Suzuki halts Swift production amid China rare earth export curbs
Suzuki Motor Corporation
has suspended production of its popular Swift subcompact car due to a shortage of critical components linked to China's rare earth export restrictions, according to two sources familiar with the matter, Reuters reports. The move marks the first confirmed impact on a Japanese automaker from Beijing's latest trade policy shift.
The automaker had earlier announced a planned production stoppage for the Swift model—excluding the Swift Sport variant—from May 26 to June 6. However, it did not specify the reasons behind the parts shortage at the time. A company spokesperson declined to comment further, while Japanese business daily
Nikkei
first reported the link to China's export curbs.
In a statement released Thursday, Suzuki said it would partially resume production of the Swift at its Sagara plant on June 13, with full operations expected to restart after June 16. The company noted that the "prospect of parts supply is clearer" now.
The disruption follows China's April decision to tighten control over exports of rare earths and related magnet materials—critical components in the production of electric motors, electronics, and other high-tech devices. The move has reverberated across global supply chains, affecting industries ranging from automotive and aerospace to semiconductors and defense.
Several European auto parts manufacturers have also reported suspensions in output, while Mercedes-Benz is actively exploring measures to mitigate the risk of rare earth shortages.
Suzuki's suspension highlights the growing vulnerability of global manufacturing sectors to geopolitical tensions and resource dependencies, as nations increasingly seek to secure critical supply chains amid strategic competition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ange Postecoglou Sacked: Tottenham Hotspur make surprise move, remove manager despite first major trophy in 17 years
Ange Postecoglou (AP Photo) NEW DELHI: Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur on Friday announced the dismissal of their manager Ange Postecoglou, shortly after the Australian guided the side to their first trophy in 17 years through the Europa League triumph. The victory over Manchester United with a 1-0 scoreline in Bilbao marked Tottenham's first European success in 41 years, additionally securing them a Champions League spot for the upcoming season. However, the club's dismal domestic performance, their worst since the 1976-77 relegation season, resulted in Postecoglou's departure. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "Following a review of performances and after significant reflection, the Club can announce that Ange Postecoglou has been relieved of his duties," according to a statement posted on Tottenham's official X account. The Australian's tenure ended precisely two years after his appointment from Celtic, with chairman Daniel Levy making the final decision. The club's Premier League campaign concluded with 22 defeats from 38 matches, placing them 17th, just above Leicester, Ipswich and Southampton, who faced relegation. "The Board has unanimously concluded that it is in the best interests of the club for a change to take place," the statement continued. "Whilst winning the Europa League this season ranks as one of the club's greatest moments, we cannot base our decision on emotions aligned to this triumph."
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump vs Musk feud sparks mockery in Moscow: ‘Don't fight, guys!' say Russian officials
The ongoing public spat between US President Donald Trump and tech-billionaire Elon Musk has found unlikely spectators in Moscow, where top officials, tycoons, and media personalities gleefully weighed in with offers of peace talks, business deals—and sarcasm. 'Elon, don't be upset!' posted nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, formerly head of Russia's space programme. 'If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity,' he added on Musk's own platform, X. Elon @elonmusk , don't be upset! You are respected in Russia. If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us – a 'Bars-Sarmat' fighter. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity. — ROGOZIN (@Rogozin) June 6, 2025 Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev also joined the online fray, quipping: 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys!' The clash between the US president and the world's richest man quickly became low-hanging fruit for Russia's political elite, many of whom have made a habit of mocking perceived chaos in Washington. Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of RT and one of Russia's most powerful media figures, jabbed at the row as a symbol of 'modern US. political culture' — calling it 'Sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse.' Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund and a former advocate for US-Russia cooperation in space, lamented: 'Why can't we all just get along?' He later asked X's AI chatbot, Grok, how the pair might reconcile. @grok what needs to happen for @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk to reconcile — Kirill A. Dmitriev (@kadmitriev) June 5, 2025 Even the Kremlin chimed in—carefully. Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov diplomatically called it an 'internal matter' for the US but expressed faith in Trump's ability to multitask. 'Presidents handle a huge number of different things at the same time, some more and some less important,' he said, Reuters reported. Others, like hardline nationalist businessman Konstantin Malofeyev, viewed the feud as a strategic opening: 'We can just be glad that they won't have time for us… the best time to strike back [against Ukraine].'
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
NATO boosts defence budget, but US carries largest burden
On June 5, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Secretary General Mark Rutte announced an ambitious new defence spending target for all members, including the United States. The proposed target sets total defence investments at five per cent of GDP, comprising 3.5 per cent for core defence capabilities and 1.5 per cent for defence- and security-related investments such as infrastructure and announcement aligns with US President Donald Trump's longstanding call for NATO allies to increase their defence spending to five per cent, aiming to close existing capability gaps, strengthen deterrence, and prepare for emerging global EXPENDITUREAccording to the NATO Defence Expenditure report (2014-2024), defence spending among NATO member countries has increased significantly over the past decade. The United States remains the largest spender, with an estimated defence expenditure of $755 billion in 2024 — 3.4 per cent of its GDP — marking a 14.3 per cent increase since 2014. Notably, Poland has shown the highest growth rate of 213.7 per cent, increasing its defence budget from $8.6 billion in 2014 to an estimated $26.8 billion in 2024, now accounting for 4.12 per cent of its GDP. Other countries like Turkey and the Netherlands have also more than doubled their defence spending, with growth rates of 128.7 and 113.9 per cent, MANY MEET 2% SPENDING?Till now, NATO members have been required to spend at least two per cent of their GDP on defence to meet the alliance's guidelines. But in reality, not all of them spent that much. The number of NATO allies meeting the two per cent target, however, has steadily increased alongside the growth in total member 2014, only three out of 28 members (11 per cent) met the target. By 2020, 30 per cent of allies were spending at least two per cent of their GDP on defence. This number rose sharply to 23 out of 32 members (72 per cent) by 2024. During this period, the alliance expanded with Montenegro joining in 2017, North Macedonia in 2020, Finland in 2023, and Sweden in 2024, contributing to the increase in total SPENDS MORE?In January this year, the Trump administration urged NATO allies to significantly increase their spending, emphasising that European nations should take primary responsibility for their total defence expenditure has steadily increased over the past decade, rising from $910 billion in 2014 to an estimated $1,185 billion in 2024, based on 2015 prices and exchange rates. While the United States remains the largest contributor, accounting for around 73 per cent of NATO's total defence spending in 2014, its share is gradually decreasing. By 2024, the US is projected to contribute about 64 per cent of the total defence expenditure, amounting to $755 the same time, defence spending by European allies and Canada increased from $250 billion to an estimated $430 billion, although this amount remains lower than US spending. Despite the increase in defence spending, some NATO countries still fall short of the two per cent GDP target. The question is whether the recent rise in spending is largely driven by pressure from Trump, as the US is the largest contributor to NATO's Watch
