'Spying at unprecedented levels': $13.6b annual cost for Australia
Stephen Dziedzic
, ABC
ASIO chief Mike Burgess has used a speech to warn of the costs of foreign espionage to Australia.
Photo:
ABC News/ Shaun Kingma
Australia's domestic spy chief has used a major speech in Adelaide to warn foreign espionage is costing the nation at least A$12.5 billion (NZ$13.6b) a year, while revealing ASIO has disrupted 24 "major espionage and foreign interference" operations in the last three years alone.
ASIO director-general Mike Burgess has also confirmed that Australia expelled "a number" of undeclared Russian intelligence officers in 2022, whilst berating some public officials for "head-spinning" complacency about the threats posed by overseas intelligence agencies.
Burgess has struck an increasingly urgent tone about the threats posed by foreign interference in recent years, but Thursday night's speech - delivered at the annual Hawke Lecture at the University of South Australia - is his most detailed account laying out the scale of the threat.
The spy chief again listed China, Russia and Iran as three of the main nations behind espionage in Australia but said Australians would be "shocked" by the number of other countries that were also trying similar tactics.
He said the 24 major operations disrupted over the past three years were "more than the previous eight years combined" and that strategic competition was driving a "relentless hunger for strategic advantage and an insatiable appetite for inside information".
"Nation states are spying at unprecedented levels, with unprecedented sophistication," he said.
"ASIO is seeing more Australians targeted - more aggressively - than ever before."
He gave multiple examples, such as spies who "convinced a state bureaucrat to log into a database to obtain the names and addresses of individuals considered dissidents by a foreign regime" and a foreign intelligence service that "directed multiple agents and their family members to apply for Australian government jobs - including with the national security community - to get access to classified information".
He also said foreign companies connected to intelligence services had "sought to buy access to sensitive personal data sets; sought to buy land near sensitive military sites; and sought to collaborate with researchers developing sensitive technologies".
The spy chief also told a story about an overseas delegation visiting a "sensitive Australian horticultural facility" who snapped branches off a "rare and valuable variety of fruit tree" in order to steal them.
"Almost certainly, the stolen plant material allowed scientists in the other country to reverse engineer and replicate two decades of Australian research and development," he said.
Burgess also said that foreign spy agencies were taking an "unhealthy interest" in accessing military technology secrets shared through the AUKUS pact.
"Foreign intelligence services are proactive, creative and opportunistic in their targeting of current and former defence employees: relentless cyber espionage, in-person targeting and technical collection," he said.
"In recent years, for example, defence employees travelling overseas have been subjected to covert room searches, been approached at conferences by spies in disguise and given gifts containing surveillance devices.
"Defence is alert to these threats and works closely with ASIO to counter them."
Private investigator desk with top secret envelopes.
Photo:
123RF
Burgess didn't name any of the countries behind the new plots he identified, but released a new report that ASIO developed with the Australian Institute of Criminology, which tries to count the cost of espionage.
He said while calculating the cost was "challenging", the report found espionage cost the Australian economy at least $12.5b in the 2023-2024 financial year - an estimate Burgess called "conservative" and which likely "significantly underestimates" the true cost of espionage.
"Many entities do not know their secrets have been stolen, or do not realise they've been stolen by espionage, or do not report the theft," he said.
The spy chief also once again took aim at businesses and officials who he suggested were complacent or deeply naive about the threat of espionage, saying he'd "lost count of the number of times senior officials and executives have privately downplayed the impacts of espionage".
"I've watched corporate leaders literally shrug their shoulders when told their networks are compromised," he said.
In unusually frank remarks, Burgess also heaped scorn on an unnamed Australian trade official.
"Most recently, a trade official told ASIO there's no way the Chinese intelligence services would have any interest in his organisation's people and premises in China," he said.
"All too often, we make it all too easy."
Australian public servants are being too cavalier on sharing details about their work, Mike Burgess says.
Photo:
Shutter Speed/Unsplash
And he once again rounded on Australian public servants who reveal details about their work online - including on professional networking sites - saying about 7000 of them "reference their work in the defence sector" and "close to 400 explicitly say they work on AUKUS".
"Nearly two and a half thousand publicly boast about having a security clearance and 1300 claim to work in the national security community," he said.
"While these numbers have fallen since I first raised the alarm two years ago, this still makes my head spin … surely these individuals, of all people, should understand the threat and recognise the risk?
"I get that people need to market themselves but telling social media you hold a security clearance or work on a highly classified project is more than naive; it's recklessly inviting the attention of a foreign intelligence service."
Burgess said that "thousands of Australian students, academics, politicians, business people, researchers, law enforcement officials and public servants at all levels of government" have been targeted for espionage through networking sites.
"The vast majority resist, report or ignore the approaches," he said.
"Unfortunately, though, some are sucked in and end up being used - recklessly or consciously - to gather information for a foreign country."
-ABC
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Jailed rapist Gareth Ward refuses to quit Australian state parliament
Gareth Ward was last month found guilty of sexually abusing two young men Photo: Supplied / NSW government An Australian politician has refused to stand down despite being jailed for rape, sparking an urgent court battle to expel the sex offender from a state parliament. New South Wales state politician Gareth Ward was last month found guilty of sexually abusing two young men, aged 18 and 24, between 2013 and 2015. The 44-year-old right-leaning politician has refused to stand down from state parliament, despite sitting in prison while awaiting sentencing for his crimes. State Premier Chris Minns said Ward had "no shame", pledging to move a motion that would expel him from parliament. But Ward has so far stymied these efforts, obtaining a temporary injunction late on Monday that prevented the Labor government from removing him. Leader of the House Ron Hoenig said the government would seek an urgent hearing this week to have the injunction lifted. "The issue is, as you would appreciate, of considerable significance," Hoenig told reporters on Tuesday. "The house needs to be able to make its judgement to protect itself. And we will be seeking a review of the judge's decision." Ward said he planned to appeal his convictions, and should remain in parliament until this appeal is heard. - AFP Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Australia's Snowtown murderer James Vlassakis granted parole after 26 years in jail
Eight bodies were found in acid-filled barrels in a disused bank vault at Snowtown in May 1999. Photo: ABC / Che Chorley Convicted Snowtown murderer James Vlassakis has been granted parole after serving 26 years in jail. Vlassakis was the youngest of the four perpetrators involved in South Australia's (SA) "bodies-in-the-barrels" serial killings between 1992 and 1999. He was also the key prosecution witness against killers John Bunting and Robert Wagner, who are serving life sentences without the prospect of parole. The South Australian Parole Board announced its decision on Tuesday afternoon, but Vlassakis won't be immediately released into the community. Parole Board chair Frances Nelson KC said there is a 60-day period during which the SA Attorney-General, the Commissioner for Victims' Rights and Police Commissioner could appeal. "He would then go to the pre-release centre for up to 12 months," she said. "We've had a look at the legislative criteria and, in our view, he meets the criteria. "We have to look at whether or not he presents a risk to the community and in our assessment he does not. His institutional behaviour has been excellent." SA Parole Board Chair Frances Nelson KC said she thinks Vlassakis is 'genuinely remorseful' and that his 'institutional behaviour has been excellent'. Photo: ABC News Ms Nelson said she believed Vlassakis was "genuinely remorseful". "Don't forget he has done it hard in prison, because he gave evidence against Bunting and Wagner," she said. She said while she understood while families and victims opposed his release, it was not the role of the parole board to decide on punishment. "Many victims have the view that someone hasn't really got a long enough sentence and they shouldn't be released, but that isn't a matter that should even feature for the parole board - it would usurp the function of the courts," she said. "The court does not have to set out a non-parole period but they did in his case, and they set a much reduced non-parole period for reasons which are set out in the sentencing remarks." Ms Nelson outlined strict restrictions which Vlassakis would be required to adhere to. "There will be some geographic exclusion zones which the victims have requested, there would be condition that he's not to contact any of the victims - not that I think for a moment that he would, but that does give them some reassurance," she said. "He would [also] have to obey the rules of the pre-release centre which includes a curfew." In May 1999, SA Police discovered the decomposing remains of several victims in six plastic barrels hidden in an old bank vault at Snowtown. Nearly all the murder victims were friends or family of the perpetrators. Vlassakis, whose image remains suppressed and who is now aged in his mid-40s, was 19 when he committed the crimes and was found guilty of being involved in four of the murders. He was jailed for life, but because he had helped authorities, he was given a 26-year non-parole period. Eight bodies were found in acid-filled barrels in a disused bank vault at Snowtown in May 1999. Photo: ABC / Che Chorley He became involved in the serial killings through his stepfather Bunting, who lived with him and his mother in Adelaide's northern suburbs. Co-accused Bunting and Wagner were jailed for 11 and 10 murders respectively, as well as accomplice Mark Ray Haydon, who was released into the community last year after serving a 25-year sentence. Nelson said last year that neither Bunting nor Wagner had shown any contrition for their crimes, and she added that they were "obviously very unpleasant people". "I don't get the impression that either of them is particularly remorseful for what they did," she said. - ABC

1News
8 hours ago
- 1News
Government forges ahead with foreshore and seabed law
The Government is forging ahead with plans to change the law governing New Zealand's foreshore and seabed, despite a Supreme Court ruling last year that appeared to undercut the rationale for the change. The proposed legislation stems from a clause in National's coalition deal with NZ First, which promised to revisit the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act. That commitment was driven by fears that a 2023 Court of Appeal decision could have made it significantly easier for Māori groups to win recognition of customary rights over parts of the coastline. The Government introduced a bill to Parliament last year to prevent that, but it hit pause in December after the Supreme Court effectively overturned the earlier ruling. At the time, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith welcomed the development and said ministers would take time to reassess their plans. ADVERTISEMENT On Tuesday, Goldsmith confirmed to RNZ that Cabinet had agreed to press ahead with the law change regardless and to pass it before October. "Everybody in New Zealand has an interest in what goes on in the coastline, and we're trying our best to get that balance right." Goldsmith said he was not convinced that last year's Supreme Court ruling had set a high enough test for judging whether customary rights should be granted. "We've had a couple of cases that have been decided since then - which have shown almost 100% of the coastline and those areas being granted customary marine title - which confirmed to us that the Supreme Court test still didn't achieve the balance that we think the legislation set out to achieve." Asked whether he expected an upswell of protest, Goldsmith said that had been an earlier concern but: "time will tell". "There's been a wide variety of views, some in favour, some against, but we think this is the right thing to do." The legislation was one of the key objections raised by Ngāpuhi leaders last year when they walked out on a meeting with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in protest. ADVERTISEMENT More than 200 applications for customary marine title are making their way through the courts. Under the amendment bill, any court decisions issued after 25 July 2024, will need to be reconsidered. That would appear to cover seven cases, involving various iwi from around the country. "I understand their frustration over that," Goldsmith said. "But we believe it is very important to get this right, because it affects the whole of New Zealand." Goldsmith said the government had set aside about $15 million to cover the additional legal costs. The Marine and Coastal Area Act was originally passed by the National-led government in 2011, replacing the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, which had extinguished Māori customary rights in favour of Crown ownership. The 2004 law, introduced by Helen Clark's Labour government, provoked widespread protest and led to the creation of the Māori Party, now known as Te Pāti Māori. National's 2011 replacement declared that no one owned the foreshore and seabed but allowed Māori groups to seek recognition of their rights - or "Customary Marine Title" - through the courts or in direct negotiations with the Crown. ADVERTISEMENT Customary title recognises exclusive Māori rights to parts of the foreshore and seabed, provided certain legal tests are met, including proving continuous and "exclusive" use of the area since 1840 without substantial interruption. The 2023 Court of Appeal ruling, however, declared that groups only needed to show they had enough control over the area that they could keep others from using it, and that situations where the law itself had prevented them from doing so could be ignored. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned that and said the Court of Appeal had taken an unduly narrow approach in its interpretation.