Will ensure complete transparency in appointment of judges: CJI Gavai
Justice Gavai said that pendency of cases was a 'huge' issue, which the SC is trying to resolve and unfilled vacancies of judges were one of the reasons. The CJI said he will follow up on names recommended by the SC collegium.
CJI Gavai was addressing the felicitation by Bombay Bar Association (BBA), in Mumbai held at Central Courtroom (Number 46) on the second floor of the Bombay High Court building.
Justice Gavai said that he will make efforts to ensure that the Bombay High Court begins functioning with a full strength to reduce the pendency of cases.
With two additional judges taking oath on Friday, the Bombay HC will now function with 65 judges — 49 permanent judges, and 16 additional judges.
However, the sanctioned strength of the court, which is the second largest in the country after the Allahabad High Court, is 94.
'From the period of Justice Sanjeev Khanna (as CJI), we have tried to infuse more transparency in the matter of appointments of judges. In the last three days, we held interviews with nearly 54 candidates and recommended around 36 appointments… All of us know that the pendency is a huge issue. We are trying to work on it. One of the reasons for the pendency is the vacancies which are not filled up,' CJI Gavai said.
He referred to Justice Dipankar Datta of the SC who had, last week, flagged the issue over interference in the functioning of the Collegium.
Justice Datta had said that the external forces which prevent the enforcement of Collegium's recommendations should be dealt with in stern manner.
'I must assure you that we will ensure that we will adopt a complete process of transparency. While ensuring that the representation is given to all sections of the society, the merit will never be compromised. And insofar as my own High Court (Bombay HC) is concerned, I can assure that whatever name are recommended, we will try to follow up on that as soon as possible till the Bombay High Court starts functioning at a full strength, so that at least the issue of pendency is addressed to some extent,' Justice Gavai said.
CJI Gavai also reiterated that the Supreme Court is not a CJI-centric court and he along with earlier CJIs, including Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Uday U Lalit had tried to 'dispel' the said impression.
'After I became Chief Justice or rather before that when Justice Sanjeev Khanna had taken over and even during the period of Justice Uday Lalit (as CJI), as I have said on earlier occasions, that the Supreme Court of India is a court of all the judges. The Chief Justice is only first amongst the equals.And we have tried to dispel the impression that the Supreme Court of India is a CJI-centric court. Immediately on my assuming office on May 14, the very next day, we had a full court meeting wherein all the judges participated and we made many decisions in the interest of the institution.'
CJI Gavai also revealed that when his name was recommended in 2019 for elevation to the Supreme Court, one of the judges on the
Collegium was not in favour of the same as he was told that it would lead to 'unrest' in the original side bar of the HC.
However, senior Mumbai lawyers told the judge of being under 'wrong impression'.
Justice Gavai said his elevation as SC judge and later CJI wouldn't have been possible without the support of the BBA.
He went on to say that after taking over as CJI, he refused to speak to the media about his 'roadmap'.
'Because I personally believe that rather than speaking now, after six months (post retirement), if I am in a position to achieve something, it is better to speak thereafter. Rather than giving lots of promises in the beginning and disappointing at the time one leaves the office.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Protect Constitution from communal forces, says TPCC chief
Hyderabad: Telangana Congress president B Mahesh Kumar Goud on Sunday said that govts are formed only with the support of SC, ST, BC, and minorities. He urged these communities to back the Rahul Gandhi-led movement to protect the Constitution from alleged communal forces currently ruling the country. Addressing the national conference of Telangana SC, ST, BC, and minorities federation at Ravindra Bharathi, the TPCC president said that those who were never involved in India's freedom struggle are now ruling the nation and attempting to divide it along religious lines. "To protect the Constitution from communal forces, we all must stand united. Conspiracies are being hatched to replace the Constitution with Manusmriti. Chief minister A Revanth Reddy is the leader who has made Telangana a role model for the country by conducting a caste survey, passing 42% BC quota bills and fulfilling the decades-long dream of the SCs for categorisation," he said. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Mahesh Goud emphasised that it is the responsibility of everyone to safeguard the Constitution. He further stated that communal forces undermining democracy must be stopped, and this can only be achieved through unity. The Congress govt, he reiterated, is committed to extending the 42% quota to the BCs in local bodies. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
"Constitutional Validity Doesn't Mean Desirability": Ex-Chief Justice Khanna To Parliament Committee
New Delhi: Former chief justice of India Sanjeev Khanna has told a parliamentary committee scrutinising the simultaneous election bill that the constitutional validity of a proposal in no way amounts to a pronouncement upon the desirability or necessity of its provisions. In his written opinion to the committee, Khanna, however, said that arguments related to the dilution of the country's federal structure may be raised about the constitutional amendment bill, as he listed the various claims made supporting and criticising the concept, sources said. Most of the experts, who have shared their views with the committee headed by BJP MP P P Chaudhary, have rejected the charge that the proposals are unconstitutional but have flagged some issues with the current provisions of the bill. Khanna, who is scheduled to interact with the committee on Tuesday, has joined a few other former chief justices of India in raising concerns over the extent of power given to the Election Commission in the bill. He said the bill confers "unfettered discretion" on the EC in deciding that an assembly poll cannot be conducted along with that of the Lok Sabha, and to make a recommendation to the President on these lines, the sources said. "This clause will be open to question as violating and offending the basic structure of the Constitution on the ground of being arbitrary and offending Article 14 of the Constitution," he is learnt to have said. Article 14 deals with equality before law. Khanna added, "Postponement of elections by the Election Commission may result in indirect President's rule, in other words, the Union government taking over the reins of the state government. This will be questionable judicially, as violating the federal structure envisaged by the Constitution." Commenting on various arguments related to the bill, he said the fact that simultaneous elections were held in 1951-52, 1957, 1962 and 1967, is a "coincidence", certainly not an express or not even an implied constitutional mandate. Khanna said there is a difference between "merit review" and "judicial review". When the Supreme Court or high courts uphold constitutional validity, it is a mere affirmation of the legislative power and that the amendment or the provision is not violative of the constitutional limitations, he said. "The court decisions in no way amount to pronouncement upon the desirability or necessity of such provisions," he added. Before Khanna, ex-CJIs D Y Chandrachud, J S Khehar, U U Lalit and Ranjan Gogoi have interacted with the committee members on various provisions of what is often referred to as "one nation one election" bill. The BJP and its allies have supported the bill, asserting that it will boost growth by cutting down on expenditure caused by the relentless poll cycle, leading to frequent deployment of security and civil officials on poll duty and the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct. The Opposition has argued that it undermines democratic principles and weakens federal structure.
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
'Dog lovers are the vast majority...': Mahua Moitra appeals Supreme Court to stay 'inhumane order' on stray dogs
'Dog lovers are the vast majority, not a vocal minority," Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra posted on X, appealing the Supreme Court to stay, what she called an 'inhumane order' on stray dogs. The TMC MP's comments come after the Supreme Court, on Thursday, reserved its order on petitions challenging its August 11 directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR streets and confine them permanently in shelters. Instead of permanently shifting the dogs to shelters, Mahua Moitra appealed to the Supreme Court 'to return to a system of sterilisation and community care.' On August 11, the Supreme Court directed all stray dogs in Delhi and NCR cities (Noida, Gurugram, Ghaziabad, Faridabad) to be shifted to shelters within eight weeks. The court also warned of legal action against those obstructing the process. The apex court's order also bars captured dogs from being released back into their original areas, diverging from the existing Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023 The SC asked for facilities with sterilisation, vaccination, and CCTV monitoring to house dogs safely. SC's order sparked a wave of protests across Delhi NCR, with animal activists criticising the move. After petitions challenged the August 11 ruling, the matter was placed before a new three-judge bench. On August 14, the SC reserved its interim order while criticising local bodies for failing to implement sterilisation programmes effectively.
