France Bans Smoking on Beaches, in Public Parks
The French government has announced plans to ban smoking in public beaches, parks, school fronts, and other outdoor public spaces from 1 July.
The move aims to protect children and follows similar restrictions introduced across Europe amid growing public opposition to smoking.
The ban will exclude open-air café terraces and will not apply to electronic cigarettes. Scientific studies have shown significant public health benefits from prohibiting smoking in public areas.
Health and Family Minister Catherine Vautrin told *Ouest-France* newspaper, 'Tobacco must disappear wherever children are present.'
She
added
, 'From 1 July, beaches, public parks, playgrounds, school grounds, bus shelters, and sports facilities across France will be smoke-free, banning smoking in these areas to safeguard our children.'
Tobacco kills around 200 people daily in France, officials noted. A recent report from the French Observatory for Drugs and Addiction revealed that smoking rates in the country have reached historic lows.
The report indicated that fewer than one in four people aged 18 to 75 smoke daily, the lowest rate since records began in the late 1990s.
France follows the example of the UK, which implemented a similar ban last year, while certain Spanish regions have already prohibited smoking on beaches.
Sweden has banned smoking in outdoor areas of restaurants, bus stops, train platforms, and schoolyards since 2019.
read more
Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685
NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria
Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO
Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided
News
Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks
News
Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank
News
Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region
News
One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid
News
Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia
News
Australia Fines Telegram $600,000 Over Terrorism, Child Abuse Content
Sports
Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer
Sports
Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers
News
Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies
Arts & Culture
New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple
Business
Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War
Arts & Culture
Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies
News
Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
News
Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
See - Sada Elbalad
5 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
The Jessica Radcliffe Orca Attack? 100% Fake and AI-Generated
By Ahmad El-Assasy The viral video claiming to show Jessica Radcliffe's death by an orca attack is entirely fabricated. It portrays an event featuring a marine trainer named Jessica Radcliffe at a made-up venue called Pacific Blue Marine Park, where she is supposedly killed during a performance. However, thorough investigations have debunked this video, highlighting several facts: - There is no evidence of Jessica Radcliffe's existence; no records, employment details, or credible accounts support the claim that she was a marine trainer or involved in such an incident. - The video in question is created using artificial intelligence, blending AI-generated voices with either manipulated or old footage to craft a false narrative. - It contains sensational details, such as the attack being provoked by menstrual blood, aimed at enhancing the emotional response and viral potential of the story. - This hoax draws on real-life tragedies, such as the deaths of trainers Alexis Martínez in 2009 at Loro Parque in the Canary Islands and Dawn Brancheau in 2010 at SeaWorld Orlando, which was featured in the documentary "Blackfish." These true events likely lent the video a semblance of credibility. - No credible evidence or official statements support the video's claims, underscoring its role as a stark example of how AI and social media can be used to propagate misinformation quickly. In essence, the story of Jessica Radcliffe's death is a fictional, AI-generated hoax without any factual basis, crafted to mislead and garner views by mimicking real orca attack incidents. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani
Daily News Egypt
5 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
The Reoccupation of Gaza
When former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon executed his unilateral withdrawal plan from the Gaza Strip on September 11, 2005, the main selling point was clear: 'Protecting the settlers in the Strip is too costly.' Under this plan, Israel dismantled its military bases in Gaza, withdrew all soldiers, and evacuated over 9,000 Israeli settlers from 25 settlements. In reality, the unilateral pullout served as a calculated strategy to relocate several thousand illegal settlers from Gaza to other equally illegal settlements in the West Bank, while effectively sealing off the entire Strip from the outside world—a blockade that endures to this day. Now, nearly two decades later, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to be turning back the clock, following the Israeli Security Cabinet's decision to reoccupy Gaza. In truth, however, this move is a leap into the unknown—an unpredictable gamble at a time when the humanitarian crisis within the enclave has reached catastrophic levels, with consequences that may spiral out of control. From a military standpoint, senior Israeli commanders have openly rejected the plan, deeming it both operationally exhausting and perilous—not only for soldiers but also for the remaining hostages still held by Hamas. Of the 251 people abducted on October 7, 2023, 50 remain in captivity. Given that 75% of Gaza is already under Israeli control, and to avoid further political-military fractures, the likely outcome is a hybrid strategy: neither a full siege nor a complete reoccupation. Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, who voiced strong reservations about the plan, has instead advocated for fortifying the areas already under IDF control and launching targeted strikes from those positions to wear down and exhaust Hamas. These attack lines would lie west of the buffer zone, which is currently being cleared of tunnels and Hamas infrastructure. Zamir warned that reoccupation would erode both regular and reserve forces, drain resources, and overextend armored units, whose maintenance is already costly and logistically demanding. Military assessments suggest that fully occupying Gaza City and the central refugee camps could take years, not months, as some political leaders assume—with the longer timeline inevitably translating into higher casualties, deeper financial strain, and further deterioration of Israel's already tarnished global image, as accusations of genocide mount. Moreover, any attempt to seize the remainder of Gaza could result in the execution of all remaining hostages, making Netanyahu liable for an inevitable political showdown with their families. In fact, during the Cabinet meeting that approved reoccupation, Zamir urged the removal of 'hostage recovery' from the official objectives, warning that Hamas would kill them the moment Israeli troops re-enter the Strip. Reoccupation would also require calling up 250,000 reservists—a massive economic and social burden—and would drag Israel deeper into the Gaza quagmire, with the likelihood of more casualties among an already war-weary military entering its third year of sustained engagement on at least three fronts. According to Maariv, the psychological toll is intensifying, with suicide rates rising among soldiers who see no end in sight to a war that has failed to achieve any of its stated goals—neither freeing the hostages nor dismantling Hamas's military capacity. Another looming challenge is the question of supplying and feeding over two million displaced and unemployed Gazans—a responsibility the IDF is ill-equipped to bear. Zamir has categorically opposed assigning this burden to the military. Domestically, the relationship between political decision-makers and the military leadership has broken down, with each side blaming the other for the hostage crisis. The generals accuse Netanyahu of assuming a prisoner exchange was imminent, thereby holding back the military from delivering a decisive blow to Hamas. Netanyahu, in turn, claims the army failed both to prevent the October 7 attack and to defeat Hamas afterward. Adding to this internal friction is the opposition's exploitation of Netanyahu's crisis in a bid to collapse his coalition government—an outcome that could trigger early elections, a scenario that Israel can ill afford in its current predicament, as the political and diplomatic fallout could prove disastrous, resetting the conflict to square one. Regionally, Egypt has categorically rejected any large-scale ground invasion of Gaza, warning that such a move would threaten Egyptian national security and could jeopardize the 1979 Camp David peace treaty. Cairo is likely to view reoccupation as an attempt to impose a new status quo in Gaza—one that 'will not go unanswered' diplomatically and could prompt a reassessment of bilateral agreements with Tel Aviv. Meanwhile, another front is simmering: Lebanon—specifically Hezbollah—which has been trying to regroup after sustaining heavy losses since October 8, 2023. The Lebanese government has recently endorsed a policy to disarm the group and place all weapons under state control. Hezbollah's Deputy Secretary-General, Naim Qassem, has warned that if Israel intensifies operations against the movement, it will resume rocket fire into Israeli territory. For Hezbollah, the reoccupation of Gaza could provide a powerful pretext to re-enter the conflict, reshuffle the strategic deck, and improve its negotiating position—particularly now that it has little left to lose. The American role in this equation remains opaque. President Biden has publicly opposed the reoccupation plan, yet continues to grant Israel the necessary assurances—both in arms supplies and in ready-to-use UN Security Council vetoes. Some policy circles in Washington are increasingly embracing the view that Gaza's 'next phase' begins with force, not diplomacy—treating the Strip as rebellious territory that must first be subdued militarily before being rebuilt politically and securely. Global opposition to the plan, coupled with eroding domestic support, may ultimately force Netanyahu to abandon the illusion of reoccupation in favor of a single comprehensive deal—ending the war outright and withdrawing from most of Gaza in one stroke. This would require Hamas to be ready for such an agreement. The lingering question is: Does Netanyahu have an exit strategy? History suggests he usually finds one—but only for himself. The deeper problem is that no one in Israel's political or military leadership seems to have a viable plan for navigating the political, military, and humanitarian impasse. For now, everyone is simply waiting. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University
Daily News Egypt
5 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
27 Western countries issue joint call for unimpeded aid access to Gaza
Twenty-seven Western countries and entities, including Britain, France, and the European Union, on Monday issued a joint statement condemning the humanitarian situation in Gaza and demanding that Israel allow all international NGO aid shipments into the besieged enclave. The statement, signed by the foreign ministers of countries including Australia, Canada, Japan, and Spain, also stressed the need for a ceasefire, an end to the war, and the release of all hostages. 'The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached incredible levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes,' the statement, published by the British government, read. 'Urgent action must be taken now to halt and reverse the famine. The humanitarian space must be protected, and aid must not be politicised.' The ministers called on Israel to grant permits for all international NGO aid shipments and lift barriers to their operations, warning that restrictive new registration conditions could soon force essential international NGOs to leave the Occupied Palestinian Territories, further worsening the humanitarian situation. 'Lethal force must not be used at aid distribution sites, and civilians, humanitarian workers, and medical personnel must be protected,' the statement added, calling for immediate steps to facilitate safe and widespread access for the U.N. and other partners. It urged the use of all crossings and routes to allow aid, including food, fuel, clean water, and medical supplies, to flow into Gaza. The signatories also expressed their gratitude for the efforts of the United States, Qatar, and Egypt in pushing for a ceasefire and seeking peace. The joint statement comes amid growing international pressure on Israel. U.N. humanitarian organisations have demanded 'urgent action' after medical sources in Gaza announced that more than 100 children have died from malnutrition since the war began in October 2023. The total number of victims of famine and malnutrition in the strip has risen to 227, including 103 children, the Palestinian news agency Wafa reported, citing medical sources. Last week, foreign ministers from nine Western countries and the EU expressed their opposition to the Israeli government's plan to expand military operations in Gaza, stating that the decision would exacerbate the 'catastrophic humanitarian situation, threaten the lives of hostages, and increase the risk of mass displacement of civilians.'
