New Details Emerge About Ancient Inca Counting Technology
In a paper published today in Science Advances, an international team of researchers investigated the primary cord of a khipu from around 1498 CE made from human hair. Their analysis revealed that the individual who wove their hair into the khipu ate a diet commonly associated with commoners, suggesting that a greater diversity of people used the instrument than previously thought.
'Despite recent advances in our understanding of Andean khipus, scholars know little about the specialists who created Inka khipus,' the researchers wrote in the study. 'With limited direct evidence concerning the lives of Inka khipu experts, our knowledge is based mainly on the chronicles of Spanish-language colonial observers.'
Researchers believe that khipus were buried alongside their owners when they died. Unfortunately, however, the burials where experts have discovered many Inca khipus were previously looted, meaning they can no longer provide this crucial insight. As such, the team from the new study took a different approach.
'Historically, when human hair was incorporated into a khipu's primary cord, it served as a 'signature' to indicate the person who created the khipu,' the researchers explained. 'Recent advances in elemental analysis–isotope ratio mass spectrometry allowed us to undertake simultaneous carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) measurements from a single KH0631 hair sample, revealing that this individual consumed a diet characteristic of low-ranking commoners,' they added. 'This evidence suggests that Inka commoners could be involved in creating Inka-style khipus.'
Specifically, the individual in question ate tubers and greens instead of meat and corn, which was the typical Inca elite's diet. The researchers' approach also revealed that this khipu specialist, or khipukamayuqs, probably lived in modern-day southern Peru or northern Chile.
These results align with the fact that in the 19th and 20th centuries, 'commoners,' such as peasant farmers, farm laborers, and female peasants, created and used khipus. What's more, it bolsters recent research as well as accounts by Felipe Guamán Poma de Ayala, a 16th-century Inca nobleman and chronicler, that women in the Inca Empire also made khipus.
While the researchers admit that 'KH0631 is only one khipu,' they conclude that 'the new isotopic evidence from KH0631 suggests that khipu literacy in the Inca Empire may have been more inclusive and widespread than hitherto thought.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
18 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
How to Find Out If Microplastics Are Actually Destroying Our Health
Researchers have found plastic in almost every corner of the human body, from our brains and poop to blood and testicles (at least it's not making our stomachs crunch yet). Is this plastic contamination bad for us? While the answer to that question might seem like a no-brainer—and certainly no one is crazy enough to theorize that microplastics in breast milk are a good thing—there haven't been any human trials to confirm that microplastics are detrimental to human health. Some research has simply linked microplastics to health complications, which isn't nearly definitive enough. So what are we waiting for? To be clear, it's not simply a matter of getting it done. To understand how or if micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are toxic for human health, we first need to quantify and analyze their concentration and composition in samples from living organisms. Spoiler alert—there is no guidebook on how to do this. After surveying the existing scientific literature on the matter, however, a team of researchers has outlined some best practices that could finally get us started in the right direction. 'Most detection techniques are better suited for microplastic and nanoplastic (MNP) identification in ideal media (such as water) and face limitations when analysing biological samples,' the researchers wrote in a study published last month in the journal Nature Reviews Bioengineering. Part of the problem is that different biological samples have different compositions. Apples, for example, are fibrous, while our bodies also have fats and proteins, and trees and plants have lignin, Baoshan Xing, an environmental and soil chemistry professor at UMass Amherst and lead author of the study, said in a university statement. 'Strategies for digestion [preparation], separation, enrichment and detection of MNPs need to be optimized depending on the category of organism under investigation,' the researchers explained in the study. Currently, there is no standard approach for this, an unfortunate fact that Xing described as a 'headache' in the statement. You Don't Want to Know Where Scientists Just Found 27 Million Tons of Plastic Another complication is that most studies in this context presume MNPs to be spherical-shaped. That might not be the case, which carries important implications, given that particle shape can impact how MNPs travel through a system. Plus, toxic substances might collect in tiny niches or cavities. As such, the team argues that researchers need protocols for analyzing the polymer types and shapes, as well as MNPs' surface characteristics. If that sounds like a whole lot of features to analyze, you're not wrong. Luckily, 'machine learning algorithms can greatly reduce the labour time and cost of MNP identification and characterization,' the researchers pointed out in the study. 'The day is not far off when we'll be able to accurately detect, characterize and quantify MNPs in biological samples,' Xing concluded in the statement. In the meantime, though, stop chewing gum. Just in case.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ultra-Processed Foods Could Sabotage Weight Loss, Even on a 'Healthy' Diet
Ultra-processed foods already have a lousy reputation – and now a new study suggests that even 'healthy' versions of them can significantly undermine your weight-loss efforts. Researchers from the UK and US analyzed data from 50 overweight people who completed two diet programs on separate occasions. Both diets matched in terms of nutrition – with the same amounts of fat (including saturated fats), carbs, fiber, salt, and even fruits and vegetables. The key difference is one diet was built around ultra-processed foods (UPFs), and the other focused on minimally processed foods (MPFs). The UPF diet included the likes of breakfast oat bars and lasagne ready meals, while the MPF one featured overnight oats and homemade spaghetti bolognese. Related: Both diets resulted in weight loss. But the MPF diet was associated with shedding twice as much weight as the UPF diet, on average. Participants also lost more unhealthy body fat while on the MPF diet and reported better control over unhealthy food cravings. "Previous research has linked ultra-processed foods with poor health outcomes," says clinical scientist Samuel Dicken, from University College London (UCL). "But not all ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy based on their nutritional profile." "The main aim of this trial was to fill crucial gaps in our knowledge about the role of food processing in the context of existing dietary guidance, and how it affects health outcomes such as weight, blood pressure, and body composition, as well as experiential factors like food cravings." While the overall reductions in weight were only 2 percent for the MPF diet and 1 percent for the UPF diet, the researchers point out the short timespan of the study: eight weeks for each diet, with a gap of four weeks in between. The changes seen here could quickly add up. In combination with other factors that contribute to a healthy and effective diet, avoiding ultra-processed foods could make a noticeable difference over time. "Though a 2 percent reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake," says Dicken. "If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13 percent weight reduction in men and a 9 percent reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4 percent weight reduction in men and 5 percent in women after the ultra-processed diet." The trial was relatively small and excluded people with dietary restrictions, but it offers more evidence on how we can tackle our growing obesity crisis – and highlights the difference that following nutritional guidelines in diets can have. "The global food system at the moment drives diet-related poor health and obesity, particularly because of the wide availability of cheap, unhealthy food," says Chris van Tulleken, a global health and infection researcher at UCL. "This study highlights the importance of ultra-processing in driving health outcomes in addition to the role of nutrients like fat, salt, and sugar." The research has been published in Nature Medicine. Related News Man Hospitalized With Psychiatric Symptoms Following AI Advice Signs of a Rare Type of Cancer May Be Hiding in Your Voice Scientists May Have Identified a Natural Alternative to Ozempic Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What people who live to 100 years old have in common, according to science
Living to see 100 is a major feat that has a common thread. Recent studies of centenarians – people who are in their 100s – have found that they suffer from fewer diseases overall, develop them more slowly and are less likely to experience fatal conditions compared to people who live shorter lives. One 2024 study from Sweden, published in the journal GeroScience, considered historical data from people over 60 years old born between 1912 and 1922. Study Reveals Why 'Super Agers' Maintain 'Outstanding Memory' Into Their 80S Researchers followed these individuals from 1972 to 2022, considering the age of their death and also medical complications like stroke, myocardial infarction, hip fracture and various cancers. Centenarians were found to have a lower age-specific lifetime risk for all conditions except hip fractures, which suggests that 100-year-olds are able to delay and avoid many major age-related diseases rather than surviving them. Read On The Fox News App The findings challenge the idea that a longer life span inevitably leads to higher disease rates, the researchers stated. Another study in August 2025, conducted by the same researchers and published in The Lancet, looked into how older individuals accumulate and manage health conditions over a lifespan, instead of avoiding them. Aging Hits A Dramatic Turning Point At One Specific Number, Scientists Discover The researchers tracked the health of participants born between 1920 and 1922, comparing the disease trajectories of centenarians to those who did not live as long. Those 100 and older were found to have fewer diagnosed conditions and also accumulated diseases at a slower rate. The researchers found that cardiovascular diseases were the most common diagnoses across all ages, but they contributed less to the overall disease burden among those who made it to 100. Malignancies, like cancer cells that typically spread, were more largely present in centenarians, while neuropsychiatric conditions, such as anxiety disorders and dementia, were less common. Your Heart May Be Older Than You Think — And The Number Could Predict Disease Risk People in their 100s were also found to have fewer diseases occurring at the same time and were more likely to have conditions confined to a single disease group. "Future research should aim to identify genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors underlying these patterns to inform early-life preventive strategies that promote longevity and resilience," the researchers noted. Dr. Macie P. Smith, a licensed social worker and gerontologist based in South Carolina, said it makes "complete sense" that people who avoid serious illnesses like stroke and heart disease live beyond 100 years old. People who have reached 100 are considered "traditionalists," who have typically avoided exposure to harmful elements such as radiation, additives, preservatives and artificial coloring in foods, Smith told Fox News Digital. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter "They also were not exposed to an abundance of modern medicine," she said. "They relied more on natural remedies and organic foods." Modern-day technology and global connections, which were not available to centenarians, could also contribute to stress and other mental health factors, according to Smith. "They had the ability to mind their own business while reducing their stress levels," she said. "That alone brings about longer life … When you mind other people's business, you take on other people's problems, thereby increasing stress levels. This is called vicarious trauma." Smith also believes the older generation is more "free-spirited." "They didn't take on the restrictions that we take on today to look a certain way or be a certain way in public," she said. "There was a lot less scrutiny back in those days." "Yes, they had their struggles that we don't see today; however, they just showed up in a different way, and they were handled in a different way." Choosing your path when you're younger will determine how you live when you're older, Smith noted, whether it's independently or dependently, or living on your own or in a community. Making healthy lifestyle decisions early on can also significantly reduce the risk of complications in the future, which can impact longevity. For more Health articles, visit Smith recommends eating a low-fat, low-salt, brain-healthy diet and eliminating processed foods, while managing stress, engaging with family and friends, staying active and getting adequate sleep. "This will prolong life and improve the quality of life," she article source: What people who live to 100 years old have in common, according to science Solve the daily Crossword
