Planning for Castleknock apartments refused
Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd was planning to build a five storey, 56 apartment scheme on the site at Brady's Public House, Old Navan Rd, Dublin 15.
The refusal upholds a decision by Fingal Co Council to refuse planning permission after 75 objections were lodged against the proposal.
It is now the second failed attempt by Bartra to secure planning permission to redevelop the site.
READ MORE
Among the objectors was Castleknock resident, Barry O'Lone who in 2023 turned down a €100,000 offer from Bartra to withdraw a High Court challenge against a 210 bedspace co-living scheme for the same site opposite his family home.
That co-living scheme did not proceed and in May of last year, Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd lodged plans for the apartment scheme for the site.
As part of his objection, Mr O'Lone repeated the allegation that he was previously offered €100,000 by Bartra in April 2023 to withdraw the High Court judicial review against the co-living scheme.
In its refusal to the new scheme, the appeals board concluded that having regard to its height, massing, bulk and design and its lack of a direct relationship with the public open space located immediately to the north-east of the subject site, the proposed development fails to integrate with the established character of the area.
As a result the scheme would be contrary to the Fingal County Development Plan 2023-2029, which requires that new development adds quality by integrating high quality design and ensuring good quality accessible public realms, it said.
The board also refused permission as the lack of adequate on-site car parking provision would result in substandard residential amenity for future occupants and would be likely to result in congestion and obstruction of roads, which would endanger public safety.
In the Bartra appeal lodged, Thornton O'Connor Town Planning stated that there are not many better sites in the city that have the capacity for increased height and density.
Bartra did not respond to a request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Danone fails to appeal Yoplait's High Court injunction in low fat yoghurt row
A row over low fat yoghurt between two multimillion global companies has come before the Irish courts. In the latest round, the Court of Appeal has upheld an injunction granted three months ago to Yoplait Ireland Ltd and ordered that the Irish subsidiary of Danone be restrained from passing off certain Skyr products on the Irish market as those of Yoplait pending the determination of the proceedings. Yoplait Ireland Ltd is suing Nutricia Ireland Ltd, the Irish subsidiary of Danone, over allegedly "passing off" the product. At issue are certain Skyr yoghurts which are made using a traditional Icelandic recipe and are low in fat and high in protein. Yoplait has previously claimed that the "get up", or packaging, of the Danone Skyr "Icelandic style" yoghurt is so similar to the Yoplait "Skyr" product that consumers are likely to be confused when shopping. It claims Danone is piggybacking on the goodwill it has built up to sell its product and is allegedly engaging in an unfair competitive tactic in doing so. Nutricia Ireland had appealed a decision by the High Court last May granting the injunction restraining Danone. Court of Appeal ruling Giving the judgement of the Court of Appeal, Ms Justice Niamh Hyland said she rejected the appeal of Danone and upheld the High Court decision to grant an injunction to Yoplait, but in modified terms. 'I am conscious that Danone is being denied entry to a market, that on its case it is fully entitled to enter. If it transpires that it is correct, competition will have been stifled,' the judge said. She said in the circumstances there was an obligation upon Yoplait to expedite the trial of the action and to make an application to the judge in charge of the Commercial Court list on the matter. Ms Justice Hyland said Danone had failed to establish material error in the High Court judge's conclusion that the relevant customer was one shopping in Ireland for Skyr yoghurt rather than one shopping for white strained yoghurts, as Danone contended. The judge further rejected Danone's argument that the trial judge erred in only considering the position on the parties on the Irish market and not their activities in other markets and she also rejected Danone's argument that Yoplait delayed in bringing the proceedings. However, Ms Justice Hyland ruled that the injunction order by the High Court which restrained Danone not just from passing off the goods, the subject of the proceedings, but from placing on the market confusingly similar Skyr products was 'likely to bring about an injustice'. The judge upheld Danone's appeal in that regard and modified the order to restrain Danone from passing off their Skyr products as those of Yoplait's Skyr's products, pending the hearing of the case. Case background Setting out the background to the case, Ms Justice Hyland said Yoplait Ireland had launched its Skyr product in September 2022 which it sold in packaging featuring a blue and white colour scheme with mountain imagery. She said last year Yoplait updated its it logo packaging but retained the overall get up. Yoplait, she said, asserts that its Skyr products are the leading offering in the Irish market with over 430,000 of the 850g pots sold last year. Nutricia Ireland, she said, first launched Skyr products - including yoghurt with blue and white packaging - in France in 2018 with redesigned packaging introduced to Belgium and Italy last year and an intention to launch into the Irish market in May of this year. Yoplait wrote to Danone last March stating that Danone's Skyr products were confusingly similar to their own and seeking undertaking from Danone not to launch the products in Ireland. Danone declined to provide such undertaking and disputed the claim of passing off and asserted that its packaging is consistent with its established branding and trademark.
The Irish Sun
2 days ago
- The Irish Sun
Two more Irish River Island stores among 33 to close for good as part of major new restructuring plan
TWO more Irish River Island stores are set to close for good, it has been confirmed today. At least 33 shops will shut as part of a major restructuring plan approved by the UK High Court. 1 River Island is set to close 33 more stores, including two located in Northern Ireland Credit: Alamy The Bangor Bloomfield and Lisburn stores in Northern Ireland will shut in January 2026. The chain's Henry Street store in Dublin closed at the end of June. A sign in the window said: "This store is closing. "This store will be closing from Friday 27th June." Customers were reassured that they can visit the nearby Grafton Street location or visit the online store. The restructuring plan is aimed at balancing the retailer's books and writing off its debt as it struggles to stay afloat. River Island had submitted its plans to the High Court for approval and the court decided this morning to let those plans go ahead. CEO of River Island, Ben Lewis said: "We are pleased that River Island's restructuring plan has been approved by the High Court. "We have a clear transformation strategy to ensure the long-term viability of the business, and this decision gives us a strong platform to deliver this. "Recent improvements in our fashion offer and shopping experience are starting to show results, and the restructuring plan will enable us to align our store estate to our customers' needs. "We are grateful to our suppliers, landlords and other stakeholders for their constructive engagement and shared confidence in River Island's future." The fates of another 71 shops also now hang in the balance. River Island says it has been hit hard by the rise in ultra-cheap fast fashion and lower customer spending. Its CEO Ben Lewis said in June: "River Island is a much-loved retailer, with a decades-long history on the British high street. "However, the well-documented migration of shoppers from the high street to online has left the business with a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs. "The sharp rise in the cost of doing business over the last few years has only added to the financial burden." TOP SHOP BACK Meanwhile, McElhinney's department store, located in Ballybofey, has announced that it will be home to the first Topshop store in Ireland since the brand closed its doors five years ago. The department store announced the comeback on their Instagram, captioning it: 'Get ready… Topshop is coming to McElhinneys.' It comes just weeks after a similar post shared on the retailer's social media page said: "Watch this space". Now the popular retailer is set to return to Irish shores with the Donegal shop opening on August 21. Irish fans have taken to Instagram to share their excitement. One fan said: "I AM SO READY!!!" Another said: "Whatttt. Can't cope. This is epic." One shopper shared: "Fab can't wait for it." While another added: "This is unreal." The retailer, which at one time boasted eight stores in Ireland, closed after its parent company, the Arcadia group, collapsed in 2020. The group, which included brands such as Miss Selfridge and HIIT, was later bought by online retailer ASOS in 2021 for around €300million.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
State agency Solas faces legal challenge over Safe Pass courses
State training agency Solas is facing legal action from companies who argue that it is breaking competition law by offering Safe Pass courses to builders. Anyone working on a building site in the Republic must have a Safe Pass card, issued by Solas after they complete a recognised safety awareness course, and which they must renew regularly. Solas began offering an alternative Safe Pass renewal course through multinational Pearson in February 2023, angering businesses that provide the same renewal service. Full Circle Safety Ltd, Euro Safety & Training Services Ltd and several individuals have filed proceedings in the High Court alleging that Solas is in breach of competition law by offering its own Safe Pass renewal courses. READ MORE The companies argue that as Solas is acting simultaneously as both regulator and commercial provider of the Safe Pass renewal service, this 'constitutes a conflict of interest'. They add that Solas is undermining 'the integrity of its regulatory function' and distorts the market for renewal courses, disadvantaging the companies and others in the same business. The companies argue that Solas is preventing, restricting or distorting competition in Safe Pass renewal courses by offering the service. They also maintain that the course offered by the State agency does not 'constitute a training programme', according to the regulations governing the scheme. The companies want the High Court to order Solas to stop offering the Safe Pass renewal courses. They are also seeking damages where appropriate. In response, Solas said on Thursday that it was not aware of the proceedings issued by the companies. [ Apple's new investment in US may be just enough to appease Trump, for now at least Opens in new window ] 'Safe Pass training programmes are not delivered by Solas,' the agency said. 'The programmes are delivered by external Solas-approved tutors and training organisations.' The plaintiffs filed their claim with the High Court on August 1st. Solas, established in 2013, is the State agency responsible for overseeing apprenticeships and other vocational training schemes. It also oversees the Safe Pass and safety awareness training programmes and the construction skills certification scheme, needed in posts where safety is critical.
