logo
Black children arrested in London ‘15% more likely to be criminalised' than white children

Black children arrested in London ‘15% more likely to be criminalised' than white children

The Guardian5 hours ago

Black children detained by police are 15% more likely to be 'criminalised', that is charged and put into the criminal justice system, than white children detained for similar types of offences, a study has found.
The report by the Youth Endowment Fund (YEF), which tackles youth violence, found that black children were 14.8% less likely to be offered diversion, which can include mentoring or counselling, that usually results in them avoiding getting a criminal record at an early age.
The authors of the study say they have taken into account the seriousness and prior offending record, and are thus comparing like with like. The racial gap pointed to 'systemic inequities', the report said.
The study examined almost 265,000 records of children aged 10 to 17 who were arrested by the Metropolitan police in London, or where a decision was made to take further action after a stop and search.
It is believed to be the largest study of its type and the data covers from 2015 to 2022.
The study also said children arrested in outer London, which tended to be whiter, were more likely to avoid being criminalised than those in inner London: 'Outer London boroughs, particularly Bromley (diversion rate 66%), Bexley (65%) and Kingston upon Thames (65%), have the highest diversion rates. Inner London boroughs, such as Haringey (43%), Lambeth (42%) and Hackney (41%), show the lowest.'
Previous studies have found racial disparities at different levels of the criminal justice system. Some say that is the result of institutional racism, which the Met has been found guilty of by the Macpherson report into the Stephen Lawrence murder investigation in 1999, and by Louise Casey's report into the force in 2023.
There is some anecdotal evidence that as black young people mistrust police more, they are less likely to admit their guilt, which is a prerequisite for being accepted for some diversion schemes.
The report said: 'Two compounding disparities emerge for Black CYP [children and young people]: i) they faced disproportionately higher rates of police contact than CYP from other ethnic groups, and ii) once involved with the police, they received comparatively fewer diverted outcomes than their peers.
'Even after controlling for factors such as type of offence and prior arrests, Black CYP were less likely to be diverted than White CYP, with a gap of 8.88%pts. These findings are based on historical data (2015–22), which points to systemic inequities requiring attention.'
The report said that for knife crime, white children were less likely to be charged than black children. Black children arrested by the Met police were offered diversion in 17.2% of cases, while for white children that figure was 35%. This statistic did not include an adjustment for the seriousness of the alleged offending or prior arrest record.
Ciaran Thapar of the YEF said: 'This important research suggests that a black child in Lambeth who is arrested for the same crime as a white child in Kingston upon Thames can expect to have a very different experience of policing and chance of being diverted from court.
'This is a worrying inconsistency … It potentially means that arrested black children are becoming disproportionately and unnecessarily criminalised by the justice system early on in their lives.'
The report said diversion appeared to reduce the rate of reoffending. It allows people at the start of their lives to avoid a criminal conviction that could blight their futures.
Thapar said: 'The findings also suggest that diversion can be a highly effective way of preventing reoffending and violence. There are many organisations across London working to divert children in their communities, before they become criminalised. We should be pushing the Met towards a better, more equitable use of diversion and sustainably funding initiatives who can help them to facilitate it.'
The Met did not respond to a request for comment on the study based on the force's own data.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Convicted killer and Cheryl stalker admits breaching restraining order
Convicted killer and Cheryl stalker admits breaching restraining order

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Convicted killer and Cheryl stalker admits breaching restraining order

A convicted killer and stalker of Girls Aloud star Cheryl Tweedy has admitted another breach of a restraining order after turning up at the singer's home. Daniel Bannister pleaded guilty to a single charge of breaching a restraining order at Reading Magistrates' Court on Thursday, a court spokeswoman said. The spokeswoman said the charge against the 50-year-old stated that he attended an address where he 'reasonably believed or reasonably suspected' Cheryl to be residing. He was remanded into custody to appear at Reading Crown Court on September 23. A court previously heard Bannister 'can't stay away' from the singer and was jailed for 16 weeks at Wycombe Magistrates' Court in March for repeatedly turning up at her Buckinghamshire home while under a restraining order. He was initially jailed for four months in September last year where he was handed a three-year restraining order, but breached it by turning up at her home in December. During the hearing in which Bannister was jailed for 16 weeks, the court heard Cheryl 'immediately panicked' and was 'terrified' when she saw him outside her home – fearing for the safety of her eight-year-old son Bear. In 2012, Bannister killed 48-year-old Rajendra Patel in an attack at a south London YMCA shelter and pleaded guilty to manslaughter. Cheryl's former partner Liam Payne died last year in Buenos Aires, Argentina, after falling from his third-floor hotel balcony. She described the ex-One Direction star's death as 'indescribably painful' and voiced fears about protecting their son.

Cheryl Tweedy's killer stalker convicted for harassing her again
Cheryl Tweedy's killer stalker convicted for harassing her again

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Cheryl Tweedy's killer stalker convicted for harassing her again

A convicted killer who has repeatedly stalked Cheryl Tweedy has admitted harassing her once again. Daniel Bannister, 50, flouted a restraining order by going to an address in Buckinghamshire where he believed the Girls Aloud singer to be present on June 19. He has previously admitted repeatedly showing up at Tweedy's home and harassing her through the intercom. Bannister, who was previously jailed for killing a man at a homeless shelter, was arrested for stalking the pop star at his bail hostel in Brixton, south London. He is facing five years in prison after pleading guilty to breaching the restraining order at Reading Magistrates's Court. District Judge Davinder Sandhu refused bail and passed the case on to the crown court for sentencing on Sept 23, The Sun reported. Bannister visited Tweedy's home twice last year, including after her former boyfriend Liam Payne's funeral, before being issued with a restraining order. A court previously heard he spoke through an intercom system in January 2024, claiming he had 'come to get Cheryl', before appearing again in July saying: 'I'm really thirsty, I just want a glass of wine, please.' Tweedy is said to have 'panicked' when she spotted Bannister outside her home for a third time last year, the court heard. Datta Ryan, prosecuting, told the court that in January of last year, Bannister turned up at Tweedy's home at around 7.30pm. 'He said, 'It's Daniel, I've come to get Cheryl',' the prosecutor told the court. 'She was terrified and contacted her security guard. She felt violated, terrified and unsafe in her own home.' In July of the same year, the singer was at home with her eight-year-old son, Bear, when she saw Bannister outside again asking for a glass of wine. Speaking about the third visit in December, Tweedy told police: 'I knew this was Daniel because I have had previous incidents where Daniel has come to my property. 'I immediately panicked when I saw Daniel. 'I feared for my safety and my child's safety. My son was due back from the cinema and I didn't want him to see Daniel. 'I was concerned he was looking for a way into the property. I want to protect my child from any harm.' The visit came soon after Payne, the One Direction singer and Bear's father, died in Buenos Aires, Argentina, after falling from his third-floor hotel balcony. Colin Mackrell, defending, said Bannister had appeared at Ms Tweedy's home in December to 'reassure her'. He said: 'It's clear Mr Bannister has formed an affectionate view of her.' Bannister killed Rajendra Patel, 48, in an attack at a south London YMCA shelter in 2012 and pleaded guilty to manslaughter, receiving 20 months in prison.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store