logo
217 days and counting: Trump's rules slow the release of migrant children to their families

217 days and counting: Trump's rules slow the release of migrant children to their families

WASHINGTON (AP) — Dressed in a pink pullover, the 17-year-old girl rested her head in her hands, weighing her bleak options from the empty room of an shelter in Poughkeepsie, New York.
During a video call into an immigration courtroom in Manhattan, she listened as a lawyer explained to a judge how new regulations imposed by President Donald Trump's administration — for DNA testing, income verification and more — have hobbled efforts to reunite with her parents in the U.S. for more than 70 days.
As the administration's aggressive efforts to curtail migration have taken shape, including unparalleled removals of men to prisons in other countries, migrant children are being separated for long periods from the relatives they had hoped to live with after crossing into the U.S.
Under the Trump rules, migrant children have stayed in shelters an average of 217 days before being released last month to family members, according to new data from the Health and Human Services Department's Office of Refugee Resettlement. During the Biden administration, migrant children spent an average of 35 days in shelters before being released to relatives.
'Collectively, these policy changes have resulted in children across the country being separated from their loving families, while the government denies their release, unnecessarily prolonging their detention,' lawyers for the National Center for Youth Law argued in court documents submitted May 8.
The Trump administration, however, has argued that the new rules will ensure the children are put in safe homes and prevent traffickers from illegally bringing children into the country.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. the health secretary, told lawmakers in Congress this month: 'Nobody gets a kid without showing that they are a family member.'
The family situation for the 17-year-old, and her 14-year-old brother who came with her from the Dominican Republic, is complicated. Their parents, who were living apart, were already in the U.S. Their children were trying to reunite with them to leave behind a problematic living situation with a stepmother in their home country.
After 70 days in detention, the teen girl seemed to wonder if she would ever get back to her mother or father in the U.S. If she agreed to leave America, she asked the judge, how quickly would she be sent back to her home country?
'Pretty soon,' the judge said, before adding: 'It doesn't feel nice to be in that shelter all the time.'
The siblings, whom the Associated Press agreed not to identify at the request of their mother and because they are minors, are not alone. Thousands of children have made the trek from Guatemala, Haiti, Mexico and other countries, often alone on the promise of settling with a family member already in the U.S.
They've faced longer waits in federal custody as officials perform DNA testing, verify family members' incomes and inspect homes before releasing the children. The new rules also require adults who sponsor children to provide U.S.-issued identification.
The federal government only released 45 children to sponsors last month, even as more than 2,200 children remained in their custody.
Child stays in shelter as Trump requires DNA testing
Under the Biden administration, officials tried to release children to eligible adult sponsors within 30 days, reuniting many families quickly. But the approach also yielded errors, with some children being released to adults who forced them to work illegally, or to people who provided clearly false identification and addresses.
Trump's Republican administration has said its requirements will prevent children from being placed in homes where they may be at risk for abuse or exploited for child labor. Officials are conducting a review of 65,000 'notices of concerns' that were submitted to the federal government involving thousands of children who were placed with adult sponsors since 2023.
Already, the Justice Department indicted a man on allegations he enticed a 14-year-old girl to travel from Guatemala to the U.S., then falsely claimed she was his sister to gain custody as her sponsor.
DNA testing and ID requirements for child protection are taking time
Immigration advocacy groups have sued the Trump administration seeking to block the more rigorous requirements on behalf of parents and adult siblings who are waiting to bring migrant children into their homes.
'We have a lot of children stuck ... simply because they are awaiting DNA testing,' immigration lawyer Tatine Darker, of Church World Service, told the Manhattan judge as she sat next to the Dominican girl.
Five other children appeared in court that day from shelters in New York and New England, all saying they experienced delays in being released to their relatives.
The Trump administration's latest guidance on DNA testing says the process generally takes at least two weeks, when accounting for case review and shipping results.
But some relatives have waited a month or longer just to get a test, said Molly Chew, a legal aide at Vecina. The organization is ending its work supporting guardians in reunification because of federal funding cuts and other legal and political challenges to juvenile immigration programs. DNA Diagnostics Centers, which is conducting the tests for the federal government, did not respond to a request for comment.
Plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit filed by the National Center for Youth Law have also cataloged long wait times and slow DNA results. One mother in Florida said she had been waiting at least a month just to get a DNA appointment, according to testimony submitted to the court.
Another mother waited three weeks for results. But by the time those came through in April, the Trump administration introduced a new rule that required her to provide pay stubs she doesn't have. She filed bank statements instead. Her children were released 10 weeks after her application was submitted, according to court documents filed Tuesday.
Many parents living in the U.S. without work authorization do not have income documents or U.S. identification documents, like visas or driver's licenses.
The siblings being held at the Poughkeepsie shelter are in that conundrum, said Darker, the New York immigration lawyer. They crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in March with their 25-year-old sister and her children, who were quickly deported.
Their mother said she moved to New Jersey a few years ago to earn money to support them. She couldn't meet the new income reporting requirements. Their father, also from the Dominican Republic, lives in Boston and agreed to take them. But the DNA testing process has taken weeks. The AP could not reach him for comment.
She said her children are downcast and now simply want to return to the Dominican Republic.
'My children are going to return because they can't take it anymore,' the mother said in Spanish. She noted that her children will have been in the shelter three months on Sunday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As partisan redistricting battles flare, Maine constitutional officers weigh in
As partisan redistricting battles flare, Maine constitutional officers weigh in

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As partisan redistricting battles flare, Maine constitutional officers weigh in

Voters cast their ballots at the Quimby School gymnasium in Bingham, Maine on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. (Photo by Michael G. Seamans/ Maine Morning Star) Since President Donald Trump asked Texas to redraw its congressional maps to find five more Republican seats ahead of next year's elections, some Democratic states are considering redistricting to counter the effort. Maine is not, at least according to Gov. Janet Mills, though an anonymous group tried to encourage the Pine Tree State to intervene earlier this month by flying planes over Augusta with banners that read 'Mess with Texas.' The state's constitutional officers, Attorney General Aaron Frey and Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, both Democrats, condemned Texas' move, and Trump instigating it, as a blatant abuse of power. But, they said Democratic states exploring the avenues legally available to them to redistrict outside the regular schedule is understandable. Bellows refrained from any judgement of those counter efforts, while Frey was more critical, particularly due to what he sees as a likely snowball effect. 'I am lamenting what this might mean for how our politics will continue, in terms of people trying to do the one-upsmanship,' Frey said in a sit-down with Maine Morning Star. 'As much as it probably sounds like it's a critique, it really is more of a concern about this being the evolution of where the politics is going.' The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, the official party committee dedicated to electing Democrats to statehouses, called on Democrats on Aug. 4 to pursue redistricting opportunities to respond to possible changes to Texas' congressional map. Last week, California was the first state to release a proposal to that aim. Such ideas have also been floated by officials in New York, Maryland, and Illinois — whose governor has already waded into the redistricting battle by welcoming Texas Democrats who fled the state to block a vote on the Republican proposal. They've since returned. But, Republicans control more state legislatures than Democrats and Vice President JD Vance is touring those states to encourage more gerrymandering. Several, including Missouri, Florida and Indiana, are now considering redrawing their maps to counter the Democrats' countering. 'It should be a concern for all of us about what this means for the next time that the next majority is in power,' Frey said. 'I am hoping that I would have just as much concern if California would have been the first state to say that they were going to do this as I have about Texas saying that they're going to do this, even though it may be perfectly appropriate legally.' Redistricting procedures vary state by state but largely happen every ten years following new census data. Under the Maine Constitution, the state Legislature must establish a bipartisan advisory commission to draw its congressional and legislative districts every ten years. These maps are then sent to the Legislature for approval, though lawmakers aren't bound to those recommendations. Approval requires a two-thirds vote, and because neither party has held a supermajority in the last decade, this has typically required bipartisan support. The map is then subject to the governor's approval. Maine last went through this process in 2021. Mills did not respond to multiple requests for comment about whether she supports the actions other Democratic states are considering to redraw their maps in response to Texas Republicans' attempts. A spokesperson told the Portland Press Herald in early August that she was not considering any actions related to redistricting in Maine. If the Legislature is unable to reach the two-thirds threshold, the Maine Supreme Court would draw the maps instead. 'It's understandable that other states are seeking to fight fire with fire,' Bellows said, echoing California Gov. Gavin Newsom, 'but none of what's happening outside of Maine would change unless the Legislature and the people of Maine decided to pursue a constitutional amendment.' A constitutional amendment in Maine requires a two-thirds vote, plus approval by the voters, so such a change, especially before the 2026 midterms, is not likely. When asked if Maine should get involved in the nationwide redistricting fight, Frey said, 'No, not at this point.' As the officer representing the state on legal matters, Frey said he doesn't see an opportunity for legal recourse given that other states drawing congressional districts is a state-level process pertaining to their residents and it doesn't have a direct harm to Maine. However, how these maps ultimately shape Congress will inevitably impact Maine, he said, looking at a list on his desk of lawsuits Maine has filed or joined against the Trump administration. Particularly if Trump gets his way in Texas, Frey said it could result in a continuation of a Congress that doesn't serve as an adequate check to the executive branch. Some politicians are seeking to choose their voters instead of their voters choosing them. – Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows Like other Democrats across the country, Frey and Bellows walked a line to frame their party's use of redistricting differently than Republicans'. 'The Trump administration is trampling all over the norms in our democracy, and it is really important that people stand strong for our values in this moment,' Bellows said. 'What's concerning about what Texas is trying to do is they are basically trying to cheat their way into electoral success in 2026 and 2028, so it's understandable that some of the larger states that are blue states are thinking about how they might respond.' Of those clear political aims, Frey similarly said, 'There's no mask to it,' arguing it would be different if Texas had come to a conclusion that redistricting mid-cycle was needed because its districts were no longer representative due to population shifts or another clear reason. 'Let's say this was Joe Biden who in 2023 was like, 'California, Gavin Newsom, you like us, California does a lot of stuff that supports the administration, I need you to go redistrict and get me five more seats in Congress,'' Frey said. 'What would people say?' But while Frey said Democratic states may be legally within their right to explore counter measures, he doesn't see it as a productive way to resolve political discord nor address the priority issues of everyday Americans, such as the cost of living. 'If anything, it's creating a system that is going to be more unable to meet what it is that, I think, Mainers and the American people are asking for,' Frey said. As Trump eyes election changes, Secretary Bellows warns of fallout Earlier this month Bellows officially responded to the U.S. Department of Justice's request for sweeping voter data, questioning the federal agency's intentions and asking that the request be withdrawn. She sees a throughline with that effort, Trump's executive orders and his push for Texas Republicans to redistrict. 'Some politicians are seeking to choose their voters instead of their voters choosing them,' Bellows said. 'Many of these initiatives seem designed to shrink the population of people who are participating in elections, to spread fear and deter people from participating, or to create artificial barriers to participation.' Frey also sees connections. The day before speaking with Maine Morning Star, Frey had returned from a trip to Washington, D.C., where he saw National Guard troops and FBI agents gathered on the mall. 'They are pushing boundaries to see how far they can get,' Frey said of the administration. Pulling up the president's post on Truth Social ordering the U.S. Commerce Department to start working on a new U.S. Census that does not count people in the country illegally, Frey asked, 'What's the end?' He sees all of these moves as a test of the democratic foundation of the country, the U.S. Constitution. 'If enough citizens out there who are protected by this contract decide that they are unwilling to hold the president to the limitations that the constitution places on government action, I mean, at a certain point that contract by both parties is just going to dissolve,' Frey said. The book 'The Storm Before the Calm' sat on his desk as he added a hopeful nod, explaining the current moment could provide an opportunity to be reminded of the importance of those protections. The book, by geopolitical forecaster George Friedman, views American history through cycles, enduring upheaval and conflict but, ultimately, increasing in strength and stability. With 2026 on the horizon — when Maine's governorship, U.S. Senate seat, two U.S. House seats and Legislature are all up for reelection — Frey said, 'Maybe there will be an opportunity for renewal.' Time will tell how redistricting may play a part in that. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Memphis repeats as city with worst drivers in the U.S. though another Tennessee city is competing for the top spot
Memphis repeats as city with worst drivers in the U.S. though another Tennessee city is competing for the top spot

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Memphis repeats as city with worst drivers in the U.S. though another Tennessee city is competing for the top spot

Memphis ranked as the city with the worst drivers for the third consecutive year, but another Tennessee city came in second. ConsumerAffairs, a customer review and news service that collects and analyzes data to assess various aspects of American life, ranked Memphis as the worst city for the third consecutive year. The organization analyzes crash data from the U.S. Department of Transportation. This ranking uses the most recent data available for 2024. According to the report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that in 2024, 39,345 people died in traffic crashes in the U.S. This figure marks the first time since 2020 that the number of fatal traffic crashes was below 40,000. Here's which city in Tennessee has joined Memphis at the top of the list of worst drivers in America. Does Tennessee have good drivers? While Tennessee is not the worst state for drivers, it is certainly not the best. Of the six Volunteer State cities included in the ranking, only two saw improvements in their ranking in 2025. Memphis ranked No. 1 as the city with the worst drivers, the same rank it had in 2024. It had 17.96 crashes related to bad driving, 38.79 total fatalities, 2.23 fatalities involving DUI, 8.58 fatalities involving speeding and 9.22 fatalities involving positive blood alcohol content per 100,000 people. The only categories to decrease from 2024 to 2025 were the number of fatalities involving DUIs and positive blood alcohol content. Knoxville ranked second, up from No. 25 in 2024. The city had 13.94 crashes related to bad driving, 31.49 total fatalities, 3.61 fatalities involving DUI, 9.29 fatalities involving speeding and 4.65 fatalities involving positive blood alcohol content per 100,000 people. Chattanooga placed 16th, up from No. 34 in 2024. It had 9.30 crashes related to bad driving, 20.24 total fatalities, 2.73 fatalities involving DUI, 5.47 fatalities involving speeding and 4.92 fatalities involving positive blood alcohol content per 100,000 people. Clarksville ranked 29th, up from No. 93 in 2024. It had 8.14 crashes related to bad driving, 18.03 total fatalities, 1.16 fatalities involving DUI, 6.40 fatalities involving speeding and 4.07 fatalities involving positive blood alcohol content per 100,000 people. Nashville ranked 55th, an small improvement from No. 53 in 2024. It had 6.0 crashes related to bad driving, 16.4 total fatalities, 2.8 fatalities involving DUI, 3.4 fatalities involving speeding and 6.0 fatalities involving positive blood alcohol content per 100,000 people. Murfreesboro was the safest city in Tennessee, ranking No. 191 with a crash score of 16.9. It had 2.6 crashes related to bad driving, 7.2 total fatalities, 2.0 fatalities involving DUI, 1.3 fatalities involving speeding and 3.9 fatalities involving positive blood alcohol content per 100,000 people. In 2024, Murfreesboro ranked 185th. Cities with the worst drivers in 2025 Memphis has been ranked as the city with the worst drivers for the third consecutive year. Memphis had the most crash fatalities and fatalities involving a driver with a positive blood alcohol content in the country. Memphis, Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee Waterbury, Connecticut Aurora, Colorado Tucson, Arizona Kansas City, Missouri San Bernardino, California Billings, Montana Miami Gardens, Florida Charleston, South Carolina Cities with the best drivers in 2025 Frisco, Texas, was the city with the best drivers in 2025. The city had zero crashes related to bad driving, fatalities involving DUI, fatalities involving speeding, or fatalities involving a positive blood alcohol content. The total fatalities per 100,000 people was 0.48. Frisco, Texas Fargo, North Dakota Santa Rosa, California Lehigh Acres, Florida Alexandria, Virginia Bellevue, Washington Torrance, California Lowell, Massachusetts Quincy, Massachusetts Pasadena, California Jordan Green covers trending news for The Commercial Appeal. She can be reached at This article originally appeared on Memphis Commercial Appeal: Memphis repeats as city with worst drivers followed by another TN city Solve the daily Crossword

WNC awarded $7.6B in federal, state aid after Helene, report says. More still needed
WNC awarded $7.6B in federal, state aid after Helene, report says. More still needed

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

WNC awarded $7.6B in federal, state aid after Helene, report says. More still needed

The federal and state governments have provided approximately $7.6 billion in total aid to Western North Carolina in the aftermath of Tropical Storm Helene, according to an Aug. 15 report from the Governor's Recovery Office for Western North Carolina, or GROW NC. The reported figure is about 12.8% of the nearly $60 billion in damage and needs the region sustained after the September 2024 storm, which killed more than 100 people and damaged more than 38,000 homes across the state. According to the report, the state has provided more than $2.9 billion in funding, including $2 billion in new appropriations, with the remainder reallocated or redirected from other appropriated funds and state agencies, as of June 30. Meanwhile, only $1.6 billion in federal funding has been disbursed, according to the report, while another $3.1 billion has been awarded but requires additional approval steps to be completed before disbursement. That figure includes $1.4 billion from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development slated for the state's single family home repair program that launched in June. According to the report, the Federal Emergency Management Agency disbursed $1.1 billion for programs like individual assistance, which provided temporary housing for storm survivors. Other federal agencies like the U.S. Small Business administration, U.S. Department of Labor and the Federal Highway Administration disbursed the remainder, according to the report. More: A FEMA 'system error' stirs confusion, fear for Helene survivors staying at area hotels The $4.71 billion in federal funding awarded as of June 30 is about 8% of the total need, well short of the 48% the state has requested from the federal government. Even if the state's federal funding request of more than $28 billion is ultimately granted in full, it would still fall short of what other states received following major natural disasters. After Hurricane Katrina, which hit the Gulf Coast region of the U.S. in 2005, the federal government covered more than 70% of the storm's cost, according to data GROW NC's Director Matt Calabria presented to state lawmakers in July. The federal government did the same after Superstorm Sandy hit the Northeast in 2012, and after Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico in 2017, during Trump's first term in office. More: After Helene, federal funds slow to arrive in NC as state presses for more aid More: How is a North Carolina town recovering after Helene? Gov. Stein announces a grant to help Jacob Biba is the Helene recovery reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@ This article originally appeared on Asheville Citizen Times: Tropical storm Helene: $7.6B awarded in federal, state aid so far Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store