Solar spat unfolding in Sussex County
SUSSEX COUNTY, Va. (WAVY) — An Idaho-based company wants to put in a nearly $1.1 billion, 600 megawatt solar farm over a 4,800-acre area of Sussex County, but there is an organized effort to block the resubmitted project application, with a growing chorus of people saying 'not in our backyard.'
That is what property owner Molly Dowless was saying when she was offered $2.4 million from the Idaho-based Clēnera to put solar panels on 50 acres of her property as part of the project, which would be spread out over several sites across the proposed project area.
'I was offered $2.4 million over the course of the 30-year project total,' Dowless said in an interview on her Wakefield property. 'The number was tempting, I will admit. So obviously, I started doing a little bit of research. It didn't take long before I realized that what would be involved with industrial solar would have an environmental impact, not only on my land, on our land, but on land for acres and acres beyond.'
The solar farm has been proposed for a 4,800-acre project area with multiple sites, reduced from an initial proposal of 9,000 acres. The company said it would bring in nearly $5 million in revenue to Sussex County in its first year, and over its lifecycle, could bring the county upwards of $170 million in additional revenues, it said, without raising taxes.
'We will be the largest taxpayer in the county, providing significant resources for the county to provide some of the essential services,' said Ed Rumler, director of development for the Idaho-based Clēnera.
He said the project would last more than 35 years, not the 30 years that had been previously proposed.
'This is this is what I would call ground zero for this particular installation called Blackwater — the land you see here,' Dowless said while standing on her farm.
When you get to the town of Wakefield, there are overt signs of discontent — a pitched battle protest against industrial solar power.
'The farm was actually deeded to my grandmother's family,' Dowless said. 'This land dates back to King George II in 1747 — that's how long it's been in our family.'
A family cemetery has headstones from the late 1700s and 1800s.
The Blackwater Solar Project would mean the massive clear-cutting of tens of thousands of trees over thousands of acres in Sussex County.
Blackwater-Solar-FactsheetDownload
'When you do that, you've changed the dynamics of the land, you've gotten rid of the root structures, the systems in place that keep erosion from happening,' Dowless said. 'Think about the dust bowl, the topsoil was gone and what happened? The land was not productive anymore. Now these companies tell us they can put the topsoil back when the project is over and decommissioned. I'm not sure any of us believe that.'
Sensing opposition to the project, Clēnera scaled back a possible 9,000-acre project to 6,000 acres, and now, to the current proposal of 4,800 acres, or about 23% of Portsmouth's land mass.
'We have significantly shrunk the project in terms of acreage and actual megawatt size,' Rumler said.
Clēnera withdrew the original application, but not before the Sussex County Board of Supervisors voted down Blackwater by a 5-2 vote.
Rumler confirmed the company resubmitted the application last October, which reduced the solar project to the current 4,800-acre proposal.
'We have also removed the battery portion of the project based on the feedback from the town of Wakefield … that it was too close to the town,' Rumler said.
Clēnera eliminated a controversial battery energy storage facility, which if it were to catch fire, would be a difficult one to fight.
Dowless has other concerns, including the cutting down of 5,000 acres of trees and hauling them out to put in around 800,000 solar panels, down from the originally-proposed 1.4 million solar panels.
She is also concerned about anticipated construction traffic, 'which completely degrades the roads,' Dowless said.
Rumler says Clēnera considered that complaint.
'We've heard that, [and] we have agreed to not use heavy truck traffic through the town of Wakefield and immediately repair roads and using best practices for construction to make sure there's no damage to neighboring properties,' Rumler said.
However, many who oppose the project, including Dowless, would not support it under any conditions.
Not everyone, however, is opposed to the solar project.
County Supervisor Rufus Tyler, who represents the Henry District in the county, was one of those two votes in favor of the project.
'Those funds can be used to improve our infrastructure,' Tyler said. 'Those funds can be used to improve public safety [and] education.'
Tyler is referring to site funds under Virginia law which are given to localities that host a solar farm — in this case, an estimated $170 million over 35 years.
'The $170 million would be both tax revenue and siting agreement revenue,' Tyler said. 'They are separate, but the $170 million is the total pie of what would be to Sussex County.'
That's why Tyler voted for the project, and he fears losing that $170 million.
'I'm thinking that we might be losing [this] opportunity, because if we can improve our infrastructure, we can attract more industry, and with more industry we can generate more jobs,' Tyler said.
Tyler was asked whether he believes trees are important, in light of what would happen to many of them in the county as a result of the solar project.
After a slight pause, he answered.
'I think there are times when you have to find the equilibrium,' Tyler said. 'What's important? What about the quality of life in the community? What about educating kids so that they can be competitive in the global economy? I think that's important. What about health care? I think that's important. What about public safety? You know, those things are important as well.'
Dowless acknowledges that point and noted it puts members of the county's board of supervisors in a tough spot.
'We maybe need new buildings, new schools or something,' Dowless said. 'It may be a tough decision for them, and I know I don't envy their position.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
23 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
SEPC secures Rs 650 crore solar EPC contract from Parmeshi Urja
By Aman Shukla Published on June 12, 2025, 15:55 IST SEPC Limited (NSE: SEPC | BSE: 532945), a leading player in the Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) space, has been awarded a prestigious contract worth ₹650 crore by Parmeshi Urja Ltd, a Kolkata-based subsidiary of India Power Corporation Limited. The project entails the full EPC scope — including Design, Engineering, Supply, Installation, Testing, and Commissioning — of a 133 MW Solar Power Project. The solar infrastructure will be spread across four key districts in Maharashtra: Sambhaji Nagar, Dhule, Solapur, and Nanded. This green energy initiative falls under the Government of India's PM-KUSUM Yojana, which aims to boost solar adoption for agricultural and rural development. With an estimated execution timeline of 12 to 18 months, the project is a strategic leap for SEPC, marking its return to the renewable energy sector. The company, known for its past projects in Wind, Biomass, and Thermal power, is poised to deliver high-quality, large-scale infrastructure solutions. This major order almost doubles SEPC's domestic order book and strengthens its portfolio across the renewable energy domain. It also reinforces SEPC's commitment to supporting India's clean energy mission and showcases its expertise in executing technically complex infrastructure projects across multiple regions. Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at


San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
A major wine company is exiting California. Here's what it means
Alcohol distribution does not sound like an exciting topic, but it's suddenly the hot gossip within California wine circles. Republic National Distributing Co., the nation's second-largest alcohol wholesaler, announced last week that it will no longer do business in California after Sept. 2. It's sent more than 2,500 beverage brands scrambling to find a new distributor in the state. This reshuffling has generated so much attention largely because it looks like a dire warning for an industry already known to be in peril. If a wholesale behemoth is simply opting out of the largest wine market in the U.S. — if it would rather leave than try to compete — that seems like confirmation that the alcohol industry's downturn has not reached its bottom. While the Grand Prairie, Texas-based Republic National has not suggested that politics played a role in the decision, the news also may be resonating so widely in part because of the narrative it presents: A Texas company wants nothing to do with California. CEO Bob Hendrickson cited 'rising operational costs, industry head winds, and supplier changes' as reasons for the move. The latter is what everyone in the wine industry seems to be discussing. Some of Republic National's most important brands have defected lately to other distributors, especially to the beer-focused Reyes Beverage Group. Since the beginning of the year, the company has lost the right to sell top-selling spirits including Tito's, High Noon, Cutwater Spirits and Jack Daniel's, among many others. The loss of those brands had to be a major financial blow to Republic National. Why they all left, and all at once, is unclear. VinePair's Dave Infante posited that it was the result of Reyes' quest to increase its spirits portfolio after a change in California law made it easier for beer wholesalers to sell liquor. 'It left everybody in the lurch,' said John Buehler, owner of Napa Valley's Buehler Vineyards, where wholesale purchases drive 80% of the business. 'It was really such short notice.' Although Republic National continues to sell his wines in a few other states, he'll need to find a new California distributor. Many wineries and distilleries will now try to jump onto the lists of the other two big dogs, Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits or Breakthru Beverage Group. The Napa-based importer Wilson Daniels has already announced it's bringing its book of prestigious wines like Burgundy's Domaine de la Romanee-Conti and Piedmont's Gaja to Breakthru, while Treasury Americas president Ben Dollard said he's still 'evaluating alternative arrangements' for wineries including Beaulieu, Frank Family and Daou. Other producers will look to smaller distributors, like Chambers & Chambers or Skurnik Wines & Spirits, for their California sales. But in a contracting wine market, there may not be room for everybody on those lifeboats. 'It's going to be a thinning of the herd,' Buehler said. 'The ankle biters that were in that portfolio, the little guys — there's going to be a lot of collateral damage.' Republic National had only recently increased its presence in the Golden State when it completed the purchase of major California distributor Young's Market Co. in 2022. The industry analyst Impact Databank estimated the company's sales that year at $2.8 billion in California alone. Despite that considerable power, however, Buehler — who had been with Young's since 1992 and moved to Republic National as a result of that acquisition — said that Republic National consistently 'underperformed' for him in terms of sales. He now regrets waiting so long to find a new distributor. 'I think I should have seen the writing on the wall. You lose these suppliers, and you're not attracting any new suppliers,' he said. Still, 'I had no idea that they were going to close up shop.' At least Republic National appears to still be selling his wine ahead of the September shutdown date. 'I keep getting purchase orders,' Buehler said, 'so I guess it's business as usual.'

Associated Press
32 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Summit Spine Continues Expansion into North Carolina, Partners with Dr. Louis Torres
'We are thrilled to welcome Dr. Louis Torres to our team as we continue to enhance access to advanced pain care for the Fayetteville community.'— Dr. Amit Patel, CEO and Founder of Summit Spine & Joint Centers FAYETTEVILLE, NC, UNITED STATES, June 12, 2025 / / -- Summit Spine & Joint Centers, a leading multi-location provider of minimally invasive spine care, proudly announces the appointment of Dr. Louis Torres as the newest physician leader. Dr. Torres will support Summit's growing North Carolina operations – which operate under the Integrated Pain Solutions brand. Dr. Torres' arrival represents a strategic milestone in the organization's continued commitment to delivering best-in-class musculoskeletal (MSK) solutions to the Fayetteville region. With an established presence spanning 30 locations in Georgia, 11 in North Carolina, one in Tennessee, and two in South Carolina, Summit Spine & Joint Centers has earned widespread recognition for its excellence in pain management and compassionate patient care. The addition of Dr. Torres strengthens the Company's dedication to expanding access to high-quality, patient-focused care for individuals suffering from chronic pain across the Southeast. Specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of complex conditions—including neck and back pain, sciatica, herniated discs, headaches, pelvic and musculoskeletal pain, and neuropathic disorders—Summit Spine leverages state-of-the-art technologies to deliver precision-based care tailored to each patient's needs. 'We are thrilled to welcome Dr. Louis Torres to our team as we continue to enhance access to advanced pain care for the Fayetteville community,' said Dr. Amit Patel, CEO and Founder of Summit Spine & Joint Centers. 'Our team of highly skilled physicians, nurses, and support staff are united by a shared mission: to improve lives by relieving pain and restoring function through innovative, minimally invasive treatments.' Dr. Torres, a Fayetteville-based physician with strong ties to the region, shared his enthusiasm for the partnership: 'I'm honored to expand access to advanced pain care in a community that means so much to me. Summit's focus on cutting-edge technology and its collaborative, patient-centered approach ensures that each patient receives the highest level of comprehensive and compassionate care.' Summit Spine & Joint Centers operates 17 ASCs and 44 clinics across four (4) states, with Georgia locations in Athens, Augusta, Braselton, Buford, Canton, Carrollton, Cartersville, Columbus, Commerce, Conyers, Covington, Cumming, Dalton, Decatur, East Cobb, Gainesville, Jasper, Johns Creek/Norcross, Lawrenceville, Lithia Springs, Newnan, Ringgold/Ft. Oglethorpe, Rome, Roswell, Savannah, Snellville, Stockbridge, Stonecrest/Lithonia, Winder, and Woodstock; North Carolina clinics in Asheboro, Beaufort, Fayetteville, Jacksonville, Laurinburg (2), Rockingham, Southern Pines, Wadesboro, Whiteville, and Wilmington; clinics South Carolina locations in Greenville and Spartanburg; and a clinic in Chattanooga, Tennessee. For more information call (864) 383-0669 or visit Samantha Montague Summit Spine & Joint Centers +1 404-784-5318 email us here Visit us on social media: LinkedIn Instagram Facebook Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.