Cumbrian firms scoop prizes at region's family business awards
Cumbria family businesses have been recognised for their success at the North West Family Business Awards 2025.
The event, held at The Rum Warehouse, Titanic Hotel, Liverpool, on Friday, May 9, celebrated the achievements of family-owned businesses across the region.
More than 400 people attended the ceremony, which was organised by The Family Business Community.
The awards were presented by food writer and broadcaster Nigel Barden, alongside co-founders of the Family Business Community, Dave Clarkson and Sue Howorth.
Widdop & Co (Image: Supplied) Mr Clarkson and Ms Howorth said: "We always want to create an unforgettable experience for all attendees, and bringing the awards back to Liverpool added an extra layer of magic to the occasion.
"The turnout was our largest to date and the energy in the room was incredible.
"We're so grateful to everyone who came out to support the awards and recognise the hard work and dedication of our North West family businesses.
"It was truly an unforgettable night for everyone in the room."
Cumbria businesses were among the winners, with The Plastic Bottles Company in Ulverston winning the Business Services Excellence (Small) award.
Penningtons Tea & Coffee Ltd in Kendal was named the best Food & Drink Producer, while The Quiet Site in Penrith won the Leisure & Tourism award.
The People's Choice award, which was decided by public votes, went to Marina View Cafe in Maryport.
The judges said they were impressed by the high calibre of entries this year, making the selection process both challenging and rewarding.
There were 23 categories in total, including sector-specific categories, the People's Choice, and Employee of the Year awards.
The overall North West Family Business of the Year award was presented to Oldham-based fifth-generation family business Widdop & Co.
Mr Clarkson and Ms Howorth added: "We would like to give thanks to our judges, events team, our sponsors, and all the incredible individuals and organisations who participated in our awards.
"Your support and dedication made this event a tremendous success once again, and we are truly grateful."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Victoria's Secret Reveals Preliminary Q1 Results, but Delays Full Report Following ‘Security Incident'
Victoria's Secret & Co. got its websites back up and running, but needs to huddle with tech support some more before reporting its official first-quarter results. The lingerie giant's websites went dark for three days last week as it wrestled with a 'security incident involving information technology systems.' More from WWD Victoria's Secret Goes Dark and Stays Dark in Security Incident Together Group Acquires 'Experiential' Agency Obo Victoria's Secret Adopts Poison Pill to Keep Brett Blundy's BBRC at Bay Victoria's Secret detected the problem on May 24 and said it 'immediately enacted its response protocols to attempt to contain and eradicate unauthorized network access, and third-party experts were engaged.' Its corporate systems, including some functions in stores and e-commerce sites, were shut down on May 26. The e-commerce sites were back up on May 29, but the company is still working to restore full access to the corporate system. The incident did not materially disrupt operations, according to the company. While the tech trip up happened during the second quarter, Victoria's Secret postponed its first-quarter financial update, which was scheduled for Thursday. 'The restoration process has prevented employees from accessing certain systems and information needed to support the company's release of its financial results for the first quarter,' the firm said. Earnings will be released at a later time, but the company gave investors a preview with preliminary results that were near or above the high-end of its previous guidance. First-quarter sales came in at $1.35 billion, down from $1.36 billion a year ago, but ahead of the $1.3 billion to $1.33 billion the company forecast. Adjusted operating income totaled $32 million, down from $40 million a year earlier, but ahead of the $10 million to $30 million forecast. The question now is how much the incident will weigh on the second quarter. 'The company continues to assess the full scope and impact of the incident, under the oversight of the audit committee of the board of directors,' Victoria's Secret said. 'Although this incident has not caused a material disruption to its operations to date, the company has incurred — and may continue to incur — expenses and other financial impacts related to this incident, which could negatively impact its future financial results, including for the second quarter.' It's been a complicated stretch for the Victoria's Secret board, which, in the midst of the website outage last week, also imposed a poison pill shareholder rights plan to prevent Australian entrepreneur Brett Blundy's BBRC International from buying the company without paying a control premium. BBRC has a 13 percent stake in Victoria's Secret. Best of WWD Harvey Nichols Sees Sales Dip, Losses Widen in Year Marred by Closures Nike Logs $1.3 Billion Profit, But Supply Chain Issues Persist Zegna Shares Start Trading on New York Stock Exchange
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
JPMorgan Banker Warns of Silicon Valley Trap for Clean Tech
(Bloomberg) -- The venture capital model honed and perfected in Silicon Valley is proving a bad fit for the clean tech industry, and investors should instead accept that they'll need to commit much bigger sums of money for longer periods of time. Where the Wild Children's Museums Are Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending 'In traditional VC, the model is to make 100 bets, 90 of which will completely fail, and of the 10 remaining maybe a couple will have real exponential growth,' JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s Rama Variankaval said in an interview. However, 'the amount of capital you'd need to replicate that in climate is enormous, so you might need to accept a revised model where you are picking fewer, more concentrated bets.' The warning from Variankaval, whose role as global head of corporate advisory includes running JPMorgan's Center for Carbon Transition, has serious implications for the trajectory of climate change. More than $200 trillion needs to be invested in the transition to net zero over the next three decades to avoid catastrophic temperature rises, BloombergNEF estimates. Spending last year, meanwhile, was just over $2 trillion. Most of the money — both public and private — flowing into the low-carbon transition is going toward electrified transport, renewable energy and power grids, BNEF's analysis shows. Those are capital-intensive sectors that require committed capital. That's in contrast to the 'asset-light businesses' to which venture capital is best suited, Variankaval said. 'If you are investing in a software business and you put in $10 million, the need for additional capital from this company might not be high,' Variankaval said. 'But $10 million in a climate tech company doesn't get you a whole lot of runway.' Of the $270 billion of energy transition-focused private capital raised between 2017 and 2022, venture capital accounted for $120 billion, or 43%, while private equity and infrastructure-focused funds raised $100 billion, or 37%, according to a September 2023 report by S2G, a firm that focuses on venture and growth-stage businesses. Fresh examples include climate tech investment firm Energize Capital, which just raised $430 million for a new fund targeting early-stage startups working on projects like new batteries and software for the electric grid. Clean tech was particularly vulnerable to the rapid surge in interest rates that started in early 2022, with much of the capital-intensive green sector brought to its knees in the period that followed. Over the past three years, the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index has lost almost 40% of its value, compared with a gain of more than 40% in the S&P 500 Index. 'The problem is investors are very segmented,' Variankaval said. 'Different investor groups have different risk-reward preferences, and for the most part a lot of the transition theme falls in the gap between various pockets of capital,' in what's known as 'the missing middle.' Other banks have offered similar warnings. Barclays Plc, which has called on the UK government to address the funding challenge facing companies in low-carbon industries, said in a recent report that climate tech companies face 'a longer and riskier path to profitability' because they tend to be 'capital expenditure-intensive, with high upfront investments required in plant and equipment.' It's clear 'what success looks like,' Variankaval said. 'It's project finance, it's infrastructure. That's where we need to get to, because that's the right cost of capital for a lot of these projects and companies.' Meanwhile, the Trump administration has made a point of withdrawing support from clean energy and instead doubling down on fossil fuels. Though the approach has angered many climate investors, Variankaval suggests it has also helped clarify which technologies have the most potential. The sense now is that 'winners and losers have been more directly identified,' he said. 'It seems like nuclear and geothermal might be more in the winner camp and things like hydrogen might not be. In a way, that helps investors to say, 'Okay I feel like I can have a bit more focus and I know policy support will continue for these couple technologies'.' Demand for nuclear energy was underscored on Tuesday, with an announcement that Meta Platforms Inc. has entered a deal to buy power from Constellation Energy Corp. The agreement marks the latest example of Big Tech tapping an energy form that's available around the clock and that doesn't release greenhouse-gas emissions. There are also some green technologies 'that we can see will continue to have quite solid policy support, maybe even increased support,' Variankaval said. 'In some ways, that's helpful because you're focusing now on maybe two or three things.' The bottom line, though, is that 'climate risk is real,' Variankaval said. 'You're living with the consequences every day, and it's a problem that has negative consequences if left unaddressed. That story does not change in my mind because of either economic cycles or political cycles.' (Adds references to Meta purchase of power from Constellation, and Energize VC fund.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
JPMorgan Banker Warns of Silicon Valley Trap for Clean Tech
(Bloomberg) -- The venture capital model honed and perfected in Silicon Valley is proving a bad fit for the clean tech industry, and investors should instead accept that they'll need to commit much bigger sums of money for longer periods of time. Where the Wild Children's Museums Are Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending 'In traditional VC, the model is to make 100 bets, 90 of which will completely fail, and of the 10 remaining maybe a couple will have real exponential growth,' JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s Rama Variankaval said in an interview. However, 'the amount of capital you'd need to replicate that in climate is enormous, so you might need to accept a revised model where you are picking fewer, more concentrated bets.' The warning from Variankaval, whose role as global head of corporate advisory includes running JPMorgan's Center for Carbon Transition, has serious implications for the trajectory of climate change. More than $200 trillion needs to be invested in the transition to net zero over the next three decades to avoid catastrophic temperature rises, BloombergNEF estimates. Spending last year, meanwhile, was just over $2 trillion. Most of the money — both public and private — flowing into the low-carbon transition is going toward electrified transport, renewable energy and power grids, BNEF's analysis shows. Those are capital-intensive sectors that require committed capital. That's in contrast to the 'asset-light businesses' to which venture capital is best suited, Variankaval said. 'If you are investing in a software business and you put in $10 million, the need for additional capital from this company might not be high,' Variankaval said. 'But $10 million in a climate tech company doesn't get you a whole lot of runway.' Of the $270 billion of energy transition-focused private capital raised between 2017 and 2022, venture capital accounted for $120 billion, or 43%, while private equity and infrastructure-focused funds raised $100 billion, or 37%, according to a September 2023 report by S2G, a firm that focuses on venture and growth-stage businesses. Clean tech was particularly vulnerable to the rapid surge in interest rates that started in early 2022, with much of the capital-intensive green sector brought to its knees in the period that followed. Over the past three years, the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index has lost almost 40% of its value, compared with a gain of more than 40% in the S&P 500 Index. 'The problem is investors are very segmented,' Variankaval said. 'Different investor groups have different risk-reward preferences, and for the most part a lot of the transition theme falls in the gap between various pockets of capital,' in what's known as 'the missing middle.' Other banks have offered similar warnings. Barclays Plc, which has called on the UK government to address the funding challenge facing companies in low-carbon industries, said in a recent report that climate tech companies face 'a longer and riskier path to profitability' because they tend to be 'capital expenditure-intensive, with high upfront investments required in plant and equipment.' It's clear 'what success looks like,' Variankaval said. 'It's project finance, it's infrastructure. That's where we need to get to, because that's the right cost of capital for a lot of these projects and companies.' Meanwhile, the Trump administration has made a point of withdrawing support from clean energy and instead doubling down on fossil fuels. Though the approach has angered many climate investors, Variankaval suggests it has also helped clarify which technologies have the most potential. The sense now is that 'winners and losers have been more directly identified,' he said. 'It seems like nuclear and geothermal might be more in the winner camp and things like hydrogen might not be. In a way, that helps investors to say, 'Okay I feel like I can have a bit more focus and I know policy support will continue for these couple technologies'.' There are also some green technologies 'that we can see will continue to have quite solid policy support, maybe even increased support,' Variankaval said. 'In some ways, that's helpful because you're focusing now on maybe two or three things.' The bottom line, though, is that 'climate risk is real,' Variankaval said. 'You're living with the consequences every day, and it's a problem that has negative consequences if left unaddressed. That story does not change in my mind because of either economic cycles or political cycles.' YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
