lee Eog-weon, a former first vice finance minister and macroeconomic strategist, was nominated to chair the Financial Services Commission, the country's top financial regulator. Known for guiding the economy through the pandemic and advancing innovation-led growth, Lee also served as the first Korean chair of a WTO domestic regulation working group. His policy track record spans international finance, market regulation and structural economic reform, giving him rare crossover expertise in both fiscal management and capital market oversight. The government said he will be tasked with balancing market stability with reform while expanding consumer protections. After nominating a new Financial Services Commission chair, the agency held an emergency meeting Wednesday to recommend attorney Lee Chan-jin as governor of the Financial Supervisory Service, a post that would make him the administration's first chief of the watchdog once confirmed. A classmate of President Lee Jae Myung at the Judicial Research and Training Institute, he built his career as a labor rights advocate, serving in leadership roles at Lawyers for a Democratic Society and People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy. He also represented the president in a high-profile case involving alleged illicit payments to North Korea. Separately, the government promoted internal candidates to lead two other agencies: Baek Seung-bo as commissioner of the Public Procurement Service and Ahn Hyung-jun as commissioner of Statistics Korea.


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee pledges complete wartime OPCON transfer by 2030
Proposal includes restoring inter-Korean relations, pursuing pragmatic diplomacy The transition of wartime operational control from the United States to South Korea has been designated as a key national security priority in the Lee Jae Myung administration's five-year governance plan that was unveiled Wednesday. According to the State Affairs Planning Committee — a de facto transition team tasked with drafting the administration's long-term agenda — the government aims to establish and implement a road map for the OPCON transfer during Lee's term. The plan calls for strengthening South Korea's operational planning and command capabilities to enhance deterrence against North Korea, while reaffirming that the transition will proceed in close coordination between the South Korea and US alliance. The OPCON transfer has long been a point of discussion between Seoul and Washington. South Korea has not held wartime operational control of its troops since the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950, when the authority was relinquished to the United Nations Command. It was later transferred to the South Korea-US Combined Forces Command, which remains under the leadership of a US four-star general. In 1994, under the liberal Kim Young-sam administration, South Korea regained peacetime operational control. However, wartime command authority continues to reside with the US under the current Combined Forces Command structure. With President Lee expected to hold his first summit with US President Donald Trump later this month in Washington, the OPCON issue is likely to resurface as a key agenda item. Broader alliance matters, including the level of the US troop presence in South Korea and defense cost-sharing, are also expected to be discussed. Yet Lee, who attended the committee's briefing session, stressed that the plan should not be seen as finalized government policy, but as a set of recommendations. "This is not a confirmed plan," Lee said. "It is a set of proposals outlining the desirable direction of state affairs. We will take them into account, and they may be revised through the process of consultation and coordination." He added that the government would "thoroughly and swiftly review" the committee's proposals and implement "as much as possible within feasible bounds." Caution remains within the military. Gen. Xavier Brunson, commander of the South Korea-US Combined Forces Command, reiterated last week that the transition must proceed under the agreed conditions. "If we choose to take shortcuts, that could endanger the readiness of the force here on the peninsula," Brunson said during a press conference at Camp Humphreys in Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi Province. "The hope is — the hope has always been — that OPCON transfer would happen at some point in the future when the conditions are met." In addition to OPCON, the administration plans to upgrade South Korea's three-axis defense system, which was developed in response to growing threats from North Korea. The system consists of the Kill Chain preemptive strike platform, the Korea Air and Missile Defense system and the Korea Massive Punishment and Retaliation strategy. To address the steadily shrinking number of military personnel, the government plans to restructure military branches, expand the use of civilian resources and improve the readiness of reserve forces. It also pledged to support the defense industry by fostering high-tech sectors such as artificial intelligence, drone systems, advanced engines and space technologies, as well as by pursuing innovation in weapons acquisition. Meanwhile, the blueprint also calls for the dissolution of the Defense Counterintelligence Command, with its core functions to be transferred to other agencies. The unit, tasked with countering North Korean espionage, has come under scrutiny for its role in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law declaration on Dec. 3, 2024. It was reported to have attempted to locate lawmakers and gain access to the National Election Commission during the incident. Inter-Korean policy, pragmatic diplomacy The blueprint also outlines a major shift in inter-Korean policy, moving away from confrontation and toward reconciliation. The government aims to restore inter-Korean relations by reopening communication channels, resuming talks and civilian exchanges and restarting humanitarian cooperation — a broader effort that, according to the committee, also includes pursuing a basic agreement between the two Koreas, modeled after the 1972 treaty between East and West Germany. The committee emphasized that any path toward unification must be grounded in public consensus, pledging to broaden civic participation in policymaking, promote peace and unification education and foster a more balanced public perception of North Korea. In broader diplomacy, the Lee administration promised a pragmatic approach based on national interest. The government seeks to evolve the alliance with the US into a future-oriented comprehensive partnership, pursue forward-looking relations with Japan, deepen strategic ties with China and manage relations with Russia in a stable and constructive manner. The plan also reaffirmed Seoul's commitment to expanding its outreach to G7 nations, building upon the New Southern and New Northern policies, and to strengthening engagement with countries in the Global South.