This May Be The World's Oldest Human Fingerprint, And That's Not All
This one small marking on this one small stone still exists to this day. It was discovered in 2022 in the San Lázaro rock shelter of Central Spain, and it may be the world's oldest complete human fingerprint.
More than that, it could also be one of the oldest known artistic representations of a human face.
That latter claim remains controversial, but the red fingerprint does sit in the very middle of the pebble, below two divots and above another – an artistic 'boop' right where a nose should be.
On site, the face immediately jumped out to archaeologists, led by David Álvarez-Alonso at the Complutense University of Madrid.
If the team is right, this stone was probably carried from the nearby river to the San Lázaro rock shelter.
The Neanderthal who selected it must have seen something special in its shape to take it home and paint it with ocher, especially as it seems to serve no functional purpose and no other ocher has been found at the site.
"The ocher dot does not appear as a shapeless addition or a mere stain," explain the authors, "rather, it contains a fingerprint that implies the pigment has been applied specifically with the tip of a finger soaked in pigment."
There's always a chance the print was made by accident.
But Álvarez Alonso and colleagues think it is more likely the marking was an intentional act of imagination and symbolic art – a skill we have only just started giving Neanderthals credit for.
"If we had a pebble with a red dot on it that was done 5,000 years ago by Homo sapiens, no one would hesitate to call it portable art," Álvarez Alonso told Sam Jones at The Guardian.
"But associating Neanderthals with art generates a lot of debate. I think there's sometimes an unintentional prejudice."
The study was published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.
Robot Hand Could Help Scientists Decode Why Tickling Makes Us Giggle
Earliest Known Whale Bone Tools Discovered in Europe's Museum Collections
Are Dogs Replacing Babies in Countries With Declining Birth Rates?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
44 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
In ancient teeth, clues of human evolution — and perhaps a new species
A close examination of 13 teeth discovered in the Ledi-Geraru research area, ranging from 2.6 million to 2.8 million years old, adds new fragments of evidence to the increasingly complex story of human origins and potentially reveals an entirely new species, according to research published Wednesday in the journal Nature. Advertisement Human evolution has long been visualized as a simple linear timeline, a kind of evolutionary baton race in which one species evolves into another, from apes to modern humans. The new finds reinforced that human evolution was more of a tangled-up bush. Different species and different branches of the hominin family tree overlapped with one another in time and space. Three smaller teeth, the researchers report, were from the group that modern humans belong to, Homo, and dated to 2.6 million and 2.8 million years ago. They were found at Ledi-Geraru in 2015 and 2018. The larger teeth were relatives of Lucy — an Australopithecus whose famed fossil find in Ethiopia 50 years ago changed the modern understanding of human origins. Already, outside researchers are debating next steps and whether they agree that the teeth found by Reed's team represent a new species of Australopithecus. The study was supported by the National Science Foundation. Because of the uncertainties around federal funding, Reed isn't yet sure if the next year of grant funding will come through. Advertisement 'We don't have all the pieces of the puzzle,' Reed said. 'What's exciting to us is you want more pieces of the puzzle to put this [story] together.' For years, paleoanthropologists have been piecing together evidence of a diverse world of hominins — the group that includes modern humans and our close ancestors. In Kenya, 1.5 million-year-old preserved footprints show that Homo erectus and another branch of the hominin family tree, Paranthropus boisei, walked along the shores of a lake within hours or days of each other. In and around a cave in South Africa, fossils reveal that Homo erectus, Australopithecus sediba, and Paranthropus robustus coexisted 2 million years ago. Now, in East Africa at sites within the Ledi-Geraru research area, a collection of ancient teeth show Homo and Australopithecus coexisting in yet another spot. But would they have interacted with one another? Would they have interbred? John Hawks, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Wisconsin at Madison who was not involved in the work, said the find is exciting because it opens a window into a critical and mysterious period of human evolution between 2.5 million and 3 million years ago. He said he's eager to see the work published, but noted that such finds raise as many questions as they answer. 'The kinds of evidence that Ledi-Geraru is generating is evidence spanning hundreds of thousands of years of time, and potentially hundreds of square kilometers of space,' Hawks said. 'When several things are reported together like this, that creates a challenge of interpreting what that evidence together tells you.' Advertisement Clément Zanolli, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Bordeaux, said in an email that he was not yet convinced that the teeth are a new species of Australopithecus and would be cautious about attributing the smaller teeth traced to Homo. Newer techniques that use CT scanning allow scientists to study the internal structure of teeth and could build a stronger case. He said the finds would represent some of the oldest remains of Homo and the youngest specimens of Australopithecus in East Africa. 'These new findings are thus adding more pieces to the puzzle, but they are not decisive to understand human evolution,' Zanolli said. When the famous Lucy fossil was discovered a half-century ago, she was popularized as a 'missing link' between apes and humans. Human evolution looked simpler then. Today, the tree of human evolution is full of species that may have been direct ancestors, distant cousins, or side branches that died off. If anything, the science of human evolution has become a deeper mystery, as it has become clear that there were once lots of hominins walking around the planet, sometimes interacting with one another. As hallmarks of human innovation — such as using stone tools and butchering meat — have been shown to have been shared with hominin ancestors, the question of how and why humans alone succeeded has become more mysterious. Zeray Alemseged, a paleoanthropologist and professor at the University of Chicago, said he thinks it's possible the Australopithecus teeth described in the paper aren't a new species, but they could be evidence that Lucy's species persisted. Australopithecus afarensis was previously thought to have vanished around 2.95 million years ago from East Africa. Advertisement One model for how to understand human evolution is a concept called 'budding cladogenesis.' In this model, species don't progressively change into the next species and vanish. They give rise to different species at different times and in different places, and the ancestors may stick around and live alongside them. Lucy's species could have been one such long-lived species, and the teeth are one new piece of evidence to consider. 'The material is … highly fragmentary, but it does have important information in regard to a time period which is really critical,' Alemseged said. 'It really allows us to think about the complex question of how evolution has happened.'
Scientific American
5 hours ago
- Scientific American
Entirely New Species of Human Ancestor Discovered
Researchers working in northeastern Ethiopia have discovered remains of a previously unknown branch of humanity. The fossils, which include teeth that date to between 2.8 million and 2.6 million years ago, belong to a never-before-seen member of the genus Australopithecus —the same genus to which the famous Lucy fossil belongs. They show that this newly identified member of the human family lived alongside early representatives of our own genus, Homo. The findings were published in Nature on August 13. The discovery team, led by investigators at Arizona State University, has yet to name the new species because the researchers need more fossils from other parts of the body to do so. But comparisons of the teeth with other fossils from the same site—Ledi-Geraru in the Afar Region of Ethiopia—as well as with other hominin fossils, revealed that they are distinctive enough to represent a species of Australopithecus that is new to science. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Together with previous finds, the new fossils demonstrate that at least four lineages of hominins (creatures more closely related to us than to our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos) lived in eastern Africa between three million and 2.5 million years ago. How these hominins were able to share the landscape is a question the team is working to answer. One possible explanation is that they preferred different foods. Studies of the enamel of their fossilized teeth may yield clues to what they were eating. Once upon a time, scholars thought that human evolution was a march of progress in which our forebears evolved in linear fashion from an apelike ancestor to a series of increasingly humanlike forms. The new find underscores the complexity of human origins. Although Homo sapiens is the only hominin species on Earth today, for the vast majority of humanity's existence, multiple hominin species shared the planet. Our family tree is more like a bush, with lots of twigs that were dead ends—failed evolutionary experiments that occurred outside of our direct line of ancestry.
Gizmodo
2 days ago
- Gizmodo
Jellyfish Overpower Nuclear Power Plant in Show of Force From Mother Nature
Jellyfish may be spineless, but they showed the backbone of a dedicated environmentalist over the weekend. A swarm of the gelatinous sea dwellers overwhelmed a nuclear power plant in northern France, forcing its shutdown on Sunday. The incident started when a 'massive and unpredictable' swarm of jellyfish started to overwhelm the filter drums, which remove debris from cooling water systems, at the Gravelines nuclear power plant that sits on the coast of the North Sea. The sheer volume of jellyfish caught in the filter forced four reactors at the plant to go into an automatic shutdown, taking them offline to avoid potential disaster. The timing certainly could have been better, as The Guardian reported that two other reactors at the plant were already offline at the time for summer maintenance. By Sunday, the entire plant, which is capable of powering about five million homes, was shut down completely. According to European energy outlet Montel News, the incident knocked out 10% of France's nuclear capacity. While losing power is not ideal, it certainly beats the other potential outcomes. The good news is that the safety system at the plant operated as intended. EDF, the company that operates the plan, reported that the incident didn't do any harm to the facilities, staff, or environment, and there are no long-term safety concerns. The plant is expected to come back online once the drums are cleared and operations can continue without fear of getting gunked up by rogue jellyfish. This whole 'overwhelmed by jellyfish' thing has become a bit of a problem for nuclear power plants, as the number of incidents just keeps piling up. A similar occurrence plagued a plant in Sweden in 2013, Scotland, Israel, Japan and Florida in 2011, and California in 2008. It's difficult to do anything about it because jellyfish blooms can be difficult to predict. They tend to just show up, and when it happens near a nuclear power plant, the operators have to deal with it, though there have been some efforts to try to better predict when a swarm may appear. One thing we do know, though, is that jellyfish blooms are becoming more common—in no small part due to human activity. Warming ocean temperatures are more hospitable to the jellyfish, which are also finding more food sources because overfishing and warmer conditions have pushed competitors out of their environments. It's kind of amazing how something that is 95% water can create such major problems, but we only have ourselves to blame.
