League of Women Voters submits Arkansas ballot question to roll back initiative changes
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – The League of Women Voters of Arkansas submitted a proposed constitutional amendment to roll back many of the changes to ballot initiatives during the current legislature.
Representatives of the group said the proposed amendment and ballot title had been submitted to the attorney general for approval. They said the proposal would reform the ballot initiative process and address concerns over transparency and accessibility.
People speak out for & against bills aimed to change the way initiatives are placed on the Arkansas ballot
The current session of the 95th General Assembly has seen numerous changes to the ballot initiative process, with more changes being proposed. The changes would make ballot initiatives, such as those in the past that have raised the minimum wage and approved medical marijuana, more challenging to accomplish.
Critics of the process call out security concerns, such as the possibility of falsified signatures.
League representatives said they had six key provisions in the proposal:
Restricts legislative changes to citizen initiatives: Prohibits the General Assembly from amending a voter-approved constitutional amendment with a two-thirds vote.
Streamlines ballot title approval: Requires the attorney general's office to approve or, if necessary, modify the language of ballot titles. Once approved, challenges must be filed within 45 days before the Arkansas Supreme Court, preventing legal disputes after signature collection.
Protects referendum rights: Ensures the names and titles of referendums align with those assigned by the General Assembly to the laws they seek to repeal.
Mandates separate votes on emergency clauses: Requires separate votes on legislation and emergency clauses, with at least 24 hours between them, to improve transparency.
Eliminates legislative interference: Prohibits the General Assembly from amending or repealing constitutional amendments approved by voters.
Simplifies signature collection: Allows canvassers to submit signatures under penalty of perjury, eliminating the need for notarization and streamlining the process.
Bonnie Miller, president of the League of Women Voters of Arkansas, said the amendment is necessary to protect Arkansans' right to direct democracy.
'We believe filing this amendment is prudent because politicians have continually attacked Arkansans' constitutional right to petition our government,' Miller said. 'Attempts to weaken and dismantle the first power reserved by the people are an existential threat to democracy in Arkansas. Power belongs in the hands of voters, not politicians and lobbyists.'
Pressure for, against petition process changes in Arkansas legislature
Attorney General Tim Griffin has 10 days to review the ballot title and popular name. If approved, supporters must collect 90,704 valid signatures to qualify the measure for the November 2026 ballot.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Townhall of concerned Arkansans voice fears over Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's proposed bill
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -In a packed town hall at the Hillary Rodham Clinton Children's Library and Learning Center, central Arkansans gathered to voice their concerns about the effects of proposed cuts to Medicaid and SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). The discussion centered on President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' currently under consideration in the U.S. Senate and its potential to impact those across the country with disabilities, the elderly and low-income families. Faith leaders protest 'big, beautiful bill' One of the most impassioned voices at the town hall was that of William Gerard, a SNAP beneficiary with cerebral palsy who also depends on Medicaid to survive. Unable to work due to his condition, Gerard shared his testimony about how these programs are 'literally life-saving' for him. 'If I didn't have Medicaid, I don't know how I would survive,' said Gerard, who is on a regimen of 10 to 12 medications, some of which cost thousands of dollars. 'Some of my seizure medications, for example, can be in the thousands. With Medicaid paying for it, I might have to pay $2, and that really helps me.' Gerard's story is a poignant reminder of how Medicaid and SNAP provide vital support for millions of Americans. Under the budget reconciliation bill that passed the House of Representatives, $600 billion in cuts to Medicaid could result in nearly 11 million Americans losing coverage over the next decade according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis released Wednesday. For Gerard and approximately 190,000 other Arkansans, these cuts would have catastrophic consequences. Beyond the cuts to Medicaid, the proposed bill also includes steep reductions to SNAP benefits, totaling an estimated $230 billion over the next ten years. Gerard, who receives just $60 in food stamps each month, expressed the challenges this would create. 'I only get $60 in food stamps. So, what's $60 going to buy me?' he asked. 'We need to get Arkansans more food stamps that deserve it, instead of taking it away from us and making us decide what can I eat?' This concern was echoed by others at the meeting, who worried that the cuts to both Medicaid and SNAP would place an even greater burden on already struggling families, according to the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. The bill proposes several requirements, including the potential for states to take on more financial responsibility for these programs. The town hall participants discussed the wider implications of these cuts, particularly the snowball effect they would have on the lives of Arkansans. The potential loss of Medicaid coverage alone could leave thousands of individuals without access to necessary healthcare, while the SNAP cuts could push more people into food insecurity, according to the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. According to the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, more than 97,000 people in Arkansas Congressional District 2 could be impacted by the proposed $109 million cut to SNAP. These cuts could devastate families, particularly those with children, since nearly 45% of SNAP enrollees in Arkansas are parents who rely on the program to feed their families, according to . Another significant concern voiced at the town hall was the proposed work requirements that would accompany these cuts. Gerard, who receives both Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), expressed his fears for those who, like him, are unable to work due to their disabilities. 'What about the elderly, the disabled, the people who can't work? How are they supposed to make a living?' Gerard asked. 'I went to a school for handicapped children, and I've seen kids who could barely feed themselves, let alone work.' Big, beautiful bill heads to the Senate For many at the town hall, these proposed cuts aren't just about numbers in Washington—they represent the erosion of a safety net for vulnerable citizens who have no other means of support. The bill, if passed, could force these individuals into even more precarious situations, with few options for survival. 'I'm not fighting for just me,' Gerard said. 'I'm fighting for all Arkansans who are struggling to make ends meet, for all of us who depend on Medicaid and food stamps to survive.' The town hall concluded with a clear message: for concerned Arkansans to contact their congressional representatives and 'make their voices heard.' 'Stop and think about what you're doing to Arkansans—those on disability, the elderly, the most vulnerable,' Gerard said. 'If these cuts go through, it's not just about money, it's about survival.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
World Environment Day: Coastal Virginia's plastic pollution problem
NORFOLK, Va. (WAVY) — Today is World Environment Day, an observance that's been drawing attention to many issues affecting our ecosystems since 1973. Each year, a theme is presented with 2025 focusing on solutions for global plastic pollution. In Virginia, plastic debris is a major concern and clogging many bodies of water. According to Clean Virginia Waterways, 80% of what's detected on the beaches and bodies of water is plastic. 80% of the plastic waste stems from land-based sources. Data from the International Coastal Clean-up shows that cigarette butts are the most commonly found item in waterways. Balloons and construction materials are also infiltrating seashores. 'Even in a neighborhood that might be miles inland if the trash gets into the storm drain, all storm drains lead to water, which eventually will lead in this area to Chesapeake Bay or the Atlantic Ocean,' said Christina Trapani, Clean Virginia Waterways Program Director. Fishery products are also taking a hit. A recent study by CWV found 99% percent of the fish samples contained plastic. Ingesting seafood is another concern. 'Even the smallest plankton are eating microfibers and microplastics,' said Trapani. 'And then as they go up into the food chain, you know, they're either ingesting the plastic themselves or they're ingesting another fish that's eating plastic. So, if we're eating fish, you know, there's a pretty good chance that it's in there.' The Commonwealth currently has a Marine Debris Reduction Plan in effect. It's the first of its kind on the east coast. It was created by Clean Virginia Waterways and the Virginia Coastal Zone Management program. More than 75 partners, organizations, educational institutions and governmental agencies are working on the plastic issues within the plan. 'We managed to get balloon releases banned in Virginia,' says Trapani. 'You know, since that time, we've managed to get a law passed in the General Assembly that allows localities to put a five-cent fee or tax on plastic bags. Richmond just passed that a few days ago.' The Virginia Coastal Zone Management program funds the implementation of Clean Virginia's Waterways' Virginia Marine Debris Reduction Plan through a grant from NOAA, which is federal funding. Trapani says there's a risk they could lose almost half their budget over the Trump Administration's rollout of funding cuts. 'As of right now, we're still kind of in a wait-and-see stage,' she said. 'But yeah, we're aware that it could easily go away and are working on looking at other possible sources of funding. You know, the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program has been an amazing partner with us for a very long time.' The next Virginia Marine Debris Reduction Plan is set to go into effect in 2026 and run through 2030. Under that plan, they hope to eliminate plastic use entirely in the Commonwealth. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conn. Gov. Ned Lamont ‘more inclined' to seek 3rd term in 2026
Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont describes his current thinking on seeking a third term. (Photo by Mark Pazniokas/CT Mirror) Gov. Ned Lamont said Thursday that the challenges of navigating the economic uncertainties and political chaos generated by President Donald J. Trump only increase the chances he will seek a third term as governor of Connecticut in 2026. 'If you had asked me a year ago, I would have said, 'No, I think the state's on a good trajectory. We've stabilized things. We're growing again. Time to pass the mantle,'' Lamont said. He said he no longer is so eager to step aside. 'It's also an incredibly complicated time right now, starting with all the uncertainty of Washington, the increased possibility of a recession,' Lamont said. 'So, maybe a time where experience makes a difference. That's a way of saying I'm thinking about it seriously.' Lamont, 71, a self-described centrist Democrat, stopped well short of declaring his candidacy, but he gave his strongest indication to date of an inclination to seek another four-year term with Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz. 'I love the job,' he said. 'I think we've had extraordinary progress compared to where we were, say, 10 years ago. I think Susan and I are a pretty good team.' Lamont met with reporters in his Capitol office at midday, just 12 hours after the General Assembly reached its constitutional adjournment deadline of midnight Wednesday. 'We got some extraordinary folks and Democrats, and I work very closely with each and every one of them,' he said. But sees himself with an edge. 'I think it's executive experience, having sat in this chair for the last six and a half years, having been through the Trump administration, having been through COVID, having worked closely with the leadership on both sides of the aisle,' Lamont said. He defended the granular details of the recently adopted budget and the broad strokes of his record as a governor overseeing a remarkable series of budget surpluses that have filled the state's budget reserves and allowed the state to pay down unfunded pension debt. With those surpluses has come pressure from the political left to address unmet needs, including low Medicaid reimbursement rates for medical providers. Lamont, they say, is too concerned with keeping spending within the state's fiscal guardrails. The criticism is not discouraging him as he finalizes a decision whether to run, he said. 'I'm a lot more inclined and interested in keeping going, keep this positive momentum going, than I was, say, six months or a year ago. That said, I still have some conversations to make. I put everything on hold during this last four or five months. We had a pretty tricky budget session to get through.' The 'tricky' part was finding ways to satisfy Democrats lawmakers within the constraints of spending caps. 'I think it's an honestly balanced budget,' Lamont said, adding it's based upon 'a pretty conservative set of assumptions.' The budget assumes that household income will grow about 4% annually over the next two years. But it also stretches Connecticut's budget controls without breaking them legally. The largest initiative, a new $220 million endowment to grow early education and child care services dramatically over the next decade, will be established outside of the formal budget and spending cap. In doing so, the leaders of the Republican legislative minorities say Lamont is losing his credibility as a fiscal centrist, a theme the GOP will try to develop if Lamont runs. 'Fiscal moderation has officially left the state Capitol,' Senate Minority Leader Stephen Harding, R-Brookfield, proclaimed recently. House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora, R-North Branford, said, 'This budget eviscerates all of our fiscal guardrails.' House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, smiled Wednesday when asked about the GOP efforts to define Lamont as a born-again, tax-and-spend liberal. 'The governor is being attacked by the left and the right, and so he's probably here,' Ritter said, pointing to the center of the table. 'And the answer is, always here.' On Thursday, Lamont concurred: the political center is his comfort zone. He noted that Republicans regularly have claimed his two-year budgets were built on shaky foundations. ''You're going to be in deficit within two years. You're going to be raising taxes.' Well, at six years later, stop crying wolf,' Lamont said. Despite the off-budget spending on early childhood education, the governor estimated that at least $1.2 billion of this fiscal year's $2.4 billion projected surplus still would be used to cover more unfunded pension liabilities He reiterated his intention to veto a bill that would give jobless benefits to strikers, a source of tension with the Connecticut AFL-CIO. He also announced an intention to veto a bill sought by Republicans — and opposed both by the building trades unions and the Connecticut Business and Industry Association. The measure, House Bill 7004, is intended to give Plainfield, a small town in eastern Connecticut, the ability to hold a referendum over a proposed trash-to-energy plant and possibly influence the state Siting Council to block the project. He briefly deferred a question about the bill to a senior staff, who confirmed it indeed would be vetoed. 'I'm vetoing that,' Lamont said, laughing. 'I just made that strong decision by myself.' Lamont said he welcomed passage of a bill encouraging housing construction, though he had yet to finish reviewing it. 'We're never going to get economic growth [and] keep it going if we don't have a place for people to live, young people to live, workforce housing, getting our cities growing again,' he said. Opponents in Fairfield County have urged him to veto the bill. 'I think there's some red flags in it, and I know why it makes people nervous,' he said. 'But it's basically gross misrepresentation from the anti-growth people down there that are stirring people up. They're saying it's a big mandate. You're gonna forcing me to build housing, you know, in my backyard, which is not what the strategy is at all. It's trying to tell towns, you take the lead, you show us where you want that housing to go. It's important for your community.' CT Mirror reporter Keith M. Phaneuf contributed to this story. This article first appeared on CT Mirror and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
