logo
Health minister confident deal will be reached to prevent mass resignations at St. Clare's

Health minister confident deal will be reached to prevent mass resignations at St. Clare's

CBC9 hours ago

Newfoundland and Labrador's health minister said she wasn't fond of the approach, but she expects a deal is "imminent" with a team of doctors who threatened a mass resignation at St. Clare's Mercy Hospital in St. John's.
Krista Lynn Howell told reporters Friday afternoon that her department has been working with the provincial health authority and the medical association to find a solution to the problems with internal medicine at the city's second-largest hospital.
The five internists warned of an "impending crisis" following the loss of the medical residency program at the hospital — stripping away valuable coverage for 24/7 patient care.
"I may disagree with the tactics that were deployed to get us to this point today," Howell said.
"But nobody has thrown down and went home. So we do believe that we're in a place right now where a resolution is imminent and we're confident the plan will resolve this issue."
Howell gave no particulars, instead deferring to Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services (NLHS) and the Newfoundland and Labrador Medical Association (NLMA).
In a brief comment, Kyle Rees — a lawyer retained by the five doctors — said he's encouraged.
"I know the parties are working on it, and that's a positive development. It's something that needs to be taken seriously, and it sounds like that's happening."
Doctors threatened resignation before
News of the resignation notice caused a frenzy on Friday, but it wasn't the first time the team of physicians has threatened to walk away.
CBC Investigates has obtained a letter dated Jan. 1, 2024, in which the internal medicine team at St. Clare's wrote to the premier's office and threatened to withhold services within 20 days.
They cited reasons such as "administrative burden, limited resources and an overwhelming patient load," as well as compensation "significantly lower" than the national average.
"We understand that our decision to withdraw services may cause inconvenience and disruption to both N.L. Health Services and our patients," they wrote at the time.
"However, we firmly believe that this step is necessary to draw attention to the urgent need for change."
The letter did not result in a job action — which is prohibited under their collective agreement — but three of the five signatories to the letter no longer work at St. Clare's.
Barry Petten, the Progressive Conservative health critic, said he wasn't surprised by the new resignation letter sent on Monday.
He said he's had contact with internists from St. Clare's going back to the first resignation threat last year.
Petten said he knows the doctors reached out to the last three health ministers — including Premier John Hogan.
"And yet, no action," he said. "This is not a new thing. Eighteen months later, there's no action."
Howell acknowledged the issue has been ongoing, but said talks have been happening for several months.
She said a plan to address their concerns was well underway before they were told the residency program was coming to an end, creating a new problem to overcome.
Residency program axed over lack of supervision, MUN says
In a statement on Friday, Memorial University said it made the decision to cut the residency program "in the best interest of our residents' training and well-being."
The statement said the university's medical school had concerns about "a lack of adequate support and appropriate supervision" for residents, leading to the entire program being terminated.
Spokesperson Chad Pelley said some modifications were made as concerns were raised, but they weren't enough to satisfy national standards during an accreditation review last November.
Formal notice was given in early 2025, outlining the issues that needed to be resolved.
The internal medicine residency at St. Clare's will come to an end on July 1.
Howell, meanwhile, said the residency program is important to the hospital, and she's hoping to see it restored in the future.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department expands hours
Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department expands hours

CTV News

time27 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department expands hours

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) says the Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department will increase its hours of operation starting Sunday. In a statement sent Saturday afternoon, the SHA said starting June 29, the emergency department will be open from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. 'The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) has made progress in stabilizing its physician staffing and is taking a phased approach in resuming SCH ED's full operational hours,' SHA said in the statement. This follows a temporary reduction in hours announced earlier this spring, during which the emergency department operated from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. due to physician availability constraints. Since February, the Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department has operated with reduced hours, with several extensions due to ongoing physician availability challenges. The SHA says this phased approach aims to provide better support across Saskatoon's emergency departments during the summer months, while work continues on the planned addition of 109 acute care beds at Saskatoon City Hospital. The SHA says it remains committed to a full resumption of hours at Saskatoon City Hospital in the coming months.

B.C. nurse suspended 12 months for sexual relationship with client
B.C. nurse suspended 12 months for sexual relationship with client

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

B.C. nurse suspended 12 months for sexual relationship with client

A B.C. nurse's registration has been suspended for 12 months as discipline for a sexual relationship the worker had with a client, according to the regulatory body. The B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives described the relationship, which happened between July and September of 2023, as 'personal and sexual.' The nurse, who is not named in the consent agreement reached with the college earlier this week due to privacy regulations, 'documented that at the time of the conduct, they suffered from a health condition that was a factor in their conduct,' reads an online summary. 'Intimate' relationships between nurses and clients are prohibited, even if they are consensual, the college said, adding that a breach of professional boundaries can harm the patient. 'The nurse-client relationship is the foundation of nursing practice across all populations and cultures and in all practice settings. It is therapeutic and focuses on the needs of the client. It is based on trust, respect and professional intimacy, and it requires the appropriate use of authority,' the summary reads. According to the college, the nurse agreed to have their registration suspended for 12 months and a six-month ban on working in community nursing. If they return to the job, the nurse will be required to be 'followed by' a counsellor for a year. 'The inquiry committee is satisfied that the terms will address the professional and practice concerns that arose and will protect the public,' the BCCNM wrote.

‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth
‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth

Danielle Smith said she welcomes a debate in court after an Alberta judge put a hold on a provincial law that bans doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth on Friday. On her Saturday radio show, Your Province, Your Premier, Danielle Smith said she believed her government's case was solid, measured, evidence-based – and on the side of young patients that Justice Allison Kuntz said faced 'irreparable harm' if she didn't issue a temporary injunction against the law before it fully came into effect. 'The evidence shows that singling out health care for gender diverse youth and making it subject to government control will cause irreparable harm to gender diverse youth by reinforcing the discrimination and prejudice they are already subjected to,' Kuntz wrote in the judgment. The law, passed late last year but not fully in effect, would have prevented doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16. 'I think the court was in error,' Smith said. 'That's part of the reason why we're taking it to court. The court had said there will be irreparable harm if the law goes ahead. I feel the reverse. I feel there will be irreparable harm to children who get sterilized at the age of 10 years old – and so we want those kids to have their day in court. 'We want those who were counselled to have sex change operations prematurely who now feel like they weren't protected to be able to be witnesses so we don't make these kinds of mistakes.' Kuntz wrote that denying access to this care not only risks causing youth emotional harm but also exposes them to permanent physical changes that don't match their gender identity. 'Intentionally or not, the ban will signal that there is something wrong with or suspect about having a gender identity that is different than the sex you were assigned at birth,' Kuntz wrote. 'Gender diverse youth will bear the entire burden of that speculation.' Smith said there's a long history of governments making decisions that have caused harm. 'We had a sterilization of those who were committed to mental institutions that we had to do a major payout on,' she said. 'There are Indigenous women who are challenging their sterilization that happened at the hands of doctors that they want to make a criminal code provision on that–we shouldn't be capricious in taking away a person's right to have children. 'So we want to battle this out,' she added.' And the way you do that is you go to the higher levels of court.' Last month, the Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors launched a legal case challenging the constitutionality of the bill, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience. Alberta's other two pieces of transgender legislation — banning transgender women from competing in women's sports and preventing youth under 16 from changing their name or pronouns in the school system without parental consent — have yet to be challenged in court. The education bill also requires parents to opt in for their children to receive lessons in school on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity. 'Demonizing vulnerable kids': Nenshi Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said in a statement that his party was pleased to see the court decision, calling it a 'great day for young Albertans who simply want to live authentically and safely.' 'The court has determined what we already knew that this ban could cause irreparable harm to gender diverse young Albertans,' Nenshi said. 'This was never about doing the right thing: it was always about demonizing vulnerable kids to boost Danielle Smith's political fortunes.' LGBTQ+ advocacy groups Egale Canada and the Skipping Stone Foundation took the case to court, and in a statement Egale said the decision was a 'historic win.' Also listed as applicants in the case are five transgender youth who will be directly affected. Egale's legal director Bennett Jensen said Friday that the decision was a 'huge relief' for the youth involved. '(The legislation) does not solve any real issues in the medical system,' Jensen said in an interview. 'It simply creates them and targets an already very vulnerable, small group of young people with further discrimination, and that's what the judge found.' Despite the Friday decision, Smith expressed confidence moving forward. 'We actually think we've got a very solid case,' she said. 'We think we've been measured, we think we've been evidence-based, and we think we're on the side of kids. 'So we want to see how long that process will play out, but we think it's really important for these issues to be debated in court.' With files from The Canadian Press and Aaron Sousa

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store