logo
The case of the Swedish school gunman who police won't name

The case of the Swedish school gunman who police won't name

Yahoo06-02-2025
In the low-level buildings of Campus Risbergska in Orebro, a 35-year-old man stalked the corridors looking for his targets.
He chose to spare some from death. Others were shot with his high-calibre hunting weapon. But three days after Sweden's worst mass shooting, the names of many of the victims have still not been made public. Nor has the official identity of the killer, who later shot himself.
Police and local authorities have also been reluctant, so far, to provide a suspected motive. However, there are clues that the gunman may have targeted migrants – something likely to inflame growing tensions in a country growing more Right-wing.
The killings took place at a large learning centre popular with non-Swedish residents who want to integrate. Mandatory language tests were proposed recently in Sweden by a Right-leaning government that has begun to take a hard line on migration.
In a blurry video showing the attack unfolding a voice can be heard between the shots, shouting in Swedish: 'You must leave Europe.'
Among the victims identified locally on Thursday were a number of Syrians who had come to Sweden as refugees, and a Bosnian. Bojan Sosic, the Bosnian ambassador, said he 'found it odd' that police were 'withholding information that pertains to foreign citizens'.
Others echoed his sentiments. Iuri Baptista, a student at the Campus Risbergska and an immigrant, said he was frustrated and that the withholding of information had made him fearful for his life in Sweden.
He said: 'It affected me, in a sense, on an unconscious level. If I go to the supermarket, should I think: 'You are a racist? Did you vote for the [Right-wing] Swedish Democrats? Would you have killed me if you had the opportunity? Are you treating me like this because I'm not Swedish?''
The question of migration is high on Sweden's agenda. The anti-immigration, nationalist Sweden Democrats were the second-largest party in the 2022 election, and ended up propping up the government.
The popularity of the conservative bloc grew in the aftermath of the 2015 migration crisis and rising gang violence.
The current government has prioritised limiting migration to the country by tightening migration laws and supporting strict citizenship laws. Since then, it has floated controversial policies, such as one forcing public sector workers to report undocumented people to authorities.
Last week Salwan Momika, an anti-Islam activist who publicly burned a Koran in Sweden, was shot dead at a flat outside Stockholm as he made a live broadcast on TikTok.
School attacks with deadly outcomes are rare in Sweden. Until Tuesday, the 2015 sword attack on a school in Trollhattan was the deadliest, with a 21-year-old man wearing a mask and a helmet killing three people. The attacker was shot dead by police, who said his attack was a hate crime inspired by xenophobia.
Asa Erlandsson, a reporter with the Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter, who wrote a book about the Trollhattan attack, said that until police clarified the reason behind the Orebro shootings it would be hard to determine the gunman's motive.
However, Erlandsson noted there were some similarities between the two events. 'A person with significant social difficulties, who has been unemployed for a long time, who is described as deeply lonely, and who appears to have been suicidal,' she said.
While the authorities remain tight-lipped, media in Sweden have identified the gunman as 35-year-old Rickard Andersson, who had three weapons with him and had a licence for four guns. The police found 10 empty magazines and unused ammunition.
Photos and elements of biography began circulating, describing him as a closed person who had difficulties studying at primary school and was unemployed at the time of his death.
Ardavan Khoshnood, a researcher in criminology from Lund University, said police had been slow to present information to the public.
'I believe that the reason for that is the magnitude of the attack,' he added. 'I believe that the reason why the police have been a little slow with giving out information is that they have had problems with identifying the victims, as well as really being sure that the individual they have found dead also is the offender.
'This is a very new thing for Sweden. We have never had this before.' He concluded that the perpetrator had planned the attack in advance after going through a 'radicalisation process', and may have been mentally unwell.
The silence from the authorities may remind some of the aftermath of the Southport killings in Britain, which triggered riots. But, as in Britain, there appear to be good reasons for the lack of public information.
Some of the victims in Sweden, for example, have not been identified, in part because of severe injuries and a fire that appeared to have started by the gunman.
Ioannis Ioannidis, a surgeon at Orebro University Hospital, told Nerikes Allehanda, a local newspaper, that some survivors suffered severe injuries, probably caused by hunting ammunition fired from a high-velocity weapon.
'The injuries are extensive even if the bullet does not hit the heart, liver or other major organs. You can be hit in an arm or leg and then bleed to death due to the extensive soft tissue damage,' he said.
Families have been gathering in the car park across the road of the campus to lay flowers, light candles and observe a minute of silence in memory of the victims of the tragedy. With them last Wednesday were King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden and Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson.
Synthia, a resident who visited the memorial last Tuesday, said the attack had made her feel sad and angry. She added: 'It's scary that something like this has happened so close to my home.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.
There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.

Indianapolis Star

timean hour ago

  • Indianapolis Star

There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.

President Donald Trump has one month to finalize the sale of TikTok or the short-form video platform risks going dark in the U.S. – again. For months, Trump has said negotiations for the sale of TikTok have been ongoing with China, as the platform is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance. Since the platform went dark for less than 24 hours in January, Trump has extended the deadline on a ban of TikTok in the U.S. three times. And he may just conduct a fourth. In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S.

Is Anyone Actually Mad About Sorority-Rush Dances?
Is Anyone Actually Mad About Sorority-Rush Dances?

Atlantic

time2 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Is Anyone Actually Mad About Sorority-Rush Dances?

'You know the LIBS are seething over this,' Joe Kinsey, an editor at the sports website OutKick, wrote on X while reposting a video of sorority girls doing a choreographed dance. Many of the girls were wearing red-white-and-blue outfits, though some were dressed as hot dogs. They waved American flags in front of a banner that read We Want You Kappa Delta. 'Credit to these ladies for pumping out patriotism to kick off the 2025 school year,' Kinsley wrote. It wasn't only the display of patriotism that supposedly made liberals seethe. 'The purple hair lesbians have to be furious that SEC sororities ARE BACK,' Kinsey wrote while reposting another sorority-dance video. This one had no clear Americana element aside from the matching trucker hats all of the dancing girls were wearing. Kinsey's two posts were viewed nearly 40 million times. Many other such videos have been shared on X in the past couple of weeks, as sororities have begun recruiting for the new school year. The videos come from TikTok, where sorority dance videos have long been popular. But they've been presented on X with a new gloss: Democrats, liberals, and leftists are enraged by pretty, mostly white young women who are dancing happily. It drives them up the wall when a woman is blond! Do not let a liberal see a woman smiling while wearing a short denim skirt. The only thing that is missing is evidence of seething libs. Search around social media, and you might be surprised how difficult such reactions are to find. In fact, I couldn't find a single one. When I asked Kinsey where he got the idea that people were angry about the sorority-recruitment videos, he didn't point me to any specific examples. He noted that many people replied to his posts saying that they weren't mad about the TikTok dances. But, he said, 'I don't believe that.' By now, this is all familiar. Recall the recent controversy over an American Eagle ad starring Sydney Sweeney, in which the actress hawked denim jeans by making a pun about her genes. A small number of people on social media did get very angry, and posted about how the ad sounded like a eugenics dogwhistle. Their reaction was then amplified by right-wing commentators eager to make the point that the left hates hot women. The fact that the situation involved Sydney Sweeney, a celebrity who had already been evoked in culture-war debates in the past, drove even more attention. It turned into a full-blown news cycle. (I am confident my grandmother heard about this.) In both cases, this burst of bizarre posting is less a story about American politics than it is a story about social media and, specifically, X. Whatever else you may say about Elon Musk's platform, it is the best place to watch a fake drama unfold. Both of the videos that Joe Kinsey shared—of the girls with the flags and the girls with the trucker hats—were originally posted on their respective sororities' TikTok accounts. But the versions he shared had been uploaded to X by what appears to be an account called 'Calico Cut Pants,' which seemingly exists to move short-form videos from one platform to another. The account follows no one and is named after a sketch from the Tim Robinson Netflix show I Think You Should Leave. Other sorority dance videos have been pulled from TikTok and posted by an account called 'Big Chungus,' which also posts almost nothing but videos from other sites, paired with incendiary rhetoric. Accounts like these can bring in money by driving engagement on X, thanks to a revenue-sharing program that debuted after Musk took over the site. Both Big Chungus and Calico Cut Pants have Premium badges, which means they can get paid for generating activity including likes and replies. According to X's Creator Revenue Sharing guidelines, the company maintains some discretion in calculating the true 'impact' of posts. For instance, engagement from other paid accounts is worth more than engagement from an unpaid account. It stands to reason that the best way to make money is to elicit some reaction to your content from the people who enjoy X enough to pay for it. Social media is replete with political outrage, and playing to either a liberal or conservative audience is likely to draw attention. (Certainly, plenty of accounts decrying MAGA values, real and exaggerated, exist.) But X, in particular, is a much more right-coded platform than it was a few years ago, and it makes sense to pander to the home crowd. Consider 'non aesthetic things,' an account that has 4.9 million followers on X, all from posting short-form videos—sometimes relatable, sometimes nostalgic, generally just mind-numbing. Its bio links to an Instagram page that is full of ads for the gambling company Stake. (None of these accounts responded to requests for an interview.) The non aesthetic things account shared a video of sorority girls at Arizona State University who were performing in jean shorts, most of them quite short, and cowboy boots. The X caption makes reference to 'their JEANS'—a subtle nod to the Sydney Sweeney panic. This pairing of footage and wink was a solid bet to produce a big reaction. Given all the attention the Sweeney dustup received, returning to it is logical for engagement farmers. 'BREAKING,' wrote a pro-Trump account called 'Patriot Oasis' that almost exclusively posts short-form videos, 'Sorority at the University of Oklahoma wearing 'Good Genes' is going VIRAL showcasing pure American beauty. Liberals are OUTRAGED online.' The caption suggested that the sorority is participating in some kind of activist response to the villainization of Sydney Sweeney, though there is no reason to believe that. The girls in the video never say anything about politics, Sydney Sweeney, genes, or even jeans. The sorority has been making similar dance videos for years. Nevertheless, the right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk reposted Patriot Oasis to his 5.1 million followers and asked, 'Do you see the difference between conservative and liberal women?' Underneath his post, a Community Note generated by other users pointed out that the video doesn't reveal whether the women are conservative or not. But that hardly mattered. Many others made the same argument in the replies to Kirk's post, driving up engagement. Although the original post has since been deleted, Kirk's repost has more than 3.8 million views. Sorority dances worked well on social media even before they were inserted into a fake culture-war debate, because they are briefly hypnotic due to the weirdness of so many people moving in the same way while wearing such similar outfits. They offer the muted thrill of a flash mob. But plucked from their original context, they offer more. Someone finds them and puts them on X with just a phrase or two of framing and they blow up. People watch the videos of young women dancing and gleefully share them, writing, for example, 'nothing is more triggering to leftists,' and 'at what point do you just give up if you're a lib?' and 'America is BACK and Democrats hate it.' There is no need to point to an actual instance of a leftist or lib or Democrat being triggered. It is easy enough to imagine how triggered they are.

There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.
There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.

President Donald Trump has one month to finalize the sale of TikTok or the short-form video platform risks going dark in the U.S. – again. For months, Trump has said negotiations for the sale of TikTok have been ongoing with China, as the platform is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance. Since the platform went dark for less than 24 hours in January, Trump has extended the deadline on a ban of TikTok in the U.S. three times. And he may just conduct a fourth. In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. When could TikTok go dark (again) in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Why is TikTok at risk of getting banned? Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store