logo
‘Don't Say Gay' expansion, misgendering bills draw criticism in House public hearing

‘Don't Say Gay' expansion, misgendering bills draw criticism in House public hearing

Yahoo03-04-2025

Former Rep. Patricia Todd, D-Birmingham, speaking to the House Education Policy Committee in the Alabama State House in Montgomery, Alabama. Todd was the first openly gay representative in Alabama. She was opposing HB 244, sponsored by Rep. Mack Butler, R-Rainbow City, at a public hearing on April 2. (Anna Barrett/Alabama Reflector)
Legislation that would expand the state's 'Don't Say Gay' law and extend legal protections to those who misgender other people drew a large number of opponents to an Alabama House committee meeting Wednesday.
HB 244, sponsored by Rep. Mack Butler, R-Rainbow City, would prohibit public school teachers at all grade levels from teaching or discussing gender identity or sexuality. The legislation also prohibits the display of pride flags and insignia in the classroom.
The law currently bans such discussions from kindergarten to fifth grade, but Butler said the expansion aligns with President Donald Trump's agenda and executive order.
'This simply is in line with President Trump's executive order, and I would encourage you guys to pass it as is,' he said.
The committee also held a public hearing for HB 246, sponsored by Rep. Scott Stadthagen, R-Hartselle, that would give public educators legal immunity and students immunity from discipline for using a person's legal name and pronouns aligned with their reproductive organs, instead of the name and gender with which they identify.
Opponents, many of whom identified as transgender or nonbinary, significantly outnumbered supporters 10-2.
Susan Stewart of Huntsville, a critic of the legislation who is cisgender and heterosexual, said the Don't Say Gay expansion was unconstitutional.
'You're going to tell that teacher that they have to use words that they know will harm their student? You're actually going to tell a teacher that if students ask questions about a classmate with two mommies, they have to drag students aside for private conversations, creating an atmosphere of shame and confusion in their own classroom?' Stewart said Wednesday.
Becky Gerritson, executive director of Eagle Forum, a conservative organization, said schools should be 'neutral' in their curriculum.
'Schools should be places of learning, not activism, and this provision ensures that classrooms remain neutral and focused on education,' Gerritson said.
Former Rep. Patricia Todd, D-Birmingham, the co-chair of Alabama Equality, an LGBTQ+ advocacy group and the first openly gay person elected to the Alabama Legislature and testified that seeing a Pride flag or hearing about other gay people did not make her gay.
'It was a feeling of the heart,' Todd said. 'We're here. We're not going away. We're going to continue to be loud and proud.'
Butler claimed a small minority of teachers were pushing gender ideology on their students. He would not name schools where that is happening.
'I've talked to a student in my county talking about one teacher that cannot teach the curriculum without spending all their time focused on gender ideology,' he said.
The legislation bans discussion of gender ideology in 'instructional time.' Rep. Jeanna Ross, R-Guntersville, said that does not apply to private conversations between a student and a teacher, fellow student or nurse.
'A student could still have a conversation with the teacher,' she said.
Stadthagen's bill would require students to get a permission slip signed by their guardian for teachers to call them by a different name. Opponents said it would create an unnecessary burden for teachers.
Allison Montgomery, a member of Alabama Trans Rights Action Coalition (ALTRAC), said the bill could require students with non-English names that go by a nickname for ease of pronunciation to get a permission slip.
'This bill would prevent teachers from calling them by their nickname, because it is not a derivative thereof, even with the permission slip,' Montgomery said. 'This would place an undue burden on teachers to keep track of who has the permissions lit and who doesn't.'
Paige Gant, a former math professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, said the legislation was a solution in search of a problem.
'In my eight years of teaching I have not come across a single situation in which a lawsuit would've been appropriate against a university regarding what pronouns someone did or did not use,' she said.
Gerritson said she did not want to be forced to go against her own moral and religious beliefs to adhere to somebody else's life.
'No one should be forced to speak or act in a way that violates their conscience, especially within our schools and universities,' Gerritson said.
Montgomery said the bill would not protect parents' rights, but instead protect people with bad intentions.
'There's a narrative about things like these that they're trying to protect kids. But how does it protect kids to require teachers to know what genitals their students have?' she said. 'Only a certain type of person would want this, and we don't want to empower those types of people.'
The committee did not vote on either bill on Wednesday. Rep. Terri Collins, R-Decatur, the chair of the committee, said they would return soon.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senator Martin Heinrich calls for Torrance County ICE detention facility to be closed
Senator Martin Heinrich calls for Torrance County ICE detention facility to be closed

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senator Martin Heinrich calls for Torrance County ICE detention facility to be closed

Jun. 9—New Mexico's senior senator is calling for a New Mexico-based Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility to be closed, after his congressional staff observed troubling conditions during a visit in late May. "For years, detainees have been denied adequate access to legal services and medical care while being subjected to inhumane living conditions and continued instances of physical abuse," Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., wrote to Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons in a letter Thursday. The Torrance County Detention Facility is owned and operated by CoreCivic in Estancia. Heinrich has repeatedly pushed for CoreCivic's contract to be terminated, including in a December 2023 letter during the Biden administration. "CoreCivic is committed to providing safe, humane and appropriate care for the people in our facilities," CoreCivic spokesman Brian Todd said in a statement, pointing to the facility's overall "good" ratings in its 2024 and 2025 ICE Office of Detention Oversight audits. As the Trump administration has been trying to increase deportations, members of Congress have been attempting to conduct oversight of ICE detention centers around the country. When New Jersey Congresswoman LaMonica McIver and other Democratic officials tried to do an oversight visit to a Newark ICE center in May, she was charged with two counts of assault after a confrontation with officers trying to arrest the Newark mayor. On May 28, Heinrich's staff members were allowed to tour one housing unit at the Torrance County facility, but were denied access to two other housing units, after they heard at least 10 detainees file complaints of abuse, and lack of access to laundry and medical services. According to Todd, detainees have daily access to sign up for medical and mental health services, there are clinics staffed with licensed health professionals and medical personnel on site at all hours. "The agent claimed that a revised ICE visitation protocol prohibited congressional staff from visiting housing units with detainees present," the letter reads. "However, the document the agent cited made no mention of limiting congressional staff visitation to empty pods, and it in fact cited to a statutory authority explicitly forbidding ICE from denying congressional staff conducting oversight access." Congressional staff members found backed-up sinks, a drain in the middle of a common area backed up with sewage water, and non-functioning tablet devices — devices that people detained by ICE use to access legal services, according to Heinrich's letter. The conditions match those described by detainees and advocates, the letter says. Maintenance staff respond quickly to plumbing issues, Todd said in a statement, and the common area drain was backed up with water after debris collected in shower drains, not with sewage. CoreCivic is committed to providing detainees with access to counsel and courts, Todd said, although he did not respond to a question about the broken tablets. TCDF Warden George Dedos confirmed that the detention facility had no water from Estancia for three days, the letter says, and was unable to answer questions about the capacity of the facilities' two back-up water tanks or describe the contingency plan for when there is another water outage, "short of the total relocation of all the detainees." "He told my staff during their visit that the water shortage had not impacted their operations, but that runs contrary to what detainees said during that same visit," Heinrich wrote. His staff were told by detainees that "water was only turned on for one hour every three days for showers, they were provided only two bottles of drinking water per day, and they were unable to flush toilets for days at a time." CoreCivic was notified on April 29 that Estancia was having a water supply issue and tried to reduce its water consumption. Drinking water and bottled water were available, Todd said, and water was provided to help flush toilets "as an added measure to reduce water consumption." The laundry services and showers were placed on a schedule, but "those services were still available to all of those in our care," according to Todd. ICE did not respond to a request for comment.

Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties
Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties

Axios

time6 hours ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties

After several years of commemorating LGBTQ+ Pride Month, Clearwater leaders skipped the recognition this year, instead designating June for the first time as "Faith and Family Month." Why it matters: While the celebration on its face seeks to strengthen families through religion, Faith and Family Month's website denies the existence of transgender people and defines marriage as between a man and a woman. It dismisses climate change and critical race theory — a concept that links racial discrimination to the nation's foundations and legal system — as "false doctrines." And it attributes that belief system to the American Pastor Project, a network of church leaders with a mission to "eradicate Wokeism from the American pulpit." What they're saying: The city "is making a statement that they don't want LGBTQ+ people to be acknowledged [or] respected," said Wendy Vernon, a Clearwater resident and the president and founder of LGBTQ+ advocacy group PFLAG Safety Harbor. "That's definitely very hurtful to the community when they're already being shunned away everywhere," Vernon told Axios. She also questioned why city leaders didn't issue a Pride Month proclamation in addition to Faith and Family Month, as was the case in Lakeland. Between the lines: Proclamations are largely symbolic and typically requested by community organizations or city staff. Clearwater's Diversity Leadership Council, made up of city employees, didn't request a Pride proclamation this year due to disruptive protests at a Pride event last year, city spokesperson Joelle Castelli told Axios. "It was very uncomfortable for the members of the committee as they were personally targeted," she said. Committee members instead invited their colleagues to participate in the St. Pete Pride parade this month and offered free tickets to a Clearwater Threshers game. Driving the news: Faith and Family Month was organized by Christian service nonprofit Somebody Cares Tampa Bay, co-founder Daniel Bernard told Axios. Bernard said he was inspired by a discussion with Clearwater Mayor Bruce Rector, who said he wanted to see a pro-family event in the city. At the request of Somebody Cares, Rector presented the proclamation at the May 15 City Council meeting. His support features prominently in promotional social media posts and on Faith and Family Month's website. "We look forward to … celebrating an entire month with family-friendly activities and talking about how faith can help families be stronger," he says in a promotional video. Reality check: Navigate to the website's "Statement of Faith" page, and a much broader belief system comes into focus. Zoom in:"We recognize God's created order, in making male and female, determined by divine imprint, genetically encoded at conception, and changeless," it says, echoing language used by the Trump and DeSantis administrations to deny rights to transgender people. It goes on to say that pastors have a role "to protect our nation from the deceptions of false teaching and anti-Christ agendas," including abortion, CRT and "climate alarmist theory." The statement is attributed to the American Pastor Project, an organization founded by Lucas Miles, an Indiana-based pastor, conservative activist and author of "Woke Jesus: The False Messiah Destroying Christianity." Rector said the purpose of the proclamation was to encourage people of all different faiths and belief systems to "celebrate the importance of faith and families." Had an organization approached the city with a Pride proclamation, he "probably" would have signed it, he said, adding that he presented one last year. He said he hadn't seen the statement of faith until an Axios reporter showed it to him. He also wasn't familiar with the American Pastor Project, Rector said. "We're not trying to come against anybody or do anything of that nature," Bernard said. "We are just promoting the truth as we understand it."

New protests in S.F. begin as Newsom says Trump is sending more National Guard troops to L.A.
New protests in S.F. begin as Newsom says Trump is sending more National Guard troops to L.A.

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

New protests in S.F. begin as Newsom says Trump is sending more National Guard troops to L.A.

Outrage over immigration raids in Los Angeles sparked a second day of protests in San Francisco on Monday, as state and local leaders accused President Donald Trump of stoking fear and violence by deploying federal troops to Southern California. The demonstrations began late Monday afternoon on the steps of City Hall as Gov. Gavin Newsom said that Trump would deploy another 2,000 members of the California National Guard to Los Angeles, despite the first 2,000 troops being underprepared and underutilized. 'This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego,' Newsom posted on social media. 'This is Reckless. Pointless. And Disrespectful to our troops.' At San Francisco City Hall, about 200 people gathered on the steps for a rally and press conference opposing Trump's immigration enforcement, including his enactment of a travel ban targeting citizens from mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. One person waved an upside-down American flag, while another held a Pride flag. Among the speakers were three members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors — Bilal Mahmood, Jackie Fielder and Shamann Walton — who each strongly condemned Trump. Both Mahmood and Walton described the Trump administration as tyrannical, while Mahmood challenged Trump to come after him first before targeting his residents. 'Donald Trump, you are a coward,' Mahmood said. 'You are a wannabe king anchored in hatred.' Fielder accused Trump of "recklessly" escalating the protests in Los Angeles by deploying the California National Guard and later the Marines. 'It was the National Guard that incited violent protests by arresting peaceful protesters,' Fielder said. 'We have fought this before, and we have to fight it again.' The demonstration came on the heels of a chaotic altercation in downtown San Francisco on Sunday that resulted in the arrest of 148 adults and six juveniles. The civil unrest spurred Mayor Daniel Lurie and other city officials earlier Monday to urge protesters to demonstrate peacefully, while promising to hold those who commit vandalism or other crimes accountable. The rally at City Hall was expected to merge with a protest Monday evening at the 24th and Mission BART plaza. The protests first erupted over the weekend in Los Angeles after federal authorities conducted immigration raids in heavily Latino neighborhoods. Some protesters clashed with local law enforcement, while people vandalized buildings and set vehicles on fire. Local law enforcement deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades on protesters. The Trump administration deployed National Guard troops, without the request of the governor, in an effort to quell the protests, but Newsom said local law enforcement did not need the help and that the federal government sent them to escalate tensions. The deployment led to Trump and Newsom trading barbs on Monday. Newsom said the state would sue the administration over the deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' Trump said on Monday that Newsom should be arrested, and the government began deploying hundreds of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles. On Sunday in San Francisco, protesters gathered near the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office downtown. The demonstration soon turned into a chaotic standoff between protesters and police that injured two officers, police said. Of the more than 150 arrested, police cited and released all but one of them, a person suspected of aggravated assault. There was no immediate indication that federal officials also planned to send National Guard troops to San Francisco. San Francisco's mayor Lurie refrained from attacking Trump at a press conference Monday morning, while stressing the need for protesters to demonstrate peacefully. Lurie said he understood why people were protesting and criticized the 'tactics being used across the country to target immigrant communities.' 'Those tactics make members of our community less likely to work with law enforcement to report crimes and criminals,' Lurie said. 'They make people afraid to go to work or send their kids to school. That all makes our city less safe.' Lurie endorsed San Francisco's sanctuary law that limits cooperation between its police and federal immigration enforcement, saying the policy had made immigrant residents of the city more comfortable working with police when necessary. He also said 'everyone in this country has a right to make their voices heard peacefully.' 'But let me also be clear: We will not tolerate violence and destructive behavior, and we will never tolerate violence directed at law enforcement or city workers,' Lurie said. 'Our public servants are there to protect the right to protest and the right to be safe. Violent behavior towards them is unacceptable.' District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said she sympathized with immigrant residents who are afraid to go about their daily lives because of the raids being conducted by the Trump administration. She expressed support for peaceful protest but said 'we draw the line when people violate the law.' Jenkins vowed to prosecute 'those who are committing vandalism, violence and other acts that are criminal' but said it would take time for her office to sort through videos and other evidence gathered by police on Sunday. Law enforcement leaders are bracing for a potential influx of arrests in the coming days if unrest persists in San Francisco. The sheriff's office prepared its intake and release facility to handle mass arrests 'should the need arise,' Undersheriff Katherine Johnson told reporters. Sheriff's officials can open additional jail units if needed, she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store