The White House wants women to have more babies. They're ignoring part of the problem — men.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Has the pronatalism movement gone mainstream?
The Trump administration is considering a baby bonus. Is it enough to encourage people to have more kids?
America's birth rate has been on a steady decline since 2007, and pronatalists − both in and outside the White House − are determined to raise it. But how?
President Donald Trump and his administration have reportedly begun wading through various proposals aimed at reversing America's declining birthrate. Per the New York Times, some ideas that have been floated include scholarships for married people and parents, a one-time $5,000 cash "baby bonus" for mothers and government-funded education on menstruation and ovulation. One pronatalist activist also proposed that mothers of six or more receive a 'National Medal of Motherhood."
And calls for women to bear more children aren't just inside the White House – they've infiltrated the cultural zeitgeist.
Trad wives, or 'homestead creators,' are making waves on social media for romanticizing the nuclear family unit that Trump and Vice President JD Vance have lauded.
But when partners struggle to conceive, the burden is rarely distributed evenly between men and women. Still, fertility experts say we're missing a key component of the conversation – male infertility.
Research shows that for heterosexual couples trying to conceive, when the cause of infertility can be attributed to a known factor, it's a roughly 50-50 split between male and female factors. The male partner was found to be solely responsible in about 20% of infertility cases, and a contributing factor in another 30-40% of all cases. Male and female infertility factors often coexist, yet a high number of men do not undergo testing before their female partner begins IVF, according to Dr. Neel Shah, the Chief Medical Officer at Maven Clinic, a virtual clinic for women's and family health.
'Our healthcare system generally seems better designed for men than for women, but men are more reluctant to engage with it in the first place,' he says. 'It's relatively common for women to go through entire fertility journeys, and the men to never be tested. But when you don't treat the couple as a unit, the burden is disproportionately on one person.'
1 in 6 people are affected by infertility, but women often carry the burden
According to a 2025 report released by Maven Clinic that surveyed 1,000 women struggling with infertility, 65% said they felt that the burden of fertility lay almost entirely with them, not with their partner.
'In the design of the healthcare system, but even more broadly, socially, we have unfortunately put the entire burden on women,' Shah says. 'They're the ones who get tested first. They bear the most emotionally. But the science is very clear, infertility is just as likely to be caused by male factors as female ones.'
Characterizing fertility solely as a woman's issue is part of a 'broader cultural misunderstanding,' limits the accessibility of fertility care and contributes to the feelings of shame some women experience when struggling with infertility.
Trump wants a baby boom. Is his 'pronatalism' agenda missing the point?
Men are more reluctant to do fertility testing
Women have biological markers, such as their menstrual cycle, that serve as a checkpoint for reproductive health. Men, on the other hand, don't have an obvious, visual indicator for sperm health.
To test male infertility, doctors can look at the concentration of sperm and motility, meaning how active the sperm are. This usually involves going to a clinic and producing a semen sample, which Shah says many men are reluctant to do.
'Men like having things to do and appreciate being able to support their partners,' he says. 'But in many cases ... they're not being engaged in a way that makes them comfortable.'
In some cases when male infertility is a contributing or sole factor, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) is still necessary. However, it should be done using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), which involves injecting a single, healthy sperm into an egg.
'It's the world's tiniest surgery,' Shah says.
Some factors contributing to male infertility are lifestyle-based; things like wearing tight underwear and sitting in hot tubs actually can decrease sperm count. Other factors, such as taking testosterone, can work as a contraceptive, just like estrogen in women. 'Men think they're taking testosterone to make themselves more virile, but it's doing the opposite,' Shah explains.
Women want parental leave, greater financial incentives to raise the birth rate
In a video with over 330,000 views, a pair of parents expressed their shock at some of the White House's suggestions for raising the birth rate. "Obviously no women were involved in this council that's coming up with these ideas," a man says in the video, as his wife reads him some of the proposals and they react to each one. She laments, 'Not like, free health care or, I don't know, paid maternity leave."
Jennifer Sciubba, a demographer and the author of the book "8 Billion and Counting: How Sex, Death, and Migration Shape Our World," previously told USA TODAY the reasons for America's declining birthrate are vast and complex. For starters, more people feel they simply can't afford to have families amid economic uncertainty and rising housing prices. Couples seeking IVF are often met with high prices, leading some to partake in "medical tourism" for cheaper fertility care abroad.
Sciubba added that more couples are also delaying marriage, shortening their window to conceive naturally with their spouse. More people also don't see children as necessary to a fulfilling life.
Shah advises against framing fertility in moral and political terms.
"It sends the message that women's bodies are public battlegrounds," he cautions. "It could end up overriding some of the real medical struggles (and) emotional distress that people have when they're trying to build their trying to build their family."
Contributing: Charles Trepany, Jonathan Limehouse

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declares 'loyalty' to Trump, rules out a 2028 presidential bid
WASHINGTON — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he's not running for president in 2028 and intends to remain in his position until President Donald Trump leaves office. The leader of the "Make America Healthy Again" movement said in an X post that his "loyalty" lies with Trump, and he dismissed speculation about his political future as part of a "smear campaign" from disgruntled Washington insiders who oppose the MAHA agenda. "They're pushing the flat-out lie that I'm running for president in 2028. Let me be clear: I am not running for president in 2028," Kennedy said. Kennedy competed for the presidency in 2024, first as a Democrat and later as an independent, before suspending his candidacy last August and throwing his support behind Trump. After the election, Trump made him HHS secretary. His comments ruling out a 2028 bid came far-right activist Laura Loomer accused Kennedy aide Stefanie Spear of using her position at HHS to lay the groundwork for Kennedy to run again. Loomer's comment came in a Politico interview and followed an Axios report in July that said Kennedy super PAC head Tony Lyons and Spear convened MAHA supporters on a call that left some attendees with the impression he was mulling another campaign. But in his social media post, Kennedy said, "The president has made himself the answer to my 20-year prayer that God would put me in a position to end the chronic disease epidemic — and that's exactly what my team and I will do until the day he leaves office." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: RFK Jr. says he's not running for president in 2028


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Credible scientists can't hold up Kennedy's charade for much longer
How much longer can responsible people work for President Trump's Department of Health and Human Services under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.? That question arises every time Kennedy pulls funding for vaccine research or purges respected scientists at the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force or the Food and Drug Administration. For a while, it looked like even vaccine critics weren't safe in the Trump administration. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Vinay Prasad established his reputation as a contrarian, expressing reservations about pediatric vaccination and several common mitigation measures. It was thus no surprise when he was appointed director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which covers vaccine policy. Prasad didn't last three months on the job. He resigned abruptly in late July following attacks by right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer, who labeled him a 'progressive leftist saboteur.' A Health and Human Services statement cited Prasad's desire to spend more time with his family. It has been widely reported, however, that Trump himself forced Prasad's departure, despite the objection of FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. In another abrupt move, only 10 days later, Prasad abruptly returned to the FDA, evidently at Makary's request but otherwise without explanation. While some of Prasad's views remain quite controversial among many highly regarded physicians and scientists, it is certainly reassuring to see Loomer's malign influence diminished at the FDA. Nonetheless, Kennedy is still in charge of the entire department, and it is likely only a matter of time until he resumes appointing resolute anti-vaxxers, if not widely discredited would-be 'scientists,' to key committees. Makary and Prasad, and other well-credentialed scientists, no doubt believe they can overcome Kennedy's destabilization of medical research, while still contributing to public health. Maybe they are right, and the wisest course is to hold on as long as possible, trying to do good. After all, there is no telling who would replace them. On the other hand, it seems inevitable that Kennedy's pronouncements will increasingly become intolerable. Some CDC employees already worry that the recent deadly attack on their building in Atlanta was motivated by 'RFK Jr's lies about vax safety and CDC scientists.' Meanwhile, Trump has announced that political appointees will soon take over scientific research grant approval, displacing actual scientists, i n order to 'advance the President's policy priorities.' At some point in the degradation of science, there must be a line that ethical administrators will not cross. There is no single answer to whether an official should stay or withdraw from a compromising position, but history does provide cautionary tales. In 1854, a Massachusetts judge named Edward Loring reached a sincere but tragic decision. I described the events in my book, ' Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial.' Late that spring, a fugitive from slavery named Anthony Burns, was arrested in Boston and brought before Loring, a federal commissioner under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, as well as judge of the Massachusetts Probate Court. Burns's arrest sparked mass protests in Boston, where anti-slavery sentiment was strong. Many Bostonians called upon Loring to resign from the federal commissioner's position. As a probate judge, he administered the estates of widows and orphans, which required compassion, and it was intolerable for him to be involved in the heartless business of slave-hunting. Loring took the criticism to heart, responding with a published statement. 'It is said that the statute is so cruel and wicked that it should not be executed by good men,' he wrote. But that would create a paradox. If humane judges were all to resign, 'then into what hands should its administration fall? Will those who call the statute merciless commit it to a merciless judge?' Although he had deep misgivings about the Fugitive Slave Act, Loring believed he had a duty to preside. Otherwise, judging would 'be confined to those who are reckless of that right in others, or ignorant or careless of the means given for its legal defense, or dishonest in their use.' Those who wish this, Loring continued, 'are more cruel and wicked than the statute, for they would strip from the fugitive the best security and every alleviation the statute leaves them.' Despite his protestations, Loring ruled in favor of the slaveholder, holding that it was required under the law. He sent Burns to Virginia in chains, where he was starved and abused. Burns's supporters, meanwhile, demonstrated the true meaning of humanity by raising funds to obtain his freedom. Burns returned to Boston and later studied theology at Oberlin College, no thanks to Loring. It turned out that a 'good judge,' as Loring believed himself, could not honorably enforce a pitiless law in a racist regime. He was dismissed from the Harvard Law School faculty, and the Massachusetts legislature removed him from the Probate Court. Loring is remembered today, if at all, as an enabler of slavery. Perhaps health officials are currently echoing Loring's lament. 'If I resign, someone very bad will take my place.' But sometimes, complicity is complicity.

5 hours ago
The national suicide hotline for LGBTQ+ youth went dead. States are scrambling to help
This is a KFF Health News story. On July 17, the option went dead for LGBTQ+ youth to access specialized mental health support from the national 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration said a month earlier that it would no longer "silo" services and would instead "focus on serving all help seekers." That meant the elimination of the "Press 3" option, the dedicated line answered by staff specifically trained to handle LGBTQ+ youth facing mental health issues ranging from anxiety to thoughts of suicide. Now, states such as California, Colorado, Illinois and Nevada are scrambling to backfill LGBTQ+ crisis support through training, fees and other initiatives in response to what advocates say is the Trump administration's hostile stance toward this group. In his first day back in the White House, President Donald Trump issued an executive order recognizing only two sexes, male and female, and while campaigning, he condemned gender ideology as "toxic poison." And the administration omitted "T" for transgender and "Q" for queer or questioning in announcing the elimination of the 988 Press 3 option. "Since the election, we've seen a clear increase in young people feeling devalued, erased, uncertain about their future, and seeing resources taken away," said Becca Nordeen, senior vice president of crisis intervention at The Trevor Project, a national suicide prevention and crisis intervention nonprofit for LGBTQ+ youth. Nordeen and other advocates for at-risk kids who helped staff the dedicated line said it has never been more critical for what The Trevor Project estimates are 5.2 million LGBTQ+ people ages 13-24 across the U.S. About 39% of LGBTQ+ young people seriously consider attempting suicide each year, including roughly half of transgender and nonbinary young people, according to a 2023 survey, reflecting a disproportionately high rate of risk. The use of the dedicated line for LGBTQ+ youth had steadily increased, according to data from the federal substance abuse agency, with nearly 1.6 million calls, texts or online chats since its rollout in October 2022, out of approximately 16.7 million contacts to the general line. The Press 3 option reached record monthly highs in May and June. In 2024, contacts to the line peaked in November, the month of the election. Call-takers on the general 988 line do not necessarily have the specialized training that the staff on the Press 3 line had, causing fear among LGBTQ+ advocates that they don't have the right context or language to support youth experiencing crises related to sexuality and gender. If a counselor doesn't know what the concept of coming out is, or being outed, or the increased likelihood of family rejection and how those bring stressors and anxiety, it can inadvertently prevent the trust from being immediately built," said Mark Henson, The Trevor Project's interim vice president of advocacy and government affairs, adding that creating that trust at the beginning of calls was a critical "bridge for a youth in crisis to go forward." The White House's Office of Management and Budget did not immediately respond to questions about why the Press 3 option was shut down, but spokesperson Rachel Cauley told NBC News that the department's budget would not "grant taxpayer money to a chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counselors' without consent or knowledge of their parents." Emily Hilliard, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, said in a statement: "Continued funding of the Press 3 option threatened to put the entire 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline in danger of massive reductions in service." When someone calls 988, they are routed to a local crisis center if they are calling from a cellphone carrier that uses "georouting" -- a process that routes calls based on approximate areas -- unless they select one of the specialized services offered through the national network. While the Press 3 option is officially no longer part of that menu of options, which includes Spanish-language and veterans' services, states can step in to increase training for their local crisis centers or establish their own options for specialized services. California is among the states attempting to fill the new service gap, with Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's office announcing a partnership with The Trevor Project to provide training on LGBTQ+ youth issues for the crisis counselors in the state who answer calls to the general 988 crisis line. The state signed a $700,000 contract with the organization for the training program. The Trevor Project's Henson said the details still need to be figured out, including evaluating the training needs of California's current 988 counselors. The partnership comes as the organization's own 24/7 crisis line for LGBTQ+ youth faces a crisis of its own: The Trevor Project was one of several providers paid by the federal government to staff the Press 3 option, and the elimination of the service cut the organization's capacity significantly, according to Henson. Gordon Coombes, director of Colorado's 988 hotline, said staff there are increasing outreach to let the public know that the general 988 service hasn't gone away, even with the loss of the Press 3 option, and that its call-takers welcome calls from the LGBTQ+ population. Staff are promoting services at concerts, community events, and Rockies baseball games. Coombes said the Colorado Behavioral Health Administration contracts with Solari Crisis & Human Services to answer 988 calls, and that the training had already been equipping call-takers on the general line to support LGBTQ+ young people. The state supports the 988 services via a 7-cent annual fee on cellphone lines. Coombes said the department requested an increase in the fee to bolster its services. While the additional funds would benefit all 988 operations, the request was made in part because of the elimination of the Press 3 option, he said. Nevada plans to ensure that all 988 crisis counselors get training on working with LGBTQ+ callers, according to state health department spokesperson Daniel Vezmar. Vezmar said Nevada's $50 million investment in a new call center last November would help increase call capacity, and that the state's Division of Public and Behavioral Health would monitor the impact of the closure of the Press 3 option and make changes as needed. The Illinois Department of Human Services announced after the Press 3 option's termination that it was working to train existing call center counselors on supporting LGBTQ+ youth and promoting related affirming messages and imagery in its outreach about the 988 line. A July increase in a state telecommunications tax will help fund expanded efforts, and the agency is exploring additional financial options to fill in the new gap. Kelly Crosbie, director of North Carolina's Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Use Services, said the division has recently invested in partnerships with community organizations to increase mental health support for marginalized groups, including LGBTQ+ populations, through the state's 988 call center and other programs. "We've wanted to make sure we were beefing up the services," Crosbie said, noting that North Carolina's Republican legislature continues to restrict health care for transgender youth. Hannah Wesolowski, chief advocacy officer for the National Alliance on Mental Illness, said Congress could put the funding for the LGBTQ+ line in any final appropriations bill it passes. She also said states could individually codify permanent funding for an LGBTQ+ option, the way Washington state has created and funded a "Press 4" option for its Native American population to reach crisis counselors who are tribal members or descendants trained in cultural practices. The state created the option by carving out some of its 988 funding. No state has publicly announced a plan to make such an investment for LGBTQ+ populations. Federal lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have spoken out against the closure of the LGBTQ+ 988 option and urged that it be reinstated. At a July press conference alongside Democratic colleagues, Rep. Mike Lawler, a Republican who represents part of New York's Hudson Valley, said he and Republican Rep. Young Kim of Orange County, California, wrote to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., urging him to reverse course and keep the LGBTQ+ line. "What we must agree on is that when a child is in crisis -- when they are alone, when they are afraid, when they are unsure of where to turn to, when they are contemplating suicide — they need access to help right away," Lawler said. "Regardless of where you stand on these issues, as Americans, as people, we must all agree there is purpose and worth to each and every life." If you or someone you know is struggling with thoughts of suicide -- free, confidential help is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Call or text the national lifeline at 988.