logo
State superintendent shares plan to improve Wyoming education

State superintendent shares plan to improve Wyoming education

Yahoo09-02-2025
CHEYENNE — The future of Wyoming's workforce is heavily dependent on the quality of education, a belief that State Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder reiterated to business owners Friday afternoon.
Appearing as the guest speaker for the Greater Cheyenne Chamber of Commerce's monthly luncheon at Little America, Degenfelder discussed student performance, literacy and where Wyoming's education system can improve.
'The state of education is good, but we still have much work to do,' Degenfelder said. 'As business leaders, I do not need to explain to you all the importance of education. In fact, I think it should be our top priority as policymakers in the state. Our Founding Fathers found value in funding education because they knew that the key to building the greatest country on Earth was a well-educated citizenry.'
Degenfelder noted that this drive for quality education is exactly why Wyomingites should be concerned about the results of the 2024 National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), which showed a nationwide drop in reading proficiency.
'While we should absolutely celebrate our results staying relatively stable and above many other states, we should not settle for anything less than progress,' Degenfelder said. 'Wyoming doesn't do just good enough, we aim higher. And progress is possible, but we need bold, innovative leadership in Wyoming.'
Degenfelder also noted that two years into her term, the state has made substantial progress on her strategic plan.
The plan prioritizes parental empowerment and eliminating political bias; preparing students for jobs through career and technical education; developing citizenship for students; reducing bureaucracy and creating efficiencies; valuing and supporting teachers; and improving outcomes through early literacy.
Parental empowerment
The issue of parental rights and choice has been a hot topic in the state. Degenfelder has made it a priority to make policies that prioritize parent choice.
This has included school choice, controversial library policies, transparency initiatives and anti-transgender legislation, requiring the reporting of health changes to parents.
Ten school districts in the state have joined a curriculum transparency initiative, including Laramie County School District 1.
'At the end of the day, parents should be the No. 1 decision maker in their child's education,' Degenfelder said.
The state superintendent has also supported public charter schools and education savings accounts, which she sees as an improvement in choice.
'I was a product of our traditional system, and wouldn't have changed a thing,' Degenfelder said. 'But it doesn't work as well for other families and situations. So, we're going to continue to build that and make sure that it works and we can keep a robust public education system, but also have choices for parents.'
Degenfelder's values have also influenced her support of President Donald Trump attempting to close the U.S. Department of Education, which one attendee asked her to explain.
'We know how to do this without the federal agency,' Degenfelder said. 'And so that doesn't mean that the programs and services are going away. What that can mean is more of a block grant model to our states to be able to determine how we're going to handle education, reducing the bureaucracy, and the red tape that's associated.'
The federal Department of Education was established in 1979 by former President Jimmy Carter; however, the federal government has had a role in education since the mid-1800s. It isn't certain yet what the federal government's involvement in education would be should President Trump successfully close the department, but Degenfelder sees an opportunity to increase flexibility for students.
'There's a lot of fear of the unknown out there right now, but I really think it's a great opportunity to be able again to take back power as states,' Degenfelder said.
Future workforce
Since she was presenting to local business leaders, Degenfelder made a point to demonstrate how local education builds the future workforce.
'Not only have we been able to significantly reduce the red tape that existed for career and technical education dollars to get from the federal and state government to our local districts,' Degenfelder said, 'but we also worked with the Legislature to double our funding for career and technical student organizations.'
Programs like FFA, FBLA, FCCLA and DECA prepare students for the workforce. The state is also increasing workforce credentials and work-based learning opportunities, Degenfelder said. The state is piloting project-based learning and competency-based learning, and working to connect Native American students with career and technical opportunities.
Degenfelder pointed to attempts to expand financial literacy instruction as an example of innovative ways to help students and local businesses.
'Imagine a Wyoming where students can learn far beyond the confines of a classroom,' Degenfelder said. '... That's what we're working toward in Wyoming education, because real-world experience counts when preparing the next generation of Wyoming's workforce.'
Literacy
NAEP results showed nationwide decreases in literacy. Despite this, Wyoming's fourth- and eighth-graders continued to perform above the national average in reading and mathematics, holding steady with 2022 scores, according to the Wyoming Department of Education.
For Degenfelder, this doesn't mean that the state shouldn't pursue improvements, particularly in literacy.
'We know that if the child cannot read by the third grade their future is limited, and so we're currently in the process of discussing major literacy reform in the state of Wyoming, based on national best practices,' Degenfelder said.
For the past three years, on average, fewer than 50% of Wyoming students have performed proficient or above on the English language arts assessment. Additionally, advocacy groups have expressed frustrations with the quality of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) in the state, which are typically used for students with some sort of physical or learning disability.
'We have to do better for our kids,' Degenfelder said. 'I believe, truly, that if we continue to work on these initiatives that I've outlined for you today, the next generation will be better prepared to enter the Wyoming workforce. They'll be better prepared to be patriotic citizens, and they'll be better prepared to be the visionaries that keep our state strong.'
Teachers
Degenfelder established a teacher retention and recruitment task force, composed of nearly 30 stakeholders across the state. They developed recommendations for teacher retention that would also attract new teachers.
Recommendations such as the development of a principal leadership academy, reducing content and performance standards by nearly 70%, reducing the assessment burden for teachers and students, and launching a mental health framework have already begun to be implemented, according to Degenfelder.
The WDE also intends to continue highlighting the work of teachers across the state. They also hope to create a network through which they can connect innovative teachers across the state for mentorship, Degenfelder told luncheon attendees.
This mutual mentorship between teachers would take place within their area of expertise with the intent of them working together to better serve students.
'The vast majority of our students are doing an exceptional job in the classroom, and we need to ensure that the system isn't holding them back,' Degenfelder said. 'Supporting Wyoming teachers doesn't need to mean more bureaucracy. It means giving teachers the freedom to do their jobs.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cowboy State Republican who mounted gubernatorial bid 'isn't conservative enough,' Freedom Caucus chair says
Cowboy State Republican who mounted gubernatorial bid 'isn't conservative enough,' Freedom Caucus chair says

Fox News

time7 days ago

  • Fox News

Cowboy State Republican who mounted gubernatorial bid 'isn't conservative enough,' Freedom Caucus chair says

Wyoming State Sen. Eric Barlow, a Republican and Marine Corps veteran who previously served as the state House speaker, has launched a gubernatorial bid in the Cowboy State. "Eric Barlow is running for Governor because he believes Wyoming deserves strong, respectful leadership rooted in service, not politics," his campaign website states. Barlow has served in the state Senate since 2023, and previously served multiple terms in the state House. State Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, who chairs the conservative Wyoming Freedom Caucus, blasted Barlow in a statement that she emailed to Fox News Digital, claiming that he is not "conservative enough for" the state. "If the last two election cycles in Wyoming have taught us anything, it's that Wyomingites want real, conservative leadership. Senator Barlow isn't conservative enough for Wyoming, and the Wyoming Freedom Caucus is confident that come 2026, the people will elect a true conservative for governor," she asserted, referring to Barlow as "a liberal Republican who loves big government." "During his tenure in the Wyoming Legislature, Barlow made it a priority to fight against conservative principles. He's consistently fought for ever-growing state spending, votes against state sovereignty, sponsors woke legislation, and as Speaker of the House, presided over a special session during Gordon's COVID lockdowns that failed to protect the rights of the people of Wyoming," she asserted. Fox News Digital has also reached out to Barlow and his campaign to request comment from the state senator. Wyoming's gubernatorial contest will take place next year. The state's current Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, has served in the role since 2019.

Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?
Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?

Newsweek

time07-08-2025

  • Newsweek

Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Rumors are circulating social media that President Donald Trump has said children should only attend school six months of the year. The Trump administration has embarked upon major changes to American education. In March, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to begin "eliminating" the Department of Education (DOE), marking a major change in the federal oversight of schools. A litany of concerns about the state of American education was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruption that followed. A 2024 report from the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE), a research group at Arizona State University, found that the average American student is "less than halfway to full academic recovery" from the impact of the pandemic. In January, a report from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) found that the reading and math skills of fourth and eighth grade students have declined in multiple states to below the national average. However, in June of this year, Gen Z students reported their most positive evaluations of schools in years. The standard U.S. academic or school year can vary slightly depending on the state, but the majority of states require 180 days per school year. The state with the lowest mandated school days is Colorado, which requires 160, while Kansas requires 186, according to the Pew Research Center. The Claim On TikTok, claims that Trump is trying to change the school year, making it only six months, have swept across the app. The claims differ slightly in different videos. Some social media users claim that Trump has announced this change, while others claim that he is actively trying to pass a law. One video, shared to TikTok by the account @uiort05 features a talking head of a man over images of Trump. That video has the text overlay "Donald Trump just announced kids only attend school 6 months Out of the year," and goes on to count six months of the school year as being from August to January. That video has been viewed over 200,000 times as of reporting. The audio of that TikTok has been widely shared across the platform. Another video, from the account @solyapp, claims "Donald Trump is tryna pass a law where kids only have to go to school for six months." That video has been viewed over 400,000 times as of reporting. Both of those videos were made by adults, not school aged children. The Facts The claim is false. There has been no wider reporting about the post, which would be the case if it were real. There is no record of Trump saying anything about changing the school year. The minimum amount of time that school must be in session is set by individual states, not the president. As it stands, children attend school for roughly 180 days each year. Per day, that amounts to six months. In practice, factoring in weekends and breaks for holidays, the total number of days is spread across approximately nine months, with the school year generally beginning either in late August or early September and ending in late May or early June. The TikTok from @uiort05 states in the description, "disclaimer for entertainment purposes only," indicating that it is false. The Ruling False. Trump has not said anything about changing the school year to six months. There is no evidence of the claims. The initial claim came from a source that is not reputable. FACT CHECK BY Newsweek's Fact Check team

The White House intends to slash the education safety net
The White House intends to slash the education safety net

Los Angeles Times

time04-08-2025

  • Los Angeles Times

The White House intends to slash the education safety net

Donald Trump has it in for public education. Don't be fooled by last week's release of DOE billions for the coming school year. Education Secretary Linda McMahon claimed that since the surprise decision in late June to withhold the funding, the government vetted all the programs to make sure they met President Trump's approval. In reality, the White House was inundated by protests from both sides of the aisle, from teachers, parents and school superintendents all over the country. A week earlier, 24 states had filed suit against the administration for reneging on already appropriated education funding. The reprieve will be temporary if the president has his way. Shuttering the Department of Education, and its funding priorities, was a marquee Trump campaign promise. Already, about 2,000 DOE staff members have been fired or quit under duress. That's half the agency's personnel. On July 14, the Supreme Court lifted an injunction against the firings as lawsuits protesting the firings work their way through the courts. In essence, the ruling gives Trump a green light to destroy the department by executive fiat now, even if the Supreme Court later decides only Congress has that power. The high court majority did not spell out its reasoning. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, deplored the 'untold harm' that will result from the ruling, including 'delaying or denying educational opportunities and leaving students to suffer from discrimination, sexual assault and other civil rights violations without the federal resources Congress intended.' McMahon touts what she considers her agency's 'final mission': ending federal funding for school districts that cannot prove that they have eliminated diversity, equity and exclusion initiatives, or what Trump calls 'critical race theory and transgender insanity.' The stakes are high: What's at issue is the withdrawal of nearly $30 billion in aid. The DEI threat rejects a 60-year bipartisan understanding — based on Title 1 of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act to the 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act — that Washington should invest federal taxpayer dollars in closing the achievement gap that separates privileged youth from poor and minority students and children living in poverty. Those funds support smaller classes, after-school programs and tutoring. Research shows that Title 1 can claim credit for disadvantaged students' improved performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress — NAEP — the nation's K-12 report card, which the administration is also targeting. The most innovative programs, including the Harlem Children's Zone preschool, charter schools and after-school and summer-vacation programs and one-on-one, face-to-face learning through Tutoring Chicago, have recorded especially dramatic results. Support for students with disabilities would also become history, along with the requirement that schools deliver 'free and appropriate education' to youngsters with special needs. That would have a disastrous impact on these students, historically dismissed as hopeless, because needs-focused special education can change the arc of their lives. In demanding that districts 'prove' they have eliminated DEI as a condition for receiving federal funds, McMahon claims that focusing exclusively on 'meaningful learning,' not 'divisive [DEI] programs,' is the only way to improve achievement. She's flat-out wrong. DEI initiatives, while sometimes over the top, have generally proven to boost academic outcomes by reducing discrimination. That's logical — when students feel supported and valued, they do better in school. Wiping out efforts designed to promote racial and economic fairness is a sure way to end progress toward eliminating the achievement gap. Clearly, the studies that show the gains made by DEI programs are irrelevant to an administration whose decisions are driven by impulse and ideology. Its threats to the gold standard test of American education, NAEP — an assessment that's about as nonpartisan as forecasting the weather — gives the game away. If you don't know how well the public schools are doing, it's child's play to script a narrative of failure. Tucked into Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a nationwide school voucher program, paid for by a 100% tax deduction for donations of up to $1,700 to organizations that hand out educational scholarships. There's no cap on the program, which could cost as much as $50 billion a year, and no expiration date. The voucher provision potentially decimates public schools, which will lose federal dollars. Since private schools can decide which students to admit and which to kick out, the gap between the haves and haves-less will widen. Students with special needs, as well as those whose families cannot afford to participate, will be out of luck. What's more, vouchers don't deliver the benefits the advocates promise. Studies from Louisiana, where 'low-quality private schools' have proliferated with the state's blessing, as well as the District of Columbia and Indiana, show that students who participate in voucher plans do worse, especially in math, than their public-school peers. Michigan State education policy professor Joshua Cowen, who has spent two decades studying these programs, reached the startling conclusion that voucher plans have led to worse student outcomes than the COVID pandemic. Vouchers 'promise an all-too-simple solution to tough problems like unequal access to high-quality schools, segregation and even school safety,' Cohen concludes. 'They can severely hinder academic growth — especially for vulnerable kids.' The defenders of public education are fighting back. Twenty states have gone to federal court to challenge the Department of Education's demand that they eliminate their DEI programs. 'The Trump administration's threats to withhold critical education funding due to the use of these initiatives are not only unlawful, but harmful to our children, families, and schools,' said Massachusetts Atty. Gen. Andrea Joy Campbell, announcing the lawsuit. The White House may well lose this lawsuit. But litigation consumes time, and the administration keeps finding ways to evade judicial rulings, sometimes with the help of the Supreme Court. It could be years before the judges reach final decisions in these cases, and by then the damage will have been done. That's why it is up to Congress to do its job — to represent its constituents, who have consistently supported compensatory education programs and special education programs in public schools, resisting the siren song of vouchers — and to insist that the administration obey the dictates of legislation that's been on the books for decades. Will a supine Congress rouse itself to protect public education? After all, that's what the rule of law — and public education — requires. David Kirp is professor emeritus at the Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley. He is the author of numerous books on education, including 'The Sandbox Investment,' 'Improbable Scholars' and 'The Education Debate.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store