Illegal cigarette smuggling man: an appreciation
New Zealand has lost its mojo. Maybe it could learn something from a man who strapped 1,620 cigarettes inside his pants and said 'today is the day I walk through an airport'.
Sometimes a single image can change you. Carl Sagan grasped our cosmic insignificance more profoundly after seeing Pale Blue Dot. Millions of children were permanently traumatised at the sight of Simba trying to wake Mufasa up in The Lion King. On Monday, a similarly impactful image was released on the social media accounts of the New Zealand Customs Service. It showed a 35-year-old Indonesian man with 1,620 cigarettes stuffed under his white singlet.
Customs said this man was detained at Wellington airport when officers somehow identified him as being in possession of more than the 50 cigarettes you're legally allowed to bring into the country. Its accompanying photo raises a plethora of existential questions. Chief among them is 'how does one man get 1,620 cigarettes inside his singlet?'. With some difficulty, it seems. The man's entire lower torso is a clown car of cigs. His trousers are straining at the sheer volume of nicotine they're being asked to contain. Several packets protrude from the side of his clothing.
Furthermore, how did NZ Customs manage to catch this smuggler despite his sophisticated efforts at concealment? In a statement to The Spinoff, it said its officers spotted signs of the tobacco inside the man's 'choice of clothing', without elaborating further. Those officers must have been alert and eagle-eyed, because the organisation also confirmed his cigarettes originated in Jakarta.
That means by the time he was apprehended, the smuggler had already transited through Indonesian Customs and transferred onto another flight bound from Sydney to New Zealand, all without anyone realising he had nearly 2,000 cigarettes stuffed into his belt. All up, the durries snuck 8,000km, past hundreds of fellow travellers and security personnel, only to come to a halt literally metres from finding a new life on the streets of the Miramar Peninsula.
Though it didn't provide much other information, NZ Customs did furnish The Spinoff with an extra photo, which reveals both the cig man's brand of choice, and method of transportation.
Its statement adds that the man had previously entered the country to work on New Zealand-flagged fishing vessels. He will no longer be allowed to do so. His Work to Residence visa has been cancelled due to the 'crime' of stuffing $2,447.38 worth of cigs into his pants.
That's a shame, because New Zealand is desperately short of ambition. It's trying to plug a budget hole by taking money off low-paid women. Our prime minister is stumbling through farm fields trying to relocate our lost mojo. Where's the go-get-em attitude that propelled Richie McChayaw to the top of Mt Everest? The underdog spirit that saw us become the first country in the world to throw a nine-inch penis-shaped dog toy at a minister of the Crown?
Maybe, just maybe, we detained it under the angry eagles at the Wellington domestic terminal. Perhaps the reservoir of confidence we're seeking is with the man who looked into the mirror with 1,620 cigarettes protruding from his trousers and said 'today is the day I fly to New Zealand'.
As Steve Jobs once said, here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round cigs in the square holes, because they're the ones who'll change the world. So shine on, you crazy 35-year-old cig-covered diamond. Sorry you won't be subject to potential exploitation on a camera-free fishing vessel near Antarctica anymore. But if there's one thing this has proved, it's that even with the odds stacked against you, you'll find a way to get through.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
28 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Judge reserves decision on injunction on Jevon McSkimming investigation
Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming. Photo: Getty Images A High Court judge has reserved her decision on whether the media should be allowed to report the nature of the allegedly objectionable material found on former deputy commissioner Jevon McSkimming's work computer. McSkimming resigned as the country's second most powerful cop last month amid a four-month investigation by the Independent Police Conduct Authority and police. His resignation came after Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he was recently informed of allegations of a "very serious nature", separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended. RNZ earlier revealed pornography found on McSkimming's work computer is being investigated as alleged objectionable material. He declined to comment on the allegations through his lawyer. His lawyer Linda Clark was earlier granted a rare "superinjunction" by Justice Grau that prohibited reporting the nature of the allegedly objectionable material, as well as the existence of the injunction itself. A teleconference was then held by Justice Gwyn from the High Court at Wellington to discuss the injunction with Clark, the police, and legal counsel for RNZ, Stuff and NZME. Following the conference, the order prohibiting publication of the nature of the allegedly objectionable material was continued, but the order prohibiting the existence of the injunction was not continued, meaning RNZ could report the fact of McSkimming's application and the interim result. On Tuesday, a hearing was held in the High Court at Wellington before Justice Karen Grau in relation to the injunction. RNZ, NZME and Stuff were jointly represented by Robert Stewart KC. McSkimming's lawyer, Linda Clark, began proceedings by telling the court she was seeking orders extending the current interim orders prohibiting media from disclosing the nature of the allegedly objectionable material reportedly found on his work device or devices. The order was sought until further orders of the court. Clark alleged information deemed "essential" to the investigation had been leaked to the media who were intending to publish the information. She said the orders sought were necessary to protect the rights of someone who is subject of an ongoing police investigation and who may yet be charged with a criminal offence. The information gathered during the police investigation was "confidential", she said. In relation to public interest, she said there was already information in the media about McSkimming. She said the public interest would be served in the event he was charged and stood trial. McSkimming was on notice that the police investigation was into material purportedly found on his devices. He had been told he would be invited to a formal interview, however, no request has been received to date. A police document, classified as "confidential", would be "the centrepiece of any criminal prosecution," Clark said. "It's on the basis of that information that the police can decide whether to continue the investigation, whether to look further and whether to charge, and what to charge." She said there was also an issue in terms of privacy, and said a person under criminal investigation, prior to being charged, has a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to the investigation. Clark said she was trying to "preserve Mr McSkimming's rights to engage the Criminal Procedure act if and when he's charged". She said that every time police had provided some substantive piece of information to McSkimming it had appeared within the media "in a day or two days without exception". Clark said there was public interest in McSkimming's situation. She said public interest had been served to date. "If he is charged... there will be further opportunity for media to publish more information on charges themselves and during and after any trial," she said. "But publication now of any more information about the nature of the objectionable material found on his computer will cause serious and irreversible harm." It would harm his reputation, curtail his ordinary rights under the Criminal Procedure Act, and in the event he was charged and elected trial by trial, it could impact his chance of trial by jury. "At this time he's still an innocent man who is entitled to all of the protections of a fair trial and the right to seek suppression orders." Stewart KC said a memorandum from police said they were still investigating, and no charging decision had been made. He said there was two sorts of harm that could be considered, one of which was harm to the police investigation. He said the police had no concern that further disclosure of the material would impact their investigation, or impact their decision whether or not to charge. In relation to right to a fair jury trial, Stewart KC said juries can be trusted to obey judicial directions about only dealing with the charges based solely on the evidence and to ignore pre-trial publicity. In relation to privacy, Stewart KC said McSkimming was "quite clearly" a public figure. "There is a huge public interest in these investigations into Mr McSkimming's abrupt resignation from office, first working day after he had been provided with the material by the Public Service Commission." In an affidavit, McSkimming said he resigned because he didn't want the Prime Minister or anyone else having to see what was in the reports. "The only fair way of summarising it is he jumped before he was pushed," Stewart KC said. "The public have a right to understand a little bit more about the nature of the material that led to that." Stewart KC said his clients submitted that if the interim restraint should be continued, then "matters should be left to take their course, if there is to be any restraining at all, it should be as limited as possible for as short as possible." Crown prosecutor Stephanie Bishop, appearing for police, told the court that police did not oppose the application.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Midday Report Essentials for Tuesday 3 June 2025
money media 23 minutes ago In today's episode, there's another change for the media landscape in Aotearoa with a new marriage between Trade Me and Stuff, employers and manufacturers are describing government moves to change the focus of Worksafe as long overdue, it was the deadliest King's Birthday weekend on the roads in six years, and a petition has just been handed over at parliament calling for a ban on the public sale of fireworks - in a bid to protect pets.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Immigration authorities claim success against organised crime
Photo: NZME Authorities have claimed recent success in disrupting the illegal immigration activities of organised crime syndicates operating in New Zealand. Steve Watson, general manager of Immigration Compliance and Investigations, said a multi-agency operation had investigated 38 companies over the past three months to ensure they were complying with their immigration and employment obligations. As a result of the investigation, authorities had issued 14 infringement notices to companies employing staff in a manner that was inconsistent with a work-related condition of that person's visa, with a further two pending. Officials had also issued 38 deportation liability notices for people unlawfully in New Zealand or breaching visa conditions. Two people unlawfully in New Zealand had voluntarily left the country, officials said. Immigration officials had cancelled 62 visas for people who were not currently in the country, while a further eight visas were cancelled at the border. Eight passengers were offloaded from their flights to New Zealand, officials said. Watson said the investigation was key to preventing further harm and vulnerable migrants being exploited by unscrupulous employers. "Migrant workers need to be aware of those who may seek to exploit them," Watson said. "If you are asked to pay large amounts of money to an offshore agent to travel and work in New Zealand, it is highly likely that this is part of a scam." Watson said many of the groups had links to crime syndicates who exploited vulnerable migrants by using them to live in residential properties to set up sophisticated indoor cannabis growing systems.
