logo
Christopher Luxon says he wasn't pressured by NATO to increase defence spending

Christopher Luxon says he wasn't pressured by NATO to increase defence spending

RNZ News7 hours ago

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.
Photo:
Marika Khabazi
The Prime Minister says he wasn't pressured by the NATO chief to increase defence spending in New Zealand, and "a lot of our partners are incredibly impressed" by the government's commitment to raise spending.
It comes as Foreign Minister Winston Peters told
Morning Report
he believes defence spending must be increased beyond the 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) agreed to by the coalition.
NATO leaders, including US President Donald Trump, are in The Netherlands for a NATO summit where an increase of defence spending to 5 percent of GDP for members is being discussed.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is also there ahead of the North Atlantic Council meeting and told reporters NATO has its own commitments given its "existential threat" represented in the war in Ukraine.
"From a New Zealand point of view, the fact that we have doubled our expenditure, and we've got a very clear, comprehensive plan, a lot of our partners are incredibly impressed by that," Luxon said.
He also said NATO's role in the Pacific is limited, but its role should be focused on Europe.
"I think that's exactly where the focus needs to be," Luxon said. "We are not members of NATO. We are partners that have been invited here."
He said there were areas of common interest and discussion but NATO needed to be "within the bounds of Europe".
Peters was asked about the potential increase to 5 percent of GDP for defence spending in Europe and whether this would mean the region is "armed to the teeth".
He said "all they're being asked to do is to step up and do the proper and responsible thing if defence is a matter".
"Because defence and preparedness prevents war, a lack of preparedness often invites it."
On New Zealand's commitment to increased defence spending, Peters said he believed it would need to increase beyond two percent of GDP, but that that didn't mean New Zealand would be "armed to the teeth."
"That's why there's going to be a review of our position next year because we've gotta be prepared for changing circumstances and to - as they say - pull our weight."
He said New Zealand had spent decades "talking a big game" with old weapons and vehicles.
"We've just gotta do far better than that and play a responsible role, because we do have responsibilities in the Pacific to our neighbourhood."
Peters said he didn't have a specific figure in mind, because the "shape of defence and preparedness has changed dramatically."
He said some procurement decisions the government might have made recently would have been wrong.
"So we need to be up to date, forward thinking, and ensure we don't waste any taxpayer money in properly preparing ourselves for the defence of New Zealanders."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oral Answers for 25 June 2025
Oral Answers for 25 June 2025

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Oral Answers for 25 June 2025

Rt Hon CHRIS HIPKINS to the Acting Prime Minister: Does he stand by all the Government's statements and actions? DANA KIRKPATRICK to the Minister of Finance: What is the Depositor Compensation Scheme and when does it start? Hon MARAMA DAVIDSON to the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries: Does he stand by his statement, "The bottom trawling techniques that are pursued by the New Zealand fishing industry are relatively harmless"; if so, are current levels of bycatch acceptable? Hon KIERAN McANULTY to the Associate Minister of Housing: How many New Zealanders are homeless now, compared to when the Government was elected? TODD STEPHENSON to the Acting Prime Minister: Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? MARIAMENO KAPA-KINGI to the Minister of Statistics: How will he ensure that scrapping the five-yearly Census will not magnify the problem of under-counting Maori and Pasifika populations? RIMA NAKHLE to the Minister for Infrastructure: What recent reports has he seen on New Zealand's infrastructure sector? Hon GINNY ANDERSEN to the Minister for Social Development and Employment: Does she stand by statements made on her behalf that high inflation and high interest rates were main factors in job losses in the construction sector? CHLÖE SWARBRICK to the Minister of Climate Change: Does he stand by his statement that "it is our expectation that we will remain an associate member" of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance; if not, why not? MILES ANDERSON to the Minister of Agriculture: Why is the Government proposing to ban full farm-to-forestry conversions on our highest quality productive land? INGRID LEARY to the Associate Minister of Housing: Does he stand by statements made on his behalf that his proposed changes to the Retirement Villages Act 2003 would "include provisions for repayments but not mandate them"? TOM RUTHERFORD to the Minister for Mental Health: What recent announcements have been made for the assessment and prescription for people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

The House: Parliament's reaction to the Middle East crisis
The House: Parliament's reaction to the Middle East crisis

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The House: Parliament's reaction to the Middle East crisis

Winston Peters speaking in the debate on a ministerial statement regarding the Israel/USA/Iran conflict. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith Parliament's week began with an assurance that the safety of New Zealanders in the Middle East is the first priority. The tense situation in the Middle East, and indeed, intervention from one of our allies is something that no government could ignore, so when the sitting day began on Tuesday, the first item of business was not Question Time, but a Ministerial Statement from Foreign Minister Winston Peters, followed by debate and questions. Peters emphasised that the government's main focus amidst the tension in the region was to get New Zealanders out of harm's way. "The government is committed to supporting New Zealanders caught up in this crisis," Peters told the House. "Since the beginning of the conflict, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade has provided around the clock, 24/7 consular support to New Zealanders in Israel and Iran-and to their families back home in New Zealand - and will continue to do so." The statement was also peppered with lines advocating for three D words: diplomacy, de-escalation, and dialogue - treading a delicate line of not signalling outright support for either side, citing New Zealand's limited influence in the Middle East. Perhaps as a reaction to accusations of fence-sitting in recent days, Peters finished the statement by offering a list of what New Zealand does and does not want in the region. "We want de-escalation and dialogue. We want a two-state solution, with Israelis and Palestinians living in security and peace side-by-side. We want humanitarian aid to get to those who need it. Ultimately, we want peace. "What we do not want is New Zealanders in harm's way. We do not want ever escalating rounds of military action. We do not want a nuclear Iran. We do not want Hamas holding hostages and terrorising Palestinian and Israeli civilians alike. And we do not want Israel occupying Palestinian land. "Ultimately, we do not want another generation of young people in the Middle East, scarred by conflict, replicating the enmities of today and yesterday. This cycle of conflict, now generations old, must end." Ministerial Statements are used by the government to brief Parliament-and by extension the public-on an unfolding situation or event and explain the government's plan of action in response to it. They resemble a press conference wherein a minister delivers a statement, followed by questions or comments from MPs from other parties, generally spokespersons on the relevant topic. There is a tactical benefit for governments in getting in first and delivering a Ministerial Statement (instead of waiting for the Opposition to request an Urgent Debate), in that you can lead the messaging, and so try to control it. Equally though, there is a benefit to the Opposition from Ministerial Statements - because they are able to both make comments and ask questions. Ministerial Statements are more flexible than either Question Time or Urgent Debates. Labour leader Chris Hipkins generally agreed with Peters' advocation for diplomacy over the conflict saying "there is much in the statement by our Minister of Foreign Affairs that I completely agree with". "We also welcome the possibility of a ceasefire. We also endorse the non-expulsion of ambassadors from countries who have taken actions that we disagree with. "If we want international diplomacy, if we want international dialogue, the role of diplomats has never been more important. We also want to acknowledge the New Zealand Defence Force deployment, and they go with our full support." Opinions diverged over whether New Zealand should have called the US strike on Iran a violation of the UN Charter, with Hipkins asking Peters whether the government believed the strike was in line with the Charter's clause on the right to self defence. Peter continued to tread a delicate line in his reply. "Unlike some, we wait till we get the evidence, and we've said it constantly day-after-day that instead of rushing to judgement, as we were asked this morning by the media, 'Has peace broken out?' - 'No,' we said, 'We're going to trust but verify,' and when we sought to verify we found that what they were saying by way of questioning was wrong. "And in this case, we're going to find out the facts as time goes by. There'll be some days yet-maybe sometime yet-before we can establish as to the immediacy of the problem and the level of deterioration with respect to the Iran position on gaining nuclear capability in terms of weapons." While Hipkins wasn't quite able to milk the committal he wanted from Peters, the two weren't especially adversarial in their exchange. That mood wasn't to last though, with Green co-leader Marama Davidson the other opposition MP to question the minister. After a speech advocating upholding the rules-based order, Davidson asked whether the minister would condemn the Israeli and American strikes on Iran. Marama Davidson speaking in the debate on a ministerial statement regarding the Israel/USA/Iran conflict. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith This question seemed to open the floodgates for a shouting match between the two parties, which perhaps is a lot easier with the new seating configuration in the House (New Zealand First are now close to the Greens, having swapped with ACT to allow the new deputy prime minister to sit next to the prime minister). A Ministerial Statement which began in a relatively statesmanlike fashion then morphed into a political tit-for-tat. "I have to say when it comes to the proxies for Iran that have committed so much terrorism and the loss of thousands of lives, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, with respect to Iran-when it comes to that, the Greens have been not a syllable, not a sound, not a mutter, not a murmur, no condemnation whatsoever," Peters said. "We've condemned all parties, and shouting out like that typically just disposes me to point to that member and say that member's only got one side, and, for the first time ever, she's mentioned Iran's people. Yes, Iran's people have been under 40 years of desperation." After a few minutes of back and forth and argy-bargy, Speaker Gerry Brownlee blew his metaphorical whistle. "Neither party here is displaying the sort of decorum that you'd expect out of Parliament. I refer both sides to Speaker's ruling 150/1, which means that neither side of the House has carte blanche to say whatever they like as a result of a ministerial statement." *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.

Kiwibank Launches Game-Changing Startup Funding
Kiwibank Launches Game-Changing Startup Funding

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

Kiwibank Launches Game-Changing Startup Funding

Press Release – Kiwibank Kiwibank StartUp+ launches today as a market-first funding solution designed specifically for startups. This initiative is about more than capital; its about providing tailored support that grows alongside Kiwi businesses. Kiwibank is stepping up to change the game – building a financial ecosystem that empowers startups, unlocks opportunity, and fosters sustainable business growth for New Zealand. Kiwibank StartUp+ launches today as a market-first funding solution designed specifically for startups. This initiative is about more than capital; it's about providing tailored support that grows alongside Kiwi businesses. Elliot Smith, Chief Customer Officer – Business, acknowledges that banking has historically missed the mark for startups – but that's changing now. 'Startups don't fit into traditional lending models, and we recognised the need for a more tailored and flexible approach that genuinely supports early-stage businesses. This is us challenging the status quo to better serve these businesses and it's exactly the kind of innovation that will strengthen the startup economy. 'Startup founders deserve financial solutions that work with them, not against them. They wear many different hats each day, and the financial decisions can sometimes feel daunting, so we're making funding simple, easy and accessible to help them unlock their potential early. 'Kiwibank StartUp+ is designed to evolve alongside businesses, creating a foundation for sustainable growth so entrepreneurs can focus on what matters – building something great.' Designed for the fast-paced nature of early-stage businesses, Kiwibank StartUp+ provides progress-based funding, structured to support startups at each stage of their journey without the usual barriers. This solution adapts to the needs of growing businesses, ensuring they receive the right support when they need it most. Kiwibank's General Manager of Business Banking, Joanna Greaves explains the move reflects Kiwibank's accelerating momentum in the business sector. 'We're backing Kiwi businesses at pace and that's evident in our faster than market growth. We've accounted for 25% of all business lending in New Zealand last year, giving us a good feel for what Kiwi businesses need right now. 'Launching Kiwibank StartUp+ is a leap forward in building the funding landscape New Zealand needs to stay competitive, innovative and resilient,' Greaves adds. Ministry of Awesome – Electrify Chairwoman, Marian Johnson explains Kiwibank's move shows what's possible when traditional institutions evolve with the times. 'Startups face complex challenges that traditional funding models simply don't account for. It's exciting to see our New Zealand-owned bank step up with something truly fit-for-use. This is what happens when major institutions act with agility and purpose. It's the kind of support that can transform our entrepreneurial ecosystem,' says Johnson. The programme will launch as a pilot in partnership with the Ministry of Awesome and feedback from participating businesses will shape the future of the initiative, ensuring it continues to meet the evolving needs of startup businesses. For more information about Kiwibank StartUp+, including eligibility details, visit Kiwibank is a purpose-led organisation that has modern, Kiwi values at heart and keeps Kiwi money where it belongs – right here in New Zealand. As a Kiwi bank, with more than a million customers, our trusted experts are focused on supporting Kiwi with their home ownership aspirations and backing local business ambitions, so together we can thrive here in Aotearoa and on the world stage. Kiwibank is the #1 bank in Kantar's 2025 Corporate Reputation Index and the only bank in the top 15. To find out more about Kiwibank visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store