Brazil's Bolsonaro appeals house arrest order
Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest on Monday after an order was issued by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes against him.
Moraes' decision cited a failure to comply with restraining orders he had imposed on Bolsonaro for allegedly courting U.S. President Donald Trump's interference in the case.
Bolsonaro's lawyers had already said that they would appeal the decision to place him under house arrest.
In the document sent on Wednesday, the lawyers said that Bolsonaro did not brech the restraing orders. They also asked for the house arrest order to be voted on by a wider panel of Supreme Court justices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Top US diplomat in Brazil summoned to foreign ministry over Bolsonaro trial comments
Brazil's foreign ministry has summoned the US chargé d'affaires after the embassy posted comments about the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro, as relations between the two countries continue to deteriorate. On Thursday, the embassy published a social media post in Portuguese criticising supreme court justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing the cases against Bolsonaro, who is on trial over an alleged coup attempt. The post read: 'Minister Moraes is the chief architect of the censorship and persecution of Bolsonaro and his supporters. His flagrant human rights violations have led to sanctions under the Magnitsky Act, imposed by President Trump. 'Moraes's allies in the judiciary and elsewhere are hereby warned not to support or facilitate his actions. We are monitoring the situation closely.' The message was a translated repost of a statement by Darren Beattie, the US's senior official for public diplomacy. The Brazilian government viewed the message as a direct threat to the other supreme court justices presiding over Bolsonaro's trials and – given that Trump has yet to appoint an ambassador to Brazil – summoned the acting head of mission, chargé d'affaires Gabriel Escobar. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion It was the third time Escobar had been summoned since Donald Trump began publicly defending Bolsonaro, even citing the former Brazilian president's prosecution over the 2022 coup attempt as one of the justifications for the steep tariffs imposed on Brazilian goods. According to a source at the ministry, the interim secretary for Europe and North America, Flavio Goldman, expressed to Escobar the Brazilian government's 'deep indignation' over the tone and content of recent posts from both the embassy and the US state department, which Brasília viewed as 'interference in domestic affairs and unacceptable threats against Brazilian authorities'. The US embassy did not comment on the meeting. Before Friday's summons, Escobar had attended a meeting on Thursday with Brazil's vice-president, Geraldo Alckmin, who has been leading the Lula administration's thus far unsuccessful efforts to reverse the tariffs. Brazil says it has been seeking to open negotiations with the US since April, but has received no response. This week, Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, told Reuters: 'The day my intuition says Trump is ready to talk, I won't hesitate to call him. But today my intuition says he doesn't want to talk. And I won't humiliate myself.'
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Brazil's president signs ‘devastation bill' after vetoing key licensing articles
Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has signed into law a controversial bill that scientists and environmentalists had dubbed the 'devastation bill', but vetoed key articles that would have effectively dismantled the country's environmental licensing system. On Friday, the final day to either sanction or veto the law, Lula struck down or amended 63 of the 398 provisions in a bill that, as approved by Congress last month, had been regarded as the most significant setback to Brazil's environmental protections in four decades. Environmental campaigners had urged the president to veto the bill in its entirety, but many welcomed Lula's decision and are now calling on civil society to mobilise to pressure lawmakers into upholding the vetoes. That will not be an easy task for the Lula administration, given that the largely opposition-controlled Congress has repeatedly defeated key government proposals – including by overturning previous presidential vetoes. An escalating political standoff further complicates the challenge: lawmakers aligned with former president Jair Bolsonaro are now blocking legislative activity, demanding the passage of a bill granting amnesty to the far-right leader and hundreds of others accused of taking part in a failed coup attempt in 2022. Lula's ministers – speaking at a press conference in the capital Brasília in the president's absence – expressed confidence in the government's position. After Congress approved the bill last month, environment minister Marina Silva described it as a 'death blow' to Brazil's licensing framework, saying that it threatened the country's pledge to eliminate deforestation by 2030. But on Friday, she said the revised legislation meant that 'our targets to reach zero deforestation, and our goal to cut CO2 emissions by between 59% and 67%, remain fully on track'. One of the most heavily criticised provisions of the bill would have allowed projects classified as having 'medium' environmental impact to obtain licenses through a self-declared online form – without prior studies or regulatory review. That clause was among those vetoed, as was another that would have excluded most of the Indigenous and Quilombola communities from having a say in licensing decisions affecting their territories. Lula, however, preserved a provision allowing the federal government to fast-track 'strategic' or 'priority' projects – a move that could pave the way for oil exploration at the mouth of the Amazon River. The project has been championed by the president, but heavily criticised by environmentalists. Groups such as the NGO SOS Mata Atlântica welcomed the vetoes, but said they would carry out a detailed review of both the discarded and remaining provisions 'to continue mobilising civil society and ensure that Congress upholds the gains secured'. ActionAid's climate justice specialist, Jessica Siviero, said that 'a full veto was essential, but the points that were struck down still represent progress'. Mighty Earth's global director, João Gonçalves, also welcomed Lula's vetoes and said he hoped Congress would uphold them, warning that 'if this destructive bill becomes law – just weeks ahead of COP30 in Belém – it threatens to erode Brazil's credibility on the global stage.' At Friday's press conference, Lula's ministers appeared careful not to criticise Congress, stating that there were 'positive' elements in the bill, which had been backed by agribusiness and mining interests as a way to 'cut red tape' and 'speed up' licensing procedures. 'We hope to be able to streamline licensing processes without compromising their quality, which is essential for environmental protection at a time of climate crisis, biodiversity loss and desertification,' said Silva. Should Congress overturn the president's vetoes, environmentalists and legal experts have warned the move could trigger a wave of lawsuits – both challenging the legislation itself and contesting projects approved through self-licensing – on the grounds that they violate Brazil's constitution.
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Justice Dept probes New York AG James as it escalates scrutiny of Trump targets
WASHINGTON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has taken steps to investigate several long-running targets of President Donald Trump, escalating his administration's efforts to use government power against those who have pursued their own investigations into him or publicly resisted his agenda. The Justice Department is investigating New York Attorney General Letitia James over her civil fraud case against Trump. Prosecutors have convened a grand jury and subpoenaed James' office for documents about the lawsuit against Trump and a separate case she brought against the National Rifle Association gun rights group, a person familiar with the investigation confirmed to Reuters on Friday. The department has also named Ed Martin, whose nomination to be the top federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., faltered amid opposition from some Republican senators, a special attorney to investigate allegations of mortgage fraud, according to a separate person familiar with the move. Both James and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff of California, a long-running Trump critic who led his first impeachment in 2020, have faced accusations they made false statements on real estate documents. Both have denied wrongdoing. Reuters could not immediately determine the scope of Martin's investigation. An investigation does not necessarily result in charges. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer representing James, called the reported probe "the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign" and said the appointment of Martin "makes it crystal clear this is a manufactured investigation to pursue political retribution." 'Any weaponization of the justice system should disturb every American. We stand strongly behind our successful litigation,' James' office said in a statement. A spokesperson for Schiff did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Martin is also leading an effort to review instances of alleged weaponization against Trump and his supporters. He is not a special counsel, a prosecutor with a degree of independence who is appointed to handle politically sensitive investigations, and must work with a U.S. attorney's office to bring any charges, the source knowledgeable about his appointment told Reuters. The investigations relate to officials Trump, who campaigned in part on a vow of retribution, has repeatedly assailed, on social media and at political rallies as partisan enemies. James is one of several Democratic state attorneys general who have repeatedly sued to block Trump administration actions. The civil fraud case, brought forward in 2022, resulted in a $355 million judgment against Trump last year after a judge found he fraudulently overstated his net worth to dupe lenders as he built his real estate empire. Trump is appealing the judgment, which has grown with interest. A New York appeals court signaled skepticism about the case during a court hearing last year. Trump has repeatedly accused prosecutors of bringing the case against him for political reasons. The Trump administration's Justice Department has been scrutinizing the lawsuit as part of its weaponization review. In the NRA case, a New York jury last year found the group's former leader and others liable for years of financial mismanagement. The NRA's lawyers alleged the group was targeted because of its political advocacy. The Justice Department is examining whether the cases brought by James deprived Trump and others of their civil rights, according to the first person knowledgeable about the investigation, who did not provide evidence for the inquiry. The probe was reported earlier by Fox News and The New York Times. Trump faced the same charge as part of a now-dismissed federal case accusing him of plotting to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election. Legal decisions are often appealed, but it is highly unusual for a prosecutor to face a criminal investigation over legal cases, especially those that have gone to trial and been sustained by courts. Reuters reported that prosecutors have been authorized to open a grand jury investigation into the actions of former officials in Democratic President Barack Obama's administration.
