China cracks down on ‘AI prediction' scams ahead of national university entrance exams
The Chinese authorities have vowed to crack down heavily on scammers targeting the
national college entrance examination , especially those who claim that artificial intelligence can be used to predict the real questions.
Advertisement
The Chinese Ministry of Education, the Cyberspace Administration of China and the Ministry of Public Security jointly announced a campaign to investigate and clean up 'illegal and harmful information' relating to the exams on Friday.
Known as the gaokao, the exam, which runs from June 7 to June 10 this year, can make or break a young person's future since their scores largely determine if and where they can attend university and what they can study.
04:32
What is the gaokao? A look at China's daunting university entrance exams
What is the gaokao? A look at China's daunting university entrance exams
More than 13.3 million people will take the test this year, according to education ministry figures, and many will have been preparing using mock papers and the previous years' exams.
But given the high stakes and the cutthroat nature of the competition,
the temptation to seek an advantage, or even cheat, will always be there – and there is no shortage of those hoping to profit from that.
Mock papers, which the sellers claim used artificial intelligence to better predict the actual questions, are selling online for inflated prices, according to media reports.
Advertisement
Some social media accounts and private tutors are also claiming access to 'top secret' information sourced from teachers who help set the papers, according to Friday's government announcement.
'Some even used big AI models to predict the questions as a gimmick. The relevant information was exaggerated to attract traffic, in order to induce candidates and parents to buy simulated test questions and reference materials at high prices,' the statement said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Springtime for China's engineers and scientists. In US, not so much
Out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT which side is winning the chip war. It replied that it was too early to say, characterising it as 'a complex and ongoing situation with no clear winner yet'. Impressive! Advertisement But while that may be true at a competitive national level, it seems pretty clear that individually, engineers and researchers in chips and other related tech fields have received a great boost in career and prestige in China, likewise the firms and research institutes that hire them. It's rather different in the United States. The situation is not an accident, but rooted in the respective national or state policies of Beijing and Washington. Consider the technical or industrial responses of China to Washington's chip war. They involve increased domestic production in the semiconductor industry to achieve self-sufficiency; reducing reliance on foreign technology, especially from the US; massive resource commitment to advanced chip research and manufacturing; strategic state subsidies; and ramping up even legacy and less advanced chips. The latter is necessary both to try to squeeze the most computing power out of older chips – in the absence of the most advanced ones – and to counter US restrictions that now target even less powerful chips and software. China therefore needs more and more engineers and researchers. Contrast that with US chip policy, which focuses on trade restrictions, sanctions and regulations, not to mention the White House's crackdowns on elite universities. Advertisement They aim to deny China's access to advanced chips, technology, and manufacturing equipment, and are being applied not only to US firms but those of allied countries such as the Netherlands, Japan and South Korea. As a result, they severely hamper their business in the world's biggest chip market, as well as their ability to fund future research and development. The latest trade restriction against China will reportedly cover chip design software, also known as electronic design automation. Germany's Siemens, a big player in this specialised field, will be affected.
South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
1880 Hong Kong club folds after 7 months, accused of owing staff unpaid wages
The Hong Kong branch of a Singapore-based private club, which recently closed its doors after only seven months of operation, has been accused of owing rent and more than 100 employees unpaid wages since April, with the Labour Department receiving requests for help from affected workers. 1880 Hong Kong, located at Swire Properties' office complex Two Taikoo Place in Quarry Bay last Friday announced its immediate cessation of operations, citing 'cash flow difficulties' and failed attempts to raise funds. All memberships and associated privileges were discontinued. The landlord told the Post that 'rent and other arrears' were still owed but declined to disclose more details due to confidentiality concerns. They have repossessed the premises. The club, which only opened its doors on November 8 last year, occupied four floors offering event spaces, a gym with spa facilities, and several restaurants. In an internal letter seen by the Post, founder Marc Nicolson apologised to his employees for the closure, saying the 'deal' they had been trying to close had been unsuccessful. He said he asked employees to trust him and continue working, as he believed he could raise the capital to save the company.
South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
As Malaysia's Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit
When Malaysia's deputy minister of communications, Teo Nie Ching, announced the launch of the country's 'sovereign AI infrastructure' powered by Huawei Technologies' advanced computing chips and the DeepSeek large language model, she inadvertently set off a geopolitical maelstrom Advertisement In the crosshairs of Teo's announcement was the activation of Huawei's Ascend chips on a national scale and the planned roll-out of 3,000 of those chips by next year to 'form the backbone of Malaysia's national AI grid'. Teo's office reportedly retracted her remarks just a day later. Had they been true, Malaysia's deployment of this class of Huawei's integrated circuits could have fallen foul of US export controls targeted at specific Ascend chips, issued just a week earlier. Malaysia's Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry distanced itself from Teo's announcement, clarifying that the artificial intelligence infrastructure touted was 'privately driven' and 'not developed, endorsed or coordinated' at the government level. Even Huawei, whose vice-president of Malaysia operations attended Teo's event, denied selling any Ascend chips in the country when asked by the media. The incident threw a spotlight on the increasingly difficult positions of Southeast Asian countries walking the tightrope between technological autonomy and fracturing geopolitical realities. Beijing has threatened to retaliate against Washington's latest export controls on Chinese-made chips with its anti-sanctions law, which would affect third parties enforcing US regulations. If Teo's remarks were, in fact, verifiable, they would have implied double jeopardy for a Malaysia caught between the extraterritorial reach of the United States and China's unilateral, punitive measures. Advertisement
