logo
Brazil considers capping meal voucher fees, Pix system deposits doubtful, say sources

Brazil considers capping meal voucher fees, Pix system deposits doubtful, say sources

Reuters30-04-2025

BRASILIA, April 30 (Reuters) - Brazil's government is considering capping card processor fees and shortening settlement periods to cut intermediation costs in the country's multi-billion-dollar meal voucher market, three sources with knowledge of the government's plans said.
The sources, who requested anonymity to discuss private talks, said the idea of transferring funds directly to workers through Brazil's widely popular Pix instant payment system had been discussed but is unlikely to move forward because of strong opposition from restaurant associations and meal voucher companies, which act as intermediaries.
The move comes as the government tries to curb food inflation that has weighed on President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's approval ratings, though it continues to delay regulations needed to open up the concentrated meal voucher market under rules passed by Congress in 2022.
The Labor Ministry did not respond to a request for comment, and the Finance Ministry declined to comment.
The Pix alternative had been reported by local outlets last week, sending shares of meal voucher providers Edenred (EDEN.PA), opens new tab, which owns Ticket, and Pluxee (PLX.PA), opens new tab, which owns Sodexo, sharply lower.
Alongside privately held Alelo and VR, these companies control roughly 85% of Brazil's meal voucher market.
Direct Pix deposits would effectively eliminate the need for intermediaries in a market that moves around 170 billion reais ($30 billion) annually under Brazil's Worker Food Program (PAT), created in 1976 to offer tax incentives to companies covering their employees' meal costs.
Speaking to state media on Wednesday, Labor Minister Luiz Marinho also appeared to dismiss the Pix-based alternative.
"The program needs to be preserved. Many ideas emerged, and some would have essentially destroyed it. So those were completely ruled out," Marinho said.
Without providing details, the minister said there would be changes to fees, which he described as "very high."
The sources said the government is considering a cap on the MDR (merchant discount rate) — the fee charged to merchants per transaction. Government estimates seen by Reuters show restaurants pay about 8% more on sales with meal vouchers than with credit cards.
Marinho also flagged potential changes to settlement periods, acknowledging controversy over how long it takes for funds to reach restaurants after being paid to the voucher companies. In the public sector, he said, contracts often stipulate 30-day payment terms.
"Contracts need to be adjusted to drastically shorten that period," he said.
Marinho said the government is weighing the issue carefully and could announce a decision in May, although no formal decree is currently in the works.
The Brazilian Chamber of Worker Benefits (CBBT), which represents newer companies, said there is no evidence that changing fees or settlement terms would lower food costs for workers. It instead called for the long-delayed implementation of a 2022 law that opened the rule for a single "interoperable" network for all accredited players.
The measure, which is also supported by supermarkets, would enable open access to major voucher networks and end exclusivity in participant access.
But Lula's administration has delayed regulations needed to implement the changes, including portability rules that would allow users to transfer meal credits between providers.
($1 = 5.6635 reais)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Whole Foods is opening in midtown Miami this month, spotlighting 130-plus Florida producers
Whole Foods is opening in midtown Miami this month, spotlighting 130-plus Florida producers

Time Out

time19 minutes ago

  • Time Out

Whole Foods is opening in midtown Miami this month, spotlighting 130-plus Florida producers

After much anticipation, Whole Foods Market's Edgewater location is finally set to open: the grocery chain will officially debut a new 53,400-square-foot store located at 2910 Biscayne Boulevard at 9 a.m. on Thursday, June 26. And what better way to celebrate than with free coffee and tasty breakfast treats? On opening morning, customers will enjoy complimentary java from Wells Coffee and breakfast items from Zak the Baker. And if you're a true early bird, the first 300 customers in line will receive a custom tote bag and Secret Saver coupon featuring offers up to $100 off. Don't feel like waking up early? Later in the day, Gelatys will pass out complimentary gelato pops to afternoon shoppers. To mark the opening, Whole Foods is also donating food to The Caring Place, a Miami-based organization focused on food rescue, as part of its Nourishing Our Neighborhoods program. The new Edgewater outpost will also be serving up serious Miami vibes: along with bright and bold decor nods that mimic the city's vibrant spirit (think bird motifs and tropical plants throughout), the new location will spotlight an assortment of more than 500 locally made items from 130-plus Florida suppliers. We're talking Key West pink shrimp from Cox's Seafood Co. and grouper from Greg Abrams Seafood over at the sustainably-focused, full-service seafood counter; hyper-fresh lychee and passion fruit from EcoRipe Tropicals on display in the produce section; hand-wrapped fresh mozzarella from Mozzarita and rosemary flatbread from Jennifer's Homemade on stock in the specialty department; and ground beef from Adam's Ranch Natural Beef at the butchery. A full-service coffee bar will pour Cuban-style coffee drinks (from cortaditos to café con leche); a prepared foods department will stock fresh pizza, made-to-order sandwiches and daily-changing sushi selections from Sushi Maki; and the extensive beverage offerings will include more than 240 craft beers (including Florida-born faves like Sunshine City IPA from Green Bench Brewing and Ever Haze IPA from Tripping Animals) as well as ready-to-drink cocktails and more than 700 wines. Cheers to that!

Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk breaks with Trump's agenda
Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk breaks with Trump's agenda

NBC News

time43 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk breaks with Trump's agenda

WASHINGTON — Just days after he left his powerful position as one of Donald Trump's closest advisers, Elon Musk is orchestrating a pressure campaign to sink the mammoth tax and spending package that is tied to the president's policy agenda. Musk used X, his social media site, on Wednesday to implore Americans to call Congress and urge it to ' kill' the bill that Trump hails as 'big' and 'beautiful.' He also urged lawmakers to rewrite the bill from scratch, putting him squarely at odds with Trump, who had invited him into Cabinet meetings and empowered him to dismantle whole agencies and shrink the government workforce. The bill, which has already passed the House, faces an uncertain fate in the Senate, where just four Republican defections would spell defeat. It doesn't sit well with Trump world that Musk is the messenger. Trump is considering when and how to respond to Musk's gambit, a White House official said. He was 'caught off guard' but "not entirely surprised" by Musk's opposition, a senior official said. Trump had sent Musk off in style, giving him a golden key and staging a goodbye ceremony in the Oval Office that the media covered live. 'The president wanted to be a nice guy,' the senior official said. Musk's posts come a day after his surprising break with Trump over the bill's merits. On Tuesday, he called the measure a ' disgusting abomination,' warning that it would push the nation deeper into debt. Having elevated Musk and made him a prized sidekick, Trump may discover that the world's richest man is a potential nemesis beyond his control. A White House official downplayed the notion of a falling-out with Musk. 'Everyone here in a senior role understands who Elon Musk is, understands how he acts, understands how he plays,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'There's been no surprise when it comes to Elon Musk, because he's been such a friend to the administration. 'And we all know this is coming from a place of business and is not personal.' But people in Trump's orbit were angry that Musk skewered the bill. They were particularly outraged by his not-so-veiled warning that Republicans who vote for it could lose their jobs come November 2026, a person familiar with the matter said. That assertion came after Musk said late last month that he would do 'a lot less' political spending going forward. A Republican lawmaker, in a private text chain with colleagues, wrote sarcastically of Musk: 'Team Player.' Trump is normally quick to clap back at those who publicly oppose his interests. When Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., objected Tuesday on CNBC that the bill would inflate the national debt, Trump swiftly denounced him. 'The people of Kentucky can't stand him,' Trump posted on Truth Social. In the case of Musk, Trump so far has been silent. The disparate treatment may be rooted in cold political reality. Paul doesn't have a national following, while Musk, with his capacity to influence the midterm elections, is someone Trump may not wish to antagonize. Musk spent more than $250 million to boost Trump last year and is free to pour money into a midterm campaign season in which control of Congress is up for grabs. If Democrats seize the majority, they could saddle Trump with serial investigations and perhaps impeachment proceedings in the back half of his term. Republican lawmakers, too, trod carefully Wednesday when they were asked about Musk's evisceration of Trump's key legislative priority. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana quipped: 'Well, let me say this about Elon. I wish he wouldn't sugarcoat stuff.' 'I think he's really smart,' Kennedy added. 'I think he's entitled to his opinion. He's frustrated. I think he believes, in my judgment correctly, that we're quickly becoming debt slaves.' Still, Musk's apostasy shows the inherent risks in Trump's executive style. As a centibillionaire, Musk never fit neatly in the Trump administration's chain of command. He squabbled with at least two Cabinet secretaries and found that his private interests clashed at times with Trump's policy goals. Trump's bill would curtail the electric vehicle and residential solar tax credits that are important to Musk's Tesla car and clean energy divisions. The measure would also impose a new annual $250 fee on EV drivers. Musk spoke to Trump personally about extending the electric vehicle credit, a person familiar with the matter said. He also pressed some senior lawmakers on Capitol Hill in recent weeks — before his recent X posts — including House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to keep tax credits in the bill that would incentivize electric vehicle purchases, two people familiar with the conversations said. The tax credits had been eliminated to get the most conservative House members on board as part of the delicate negotiations to ensure the bill's passage. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid — we urge the senate to enact legislation with a sensible wind down' of the credits, Tesla Energy posted on X on May 28, the day Musk officially left his government role. In opposing the bill, Musk has amplified a point that the more fiscally conservative Republicans also find troubling: The measure would greatly add to America's whopping debt. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office holds that the House-passed version of the bill would inflate the debt by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Paul, the senator from Kentucky, wrote Tuesday that he wants trillions in new debt 'removed' from the measure and that four of his colleagues 'feel this way.' An open question is the degree to which Americans care what Musk thinks. His public approval rating was underwater amid his association with the Department of Government Efficiency and the drastic cuts that left many government workers suddenly unemployed. An NBC News poll in March found that 51% of registered voters held negative views of Musk, with only 39% viewing him positively. Lawmakers seeking campaign donations may be solicitous of Musk and the news media may treat him with outsize interest because of the role Trump gave him, but can he shape public opinion on controversial legislation? Newt Gingrich, the Republican former House speaker, suggested the answer is no. 'I haven't seen any' public constituency for Musk, Gingrich told NBC News. 'If you can find one, call me.' 'I'm a big admirer of his as an entrepreneur, but he never understood the political business, and he doesn't now,' he added. That having been said, 'I'm sure no one on the Trump team thinks it's helpful,' Gingrich added. Democrats are delighted by Musk's dissent and the rift it exposes inside GOP ranks.

US State Department's planned layoffs may violate court order, judge says
US State Department's planned layoffs may violate court order, judge says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US State Department's planned layoffs may violate court order, judge says

June 4 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California on Wednesday said her recent ruling barring President Donald Trump's administration from laying off tens of thousands of federal employees likely blocks the U.S. State Department's reorganization plan that includes 2,000 job cuts. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco during a virtual meeting in a lawsuit by unions, nonprofits and municipalities said she was concerned that the State Department is flouting her May 22 order that broadly blocked government-wide mass layoffs. Illston temporarily blocked about 20 agencies, including the State Department, from carrying out plans to downsize and restructure federal agencies at Trump's direction. But the department told Congress last week that it still planned to notify about 2,000 employees this month that they were being laid off and would reorganize or eliminate more than 300 bureaus and offices. 'At this point there are some semantics being bandied about, but it appears to me that what is being implemented at the State Department now is covered by the injunction,' said Illston, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Illston ordered both sides to file briefs on the matter next week and said she would hold a hearing by June 13, the earliest date that State can issue layoff notices after it submitted its plan to Congress. In her May ruling, Illston said the White House cannot order the restructuring of federal agencies without authorization from Congress. The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause Illston's decision while it appeals, after a San Francisco-based federal appeals court refused to permit the pause. Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Musk last week said he was ending his stint with the administration, raising questions about the future of his Department of Government Efficiency. During Wednesday's 30-minute meeting, U.S. Department of Justice lawyer Andrew Bernie argued that the State Department's reorganization plan predated a February executive order and subsequent White House memo directing mass layoffs, placing it outside the scope of Illston's decision. 'We of course recognize and take with the utmost seriousness our obligation to comply with the injunction, and we are complying,' Bernie said, adding that 17 federal agencies have halted planned layoffs. But Danielle Leonard, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, countered that State Department documents and statements regarding the planned layoffs specifically reference orders from the White House. 'We've heard some things from Mr. Bernie today, but we haven't seen anything sworn under penalty of perjury saying this was … independently done,' she said. Illston had convened Wednesday's meeting after the plaintiffs in a filing late Tuesday accused the State Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of not complying with her decision. They said that HUD had fired about 80 employees who had not completed a probationary period, which Bernie on Wednesday confirmed. But he said that agencies have broad latitude to fire probationary workers, and those terminations were not the same as the mass layoffs of tenured employees that were blocked by Illston. Probationary workers typically have less than a year or two in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees in new positions. Illston said it was not clear to her whether the firings at HUD were covered by her injunction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store