Escort convoy and court perks: Shincheonji founder faces new criticism
Lee Man-hee, the 93-year-old founder and leader of the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, is facing criticism after a local TV station revealed that he used personal security staff to control traffic and allegedly received preferential treatment during court-ordered education sessions.
According to an exclusive report by JTBC on Thursday, Lee organized a private convoy unit known as the 'Volunteer Traffic Department,' enlisting male Shincheonji members with strong driving skills to escort his vehicle using motorcycles. The exact period during which this operation took place was not disclosed.
The convoy members, despite having no legal authority, blocked civilian vehicles from passing. On one occasion, they stopped an oncoming car to allow Lee's car to make a U-turn. The motorcycles were equipped with red and blue sirens, causing ordinary citizens to believe high-ranking government officials were passing by, a Shincheonji insider told JTBC.
Under Article 39 of the country's Road Traffic Act, only emergency vehicles, including police cars and ambulances, are permitted to use sirens. Violators may face a fine of up to 3 million won ($2,211).
The report said Lee, after experiencing police escort services during a visit to the Philippines in 2016, decided to form his own private convoy team here.
His attempts to receive special treatment continued even during mandatory education sessions imposed by the court for convicted offenders, JTBC reported.
In August 2022, the controversial head of the messianic religious sect was handed a three-year prison term, suspended for five years, after being convicted of embezzlement and obstruction of business.
He was found to have misappropriated over 5 billion won in church funds while building Shincheonji's training center, known as "Palace of Peace," in 2014, and to have held religious events in public venues without approval from local governments between 2015 and 2019.
The court found him not guilty of conspiring with church officials to downplay the number of members and worship locations reported to health authorities during February 2020, when COVID-19 spread rapidly among the church's followers.
At the time, the court ordered him to complete 80 hours of "legal compliance education," which typically requires offenders to gather in a classroom at the Legal Compliance Support Center, operated by the Crime Prevention Policy Bureau under the Ministry of Justice. There, offenders attend lectures by legal experts, take online courses or engage in group discussions, officials said.
However, Lee allegedly received all 16 sessions of the education one-on-one in a separate room, with each session conducted not by a professional instructor but by a staff member at the Legal Compliance Support Center. He even had a foldable bed set up in the room, the insider said.
Regarding allegations of special treatment for Lee during the sessions, the Justice Ministry told JTBC that he had health issues and that there were concerns someone with a personal connection to him might attempt to harm him during the program.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Aftermath of Cheongdo rail tragedy: 2 young subcontractors killed, safety oversight under scrutiny
Authorities launch full-scale investigation into fatal railway accident as industrial rail injuries continue to rise across the country Following the fatal train accident in Cheongdo, North Gyeongsang Province, that left two workers dead and five others injured, authorities have confirmed that both of the deceased were men in their 30s who were employed by subcontracted safety inspection firms. The victims, Cho, 30, and Lee, 37, were conducting post-flood structural inspections near the Gyeongbu Line on Tuesday when they were struck from behind by Mugunghwa Train No. 1903, just seven minutes after they began the operation. Cho had only joined the firm earlier this year, while Lee, described as the only son in his family, had been working alongside Cho as a senior colleague. The accident has prompted a large-scale investigation. The Gyeongbuk Provincial Police have deployed a 34-person task force to examine black box and surveillance footage from the site. Authorities are also reviewing Korail's field safety protocols and worksite procedures. At the same time, the Ministry of Labor has launched a 15-person task force to probe whether there were violations of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act or the Industrial Safety and Health Act. What caused it? As investigations unfold, multiple factors are emerging that may have contributed to the accident. At the time of the accident, a Korail employee at the scene was carrying a company-issued smartphone equipped with a train detection application. The app is designed to emit a warning alarm when a train enters a designated area. While it reportedly functioned and triggered a warning, it did not prevent the collision. One of the workers later told police that they heard the alarm but could not see any train and assumed it was a false alert. Making matters worse, the Mugunghwa train involved was powered by an electric locomotive, which emits significantly less noise than a diesel train. This likely made it difficult for the workers to detect the train's approach audibly, the police explained. Authorities are also examining whether workers adhered to the standard rule of walking on the trackbed, the gravel base constructed to support railway tracks, rather than along the immediate edge of the rail line. Early findings suggest that some workers may have been walking directly on or too close to the tracks, rather than on the trackbed. Korail is now investigating whether this deviation from protocol contributed to the tragedy. Environmental conditions may have further hindered safe movement. The accident site, which lies near a curve on the railway, was densely overgrown with summer vegetation, limiting visibility and potentially forcing workers to walk closer to the tracks. These conditions likely made it difficult for workers to quickly evacuate once the train was detected. 'This is a tragedy that could have been prevented with proper timing, communication and vigilance. We're working with the survivors and eyewitnesses to piece together the full chain of events," the police said. The accident occurred roughly 120 meters beyond a curved section of track. Investigators believe the train's engineer may have had limited visibility and was only able to spot the workers moments before impact, leaving insufficient time to brake. At a speed of 100 kilometers per hour, even emergency braking could require up to 1 kilometer to bring the train to a complete stop. Korail maintains that the work was being conducted farther from the tracks than the 2-meter 'danger zone' and therefore did not require blocking the tracks or halting train traffic. However, the absence of safety spotters at the scene is raising serious concerns. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport said it was investigating whether this classification was appropriate, and whether Korail followed all necessary safety protocols under the Railway Safety Act. As public scrutiny intensifies, both the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Land have pledged to investigate whether safety oversight failed not only at the individual level, but at the institutional level — and whether lives were lost as a result of preventable neglect. Depending on the outcome of the investigation, penalties such as fines or even a recommendation for the dismissal of Korail's CEO could be imposed. The Cheongdo incident highlights a troubling increase in rail-related industrial accidents nationwide. Government statistics show 76 such cases in 2023, up from 65 in 2020. At least 10 workers have died in similar incidents over the same period.
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
Korea rethinks breach of trust, its most serious corporate crime
Critics say vague rules, tough sentences chill investment, while others warn full repeal could enable abuse South Korea's criminal punishment for breach of trust is back in focus after lawmakers broadened directors' fiduciary duty beyond the company to include shareholders. The change, part of a Commercial Act amendment passed in July, has fueled concerns in the business community that it could open the door to excessive liability and criminal charges over disputed management decisions. In response, President Lee Jae Myung launched a task force on 'Rationalizing Economic Criminal Penalties,' with revision of breach of trust at the top of its agenda. 'A business misstep in Korea can land you in prison, and that chills investment,' Lee said. 'We must ask whether layering criminal sanctions, on top of economic and financial penalties, for breach of trust aligns with global norms.' Against global norms? Breach of trust applies when executives or employees violate their duty of good faith for personal gain or cause losses, and Korea is among the few countries to treat it as a crime with some of the toughest penalties. Korea regulates breach of trust under three statutes. The Criminal Act covers general and occupational cases, while the Commercial Act adds 'special breach of trust,' punishable by up to 10 years in prison or a 30 million won (about $22 million) fine. For cases exceeding 5 billion won, the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes mandates at least five years in prison — the same minimum as for murder. Japan, Germany and France also criminalize breach of trust but apply it far more narrowly. Germany shields executives under a 'business judgment rule,' while Japan and France limit liability to cases with clear intent or misappropriation. The UK and US have no equivalent statute; instead, they rely on fraud or embezzlement laws, with civil courts settling most disputes. 'In Korea, even the owner of a one-person company can face criminal charges for using a corporate card on personal expenses,' said Kim Woo-jin, a business professor at Seoul National University. 'In the US, the same act would be neither a crime nor a civil case since you cannot sue yourself. Serious breaches should be punished, but much of this belongs in civil law. Korea treats it too harshly as a crime, with prosecutors wielding disproportionate power.' Korea's statute leaves 'act in violation of duty' undefined and applies broadly to any property benefit, subjecting even good-faith decisions that result in losses to scrutiny. Moreover, anyone can file a complaint, making annual cases top 2,000. Yet, roughly about one in 10 indictments results in a conviction, fueling criticism that prosecutors overreach, particularly against conglomerates. Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong was cleared in February over a 2015 merger, ending a decade-long case. Hanwha's Kim Seung-youn, CJ's Lee Jay-hyun and former KT chief Lee Suk-chae have also had charges dropped or sentences reduced after courts could not prove them guilty. Justice Minister Jung Sung-ho recently warned against prosecutorial overreach. 'Prosecutors have been criticized for fostering risk aversion by applying hindsight judgments to strategic decisions,' he said in his July inaugural speech. 'Such caution risks weakening management and slowing decision-making.' Even Lee Bok-hyun, former Financial Supervisory Service chief who once pursued high-profile breach-of-trust cases as a prosecutor, has argued the law "unjustly exposes all boardroom choices to criminal liability," a regime found nowhere else, he emphasized. "Management decisions to be resolved in the boardroom, not the courtroom," he said. Abolishment too premature At the time, Lee, the former FSS chief, argued the law could be repealed if directors' fiduciary duty were extended to shareholders, a change enacted in July. The amendment reignited calls within the corporate sector for scrapping breach of trust altogether. Yet while many agree the law needs significant reform, some remain cautious, warning full repeal is risky in Korea's conglomerate-dominated corporate environment, where large-scale abuses — especially self-dealing or third-party favoritism — could go unchecked. 'Many breach-of-trust cases arise from asset transfers between affiliates,' said lawyer Cheon Joon-bum, vice chair of the Korean Corporate Governance Forum. 'It's often difficult to determine whether such capital shifts were made in good faith for both the investing and receiving firms. In many instances, one company bears losses to support another, leaving unrelated stakeholders exposed.' Professor Kim also warned that abolition is premature, noting it could leave controlling shareholders' unfair decisions against minorities unchecked, even when losses are not immediate. Cheon went further, arguing that the problem lies in execution. 'Only about 10 percent of indicted cases end in conviction, not because there was no wrongdoing, but because prosecutors couldn't prove it,' he said. 'In the US, cases that can't be proven wouldn't even begin. Here, they drag on for years, only to end in acquittal. That's a loss not only for genuinely innocent companies, but for the credibility of the judicial system.' Experts point to the "business judgment rule,' used in Germany and the US, as a way forward. 'The key is ensuring fairness for all stakeholders. The rule shields directors when decisions affect all shareholders equally, even if the company incurs losses,' said Cheon. The government and ruling party are moving to embed the rule in the Criminal Act, with Democratic Party of Korea lawmaker Kim Tae-nyeon already tabling a related bill. Yet Korea's breach-of-trust law is especially difficult to enforce because regulators, not boards, must prove misconduct. 'Regulators, as outsiders, struggle to obtain the documents needed to challenge management decisions. That burden makes it difficult to hold executives accountable and leaves most questionable transactions unpunished,' Cheon said. He stressed that easing criminal penalties must go hand in hand with stronger civil remedies. In the US, boards bear the burden of proving a deal's fairness in civil suits; in Korea, regulators shoulder it. Experts emphasize that legal reform alone will not suffice. 'Korea needs not only statutory change but also clearer internal procedures to prevent shareholder losses,' said Cheon. He pointed to Germany's "Konzern" system, which obligates corporate groups to safeguard minority shareholders in affiliate transactions before proceeding. Professor Kim added that Korea's recently expanded fiduciary duty to shareholders will remain hollow without a more active litigation culture. 'In the US and Europe, shareholder suits serve as routine checks on management. A comparable level of shareholder-driven litigation must take root in Korea as a precondition for easing breach-of-trust laws," said Kim. The government plans to unveil by year-end a reform package to 'rationalize' economic criminal penalties, including breach of trust. Urgent measures will be submitted to the National Assembly in September, with additional proposals finalized by year-end and aimed for passage in the first half of 2026.
Korea Herald
11-08-2025
- Korea Herald
Police investigate Korean American professor on suspicion of defaming President Lee
The police have opened an investigation into Korean American professor Morse Tan on suspicion of making false claims about President Lee Jae Myung. They have also asked the Justice Ministry to issue an entry notification order to report him if he reenters South Korea. According to local media reports, an official from the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency said Monday that Tan had been booked in late July on charges of defamation. Tan, a dean of Liberty University's School of Law and former US ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice under the first Donald Trump administration between 2017 and 2021, is accused of promoting conspiracy theories about election fraud in Korea. They include claims that the June 3 election won by Lee was rigged. The investigation was opened after civic group Freedom Korea National Defence Corps filed a complaint with the South Korean police. The details of the complaint include remarks Tan made at an event in Washington in June, in which Tan claimed that Lee was involved in gang rape and the murder of a girl during his youth. He further said that the president was sent to a juvenile detention center and was therefore unable to finish middle and high school. South Korean law allows the domestic prosecution of crimes committed abroad against Korean nationals, but in practice this requires the suspect to be in Korea. Tan is also suspected of repeating similar remarks during his visit to Korea in July, when he was invited to be a speaker at Eunpyeong Jeil Church in Eunpyeong-gu, northern Seoul.
