Judge dismisses 2 counts against US Rep. Cuellar of Texas, moves bribery trial to next year
Prosecutors with the U.S. Justice Department had asked U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal to dismiss two counts that Cuellar and his wife had each faced related to violating the prohibition on public officials acting as agents of a foreign principal.
Federal authorities have charged Cuellar, 69, and his wife, Imelda Cuellar, with accepting thousands of dollars in exchange for the congressman advancing the interests of an Azerbaijan-controlled energy company and a bank in Mexico. Cuellar has said he and his wife are innocent.
Prosecutors said they were dismissing the two counts following a February memorandum from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi that shifted the focus of charges filed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The law is aimed at ensuring transparency about lobbying efforts done in the U.S. at the direction of foreign governments or principals.
Bondi's memorandum said that such charges 'shall be limited to instances of alleged conduct similar to more traditional espionage by foreign government actors.'
During a Zoom court hearing, Rosenthal said she was set to file an order granting the prosecution's motion to dismiss the two counts.
Cuellar and his wife each still face 12 charges, including conspiracy, bribery and money laundering.
Rosenthal also granted a request from both prosecutors and attorneys for the Cuellars to reschedule their trial in Houston. The couple's trial had been set to begin Sept. 22. Rosenthal agreed to move it to April 6.
Cuellar has served in Congress for over 20 years, and his district stretches from San Antonio to the U.S.-Mexico border in South Texas.
___
Follow Juan A. Lozano: https://x.com/juanlozano70
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
Democratic states sue to force Trump to hand over crime grant money in immigration fight
ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow Twenty states and Washington, DC, sued the Trump administration on Monday, alleging that it is improperly withholding hundreds of millions of dollars meant to help victims of crimes in order to force states into cooperating with federal immigration enforcement efforts. The states, all of which have Democratic attorneys general, are asking federal judge to strike down the conditions the Justice Department has established to receive the grant money, which are used to help crime victims with things like medical bills, funeral costs, counseling, emergency shelter, crisis hotlines and legal support. If the threats came to fruition, the states allege, states would be forced to choose between fully cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, or having to scale back or shut down those programs. 'This brazen attempt to use funding that supports our most vulnerable residents to strong-arm California and states nationwide into doing the federal government's job for it, is blatantly beyond the power of the president,' California Attorney General Rob Bonda said in a statement. The demand is the latest in a series of battles between the administration and individual states over Trump's hardline immigration crackdown. Trump and his Justice Department have prioritized their work to expel migrants who are here illegally and to dismantle state and local-level protections, often referred to as sanctuary policies. Attorney General Pam Bondi published a list of places that have sanctuary policies, which includes 12 states and Washington, DC, 4 counties, and 18 cities. The department has also filed several lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions in an effort to push them into complying with immigration enforcement, including suits against Illinois and New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the latest in the labour dispute between Air Canada and its flight attendants
OTTAWA — Air Canada flight attendants remain on strike despite back-to-work orders by the Canada Industrial Relations Board. Over the weekend, the federal government asked the board to send the two sides to binding arbitration and order an end to the job action. But the union is challenging the order in Federal Court, and the 10,000 workers have stayed on strike. This morning the labour board declared the strike unlawful and ordered the union's leadership to tell the flight attendants to go back to work. Here's the latest. All times ET. 9:30 a.m. Prime Minister Mark Carney says he's disappointed Air Canada and the union representing its flight attendants weren't able to reach a deal after eight months of negotiations. He tells reporters on Parliament Hill he is urging both sides to quickly resolve the situation. 9 a.m. Air Canada says the Canada Industrial Relations Board has declared the strike unlawful and has ordered the union's leadership to direct its members to return to work. The order came as picketers continued to march around the Terminal 1 departure doors at Toronto Pearson International Airport early Monday morning. Chants reverberated through the sliding doors and into the airport terminal, where passengers approached Air Canada employees to ask about alternatives to their cancelled flights. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 18, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsmax agrees to pay $67M settlement in defamation case over 2020 election claims
DENVER (AP) — The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday. The settlement comes after Fox News paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax on Monday in a new filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It said the deal was reached Friday. The disclosure came as Trump vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the president could achieve that. Nicholas Riccardi, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
