Labour MPs back Rachel Reeves over budget cuts
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court rejects Republican election-rule challenge in Pennsylvania
June 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court passed up a chance to give politicians more power over how federal elections are conducted, declining on Friday to hear a Republican challenge to a Pennsylvania judicial decision requiring the counting of provisional ballots cast by voters who make mistakes on their mail-in ballots. The justices turned away an appeal by the Republican National Committee and Republican Party of Pennsylvania of a decision by Pennsylvania's top court on provisional ballots that the plaintiffs said ran afoul of legislature-crafted voting rules, violating the U.S. Constitution's election-related provisions. The dispute returned to the Supreme Court after the justices, on the eve of the November 2024 presidential election, rejected the emergency bid by the Republicans to block tallying the provisional ballots. The Republicans objected to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's October ruling in favor of two Butler County voters who sought to have their provisional ballots counted after their mail-in ballots were rejected during that state's 2024 presidential primary election for lacking secrecy envelopes. Election rules in states like Pennsylvania that often play a pivotal role in determining the outcome of U.S. presidential elections are a particularly sensitive issue. Republican President Donald Trump prevailed in Pennsylvania last November, but lost the state in 2020 to his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, who won the presidency that year. The case follows a major 2023 Supreme Court ruling that allows the justices to second-guess state courts if they undermine the power that the Constitution gives state legislatures to craft election rules. That 6-3 ruling, which upheld a North Carolina state court's decision that invalidated a Republican-drawn congressional map as unlawfully disadvantaging Democrats, also rejected a more extreme theory advanced by many Republicans and conservatives that would have removed any role of state courts and state constitutions in regulating federal elections. The ruling, however, stopped short of announcing a legal test for determining when state courts have ventured too far in "arrogating to themselves" a legislature's power. In the Pennsylvania case, Republicans asked the Supreme Court to answer that question, contending that the state supreme court's ruling violated the Constitution's elections provisions, including that the "times, places and manner" of federal elections "shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof." Provisional ballots generally protect voters from being excluded from the voting process if their eligibility is uncertain on Election Day. The vote is counted once officials confirm eligibility. Republicans intervened to defend Butler County's decision not to count the ballots from these voters, saying Pennsylvania's election law does not allow provisional ballots to be counted if a mail-in ballot was received on time by a county board of elections. Democrats intervened on the side of the voters, contending that if a mail-in ballot is defective and cannot be counted, that person has not yet voted and a provisional ballot must be counted. A divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court last October sided with the voters, saying that provisional ballots prevent double voting while protecting voters' right to have one vote counted.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inside story of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein's friendship after Elon Musk suggested the President appeared in FBI files. So what's the truth about claims of topless girls?
Like two fractious little boys trading playground insults they know are escalating out of control, the pair had been sparring all day – until one of them finally blurted out the slur he knew might end their friendship for ever. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' wrote Elon Musk on his social media platform X on Thursday afternoon. ' Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk didn't offer any clarifying evidence but soon added: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The extraordinary implosion of the friendship and alliance between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man has proved mesmerising. But with this thin-skinned pair of blowhards there was always a sense that their friendship could end in recrimination sooner or later. And any possibility of a truce, Washington and Silicon Valley insiders predicted yesterday, has disappeared after Musk effectively pressed the nuclear button. Although he didn't precisely spell out the accusation, Musk was clearly implying that the US government was concealing the truth about Trump's dealings with the notorious late financier and paedophile. It is no secret that Trump associated with Epstein, even if he has been reluctant to admit it. They moved in the same moneyed social circles in Palm Beach, Florida, from the late 1980s until 2004, when they fell out spectacularly over a property deal. Along with the likes of Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, Trump is one among many powerful people known to have associated with Epstein and who have been mentioned in court documents related to the financier's decades of sexual abuse. Before he was re-elected President last November, Trump said he would have 'no problem' releasing the so-called Epstein Files, the remaining documents from the major FBI investigation into the multi-millionaire, who died in a New York jail cell in 2019 ahead of his trial on sex-trafficking charges. While critics have challenged Trump's initial insistence that he barely knew Epstein – pointing out that they were most certainly friends (a fact Trump has since acknowledged) – there has been no evidence that the future President was complicit in Epstein's crimes. However, that hasn't prevented Trump's name being mentioned in some of the conspiracy theories swirling for months over why the US government has still not released the files. Predictably, within hours of Musk dropping his 'really big bomb', some of his 220 million followers on X were dutifully stirring the pot by circulating old evidence of the pre-scandal Trump-Epstein friendship. Musk retweeted several examples, adding a raised-eyebrow emoji. They included a 1992 TV news report on a party at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Palm Beach resort and home, in which Epstein and the future President can be seen talking animatedly with each other as they stand watching a crowd of dancing cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, two American football teams. They point to some of the women and Trump, gesturing to one, appears to say: 'Look at her back there, she's hot'. He then whispers in the financier's ear, leading Epstein to double over in laughter. Musk also retweeted a passage from a 2002 magazine article about Epstein in which Trump said: 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. 'It is even said he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.' Trump biographer Michael Wolff threw fresh fuel on the fire yesterday, when he claimed to have seen damning evidence from those years – evidence that Trump would never want made public. This supposedly included lewd images of Trump and the sex offender. 'I have seen these pictures. I know that these pictures exist and I can describe them,' Wolff told the Daily Beast. 'There are about a dozen of them. The one I specifically remember is the two of them with topless girls... sitting on Trump's lap. And then Trump standing there with a stain on the front of his pants [trousers] and three or four girls kind of bent over in laughter – they're topless, too – pointing at Trump's pants.' Wolff believes the alleged incriminating photos could have been in Epstein's safe when the FBI raided his New York home after his arrest in 2019. The Trump campaign dismissed Wolff's claims about the photos when he first made them last November just before the presidential election, saying: 'Michael Wolff is a disgraced writer who routinely fabricates lies in order to sell fiction books because he clearly has no morals or ethics.' But according to Wolff, Trump and Epstein 'shared girlfriends, they shared airplanes, they shared business strategy, they shared tax advice… they were inseparable'. The well-connected writer added, the lives of the two men intersected 'in a very meaningful and profound way… these guys kind of made each other'. Trump bought the Mar-a-Lago mansion and estate for a bargain $10 million in 1985 – and then Epstein purchased his own Palm Beach mansion two miles away five years later. Although Epstein never became a member of Mar-a-Lago, which includes a private members' club, he would visit for parties. The two men also dined together at Epstein's Manhattan mansion and travelled together between New York and Palm Beach, the most famous of Florida's billionaires' playgrounds. Trump and Epstein were photographed together repeatedly at Mar-a-Lago during the 1990s and early 2000s – Trump always wearing a tie, Epstein never wearing one. They were pictured with model Ingrid Seynhaeve at a 1997 Victoria's Secret party in New York. And they were photographed partying with Prince Andrew and enjoying a 'double date' at a celebrity tennis tournament with their respective girlfriends, Melania Knauss and Ghislaine Maxwell. In fact, Epstein boasted to friends that he had introduced Melania – now First Lady – to the future president. (Neither of the Trumps has corroborated this). Trump was between marriages at the time and enjoying his image as a playboy billionaire. His parties in New York and Florida were packed with models, cheerleaders and beauty-pageant contestants thanks to his business links. He owned a modelling agency and an American football team, and ran the Miss Universe pageant. The Mar-a-Lago parties, said eye witnesses, were memorable for the fact that women far outnumbered men, often by ten to one. Trump admitted as much in a 2015 interview, saying he'd been single at the time and adding: 'The point was to have fun. It was wild.' In 1992, Trump arranged for a 'calendar girl' competition for VIP guests at Mar-a-Lago. The 28 attractive contestants found they were competing in front of just two men – Trump and Epstein. The organiser of this vulgar contest, George Houraney, told the New York Times in 2019 that he tried unsuccessfully to raise his concerns about Epstein's involvement. 'I said, "Look, Donald, I know Jeff really well, I can't have him going after younger girls",' Houraney recalled. '[Trump] said, "Look I'm putting my name on this. I wouldn't put my name on it and have a scandal."' Mr Houraney claimed he 'pretty much had to ban Jeff from my events', but that Trump didn't seem to care. A former Trump adviser Roger Stone claimed in 2016 that Trump 'turned down many invitations to Epstein's hedonistic private island and his Palm Beach home', but insisted that he did visit the latter at least once and saw a bevy of underage girls there. 'The swimming pool was filled with beautiful young girls,' Trump later told a Mar-a-Lago member, according to Stone. '"How nice," I thought, "he let the neighbourhood kids use his pool".' Epstein would bring Maxwell to Trump events, too. Often referred to as Epstein's 'madam', the former socialite is now behind bars in the US following her 2022 sex-trafficking conviction. Steven Hoffenberg, a former Epstein business partner who was convicted of running a Ponzi scheme, said Trump 'liked' Epstein but he was 'crazy about Maxwell, a very charming lady'. A court filing would later reveal how Epstein's famous little black book of phone numbers contained 14 numbers for Trump, Melania and key Trump insiders. 'They were good friends,' Epstein's brother Mark told the Washington Post of Trump and Epstein in 2019. 'I know [Trump] is trying to distance himself, but they were.' Mark said Trump even used to give Epstein's mother and aunt free perks at one of his casino hotels in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Another insider who knew Trump and Epstein back then told the New York Post: 'They were tight. They were each other's wingmen.' Alan Dershowitz, a US lawyer who represented Epstein, recalled: 'In those days, if you didn't know Trump and you didn't know Epstein, you were a nobody.' Eventually, they fell out in 2004 when they both tried to snap up the same Palm Beach property, a mansion called Maison de l'Amitie (ironically, the House of Friendship) which was being sold cheap in a bankruptcy sale. Both of them attempted to lobby the trustee handling the sale before the auction. 'It was something like, Donald saying, "You don't want to do a deal with him, he doesn't have the money," while Epstein was saying: "Donald is all talk. He doesn't have the money",' recalled the trustee, Joseph Luzinski. The break-up was well-timed for Trump, as just a few months later, Palm Beach police started investigating claims that Epstein was sexually abusing local schoolgirls. In 2008, Epstein served 13 months behind bars in Florida after admitting 'solicitation of a minor for prostitution', so by the time Trump was running for president in 2016, he would have been keen to downplay this connection. In 2016, his lawyer insisted Trump had 'no relationship' with Epstein, adding: 'They were not friends and they did not socialise together.' A day after Epstein was arrested in New York three years later, Trump – by now President – announced that he hadn't spoken to him for 15 years and that: 'I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.' Trump staff stressed that he had once kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach golf club. But others countered that, at one time, he most certainly had been a fan. Sam Nunberg, a former Trump campaign aide, claimed his boss 'would hang out with Epstein because he was rich'. He said he warned Trump about his Epstein links before his first White House run against Hillary Clinton. However, the aide alleged, Trump was confident that thanks to a close friend who owned the tabloid National Enquirer and who claimed to have compromising pictures of Bill Clinton on Epstein's Caribbean island, Epstein would cause more problems for the Clintons than he would for him. Trump has insisted he never visited Epstein's so-called 'orgy island' – the alleged location of some of his worst offences – in the US Virgin Islands, saying: 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' island.' However, in February this year, US attorney general, Pam Bondi, released Epstein's flight logs which showed the president's name appearing seven times. The first flight on the financier's private jet was in October 1993 and on at least two journeys, Trump was joined not only by Epstein but by his then-wife Marla Maples, along with their daughter Tiffany and a nanny. Epstein owned several planes and it's possible Trump was specifically denying flying on the one dubbed the 'Lolita Express' for the sordid sex that reportedly occurred on board. When Musk notoriously called a British expat cave diver a 'paedo guy' after they clashed online over the 2018 cave rescue in Thailand, he ended up having to defend himself in a US libel trial (which he eventually won). Time will tell how Trump will take revenge on his former 'First Buddy' and his 'big bomb' claim that the President of the United States of America has something unsettling to hide over Jeffrey Epstein.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Court rules teaching yoga is ‘protected speech' as classes resume at San Diego beach
Yoga classes are back on at San Diego beaches this week after a federal appeals court ruled that a city ordinance restricting such activities was unconstitutional and that teaching yoga is 'protected speech'. The three-judge panel of the US ninth circuit court of appeals on Wednesday overruled a San Diego judge and decided in favor of two instructors who had sued over a law that San Diego passed in 2024 banning yoga classes of four or more people at shoreline parks and beaches. 'Because the ordinance targets teaching yoga, it plainly implicates [the instructors'] first amendment right to speak,' the ruling stated, finding that the ordinance violated the instructors' rights. The city had argued the rule wasn't specific to yoga, but commercial activity, as the instructors Steven Hubbard and Amy Baack's free classes can draw as many as 100 people who give donations for each class ranging from $5 to $40. 'The city's legitimate governmental interests in this case include the preservation, safety, and orderly use of its parks and beaches by all visitors and residents who visit them,' San Diego's attorneys wrote in court papers, adding that the city and county drew 32 million visitors in 2023. By Thursday, Hubbard had resumed teaching yoga to a dozen people underneath palm trees in the park at Pacific Beach. He said he was cited for his classes, which are free and open to all, at least 10 times since the ordinance took effect last year. He began holding classes on a livestream from his backyard, just across the street from the beach. Bryan Pease, a lawyer for both instructors, said a park official cited Hubbard for holding classes in the park even though he was not there. Outdoor yoga is a service to those who are disabled or can't afford yoga classes elsewhere, said Pease. 'It is a popular thing here. We're a beach community, and it's a way for people to access yoga that they wouldn't otherwise be able to,' Pease said. At the Pacific Beach park, John Noack, who has attended Hubbard's classes for four years, said he thinks the group was targeted because wealthy homeowners in the area didn't want people disturbing their oceanfront views. 'I personally see this as a triumph of community over a handful of elites,' Noack said.
