Pentagon chief says Trump still aiming for deal with Iran
WASHINGTON: U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Fox News on Monday that President Donald Trump was still aiming for a nuclear deal with Iran even as hostilities have escalated between U.S. ally Israel and Tehran, while a White House aide said separately that Washington was not attacking Iran.
'Of course,' Hegseth said on Fox News' 'Jesse Watters Primetime' show when asked if Trump was still aiming for a nuclear deal with Iran.
'We are postured defensively in the region to be strong in pursuit of a peace deal. And we certainly hope that's what happens here,' Hegseth said.
In a social media post on Monday, Trump said 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran,' citing what he said was the country's rejection of a deal to curb nuclear weapons development.
Israel attacked Iran on Friday and since then the two Middle Eastern rivals have exchanged blows, with Iranian officials reporting over 220 deaths, mostly civilians, in five days while Israel said 24 civilians had been killed. Israel says it aims to eliminate what it calls threats posed by Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs.
Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and has pointed to its right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, as a party to the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty
.
Israel, which is not a party to the NPT, is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that.
The air war between Iran and Israel has raised further alarms in a region that had already been on edge since the start of Israel's military assault on Gaza in October 2023.
Washington has thus far maintained it is not involved in Israeli attacks on Iran and warned Tehran not to attack U.S. interests or personnel in the region.
'We're vigilant, we're prepared, and we have messaged ... consistently from the beginning that we're in the region to defend our people and our assets,' Hegseth said on Fox News.
White House aide Alex Pfeiffer took to social media platform X to deny online claims that the U.S. was attacking Iran.
'This is not true. American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed,' Pfeiffer said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Iranians in Europe share ‘mixed feelings' on Israel offensive
FRANKFURT: As Israel and Iran trade fire in their most intense confrontation in history, members of the Iranian diaspora in Europe are torn between hopes for change and fears for their loved ones back home. In Frankfurt, Hamid Nasiri, 45, a product developer at a pharmaceutical company, said he had 'mixed feelings' about the fighting, started by Israel on Friday after weeks of tensions over Iran's nuclear programme. Like many Iranians in Europe, he sees Israel's offensive as a chance to topple the Iranian leadership under Ayatollah Ali Khamenei -- long accused of human-rights abuses and brutally repressing dissent. 'On the one hand, Israel's actions are specifically directed against the Islamic government, which is itself known for its brutal methods. That gives me a certain hope,' Nasiri said. 'At the same time, I naturally mourn for the people of Iran. When women, children and now scientists are killed, I find that morally very disturbing,' he said. 'Many are caught between hope for change and horror at what is happening right now,' said an Iranian teacher based in Frankfurt who did not want to give her name. She has not been able to reach a friend living in northern Tehran since Friday. - 'Really upset' - In London, around a dozen members of the Iranian diaspora gathered in front of the Iranian embassy on Monday. Some were waving Israeli flags, others the flag of the Pahlavi dynasty -- the ruling house of Iran until the Islamic Revolution in 1979. Psychology student Maryam Tavakol, 35, said she supported Israel's assault. 'There is no freedom in Iran, no human rights... We support each act that makes the Islamic republic weaker,' said Tavakol, who left Iran in 2019 and has been living in the UK for two years. But Ali, 49, a restaurant worker living in London who did not want to give his last name, said he would prefer the arch rivals to 'sit down and speak to each other'. '(I have) never supported the Iranian regime, I don't like the regime,' said Ali, who left Iran in 1997. '(But) who will suffer? The people... I don't support anyone who harms kids and people. I'm really upset,' he said. 'We still have family and friends in Iran, Tehran,' said Paria, 32, another London restaurant worker. 'They are fleeing to the north. We are really worried for them.' Israel on Friday launched a surprise aerial campaign targeting sites across Iran, saying the attacks aimed to prevent its enemy from acquiring atomic weapons. - 'Divided' - Iran's uranium enrichment has for decades caused tension with the West and Israel, which fear the drive is aimed at making an atomic bomb, a charge denied by Tehran. The Israeli strikes have so far killed at least 224 people, including top military commanders, nuclear scientists but also civilians, according to Iranian authorities. Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel have so far killed 24 people, according to Israeli authorities. Hamidreza Javdan, a 71-year-old actor and director originally from Tehran and now living in Paris, said the Iranian diaspora was 'divided' over the conflict. 'Some say 'no one has the right to attack our country', others think it's a good thing,' he said. Javdan said he was 'hopeful' for a change of government, but also fears for his brother, who is disabled and unable to quickly leave Tehran. 'And there are more than 10 million people in Tehran, where are they going to go?' he said. In Berlin, an Iranian translator who wanted to remain anonymous said she felt 'torn' over Israel's attacks. 'I hope so much that this war will overthrow the mullah regime. I wish for that so much. Then all the deaths would not have been in vain,' she said.
New Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Loud booms heard over Jerusalem, Tel Aviv as Iran launches missiles
JERUSALEM: Loud booms were heard over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem on Tuesday, AFP journalists reported, after air raid sirens sounded in several parts of Israel and the military warned of incoming Iranian missiles. "A short while ago, sirens sounded in several areas across Israel following the identification of missiles launched from Iran toward the State of Israel," the military said in a statement. It added that the air force was "operating to intercept and strike where necessary to eliminate the threat." Around 20 minutes later, the army released a statement saying people were allowed to leave protected spaces in several areas across the country. It said search and rescue teams were operating in several locations where "reports of fallen projectiles were received." In a statement on Telegram, the Israeli police reported that "missiles and shrapnel fell in the Tel Aviv area, causing material damage but no injuries." The fire and rescue service said there was an initial report of a "missile strike and fire" in the Dan district, an area surrounding Tel Aviv. "Around 08:45 (0545 GMT), numerous calls were received... regarding a missile strike and a fire in the Gush Dan area. Firefighting forces are on their way to the scene," it said in a statement. Despite growing calls for the longtime foes to end hostilities, neither Israel nor Iran showed any signs of cutting short the missile blitz that kicked off Friday, when Israel launched an unprecedented series of aerial raids targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities.--AFP
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Judge to rule on legality of Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
SAN FRANCISCO: A California court will hear arguments Tuesday on whether US President Donald Trump must give up control of the state's National Guard after he sent troops to protest-hit Los Angeles against the wishes of local officials. Trump has deployed more than 4,000 guardsmen – as well as 700 Marines – to the second-largest US city, where his immigration crackdown has sparked fierce, mostly peaceful opposition with some violence and vandalism. In a show of political muscle, Trump ignored the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who would usually oversee the Guard. A judge said Thursday that the Republican president's actions were "illegal" and ordered that he return control of the force to Newsom. But a higher court paused that ruling until Tuesday after the Trump administration lodged an appeal and slammed the judge's order as an "extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief." The midday hearing in San Francisco will likely at least determine whether the freeze on the order should be extended, effectively allowing Trump to maintain control over California's National Guard. The fatigue-wearing troops have been tasked with protecting federal property in Los Angeles, stationed outside buildings with helmets and large shields. US law restricts them from arresting citizens, though some guardsmen have fired tear gas and non-lethal rounds towards protesters, according to local media. California officials have heavily criticized Trump over his use of the military, saying it has escalated demonstrations that Los Angeles law enforcement could have handled. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard over the wishes of a state's governor. "His plan is clear: Incite violence and chaos in blue states, have an excuse to militarise our cities, demonise his opponents, keep breaking the law and consolidate power," Newsom wrote on X on Monday. Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, accused the Trump administration of "manufacturing a crisis." Trump has been unrepentant, taking credit for making Los Angeles "safe" and declaring that Newsom – a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 – had "totally lost control." The dispute mirrors multiple other tussles over Trump's attempts to expand the limits of presidential power, but is the first to involve troops. Like other cases, it could go all the way to the Supreme Court, where Republican appointees hold a 6-3 majority. Many in Los Angeles are angry about immigration raids carried out as part of Trump's ambition to deport vast numbers of undocumented migrants around the country. Outrage at the use of masked, armed immigration agents has also sparked protests in other cities, including San Francisco, New York, Chicago and San Antonio, Texas.--AFP
