logo
The $480 Million Scam Playbook: Chinese Microcap IPOs Are Bleeding U.S. Investors

The $480 Million Scam Playbook: Chinese Microcap IPOs Are Bleeding U.S. Investors

Yahoo6 hours ago

A growing number of U.S. investors are getting caught in what looks like the perfect setup for fraudsmall Chinese companies like Jayud Global Logistics (NASDAQ:JYD) and China Liberal Education (CLEUF) going public on Nasdaq, only to crash in spectacular fashion weeks later. What starts as a convincing ad on Facebook or WhatsApp quickly turns into a pump-and-dump operation. Investors like Utah-based college professor Braden Lindstrom were encouraged by supposed financial "advisers" to buy into these obscure names, only to watch their life savings vanish. Jayud, for example, spiked to $8 in April before plummeting below $1just after retail interest peaked. One commercial property manager in California lost $320,000. A support group of nearly 100 victims says their total losses top $9 million.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with JYD.
The playbook? Simple. A company raises funds from private investorsChina Liberal raised $21 million from 30 insidersthen shares move quietly to U.S. brokerages. Promoters hype the stock online, targeting individuals with promises of a "sure thing." After the shares are dumped, prices crash. In China Liberal's case, seven traders from Malaysia and Taiwan were charged after allegedly unloading over 50 million shares for $480 million in profit. The DOJ seized $214 million, and trading in the stock was halted by Nasdaq on June 3. Meanwhile, NetClass rode the same waveits shares soared from $5 to $51 before collapsing to just above $2.
Regulators are under pressure. Finra had already warned back in 2022 that many of these ultra-small IPOsoften raising less than $15 millionshowed signs of manipulative trading. Nasdaq has since sped up delistings for companies trading under $1. But even with stricter rules, these schemes continue. The Justice Department has now prioritized tackling this fraud, while Meta says it's testing tools to block deceptive stock ads. Still, the damage is done. As trader Nathan Michaud put it, these setups are dangerous even for short sellersbecause once the squeeze starts, even the bears can get buried.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Graphjet Technology Discloses Stay of Suspension and Nasdaq Hearing Date
Graphjet Technology Discloses Stay of Suspension and Nasdaq Hearing Date

Business Upturn

time44 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Graphjet Technology Discloses Stay of Suspension and Nasdaq Hearing Date

By GlobeNewswire Published on June 17, 2025, 04:52 IST Innovative technological leader to oversee all technical, operational, customer support and business development initiatives KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Graphjet Technology ('Graphjet' or 'the Company') (Nasdaq:GTI), a leading developer of patented technologies to produce graphite and graphene directly from agricultural waste, today announced that the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market ('Nasdaq') on June 12, 2025 that notified the Company that Nasdaq's previously disclosed determination to suspend the trading of the Company's Class A Ordinary Shares (the 'Common Stock') has been stayed, pending a final written decision by the Nasdaq Hearing Panel (the 'Panel'). The hearing (the 'Hearing') before the Panel will be held on July 17, 2025, meaning that the Company's ordinary shares will continue to trade on Nasdaq at least until the date of the Hearing. The Company previously disclosed that it received a determination letter ('Notice') on June 4, 2025 from Nasdaq indicating that the Company was not in compliance with the requirements for continued listing under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) (the 'Listing Rule') as a result of (i) the Company's delay in filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2024 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') and (ii) the Company's delay in filing its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2024. The Notice also stated that the Company is not in compliance with the Listing Rule due to the Company's delay in filing its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025. This announcement is made in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(b), which requires prompt disclosure of receipt of a deficiency notification. About Graphjet Technology Graphjet Technology (Nasdaq: GTI) was founded in 2019 in Malaysia as an innovative graphene and graphite producer. Graphjet Technology has the world's first patented technology to recycle palm kernel shells generated in the production of palm seed oil to produce single layer graphene and artificial graphite. Graphjet's sustainable production methods utilizing palm kernel shells, a waste agricultural product that is common in Malaysia, will set a new shift in graphite and graphene supply chain of the world. For more information, please visit Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements The information in this press release contains certain 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words 'believe,' 'project,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'strategy,' 'aim,' 'future,' 'opportunity,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'should,' 'will,' 'would,' 'will be,' 'will continue,' 'will likely result' and similar expressions, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from their expectations, estimates and projections and consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including but not limited to: (i) changes in the markets in which Graphjet competes, including with respect to its competitive landscape, technology evolution or regulatory changes; (ii) the risk that Graphjet will need to raise additional capital to execute its business plans, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all; (iii) Graphjet is beginning the commercialization of its technology and it may not have an accurate estimate of future capital expenditures and future revenue; (iv) statements regarding Graphjet's industry and market size; (v) financial condition and performance of Graphjet, including the anticipated benefits, the implied enterprise value, the financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, the products, the expected future performance and market opportunities of Graphjet; (vi) Graphjet's ability to develop and manufacture its graphene and graphite products; (vii) Graphjet's ability to return to and maintain compliance with Nasdaq continued listing standards; and (viii) those factors discussed in our filings with the SEC. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties that will be described in the 'Risk Factors' section of the documents to be filed by Graphjet from time to time with the SEC. These filings identify and address other important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward- looking statements, and while Graphjet may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, they assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable law. Graphjet does not give any assurance that Graphjet will achieve its expectations. Graphjet Technology Contacts Investors [email protected] Media [email protected] Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors That Class Action Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against Open Lending Corporation, Civitas Resources, and Avis Budget and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors That Class Action Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against Open Lending Corporation, Civitas Resources, and Avis Budget and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm

Business Upturn

time44 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors That Class Action Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against Open Lending Corporation, Civitas Resources, and Avis Budget and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm

NEW YORK, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO), NET Power, Inc. (NYSE:NPWR), Civitas Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI), and Avis Budget Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAR). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided. Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO) Class Period: February 24, 2022 – March 31, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 30, 2025 The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of the Company's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding the Company's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose the Company's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; (4) misrepresented the underperformance of the Company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. For more information on the Open Lending class action go to: NET Power, Inc. (NYSE:NPWR) Class Period: June 9, 2023 – March 7, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 17, 2025 Net Power is a clean energy technology company. Its business is centered around its so-called 'Net Power Cycle' technology, which is a purported novel power generation system designed to produce reliable and affordable electricity from natural gas while capturing virtually all atmospheric emissions. Net Power has a facility located in La Porte, Texas, which it uses to demonstrate the viability of the NET Power Cycle, referred to as 'La Porte' or the 'Demonstration Plant.' Net Power conducts research and equipment validation testing campaigns at the Demonstration Plant as part of its efforts to develop its first utility-scale plant, which it variably refers to as 'SN1' or 'Project Permian.' Project Permian is located at a site in the Permian Basin of West Texas. Since before the start of the Class Period, Defendants had represented that they anticipated SN1 to be operational in 2026. In 2023, Net Power's cost estimate for Project Permian was roughly $950 million, which increased to $1.1 billion in 2024. Net Power's commencement of commercial operations and, accordingly, its business and financial prospects, rely on its completion of Project Permian. As such, Defendants' projected timelines and cost estimates for Project Permian are of particular importance to investors and analysts. The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Net Power was unlikely to complete Project Permian on schedule, and the project was likely to be significantly more expensive than Defendants had represented, because of, inter alia, supply chain issues and numerous site- and region-specific challenges; (ii) accordingly, Defendants' projections regarding the time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were unrealistic; (iii) the increased time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company's business and financial results; and (iv) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. For more information on the NET Power class action go to: Civitas Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI) Class Period: February 27, 2024 – February 24, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 1, 2025 The Civitas Resources class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Civitas Resources was highly likely to significantly reduce its oil production in 2025 as a result of, among other things, declines following the production peak at the DJ Basin in the fourth quarter of 2024 and a low TIL count at the end of 2024; (ii) increasing its oil production would require Civitas Resources to acquire additional acreage and development locations, thereby incurring significant debt and causing Civitas Resources to sell corporate assets to offset its acquisition costs; (iii) Civitas Resources' financial condition would require it to implement disruptive cost reduction measures including a significant workforce reduction; and (iv) accordingly, Civitas Resources' business and/or financial prospects, as well as its operational capabilities, were overstated. The Civitas Resources class action lawsuit further alleges that on February 24, 2025, Civitas Resources announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2024, reporting revenue of $1.29 billion, missing consensus estimates by $3.44 million, and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.78 for the quarter, missing consensus estimates by $0.21 per share. According to the complaint, also on February 24, 2025, Civitas Resources revealed several 2025 outlook highlights, including '[d]elivering oil production between 150 and 155 thousand barrels per day ('MBbl/d') on average,' – a year-over-year decline of approximately 4% –'[e]xpanding [its] Permian Basin position with a $300 million bolt-on transaction that adds 19,000 net acres and approximately 130 future development locations in the Midland Basin,' and '[e]xecuting on [a] new divestment target of $300 million' meant to offset the foregoing transaction. Civitas Resources explained that '[a]s compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, lower volumes are primarily driven by the DJ Basin, due to natural declines following peak production in the fourth quarter, a low TIL count exiting 2024 and in the first quarter of 2025,' as well as severe winter weather and unplanned third-party processing downtime in the first quarter, the Civitas Resources class action lawsuit alleges. Civitas Resources additionally announced a 10% reduction in its workforce across all levels and the termination of its Chief Operating Officer and Chief Transformation Officer, according to the complaint. On this news, the price of Civitas Resources stock fell more than 18%, according to the Civitas Resources class action lawsuit. For more information on the Civitas class action go to: Avis Budget Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAR) Class Period: February 16, 2024 – February 10, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 24, 2025 The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects, including allegations that: (i) Avis Budget crafted and implemented a plan to significantly accelerate its fleet rotation in the fourth quarter of 2024; (ii) the foregoing acceleration shortened the useful life of the majority of the Company's vehicles in the Americas segment, thereby reducing their recoverable value; (iii) as a result, Avis Budget would be forced to recognize billions of dollars in impairment charges and incur substantial losses; (iv) all the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a significant negative impact on the Company's financial results; and (v) accordingly, Avis Budget's financial and/or business prospects were overstated. For more information on the Avis Budget class action go to: About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Esq. Marion Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]

Why AMD Shares Are Jumping Today
Why AMD Shares Are Jumping Today

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why AMD Shares Are Jumping Today

June 6 - Shares of Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) climbed nearly 10% on Monday trading after Piper Sandler raised its price target, citing growing optimism in the company's graphics processing unit (GPU) segment. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with AMD. In a note to clients, analyst Harsh Kumar said AMD's core client business is showing signs of recovery, pointing to early demand strength. Piper Sandler increased its price target on AMD to $140 from $125 while maintaining a Buy rating. The note follows recent updates from AMD, which unveiled its new MI350 series of AI accelerators last week and gave an early preview of the next-gen MI400 platform. These products are designed to compete in the fast-growing artificial intelligence hardware market. The rally in AMD comes amid heightened investor interest in chipmakers focused on AI workloads, a space where competitors such as Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL), and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) also operate. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store