Daylight saving time starts Sunday. Why gaining an extra hour of sunlight matters
Early Sunday morning, the United States — minus Hawaii and Arizona — will enter daylight saving time, the annual tradition of springing forward one hour.
Most Americans will lose an hour of sleep, but gain an extra hour of evening daylight.
The country has been divided on daylight saving time ever since Congress passed a law mandating it in March 1918. Back then, the U.S. was trying to conserve fuel and energy for World War I and shifted clocks to make use of natural evening sunlight.
There were no consistent rules for the practice until the Uniform Time Act was implemented by Congress in 1966, setting common start and ending dates for daylight saving time across the country.
In recent years, some lawmakers have advocated for eliminating daylight saving time while others have introduced bills to make it permanent.
Here's more on the pros and cons of daylight saving time and why it's probably not going away anytime soon.
More people can make use of evening light than morning light
For the first weeks of daylight saving time, sleep schedules may be thrown off. But for eight months, most people will have much more sun in their lives. With an extra hour of light, residents in Southern California can go horseback riding in Catalina, hiking ambitious trails or biking along L.A.'s coast.
Crime is also down during this time. A 2015 Brookings Institute study found that daylight saving time reduced the number of evening robberies. The study also said that robbery rates didn't increase in the morning, even though those hours were darker.
Sleep experts say standard time is the healthier choice
While daylight saving time provides more sunlight and reduces crime, it also disrupts sleep patterns and raises the likelihood of collisions.
'The increased morning darkness, particularly in winter if daylight saving time were permanent, would create additional challenges, such as unsafe conditions for commuters and children heading to school,' according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
Standard time, the academy notes, aligns more closely with our body's natural circadian rhythms, which regulate sleep-wake cycles. More sunlight in the morning helps people wake up and feel more alert, while less sunlight exposure in the evening signals to our bodies that it's time to wind down.
Daylight saving time isn't going away anytime soon
While all but two states in the U.S. continue to observe daylight saving time, there is still disagreement about whether the practice should be eliminated or made permanent.
Twenty states have passed legislation or resolutions in the last seven years supporting year-round daylight saving time, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
California is not among them. State Sen. Roger Niello (R-Fair Oaks) has unsuccessfully introduced legislation over the years to eliminate daylight saving time and establish standard time year-round. He reintroduced the bill this year.
In December, President Trump said Republicans would push to eliminate daylight saving time, calling it 'inconvenient' and 'costly.' This week, Trump said he won't push for eliminating daylight saving time or making it permanent, as 'it's a 50/50 issue.'
How Trump's agenda is playing out in California
Newsom's comments on transgender athletes draws swift criticism from other Democrats
A law to ban homeless encampments threw a California city into chaos
The Los Angeles fires are taking a traumatic toll on kids
More big stories
Get unlimited access to the Los Angeles Times. Subscribe here.
Justin Baldoni's tumultuous road to the center of a Hollywood scandal: The actor-director built a career blending his Bahai values and storytelling. Now allegations involving Blake Lively and 'It Ends With Us' threaten his image.
More great reads
How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com.
Going out
Staying in
What species of patriotic raptor are Jackie and Shadow, the webcam-famous Big Bear birds who welcomed their first hatchling Monday night? Plus nine other questions from our weekly news quiz.
Have a great weekend, from the Essential California team
Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editor
Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
French woman's homemade dinner sparks fury with boyfriend who just wanted a burger
A French woman's homemade dinner sparked fury from her American boyfriend who wanted a burger instead, according to a viral post. The woman said she moved from France to the U.S. two years ago and has dealt with digestive issues since, according to her Reddit posting. 'For some reason, the food here makes me sick,' she wrote. 'My body seems to struggle to digest it.' 'Whether it's takeout or fancy restaurant food … I can't go to the bathroom for days, or I'm violently vomiting,' the woman added. The expat consulted medical professionals and, after multiple tests, was told that her body was probably 'not used to the amount of salt and preservatives' in American food. After incorporating more whole foods into her diet, her health improved, she said. She wrote that she began meal-prepping and cooking meals from scratch. 'My dad is actually a chef back home, so he was more than happy to send me some recipes to keep my diet interesting,' she said. 4 After incorporating more whole foods into her diet, she began to feel better, she said in the post. Reddit/r/AmITheAngel But one of her recipes – a 'delicious' vegetarian lasagna made from scratch – caught the ire of her American partner. When he asked what was for dinner, the boyfriend 'rolled his eyes' when he found out it was lasagna, the woman wrote. '[H]e was sick of 'that organic crap' and wanted a cheeseburger,' she recounted. 'The comment hurt.' She said he told her that 'it was unfair to 'make' him eat my diet.' The woman also clarified that she intended no ill will toward Americans and said she enjoys living here – and those who shared comments mostly sided with her. 4 Her boyfriend 'rolled his eyes' when he found out it was a vegetarian lasagna and not a burger, the woman wrote. ViDi Studio – 'You are not responsible for feeding a grown man because he doesn't want to put in the effort,' one of the top comments read. While most commenters supported her, some questioned whether the post was even real. 'Because this totally happened, what in the world have you been eating since you've been in the U.S.?' one person questioned. 'In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night.' 4 'You are not responsible for feeding a grown man because he doesn't want to put in the effort,' a supportive commenter wrote. LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist based in Beverly Hills, California, told Fox News Digital the Reddit poster appears to have 'excellent taste in food, but bad taste in boyfriends.' She added, 'In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night – and certainly not a meal that the woman can't eat herself. Many couples share meal preparation duties and even enjoy it.' Lieberman, who lived in France for years, also attested that the food is generally better than what most Americans eat. 'The problem is that your boyfriend has come to expect home-cooked meals every night because you have spoiled him,' she observed, speaking to the woman who shared her story. 4 According to Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist, the woman has 'excellent taste in food, but bad taste in boyfriends.' Rafael Ben-Ari – 'He feels entitled to dictate the menu as well.' 'Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them.' Lieberman encouraged the Redditor to reevaluate her relationship. 'Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them, regardless of whether she's making vegetarian lasagna or veal escalope.'
Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States With Most HPV-Related Cancers as 1 in 3 Unaware of Link
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. People in some U.S. states are more likely to be diagnosed with HPV-associated cancers than in others—with this discrepancy likely linked to awareness of the risk from the virus. Overall, one in three adults nationally are unaware of the connection between HPV and cancer, reveals a study from the MUSC Hollings Cancer Center in South Carolina. HPV, or the human papillomavirus, is spread by skin-to-skin contact and has been linked to the onset of six different types of cancer. It is responsible for almost all cases of cervical cancers, causes the majority of throat or 'oropharyngeal' cancers and can cause anal, penile, vaginal and vulvar cancers. "Awareness of HPV in the general population is an important determinant of preventative care uptake," MUSC researcher Kalyani Sonawane told Newsweek. Such measures, she explained, include the HPV vaccine and cervical cancers screening. "Achieving adequate HPV vaccine coverage is critical for eliminating these cancers." State-level data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—see map above—shows geographical differences in the diagnoses of HPV-associated cancers. At joint top of the list, Kentucky and West Virginia recorded 16.9 HPV-associated cancer cases per 100,000 residents in 2022 (the year with the most recent available data.) However, at the bottom of the list, North Dakota recorded just 8.3 HPV-associated cancer cases per 100,000 residents in the same year. According to the new study, around a third of Americans are not aware of either HPV or that a vaccine exists against it—despite this protection having been available for nearly two decades in the U.S. This lack of awareness is heightened in the Midwest and South, the researchers noted. For example, more than 40 percent of people in 13 states—including South Carolina—are unaware there is a vaccine against HPV. "In general, literacy levels (overall and health literacy) are lower in the U.S. South and Midwest, which is likely a reason why we found a lack of HPV awareness concentrated in states in these regions," explained Sonawane. The team used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a survey conducted by the National Cancer Institute, to inform their research. Sonawane said that the CDC data "further highlights the need for increasing HPV awareness in Southern and Midwestern states"—where cases of HPV-related cancer also tend to be more common. The vaccine is the "first and best defense" against HPV-caused cancers, the researchers said. It is routinely recommended for children aged 11–12 years (and can be started as early as nine years). Catch-up vaccination is recommended through age 26. Additionally, adults aged 27–45 might be able to receive the vaccine after consultation with their healthcare provider. Doctor examining throat of male patient. Doctor examining throat of male research from Europe and the U.S. shows a significant reduction in cervical cancer cases in young women—likely due to them being the first group to have been vaccinated as children—there's a bigger picture to consider. Cervical cancer may show up when people are in their 30s or 40s, but oropharyngeal cancers are mostly diagnosed when people are in their 50s or 60s, the researchers warn. Sonawane noted that the biggest knowledge gap is in relation to oropharyngeal cancer. Across the nation, 70 percent of those who have heard about HPV did not know that it can lead to throat cancer. The vaccine is now approved for boys too, but their vaccination rates remain lower than among girls. "The HPV vaccine was first approved for the prevention of cervical cancer in women and was therefore heavily marketed toward women. This 'feminization' of the HPV vaccine continues to linger—and is likely a reason why most people have heard of HPV and cervical cancer, but not of its link with oral cancers," Sonawane explained. "Boys and men can also get HPV-associated oral, penile, and anal cancers; therefore, getting the HPV vaccine is equally important for males." While the pandemic interrupted measures of preventive care—including the HPV vaccination and screening for breast, cervical and colon cancers—an American Cancer Society report showed screening for breast and colon cancers has since rebounded. However, both cervical cancer screening—which is not a test for cancer, but a test to help prevent cancer—and HPV vaccination rates have not similarly recovered. "Prevention is always better than a cure. We have a safe and effective vaccine to prevent six cancers," Sonawane said. She concluded: "Going forward, we need to ensure that every child and eligible adult is protected from HPV-related cancers by ensuring they are offered the opportunity—i.e., the HPV vaccine—for preventing these cancers." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about HPV? Let us know via health@ Reference Garg, A., Damgacioglu, H., Graboyes, E. M., Seal, S., Deshmukh, A. A., & Sonawane, K. (2025). State-level public awareness of HPV, HPV vaccine, and association with cancer. JAMA Oncology. Star, J., Han, X., Smith, R. A., Schafer, E. J., Jemal, A., & Bandi, P. (2025). Cancer Screening 3 Years After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA, 333(17), 1543–1546.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Global Kratom Coalition Applauds Florida's Ban on Dangerous Concentrated Synthetic 7-OH Products
The Global Kratom Coalition (GKC) today praised Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier's announcement to follow the lead of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and issue an emergency scheduling of concentrated synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) opioid products. The move follows growing concern from federal and state health officials about the addictive nature and public health risks of synthetic 7-OH, a novel opioid that is masquerading as a dietary supplement. Natural leaf kratom was not included or under scrutiny in today's announcement. 'Florida's leadership in taking swift action against dangerous synthetic 7-OH opioid products is a landmark moment in protecting public health,' said Matthew Lowe, Executive Director of the Global Kratom Coalition. 'We strongly support enforcement against synthetic 7-OH opioid products, which pose real risks of abuse, dependence, and overdose. Importantly, similar to the FDA's recommendation, this action draws a clear line between natural kratom leaf products and novel lab-produced potent derivatives like 7, by clearly ensuring that natural kratom leaf is not affected by the emergency scheduling.' This announcement comes after FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary stated on July 29 that the federal government is 'targeting a concentrated synthetic byproduct that is an opioid,' underscoring the urgency of state-level action. Despite this clarity, confusion persists among consumers, policymakers, and the media about the fundamental differences between synthetic 7-OH and traditional, plant-based kratom. 'Natural leaf kratom has been used safely for over 50 years by millions of Americans,' Lowe said. 'The danger lies in synthetic manipulation by bad actors to create a product that is 13 times more potent than morphine and is in no way similar to natural kratom. Florida has sent a strong message: there's no place for these dangerous, concentrated opioids in our communities.' GKC emphasized that the Florida emergency scheduling, which takes immediate effect, aligns with the coalition's mission to ensure kratom remains available in its natural form while keeping harmful synthetic derivatives off the market. The group urged other states to follow Florida's lead and act before synthetic concentrated 7-OH opioid products become more widespread. 'We commend Attorney General Uthmeier and Commissioner Makary for prioritizing consumer safety,' Lowe added. 'This is exactly the kind of targeted enforcement that protects the public without denying consumer access to natural kratom. We stand ready to work with Florida lawmakers, like the Kratom Consumer Protection Act sponsors Senator Collins and Representative Owen, when the legislature convenes in January to codify this scheduling into law.' For more information, the Global Kratom Coalition has prepared a one-page fact sheet and a video clip of Dr. Makary's July 29 remarks to help clarify the differences between natural kratom and synthetic 7-OH products. About Global Kratom Coalition The Global Kratom Coalition is an alliance of kratom consumers, experts, and industry leaders dedicated to protecting access to kratom while advancing scientific research, driving consumer education, and developing robust regulations to protect consumers. For more information, visit Media Contact Patrick George +1 916-202-1982 [email protected] ### SOURCE: Global Kratom Coalition Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
