logo
Studio Chiefs Agree: California Needs a Better Plan to Keep Hollywood

Studio Chiefs Agree: California Needs a Better Plan to Keep Hollywood

Yahoo07-05-2025

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
It was never not going to come up. At the Milken Institute Global Conference, a panel of four film and TV executives (and one television writer) were asked about President Trump's foreign-film tariff plan, another potential foreign-diplomacy disaster in an effort to keep productions in the United States. The consensus answer from the group was a bit of a swerve.
'It's a big issue, obviously,' Ravi Ahuja, the Sony Pictures Entertainment president and CEO started things off. 'In terms of production leaving here, it's almost more a California issue, honestly, than a U.S. issue. So, while it's true a lot of production has left the United States, it's even worse for California, and there are a lot of people — including our companies — that are working on this with the state government and trying to come up with different bills that will help.'
More from The Hollywood Reporter
They want to help, but make no mistake — the economics matter.
'If the incentives are stronger in the United States — and they are in many states — we'll shoot here,' Ahuja continued. 'I think what's often forgotten in our business is the margins are pretty modest. Producers will tend to locate in the place that's efficient — so, the more we can make the U.S. efficient, the better.'
Casey Bloys, the chairman and CEO of HBO and Max content, concurred.
'I think it is a big California issue, because the talent is here, the infrastructure is here,' Bloys said. 'But the issue becomes when you're trying to plan, because [the state tax incentives are] capped, you can't plan. You have to get into a lottery, and you're not sure if your show is going to get the tax break or not.'
Bloys' job is almost exclusively oversight TV series, not films. It is currently unclear if Trump intends to impose a 100 percent tariff on all internationally-produced television shows as well as films. We can't even be certain Trump will try to see his latest tariff threat through — the day after Trump's tirade about Making Hollywood Great Again, the White House was already walking the idea back a bit.
Ironically, it is also the 'uncertainty' of California's tax-credit system that makes it 'very difficult' to film there, Bloys said. Atlanta, Canada and others guarantee an incentive right up front; not Cali.
'If California would address that, that would make a big difference,' Bloys said.
Mike Hopkins said it's a 'complicated' issue, and he agreed to it being a California-specific one. He hopes to see Governor Newsom push through a planned tax-incentive increase this summer — and to keep pushing that bar higher. Let's start by Making California Great Again.
'It's a great day when you can walk out of your office and walk down to the set and say 'hi' to your talent and see what's happening,' Hopkins, the head of Prime Video and Amazon MGM Studios said.
Pearlena Igbokwe, the chairman of Television Studios, NBC Entertainment and Peacock Scripted, agreed: 'That's the dream.'
For the dream to be realized, the guarantees have to be there, Hopkins said. And they should be there, he argued.
'It's not that we're taking money and giving it to Tom Cruise or somebody,' he said, adding that stars will 'get their fee wherever they go.'
'It actually does drive the economy,' Hopkins said.
As for the lone storyteller on the Storytelling, Strategy, and Innovation: Shaping the Future of Filmed Entertainment panel, The Diplomat creator and writer Deborah Cahn said she's happy to have her executives drop by set, as Hopkins and Igbokwe daydreamed. That didn't happen for her on season one, as The Diplomat primarily filmed in Paris and London — not for tax incentives, but because that's where the story took place. For season two, the show is in New York. It's no California in terms of studio-chief presence, but it's plenty accessible.
'The facilities here and the talent pool here is remains unmatched,' Cahn said. 'We've had great experiences overseas, (but) you still don't get the kind of designers, crews, craftspeople that you do here anywhere else. So this is always my first choice.'
USA! USA! USA!
'But if you need Buckingham Palace, you got to go get it,' she said.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
Sign up for THR's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

Los Angeles Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

time37 minutes ago

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members
LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

The Trump administration is deploying the California National Guard in response to protests in Los Angeles that begin Friday evening over immigration enforcement operations that have resulted in some clashes between demonstrators and authorities, the White House said in a statement. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum "deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness" in California as demonstrations opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations continue in the state, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Saturday evening. Earlier Saturday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the federal government was moving to "take over the California National Guard," calling the move "purposefully inflammatory" and saying it will "only escalate tensions."Jun 7, 11:07 PMHegseth says National Guard being mobilized immediately, active-duty Marines on 'high alert' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles."Hegseth said if violence continues, "active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." Jun 7, 11:07 PMTrump memo deploying National Guard calls LA protests 'rebellion' The memo that President Donald Trump signed Saturday night directing the National Guard to California said that the current protests "constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."Trump utilized his authority under "10 U.S.C. 12406 to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel," according to the presidential memorandum also said that the 2,000 service members could be deployed for 60 days or "at the discretion" of the defense memo adds that the secretary of defense "may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion."-ABC News' Michelle Stoddart Click here to read the rest of the blog.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store